![]() |
Tusk seconds
In some thread I read (I can’t remember which one) about number of songs vs number of minutes in Tusk, per member, while discussing who had the most. I checked the numbers at my Tusk Deluxe 2015 album, bought through iTunes. The CD I have somewhere it’s the one with Sara edited, and I don’t have the original vinyl album, but I don’t think the difference in seconds is significant (except for Sara of course); I checked also the Expanded 2004 release and the seconds difference in some songs against Deluxe is not relevant.
Christine, 6 songs, 1,227 seconds Lindsey, 9 songs, 1,616 seconds Stevie, 5 songs, 1,621 seconds. It's practically a tie in seconds, between Stevie and Lindsey. The minutes per song are also listed on the Wikipedia page, but checking each one I see it’s not reliable, there are considerable difference, specially with Sara and Never Forget |
Quote:
:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And in order to secure second-place ranking for having too much time on my hands, here are the averages as calculated based on your data: Chris - 3:25 per song Linds - 3:00 per song Stevie - 5:24 per song |
I did some further computation and discovered something rather surprising, Joe. Using Tusk, you can extrapolate all three laws of thermodynamics, the acceleration of gravity, and Planck’s Constant before the 18-minute unedited version of “Sara” actually ends. However, do not try this during her introduction for “Gypsy.”
https://fiverr-res.cloudinary.com/im...sing-latex.jpg |
Quote:
Now the challenge is... who were the two systems, and who was the third? https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...a38259512e.jpg |
LOL David.:laugh:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved