![]() |
2005 Grammy nominations
http://www.grammy.com/news/academy/2004/1207noms.aspx
Congrats to Velvet Revolver - but why are they in the same category as Hoobastank?? I haven't even checked out the other stuff yet, just saw this on the VR board.... |
As always, the nominations SUCK.
Quote:
|
What a joke...
the GrUmmies are using Ray Charles as this years sympathy vote!!! Why did they NOT honor the man while he was still alive? Oh wait, These are the same stupid ____ that once had Metallica & Jethro Tull in the same catergory!!!
I will miss this ****-fest like an Oklahoma University Barry Switzer asskissing pep-rally!!! Brian j. |
Congrats to Velvet Revolver - they deserve it.
rbs |
WTF? In the late 80's & early 90's I used to be pissed off that The Grammys never nominated bands that were popular, just older boring stuff. Now they've gone completely the other way & nominated most everyone just because they've been popular this past year? Cuz it's the trendy thing to do?
Well, I will say that I think Velvet Revolver, Black Eyed Peas, Loretta Lynn & Usher deserve their nominations - I may not like all of there material, but they are talented. Gretchen Wilson? I mean, I like, her, she's OK, but a GRAMMY? And I do not get the whole Kanye West thing, he's pretty boring, IMO. Paula |
I hope...
Nominees for Record Of The Year include "Let's Get It Started" (the Black Eyed Peas), "Here We Go Again" (Ray Charles & Norah Jones), "American Idiot" (Green Day), "Heaven" (Los Lonely Boys), and "Yeah!" (Usher).
Los Lonely Boys win for Heaven. :nod: |
And I can telly ou that the Black Eyed peas will get everyone that they are nominated for.
Ther're not even good. WTF!?!?!?! |
Loretta Lynn got 5 nominations-I love her new CD...so they did make a few good nominations
Chris |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved