Quote:
Originally Posted by MrStevie
Sorry you read vitriol. I was aiming for irony but oh well.  |
Vitriol was me overstating. That's a bad habit of mine. Sorry.
Quote:
Considering what you said below, I'm surprised you think the only questionable thing in the article was the sexual orientation bit. As long as the tone makes a good impression of Stevie and Chris and the only person coming off poorly is the only one who's motives you suspect, then it's okay to believe this article as the rare good one in a publication known for being nothing but complete trash? 
|
I'm sorry, but I don't know if I've completely got you, here. Who's motives do I suspect? What do you mean? I just thought your comparison of Lindsey's denying his past physical altercations to Stevie's discussion of her affair didn't make a lot of sense. That's all I meant.
I wouldn't mind The Daily Mail as a pop-culture rag. It's the framing of itself as a "serious" news publication that I find so objectionable. It can do celebrity gossip and interviews 'til the cows come home. Its seemingly random query into Stevie's potential sexual experimentations with women just reeked of frat-boy smarminess to me, and stood out from the rest of the article in that way. Could you be more specific about what parts of the article you disliked? Genuinely interested, here.