Quote:
Originally Posted by olive
|
That's a great answer but not a fair analogy. Kiss was aware Paul Stanley was not to perform per doctors orders well before the show. The band was prepared to give some sort of mutated performance. A drummer is much more key. I am sure if the drummer was ill Kiss would not have been able to perform. Mick fell ill during the acoustic set so those songs were over.
But taking this even further. Many Mac concerts were cancelled in 1987 because Stevie was ill. Is it right for the Mac to perform without one of its members? Lets say they did but removed Stevie songs from the set. There are huge amounts of fans that go just to see Stevie. So many fans would be demanding refunds because all of Fleetwood Mac did not perform.