View Single Post
  #15  
Old 02-13-2013, 09:58 AM
FierySequences FierySequences is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shackin'up View Post
Exactly. Tusk was a deliberate bite in the anckles of what was expected. Not only to the board of WB, but also at the big expectations that they built up themselves in their audience, that bought 20 million records in a couple of years with their brand on it. It's also a very selfabsorbed cover; we don't want to do what you want from us. And we know, that we are only able to show this attitude BECAUSE you spent this huge amount of money on us collectively, so we will use that money and position to put out the opposite of what you want from us. We are artists, and not expectationfillers.

Don't say that you love me. Just tell me that you want me. I'll tusk you.
And... What makes YOU think you're the one, recordindustry? Everything you do has been done, and it won't last forever.


On the inside, there's that pretty sepia pic of Lindsey preparing a room, sitting on his knees. Some insight in , or metaphore for the artistic sparkle for the album, experimenting alone and bring the result to the band in a later stadium,and there's the whole african scrapbook of small photographs and handwritings, that fit with Lindsey's own idea of being a refined primitive, something that can be said about Mick, and to a certain extend, about John too. I'll leave some space for others to fill in other perspectives than Lindsey's but I'm convinced that he was largely responsible for the "story of the album", so I read it that way. The colourphotographs are something else. They leave room for projecting meaning about flying around in space without feet on ground, and then leave, but not without leaving traces. I could ramble on, but I know there are a lot of people over here that are oversensitive for Lindsey's artistic ethics and the conflicting reality of making big chunks of money with it. I believe in his unadult behaviour towards the industry, and maybe he overstretches with his cocky, therapeutic talk. Still, he was the beating heart of Tusk, and his attitude is still alive, although he can look at it now with more life-experience and relativation. (Some of this rant will not be in correct english. Keep in mind, I'm Dutch.)

Also the sexual connotation, the history of dildo's in the early FM performances and the tusk as a male sybol, add to the primitiveness of the whole album and it's cover. Oh there's a lot more to say. But I'll leave it here.

To me, Tusk means "f*ck you", in all it's layers of meanings.
Wow, some very good observations. The thing that is unique, I think that the band and LB was not really concious to these metaphores and allegories while writting and putting together the theme on the album/pictoral layout. But that is part of the artistry and appeal about Tusk.

I think you are spot on with your assesments and this is a theme that would carry over into Mirage. Although in Mirage the pop-sounding music returned, it was laced with dark undertones once found in Tusk (album) and pioneered (by the BN era) in earlier songs like GDW and ISA. Artistical evolution of a band at it's finest.
Reply With Quote