The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Chit Chat (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   2008 anyone? (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=16793)

Jason T. 11-06-2004 08:40 PM

2008 anyone?
 
I'm assuming it's no secret that some of us didn't get what we wanted this election year. Then again, some of us did...and good for them. Truth of the matter is that both parties are going to have to nominate new people in 2008. So any ideas from either side?

I have no idea about the Republicans, but I'm going to go with Hillary Clinton for the Democrats (I CAN DREAM).

amber 11-06-2004 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason T.
I'm assuming it's no secret that some of us didn't get what we wanted this election year. Then again, some of us did...and good for them. Truth of the matter is that both parties are going to have to nominate new people in 2008. So any ideas from either side?

I have no idea about the Republicans, but I'm going to go with Hillary Clinton for the Democrats (I CAN DREAM).

Why not Hilly? She's smart as a whip, and logical. Unfortunately, Mrs. Cold-Logic-find-the-answers isn't the *best* politician. She's not too bad, though. And i don't need my politicians to be warm and fuzzy, i need them to think up good solutions to hard answers - and actually, the more logic, the better.
So, aside from Vinnie/Spanky 2008, I want Hilly! :nod: She has said she would not run, but that was this year...
Amber

dissention 11-06-2004 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Why not Hilly? She's smart as a whip, and logical. Unfortunately, Mrs. Cold-Logic-find-the-answers isn't the *best* politician. She's not too bad, though. And i don't need my politicians to be warm and fuzzy, i need them to think up good solutions to hard answers - and actually, the more logic, the better.
So, aside from Vinnie/Spanky 2008, I want Hilly! :nod: She has said she would not run, but that was this year...
Amber

Fat chance. She wouldn't carry anything for the Dems on a national level, NEVER. I wouldn't mind seeing it, but it's a sure loss and another four (or eight) years that we'd be under facist rule. It's bad enough that everyone thinks that because Kerry comes from MA, they'd get our liberal, God-hating cooties.

gldstwmn 11-06-2004 10:19 PM

2008 isn't going to mean a damn thing unless we can stop the voter fraud. We could nominate Jesus H. Christ with the way this thing was rigged and he still would have lost.
We cannot worry about 2008 right now.
I don't mean to hijack your thread Jason T.

Jason T. 11-06-2004 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Fat chance. She wouldn't carry anything for the Dems on a national level, NEVER. I wouldn't mind seeing it, but it's a sure loss and another four (or eight) years that we'd be under facist rule. It's bad enough that everyone thinks that because Kerry comes from MA, they'd get our liberal, God-hating cooties.

We can still dream...lol. :cool:

Jason T. 11-06-2004 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
2008 isn't going to mean a damn thing unless we can stop the voter fraud. We could nominate Jesus H. Christ with the way this thing was rigged and he still would have lost.
We cannot worry about 2008 right now.
I don't mean to hijack your thread Jason T.

1. Yes, we need to stop the voter fraud.
2. Jesus is WAY too liberal for the Religious Right.
3. I don't mind you hijacking my thread.

amber 11-06-2004 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Fat chance. She wouldn't carry anything for the Dems on a national level, NEVER. I wouldn't mind seeing it, but it's a sure loss and another four (or eight) years that we'd be under facist rule. It's bad enough that everyone thinks that because Kerry comes from MA, they'd get our liberal, God-hating cooties.

yeah, good point. Wait, i thought you said there was no god, not that you HATED god... :laugh: jk.

gldstwmn 11-06-2004 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason T.
1. Yes, we need to stop the voter fraud.
2. Jesus is WAY too liberal for the Religious Right.
3. I don't mind you hijacking my thread.

:laugh:
Okay. I'll answer your question now. I don't know. It's too soon for Obama. I love Hillary but some are completely threatened by what a powerful woman she is. I like John Edwards. Wesley Clark, hell Richard Clarke. :lol:

dissention 11-06-2004 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
:laugh:
Okay. I'll answer your question now. I don't know. It's too soon for Obama. I love Hillary but some are completely threatened by what a powerful woman she is. I like John Edwards. Wesley Clark, hell Richard Clarke. :lol:

:lol: Richard Clarke!

For some strange and unknown reason, I am not an Obama fan. But even if I was, he's too wet behind the ears.

greatdarkwing 11-07-2004 01:11 AM

Whoever it is will have to knock Guilianni out of the way.....Im forseeing Republicans in the casa blanca until at least 2012 :thumbsup: ;) :angel:

~Alex

estranged4life 11-07-2004 03:12 AM

Personally...
 
it will take a miracle for us to be able to see 2008...But the more I think about the less I see it happenin'

Maybe Manny, Moe & Jack can be on the ballot :shrug:

Brian "What are the Vegas odds on mutually assured destruction these days???" j.

dissention 11-07-2004 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greatdarkwing
Whoever it is will have to knock Guilianni out of the way.....Im forseeing Republicans in the casa blanca until at least 2012 :thumbsup: ;) :angel:

~Alex

He would never run, there's too much dirt out there on him (affairs, the treatment of his ex-wife, his policies and statements about the homeless, cover-ups with the NYPD, his opposition to free speech, etc.). And the GOP would never nominate a pro-choice candidate.

You can dream, though.

skcin 11-07-2004 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
:laugh:
It's too soon for Obama. I love Hillary but some are completely threatened by what a powerful woman she is.


I agree. I personally would vote for either of them in a second, BUT I really don't think I'll see a woman OR a black man as president in my lifetime. It's very sad, but I just don't see it happening. :(


And like Diss said - realistically, if Hil turns out to be the Dem. candidate in 2008, I think you can be sure that the GOP will be back in for another 4 years of bad government. :mad:

Paula

gldstwmn 11-07-2004 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
He would never run, there's too much dirt out there on him (affairs, the treatment of his ex-wife, his policies and statements about the homeless, cover-ups with the NYPD, his opposition to free speech, etc.). And the GOP would never nominate a pro-choice candidate.

You can dream, though.

Plus his father was mobbed up big time. Nope, he won't play in Jesusland. However if we don't fix the machines, it most certainly is possible.

GypsySorcerer 11-07-2004 10:00 PM

I think it will be a little early for Obama, though I do like him. I can't see Hillary getting in.....maybe Edwards will take another shot?

I think Frist wants to run. I'd like to see Hagel get the nomination.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved