Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
show is either live or pre-recorded. (and you could get both with Lindsey yesterday.) when it's live it is raw and you get glitches and warts. you get the reaction in the moment. you know, stuff that people usually complain about with LB - that he's a perfectionist and control freak. apparently not anymore - not nearly as much as some others. :nod::cool: Quote:
|
** also, why even discuss Lindsey solo stuff in the 2018-19 band forum?
#rhetoricalquestion |
Quote:
Weird would be appopriate to use, if it's also weird that Stevie talks about Lindsey in majority of recent interviews. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
sure i would have loved to have proper live recordings of BuckVie and solo anthology shows. they were amazing, with tons of new and previously never performed songs and you know that well. but i would never "defend" that as somehow forward and creative and great thing to do. and they should be actually live, not overdubbed. :) |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you do, If you consider that brooding, I would be very interested as to how you would describe Heathcliff. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTKYvapgMDs
This warms my heart in very Warm Ways. I wish we had BuckVie DVD with extras. |
Quote:
They have different goals in life - she was clear from early on she wants to be a star. She achieved that and is now a self-centered star who has been carefully grooming her persona. He wanted to be a musician and he’s been very clear that he fully understands how lucky he was to be able to make such great living of doing what he loves. Definitely very different people with different goals in life, who happen to be in a toxic personal relationship and messed up business relationship over the years. |
Quote:
Frankly, I was happy to see that pic since we then all knew that theiy are aware on his end that the stream got interrupted so they will fix it and continue on. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dude, your adoration for Richard Thompson is getting a bit boring now...and kind of odd too. You sure you're on the right board? ...Richard Thompson blah blah blah... |
Quote:
Wow, are you taking the p!ss at the fact he's charged $15? The guy has done a live show for his fans and charged a tokenistic $15 sum. I hardly think he's doing this show to make money. Rather than laugh out loud, it should be well done, good on him! |
Quote:
Oddly enough, I kept seeing him mentioned in the same breath as Lindsey in guitar rags, which is how I hooked on him. Once I saw what he was actually doing, Lindsey’s rhetoric about art and expanding boundaries seemed like a bunch of hot air. |
Apples and oranges.
Stevie, who presents herself as a pre-eminent songwriter, produces a film of a series of shows on a tour in which she sings material that averages somewhere around 30 years old (with songs written within a range of the last 50-15 years). Sure, the packaging is new -- a new film that is distributed over a variety of platforms -- and *maybe* some of the chatter accompanying each song in the film is new (and maybe not so much) with the result that she is heralded as doing something new and innovative. In reality, while the merching may be new, the content is not. It is a re-packaging of the same old. However, her goal is and always has been unabashedly to make money. She likely is succeeding (I haven't seen sales figures or revenue figures for her film but figure plenty of fans are buying). An additional goal is to be seen as still relevant, and that includes releasing a new product to sell (and singing backup with younger artists) As per above, she indeed has a new product (film) but on closer inspection the content isn't new at all. Lindsey is recovered from a near-fatal medical event, one that put him in the ICU and treatment of which damaged his vocal cords, potentially permanently. Having come out the other side of that, his goal is to let the world know by letting them see him performing live and unedited that he has fully recovered not just medically but also functionally, i.e. that he can still sing and play and perform for an audience as well as ever. He, like Stevie, would like to make money. He, like Stevie, has new product to put out. Unlike Stevie, his new product will be made of new content because, rather than *tell* people how prolific he is and making them take his word for it, he actually creates new content (in the form of a forthcoming new album). While he achieved his goal of showing the world that he is back and in fine form, his noted lack of acute business sense led him to not include any of that new content *now*, in his live stream. This was a real mistake and a reflection of his continuing lack of appreciation of how the market works. We know the album is done, why make us take your word for it, why not actually play something from it? :eek: Comparing her large, year-plus-in-the-making, highly-produced and overdubbed glossy film to his at-home, direct-interaction-with-fans, off-the-cuff livestream is apples and oranges. Her primary goal was making bucks and reminding everyone how legendary a songwriter she *was*, his primary goal was to show the world he's alive and well and better than ever, and to whet fans' appetite for new material that will show what a great songwriter he *still is*. Which he should have done by playing one of those new songs NOW rather than making us take his word for it a la Stevie. This kind of misstep is where we see his lack of a "big machine" PR team behind him. Critique his PR savvy, sure, but don't conflate his goals with hers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
how misogynistic of you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you're smart enough to see that the behavior is wrong when others do it, you are smart enough not to emulate it. Don't preach unless you're willing to be the change you want to see. :laugh: |
Quote:
ETA: Don’t expect other posters to stop posting comments because you don't like them. |
Quote:
You're the one blaming your own behavior on the 'bad example' set by others. Simply asking if you recognize it's bad behavior, why you choose to copy it? And if you knock others for doing it, you are also knocking yourself for doing the same thing. Most people just jerk off in private. ETA: I didn't ask anyone to stop posting. I asked them to stop b*tching about content they don't agree with. |
Quote:
Or you think Micks kids of similar age as Lindsey’s youngest are hugely bothered by him going around proudly prancing on social media wearing a beanie saying the same wording on it? Really don’t get why such hate and misogyny towards KB from SN fans who are not even shippers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Being in a foul-mouthed funk over his treatment, reflects a sense of ethics, justice, propriety, conscience, and morality more than greed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oops, I forgot about Karen. Make that three. |
Getting back to the thread topic... I'd love to see what Mike, Christine, Stevie and Neil could put together. I wouldn't expect a full album at this stage of the game, but an EP seems entirely doable.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I did NOT say it was HARD to believe Mick never met or barely Met Mike. I said it was revealing since they were not close or barely knew each other that Mick would ask him to join Fleetwood Mac. The answer to your first question: YES it does matter. Why do you want to justify Mick's lie. Why are you rationalizing Stevie's behavior? That was the entire reason for me posting about Mike's interview. He shares details that prove the ridiculousness of Mick. You brush it over "does it really matter." YES it does. Why cant he just say the truth? Stevie controls the band of who is fired and who is hired. Yet you quoted several lines of my posting rationalizing everything Mick said or did based on his lies. |
Quote:
When she helped make his Cranberry juice video, she commented, “He’s back bitches” and in my imagination the statement was directed at specific people, not only the world at large. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I thought Lindsey was in trouble in June, 2017, with his Classic comments, so I guess I wasn’t especially shocked. I also saw trouble brewing when Mick and Stevie met in Italy and listened to what was obvious to me an intention to revisit earlier material, while Lindsey was talking up a new solo album. The one fact both sides agree on is that the tour negotiations were brutal. Maybe they decided to fire him during the negotiations, maybe there was still lingering bitterness during MusiCares and something set it off, but it was obviously a miserable time for them (see the photo shoot). However, and this is the key point, I don’t think any of them went into negotiations with the intention of firing Lindsey. I don’t think there was a grand conspiracy. I think they simply got sick of dealing with it. And, I don’t especially feel sorry for Lindsey. I get that it was awful for him, but in the grand scheme of life, he’s still a rock legend worth tens of millions, still able to make and play music for a solid fanbase, and has a happy family life. What exactly did he lose? Quote:
|
Mick's band? Yeah right! The boss is the one who says $he's not the boss. Mick is a pathetic LOSER.
Ask Irving -on a polygraph- who is the boss. |
photoshoot?
Where can i find the MC photoshoot?
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Without Lindsey, this song could never have been played because I could only play it once. He took it and made it into the song that it is today." He'd be justified to play it in his solo set. |
Quote:
You quoted me yet completely changed what I said and took counter point. You are free to express opinions like we all do. But usually when you quote someone, you don't change what they say and base your counterpoint off what you changed about the original post. Again, your are missing my point. YES it is revealing and funny to hire a guitarist you don't know and may have met once or twice. Are you seriously saying Stevie had nothing to do with it? She never told Mick to call Mike? She put on a Petty tribute during the Mac show as a coincidence? It was all planned by Stevie. Mick made her happy so she would stay with the band and he could make millions. Its not politics as you say. It childish diva tantrums which in turn some turned a blind eye just to get paid big bucks. Yes of course people get fired from bands all the time. But only maybe Van Halen was there a more silly termination inside a legacy band. Their touring contract was signed years in advance yet can give no clear reason other than one member wanted him out. He danced behind Stevie? OMG :eek: I am a bit worried you cant see this and make rationalizations. I don't think we really needed Mike's interview to prove this but I will say it again.......it was REVEALING. Revealing: An adjective. definition: making interesting or significant information known, especially about a person's attitude or character. |
PLOT TWIST - according to the VIP question and answer session before Lindsey's live stream - Mick has already discussed working with him in the future.
|
Quote:
Seriously though, while I’m happy for Linds that he’s talking to his old band mates despite of what they did to him and how thick Muck was laying in bs against linds during backstabber tour promotion ........ I would absolutely HATE seeing Lindsey being sucked back into FM time wasting toxicity. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved