![]() |
'Rolling Stone Magazine' review of 'The Wild Heart' (July 7, 1983)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Rolling Stone really did not like The Wild Heart. They really trashed it. But it seems much of it is about her lyrics. I think they were a bit harsh but this is nothing compared to Rock A Little. Rolling Stone stated that Stevie became a parody of herself. At the end they suggested she should have taken her own advice and rock a little :eek:
|
I remember not getting this review at all. I thought then (and still think) Wild Heart is damn good.
|
Quote:
Quote:
So I was glad to see them fail. Who's updating FM now muthaf*#kas? :shrug: |
They take a pointed dig at her calling her the woman "nominally responsible" for songs like I Don't Want To Know and even Edge of 17....
nominally= in name only; officially though perhaps not in reality.(Oxford Dictionary). That's a total slam suggesting that her success is due mainly to lots of work on her raw material by far more talented musicians (Lindsey, Chris, John, Mick in FM and people like Waddy, Roy, Benmont, etc. on her solo stuff) and producers (Lindsey, Ken, Richard in the first example they give, and Jimmy in the second case)...:eek: I am however a bit perplexed they would consider IDWTK as the best example of her good songcraft, and not something like Dreams or even GDW or Landslide....:confused: That said, Rolling Stone in the 70s and 80s was full of chauvinist douchebags so.....not entirely surprising review. |
Askance
Pellucid Inchoate I had to look these up. Well-write article, and I agree about "too much love" and Sable on Blonde. Pretty harsh though! Also, pretty self-indulgent with all that screaming at the end. "Clarity, rigor, and structure" were never her brand to begin with. |
Quote:
And yes, I WOULD say that to Bob Dylan. |
While I don't agree with the review in its harshness, I do agree that Wild Heart was a big step down from Bella Donna. Clearly the magic of Bella Donna was a one time thing just like Rumours. However this album is when Nick's complete insanity began with her marrying her dead best friend's husband in the middle of it. I sense that Iovine was going for a more adult contemporary feel to boost its commercial aspect. That did not work and had the opposite effect IMHO. I have 3 complaints about the album. Many songs are drowning in background vocals. I hate Gate and Garden but when you listen to the song without all those backup vocals I can appreciate the song. While I agree Sable on Blonde is one of the better songs, its immediate background vocals in the beginning always turned me off. This is one of the reasons I like the alternative version better (sorry Mick). I remember a 1983 interview with Nicks where she claimed people told her Sable on Blonde sounded too much like Dreams and she did not care. I think the alternate version has more depth. Second complaint I have is the guitar takes a back seat compared to Bella Donna. It was the early 80s and the keyboard synth was about to take over. We got 2 hit singles that were heavy in the keyboard syth that were successful. But I think the album suffered from too much of it. That dreaded keyboard intro to Nightbird with that casio drum machine is horrible. My last complaint is the overall production of the album. The title track is nowhere near the intensity of its predecessor. The alternative version is better but she is singing too fast. The song wonders and comes to a very odd conclusion with fade out. I never cared for the basic piano parts of the song either. Its too amateur IMHO. Its still a fairly good album but could have been so much better. How All The Beautiful Worlds never made the album is a crime.
If you never heard the alternative version of Sable on Blonde https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euHCgtgppZs Alternative of Wild Heart. Her vocal on the album is better but this version is better. I think she did a few bumps before singing this because she is shouting while singing. I wish there could have been a happy medium between them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4iC...j3uqTxYMbO4ytE |
Quote:
|
In the late Seventies, Fleetwood Mac were critics’ pets, especially at Rolling Stone. But Stevie herself never was — until she reached “rock elder” status (after Fleetwood Mac had fallen out of favor with the public). There was no way that her mass-market solo albums and tours were going to please that generation of rock writers. Stevie was a figure of squareness and a casualty of punk until well into her 40s, when a younger generation of writers began treating her like a survivor of the rock wars.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Does anyone have the Rolling Stone review of Fleetwood Mac (1975). Stevie spoke ill of the reviewer for calling her singing "callow." |
Quote:
Quote:
I think the first great vocal she provides on an album was her harmony on “Mohammed’s Radio” for Warren Zevon in 1976. I think that’s when John Rockwell at the New York Times first turned on to Stevie as a singer. He wrote an essay about the song, giving Stevie probably her first great review in a major setting. (Probably also the first time that a backup vocal track earned Stevie plaudits and not Lindsey.) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved