![]() |
(2 stars) Sundaypaper Review
Lindsey Buckingham
"Under the Skin" (Reprise) http://www.sundaypaper.com/AE/Arts/A...106-Music.aspx Lindsey Buckingham At the very least, Lindsey Buckingham's first solo project in 14 years is as far removed from a Fleetwood Mac album as the band's own '70s work was from its blues-rock origins. The guitarist and vocalist's three previous discs were often experimental and tricked-out studio excursions—fascinating to dissect with headphones, but only intermittently enjoyable. Radically changing course, Buckingham unplugs here, playing most of the instruments himself for a practically drum-free exercise in wistful folk-pop. His cushy vocals are so prominently recorded with gobs of reverb, it sounds as if you're standing in a room with him, or in the case of the multiple overdubs on "It Was You," a bunch of hims. But somewhere between the concept and the execution, Buckingham forgot to write memorable melodies. Or maybe he used them up on Fleetwood Mac's less-than-stellar 2003 comeback. There are flashes of ideas—some smart reflective lyrics and a few hooks—but everything is submerged below a dreamy, creamy acoustic meringue; sweet and airy, but nothing to sink your teeth into. He even unearths an obscure Jagger/Richards gem ("I Am Waiting"), but it too fades into the billowy sonic landscape. The guitar work is typically excellent, his finger-picking and atmospheric strumming beautifully and intimately rendered. Flashes of brilliance appear on the sweeping, orchestrated ballad "Someone's Gotta Change Your Mind" and the marginally more upbeat "Show You How." But after nearly a decade-and-a-half wait, that's not enough for this effort to truly get under your skin. 2 STARS—Hal Horowitz |
I thought this was a poor review especially in contrast to the good reviews that we have seen in the UK press today
|
Yes, it's on the poor side, but it doesn't completely rip it apart which is great. To each his own I suppose. The line about forgetting to write memorable melodies is completely wrong!
|
Quote:
|
He's not for everyone, that's for sure. Uufortunately
|
No worries. I hardly think Atlanta's Sunday Paper is something that's worthy of journalistic street-cred.
When The New York Times or LA Times tears it apart, then I'll be disappointed. |
I think a lot of people simply cannot divorce Lindsey from Fleetwood Mac - making it hard for his solo stuff to get a truly fair listen from many. I think it sucks - but that's the way I see it :shrug:
|
Quote:
|
Dear Mr. Hal Horowitz,
Bite me. Thanks, Lisa :D What's the old cliche?? "Opinions are like a*^holes...everybody's got one?" ;) Like someone else already said, I'm hoping for a good review from the New York Times or LA Times! |
I find this review a little insulting. I appreciate it may not be to everyones taste. I like the way 'The Times' referred to the vocals as whine in eerie reverb - but it works. But to say 'Buckingham forgot to write memorable melodies'! I think Hal's got the disk mixed up with something else. How can you listen to UTS and not have anything but praise for DOR and CAD!
Hal has not heart!:nod: |
I too find this review insulting. "Fleetwood Mac's less-than-stellar 2003 comeback" - bull****!! 'Say You Will' is incredible :mad:
|
Quote:
|
Actually it is...
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved