The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Chit Chat (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Same Sex Marriage in British Royal Family! (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=18080)

tynan88 02-10-2005 05:42 AM

Same Sex Marriage in British Royal Family!
 
Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles are to marry in April :shocked:

Ninemsn

GypsySorcerer 02-10-2005 08:36 AM

It's about freaking time!

strandinthewind 02-10-2005 11:53 AM

[QUOTE=Lux] . . . which can ony be described as sounding of a drunken Scotsman. QUOTE]

There are sober ones :eek: :] :] :]

Moony 02-10-2005 12:10 PM

What a hideous couple

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/monarchy/Cammilla.jpg

Diana was right. Camilla is a rottweiler.

Is ugliness a requirement for british royalty? :laugh:

DrummerDeanna 02-10-2005 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moony
What a hideous couple



Is ugliness a requirement for british royalty? :laugh:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

And Jason...LOVE the title of this thread :lol:

CelticGypsy 02-10-2005 11:38 PM

Why would he even want to marry her :confused: Didn't she dump him 30 some years ago for someone else when he joined the Navy? Tells alot about her character. Charles is a very stupid and foolish man.

tynan88 02-11-2005 01:12 AM

She won't be queen though, she will be the "Princess Consort", I think I personally prefer "The Royal Rottweiler" but hey, who am I to judge lol.

strandinthewind 02-11-2005 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tynan88
She won't be queen though, she will be the "Princess Consort", I think I personally prefer "The Royal Rottweiler" but hey, who am I to judge lol.

He could make her Queen at a later date just as, I believe, Philip was make Prince Consort after he was made the Duke of Edinburough (sp.?) She will also get an HRH.

AND - lol my friend also calls her The Royal Rottweiler :laugh:

tynan88 02-11-2005 01:22 AM

Quote:

AND - lol my friend also calls her The Royal Rottweiler
Aww I thought I was being original, I am heavily involved in Australian Republican Movement, so I am chuffed he has chosen someone soooo unpopular.

strandinthewind 02-11-2005 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tynan88
Aww I thought I was being original, I am heavily involved in Australian Republican Movement, so I am chuffed he has chosen someone soooo unpopular.

I think she is smart enough to marry him and stay well out of the public eye. Personally, I agree with the Royal who said that Camilla was the only one who behaved with any dignity in the Charles/Diana divorce mess :eek: :laugh:

tynan88 02-11-2005 01:43 AM

She certainly behaved with dignity during the divorce, because she is smart enough to know if she had so much as said a word she would have been crucified. She could never be seen as Queen without the pomp and ceremony of Chaz and Di's wedding, she will always be Chaz's wife.

Vianna 02-11-2005 07:37 AM

Look it's better than their living together as I suppose they've been doing off and on all along..

He can't make her queen-only the Parliament coud do that, right?

GODDESS6 02-11-2005 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moony
What a hideous couple

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/monarchy/Cammilla.jpg

Diana was right. Camilla is a rottweiler.

Is ugliness a requirement for british royalty? :laugh:

tooooooo funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol: :] :lol: :] ~

strandinthewind 02-11-2005 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moony
. . .

Is ugliness a requirement for british royalty? :laugh:

Actually and though no beauty, Elizabeth II was a pretty girl and her sister Margaret was considered a knockout, though I always though Elizabeth II was prettier than Margaret. And their mother was not ugly. Finally, Diana was pretty as is Sara F., Dutches of York. Prince Philip was also very nice looking in his youth. So, there have been some nice looking British Royals in recent years.

dissention 02-11-2005 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Actually and though no beauty, Elizabeth II was a pretty girl and her sister Margaret was considered a knockout, though I always though Elizabeth II was prettier than Margaret. And their mother was not ugly. Finally, Diana was pretty as is Sara F., Dutches of York. Prince Philip was also very nice looking in his youth. So, there have been some nice looking British Royals in recent years.

Princess Ann loved nature despite what it did to her. She aged as well as a pork chop left out in the Texas heat for a week. She was a riot, though. Counting her age by tapping her feet. Priceless. :laugh:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved