| WildHearted |
10-01-2012 01:00 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000
(Post 1064450)
Early/unexpected death catapults many people to a higher realm of celebrity than they enjoyed while they were living. Just look at Elvis... he was a washed up has-been when he died. Same for Michael Jackson. Look at how massive their estates are now. Cult artist Nick Drake was never heard of during his lifetime. Sublime didn't hit major fame until their lead singer died shortly before their third album was released, then they became a platinum selling band.
Just look at the acting realm; actors such as James Dean & River Phoenix had very short careers, and neither were particularly well rounded or prolific in their roles. Yet in death they're viewed as patron saints of acting.
I've often wondered how Stevie's legacy would be now if she had died when she was on top (for instance, what if she died during the Rock A Little tour versus going to Betty Ford?). Because revered artists like Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, etc all went out on top, and have stayed there in death. But would these artists be in the same hallowed arena had they lived and began slowly declining in quality & sales? I tend to think they wouldn't be viewed the same way at all.
|
I agree.
As of right now,I think one could safely make a claim for Stevie in the "living legend" category. At this stage in her career, I don't think there's anything that she could do to really tarnish that - it's just a matter of how well it holds up over time. Who knows.
Now as for her legacy being bigger than Janis's... I find it really hard to compare the two at all, mostly because of the fact that Janis died young and that leaves its own sort of legacy.
Obviously as a fan, I'd like to think that in another 50 years radio (or whatever way people are listening to music then) will still be playing FM/Stevie, but I don't see a way of logically predicting whether or not that will be the case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_nh
(Post 1064454)
intresting point but if stevie died let's say in 1980 or before i think her status as a rock ''legend'' would be the same as janis,jim,or jimmi because i don't think (and still don't) stevie's solo carear was given the same respect as her years with fleetwood mac. so if she did pass away during the rock a little tour i doubt it would have the same impact because at that time in 1985 fleetwood mac was not together at that point.
But with that being said god forbid if we lost her today i think she would be remembered in a way such as jerry garcia was when he passed.
|
Certainly FM is more popular than Stevie solo. But had something terrible happened in the 80's, that still would have been Stevie dying before her time, etc. To harken back to the Elvis/MJ reference made in a previous post, Elvis wasn't so respected at his time of death, and of course MJ was about to go on tour but he still hadn't been a huge force musically or favored publicly in quite some time. But because they died young and tragically, it ironically had a very positive effect on the way they are remembered and the status to which they are held. Stevie in '85 was still popular (this isn't '94 we're talking about here - Rock a Little had some success) and while Fleetwood Mac weren't touring, they were still a band.
All that said.. I really hate speculating about Stevie dying.
|