Quote:
Originally Posted by elle
you mean like that imaginary contract chiff-queen had to record her solo album at the exact same time Fleetwood Mac needed her to be in the studio with them?
and the contract she didn't have anymore a year later when they kept asking her to join, and she said final "no!" so they went ahead with BuckVie while she was publicly taunting them not to release that album, because, you know, albums don't sell anymore so why waste time and money?
that contract? if it existed why wouldn't she figure out the way to stand with "her" band? you know, the good team player she is??
|
I don't know anything about anyone's contracts. But my response was to your post, where you said it was a possibility Christine was only going along with the decision to fire Lindsey because she had a contract she couldn't get out of. You were the one who said contract, not me. I don't pretend to know whether Christine had a contract, or whether Stevie had a contract to do one more album, and I never said she did.
You say other people are projecting, but you're doing it, too. You say Stevie "was publicly taunting them not to release the album (Buck/Vie), because, you know, albums don't sell anymore." What? How is that taunting them? It may be her opinion that albums don't sell anymore, but how is that statement "taunting" them? It looks like you're projecting, too.
I understand you're angry about Lindsey's firing and I'm not trying to change your mind about it. But just like you say "that imaginary contract chiff-queen had," this contract you say Christine has could also be imaginary. Even calling Stevie 'chiff-head' shows you can't stick to the facts and you're blinded by emotions. It would actually lend you more credibility if you called Stevie by her name, but when you resort to silly name calling, and yes I've heard worse, but it's still childish, it automatically shows you have a slanted pov about the situation.