Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMacD
Well, when you suggest they can do something as Buckingham Nicks that they couldn’t do as Fleetwood Mac, and the only difference between the two bands is that one has Mick and John while the other does not, what other possible conclusion could one come to?
|
Hmmm... Ask Mick.
I was pointing out that I would prefer a true BN set list as opposed to a small two song gesture thrown into a FM set. For the billionth time there is a difference and I doubt Mick & John have any say so in the set.
Quote:
|
Wrong. First, the most obvious difference is NO CHRISTINE. Second, Lindsey's material was for the "Gift Of Screws" album. That's well documented. Yes, he CHOSE to release it under the Fleetwood Mac name, but it had been part of a solo project.
|
Stevie was interviewed on camera at the end of The Dance tour. She said at that time they knew Christine was retiring and would not return but that they had every intention of doing another album within the next five years and that was definitely the plan. It was a premeditated project and as I said, it was the writers choice as to what songs they felt they wanted to convey as Fleetwood Mac instead of interpreting them in their solo projects. There are probably 20-30 songs that they sift through and think "Mac" or "solo" for any given album. It's not some song stealing frenzy...
Quote:
|
Again, aside from no Mick or John, I don't see the difference between the two bands.
|
Which is why you are clearly not a Buckingham Nicks fan.
I hope Fleetwood Mac does something again too, but I would hope a new Buckingham Nicks / re-release and tour would happen more.