| ShangriLaTroubl |
08-17-2007 01:22 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiliD
(Post 713318)
I don't see why that would be. I'll bet that what's left after they pay their managers cut, the lighting & sound company, the roadies, the mini-Mac'ers, and all the other palms they need to grease on a show-by-show basis, they split evenly.
Stevie & Lindsey would get more income from recordings, being the remaining songwriters in the band, getting not only artist royalties, but also songwriting and publishing (depending on what percentage of the publishing rights of their songs they kept)
Live gigs is where the non-songwriting members of the/any band make most of their money.
|
I've heard Stevie and Lindsey get a larger cut than Mick and John. They don't really work it out internally, from what I've heard. Each of their individual managers (they all have different managers, except John and Mick) work out their individual artists' per night pay with the promoter. A promoter isn't going to pay John as much as Stevie (regardless of the fact that WE KNOW he's a huge and integral part of the band), but the simple fact is he's not the one drawing the majority of the crowds...
Also some bands, I'm not sure about the Mac, don't pay roadies, expenses etc. at all. The promoter (IE: Clear Channel), pays everything, and gives the band a nightly cut-except for personal expenses (management, and their personal staff of course, etc.).
Some older bands get "guarantees" regardless of ticket sales, FMAC did at least for the first 40 dates of their SYW tour.
|