Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1
This logic was born in a time when artists still needed a big record label to put out an album. That's not the case anymore.
Michele
|
Yes!
Christine and Lindsey are still formidable forces. Even without the third engine (Stevie), they could still make a great album fly. This isn't about achieving dizzying heights of commercial success anyway. It's about the ending rein of a historic band with one last musical statement that will cap off their legacy.
Stevie Nicks's (potential) withdrawal, like Peter Green's, isn't a breaking point. The band has persevered, like no other, through numerous drastic tidal waves. Though Stevie still has a lot of appeal, she's not the commercial commodity she once was. Behind the Mask didn't benefit from her presence. Nor have her recent solo albums busted up the charts.
Commercially, it makes little to no difference if Stevie is or isn't on Fleetwood Mac's last album. But from an emotional perspective/standpoint, if Stevie decides to bail on the very last stand for the band, it reveals an unflattering selfishness and a lack of gratitude and respect for the band. She's in it for the profit of live performances, but not for the creative collaboration. It is crass ass move on her part. Shame on her.
I still hope she will pull her ego-swelled head out of her ass and spare a little love and time for the band that made her rich and famous. After that, she can shed the shackles, free to follow her muse for the rest of her life.