That’s a very good question. I suppose the request for prayers is what prompts this question. If they had said "we hope he gets well soon” that would mean he isn't in such bad shape so there’s nothing to regret if the show goes on. But if a serious situation becomes evident, it raises ethical questions.
I read here about a Mac show continued without Mick, can’t remember the details, but I guess he wasn’t that bad to ask for prayers. Anyway in both cases details and information can change everything. For example, if Mick or Castronovo told the band Don’t cancel the show, go on! Don’t stop because of me! who am I to judge them?
Of course the money is another issue. But I don’t think they just said I’m not going to lose money because he got sick! It’s more complicated than that. There are contract clauses and complications arising from breaches of contract. And it’s not just about the band’s money. Last week, Robbie Williams’ second show was cancelled, and people had traveled from Ecuador to Lima to see it. They announced a new date in december but no one is going to reimburse them for what those guys spent. And the fact that bands worry about not disappointing their audience is good for their image.
Another question: Eagles performed their first concert without Glenn 18 months after his passing. Was it wrong that the Rolling Stones performed without Charlie Watts only one month after he passed away?
I read once Don’t allow what is correct keep you from doing what is right. But to define what was right and what correct in a specific situation can be very complicated.
__________________
|