The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Rumours (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Tusk seconds (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=60455)

Villavic 09-06-2024 08:50 AM

Tusk seconds
 
In some thread I read (I can’t remember which one) about number of songs vs number of minutes in Tusk, per member, while discussing who had the most. I checked the numbers at my Tusk Deluxe 2015 album, bought through iTunes. The CD I have somewhere it’s the one with Sara edited, and I don’t have the original vinyl album, but I don’t think the difference in seconds is significant (except for Sara of course); I checked also the Expanded 2004 release and the seconds difference in some songs against Deluxe is not relevant.

Christine, 6 songs, 1,227 seconds
Lindsey, 9 songs, 1,616 seconds
Stevie, 5 songs, 1,621 seconds.

It's practically a tie in seconds, between Stevie and Lindsey.

The minutes per song are also listed on the Wikipedia page, but checking each one I see it’s not reliable, there are considerable difference, specially with Sara and Never Forget

Macfan4life 09-06-2024 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 1296511)
In some thread I read (I can’t remember which one) about number of songs vs number of minutes in Tusk, per member, while discussing who had the most. I checked the numbers at my Tusk Deluxe 2015 album, bought through iTunes. The CD I have somewhere it’s the one with Sara edited, and I don’t have the original vinyl album, but I don’t think the difference in seconds is significant (except for Sara of course); I checked also the Expanded 2004 release and the seconds difference in some songs against Deluxe is not relevant.

Christine, 6 songs, 1,227 seconds
Lindsey, 9 songs, 1,616 seconds
Stevie, 5 songs, 1,621 seconds.

It's practically a tie in seconds, between Stevie and Lindsey.

The minutes per song are also listed on the Wikipedia page, but checking each one I see it’s not reliable, there are considerable difference, specially with Sara and Never Forget

You have too much time on your hands
:)

Villavic 09-06-2024 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macfan4life (Post 1296513)
You have too much time on your hands
:)

Oh that's true. I'm already retired. If it were up to me I would be traveling all year round but it is not possible.

HomerMcvie 09-06-2024 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 1296516)
Oh that's true. I'm already retired. If it were up to me I would be traveling all year round but it is not possible.

Same. I retired early, and it's boring af.

DownOnRodeo 09-06-2024 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 1296511)
Christine, 6 songs, 1,227 seconds
Lindsey, 9 songs, 1,616 seconds
Stevie, 5 songs, 1,621 seconds.

Thank you for doing the legwork, Villavic!

And in order to secure second-place ranking for having too much time on my hands, here are the averages as calculated based on your data:

Chris - 3:25 per song
Linds - 3:00 per song
Stevie - 5:24 per song

David 09-06-2024 06:25 PM

I did some further computation and discovered something rather surprising, Joe. Using Tusk, you can extrapolate all three laws of thermodynamics, the acceleration of gravity, and Planck’s Constant before the 18-minute unedited version of “Sara” actually ends. However, do not try this during her introduction for “Gypsy.”

https://fiverr-res.cloudinary.com/im...sing-latex.jpg

Villavic 09-06-2024 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David (Post 1296530)
I did some further computation and discovered something rather surprising, Joe. Using Tusk, you can extrapolate all three laws of thermodynamics, the acceleration of gravity, and Planck’s Constant before the 18-minute unedited version of “Sara” actually ends. However, do not try this during her introduction for “Gypsy.”

Thermodynamics... that was my favorite course at college. That's whay I know the right law is: if two systems are both in thermal equilibrium with a third system, then they are in thermal equilibrium with each other.

Now the challenge is... who were the two systems, and who was the third?

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...a38259512e.jpg

DownOnRodeo 09-07-2024 12:20 AM

LOL David.:laugh:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 1296532)
Thermodynamics...

Now the challenge is... who were the two systems, and who was the third?

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...a38259512e.jpg

A three-body problem.

HomerMcvie 09-07-2024 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 1296532)
Thermodynamics... that was my favorite course at college. That's whay I know the right law is: if two systems are both in thermal equilibrium with a third system, then they are in thermal equilibrium with each other.

Now the challenge is... who were the two systems, and who was the third?

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...a38259512e.jpg

Dude, lay off of the weed.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved