| Nathan |
10-26-2009 09:38 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by PenguinHead
(Post 850185)
I'm dedicated long time big fan (circa 1975), but I don't take much stock in the stories -- especially Stevie's stories. She often doesn't speak about what inspired a song, but rather the context of where it was written, and usually in strangely vague terms. It's very perculiar and pedestrian if you compare it other (slightly more) accomplished artists. Also, being that she has a selective memory - if any memory at all - her stories/explanations change throughout the years.
I find it rather funny when people attempt a deep analysis of every word and stanza of her lyrics, as if to uncover some elaborate story. I consider her writing more impressionistic than literate. She has a very distinct talent in a limited capacity, but she's not as high-minded and sophisticated as some would like to think she is. However she has her "thing," and she's done very well with it. It's just my take.
|
Great post.
I take stock in some of the stories - but but you're absolutely right that she talks process and not inspiration. And yes, the memory may all but be gone - sometimes I suspect that Norma Desmond and Stevie are close cousins.
In any case - no, not high-minded and sophisticated ALL the time, but I'd say more often than not. The analysis' of all the bits and pieces of the songs may not reveal a story, but it does create narratives that chronicle the goings on in her life. Sara would be the example I'd cite. Lots of small pieces that create a larger picture, fragmented, maybe.
Some of her solo work, which were the only albums we ever found filler material on, could be used as examples of her just doing "her thing".
Hope that makes sense, I'm getting ripped.
|