| strandinthewind |
02-20-2005 09:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl
Clinton "didnt inhale" but is lambasted
Bush refuses to even address his past drug use, and we all say "oh well?"
|
Clinton said he did it once - and his telling of that version was the most assinine thing I have ever heard in my life :nod: I mean does anyone believe that crap - or really care for that matter :rolleyes: - yet he lied anyway. To me, it is just one more lie Clinton, whom I liked despite his lying nature, told.
Conversely, W admitted to having a problem in the past with drugs and alcohol and that he was clean and sober for years. So, he clearly addressed it :shrug: I mean what do you want him to do - specifically detail everytime he did drugs :shrug: That is not reasonable nor is it really anyone's business once he admitted the problem and the subsequent correction. Thus, I think your analogy is without merit. [Edit - Mary is correct in that W did not fiectly address his past drug use other than to say things like he was a mess and he has been sober for a long time]
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl
Clinton fools around with an intern and gets impeached
Bush fools around with a Gay Porn star and its all smoke and mirrors?
|
Please document where Bush "fooled round" with a gay porn star (which BTW the JG person was not - he was a hooker - not a skin flic star :laugh: ) on the same level that Clinton fooled around with Lewinsky. I suggest you cannot. There is no evidence whatsoever that Bush even know of this person's secret life. Though he may have, your analogy is a stretch that Bush and this guy were lovers like Clinton and Lewinsky were :shrug: Thus, I think your analogy is once again without merit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl
personally I think Bush's reluctance to "kick gays" is significant. Kitty Kelly was definitely ON to something.
|
Who can say?
|