Would Replacing Christine At This Point Really Make A Difference?
 

I heard some old recording from Chi Coltrane the other night.....hmmmmm!

Hell yes! She can't and should NEVER be replaced!!!

AMEN!!!!!

(10)

Please excuse me while I go and cry in the corner at the thought of this :shocked: :distress:

I have to say that I agree. I don't think she should be replaced at all...but even if they did again consider replacing her, I can't think of anyone who could really fill her shoes.

Yes it would make a difference, she definitely can NOT be replaced! :shocked:

Oh, I agree......there's no replacing Christine! But I think there's a HUGE hole in the band without a third lead vocalist!
(Oh, and Angel.....if you like the Runaways, please, please, PLEASE check out Fanny....the true Queens of Rock & Roll!!!)

I agree that no one can replace Christine, but I'll just say that if there HAD to be another singer, then they should have Bob Welch rejoin.

That would be a bad move.
I don't think the band would ever entertain the idea either.

Christine was an important 3rd of Fleetwood Mac, and like Stevie - she has a quality that NO ONE could replace. :)

Fleetwood Mac with a replacement Christine would be much worse than Fleetwood Mac just minus Christine.

She has already been replaced.
They're called: Sharon, Lori and that other one I try to forget.

Simply put... No. Don't replace her.

Absolutely not..

Miley

Have you guys already forgotten
that this "almost" happened? Even
Lindsey was onboard in the end, not
to mention Barry.

What could have been.........