Quote:
Originally Posted by SisterNightroad
I think the best move for Fleetwood Mac now is to release box-sets of their classic albums comprehensive of the remastered original album, a disc of alternate versions and outer outtakes and a remastered live DVD, not again the Rosebud documentary because it's an offense to the paying fanbase.
In particular I really miss this shows and if it exists, the unrelease filmed footage that's not been chosen for the video:
1975 Largo
1975 Passaic
1976 Rosebud
1976 Midnight special
1977 Tokyo
1977 Sidney
1978 Largo
1979 Largo
1979 Tusk documentary (St. Louis)
1980 Richfield (lost)
1982 San Bernardino or Us festival (unreleased)
1982 Inglewood or HBO concert
1987 San Francisco
I LIKE all the band members, but I'll always love Stevie a tiny bit more. She's also my favourite songwriter.
I'd like Stevie to sing one of her most meaningful ballads like Lady, Beauty and the beast or Has anyone ever written anything for you with Christine on piano.
I don't know if this band's collective willpower could overthrow a selective interest group, like what? Can you make an example?
If by "smooth musical operators" you mean professional, I think yes, with the passage of time they've become certainly much more mature after 40 years of experience.
For certainties I don't favor neither social media nor passage of mouth, I only turn to public notices. For everything else official sites and forums.
I read a lot but before university I used to read a lot of novels, now I only have time to read university books.
I don't sing in the shower, I sing doing housecores (but not wearing underwear!)
I have to say that during high school I was for a bit in the acting after school club where I had to sing among the other things, but I wasn't bad.
WTF is a blank cheque?
I don't think we should even talk about the existence of a centre fanbase with such diversity of opinion in our group.
|
"Selective Interest Group"= The machine that promotes/manages the band or individual members...I wonder how much influence "The Interest Group" has over the band and what percentage of the decisions made are actually made by the band itself or what the "Interest Group" has convinced the band is in their best interest to do...
I would imagine the "Interest Group" gets a percentage of the profits so are their decisions based on what's best for the band or their own motivation to increase the balance in their own bank account...
On the flip side how much resistance would the "Interest Group" give the band if FM informed said "Interest Group" that "We have decided not to tour for a few years and instead work on new music" Or what if FM decided that they were tired of the "Cash Cow" tours and wanted to play smaller venues and perform a largely acoustic set encompassing FM in it's entirety? I would imagine the "Interest Group" would try and talk them out of it since it would generate less revenue and in turn the "Interest Group" would have their income reduced. Would the band have the "Collective Willpower" in such a situation to tell them "This is what we are doing if you do not want to make it happen we will find somebody that will"
Who is really running the show? Could FM be just puppets in their own play?