Would Replacing Christine At This Point Really Make A Difference?
I heard some old recording from Chi Coltrane the other night.....hmmmmm!
|
Hell yes! She can't and should NEVER be replaced!!!
|
Quote:
(10) |
Please excuse me while I go and cry in the corner at the thought of this :shocked: :distress:
|
I have to say that I agree. I don't think she should be replaced at all...but even if they did again consider replacing her, I can't think of anyone who could really fill her shoes.
|
Yes it would make a difference, she definitely can NOT be replaced! :shocked:
|
Oh, I agree......there's no replacing Christine! But I think there's a HUGE hole in the band without a third lead vocalist!
(Oh, and Angel.....if you like the Runaways, please, please, PLEASE check out Fanny....the true Queens of Rock & Roll!!!) |
Quote:
|
That would be a bad move.
I don't think the band would ever entertain the idea either. |
Christine was an important 3rd of Fleetwood Mac, and like Stevie - she has a quality that NO ONE could replace. :)
|
Fleetwood Mac with a replacement Christine would be much worse than Fleetwood Mac just minus Christine.
|
She has already been replaced.
They're called: Sharon, Lori and that other one I try to forget. |
Quote:
|
Absolutely not..
|
Quote:
Have you guys already forgotten that this "almost" happened? Even Lindsey was onboard in the end, not to mention Barry. What could have been......... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved