The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Rumours (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Peace Keeper IS THE NEW SINGLE...... (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=8609)

Christopher 02-25-2003 01:24 PM

Peace Keeper IS THE NEW SINGLE......
 
Just heard this on the radio here on Denver's KBCO Adult Alternative station...after they played "the chain"..the dj came on and said they will have the new Fleetwood Mac song called "Peace Keeper" next Wednesday (3/5) ....

Although this is exciting!!! After hearing the snippet last night...(and I know its hard to judge from a minute and half version off television)...I wasnt convinced this should be the important 1st SINGLE after all.....Lindseys solo version definetely packed a bigger wallop......This new version has yet to grow fully on me and I agree with some of you that it has been toned down and has a totally different vibe with Stevie's vocals. My biggest observation is that it now sounds so easy listening....which to me is even a step lighter than POP!!!...

I like "Say You Will" better...but also I'm beginning to feel that perhaps "Thrown Down" should have been the 1st single....out of everything we've heard so far.. TD has the newest sound. and is harder rockin'!!

stefan 02-25-2003 01:41 PM

Having heard the different (and better) version of Peacekeeper (from Burnish.net) I`m absolutely fine with this choice!
(Who didn`t realize the difference between the files floating around- check it out, you`ll surely change your mind)

SilverGirl 02-25-2003 02:12 PM

wow... RIGHT before I came here and saw this thread, I was just thinkin, as I listened again to it, that with what's goin on in the world, I bet Peacekeeper would be VERY popular as a single! (~~~isn't that weeird?~~~~lol)

although I 'personally' like another of the songs I've heard better, i think Peacekeeper sounds very 'radio friendly', and I believe it will zoom on the charts! hey, the world needs it!! I think it's smart to release it... let the momentum build, then throw another one out!

SilverGirl 02-25-2003 02:30 PM

BTW, thanks ever so much for posting the news, Christopher!!

So much for "get your up to date news here from THE KNIGHT"!!

:laugh: ~~giggle~~ :laugh:

wondergirl9847 02-25-2003 03:15 PM

CATCHY AS HECK!!
 
I have to say, the song has to grow on me (the FM version, I am in LOVE with Lindsey's version!!!), but it's DANG CATCHY, that's for sure, I sing the chorus all the time!!! I love that they kept in the wierd sound (ya'll know the one). :laugh:

I'm gonna keep on listening to the mp3 I have of the song...and I love it, it's just...different with Stevie on it. I'm trying ya'll!!!!

estranged4life 02-25-2003 03:25 PM

Thanks for the info...
 
that should make for an interesting choice as a single...Brian J.

ps-Seems Christopher beat the "Knight" & posters over there on Mick's website with this info...Brian J.

jwd 02-25-2003 05:30 PM

Cool
 
I'm perfectly fine with the release of "Peacekeeper" as the first single and it sounds like a hit to me. I'm so glad the song turned out to be a Lindsey/Stevie harmonizing effort. I hope every song on SYW has lots of harmonies between the two of them as they sound awesome together. I really got excited last night after I heard the song played on Third Watch and am highly anticipating the relase of the new record from Fleetwood Mac. YAY!!!!


It's B/N Fleetwood Mac, not Lindsey or Stevie Fleetwood Mac. YAY!! :)

Joe

WelshWitchPMD 02-25-2003 05:31 PM

I heard the MP3 of "Peacekeeper" and I really wasn't that crazy about it. I did like Stevie's vocals, however. I think "Say You Will" would make a much better first single. I heard SYW again on the "That 70s Show" promo the other day and my ears just perk right up. Maybe if I heard "Peacekeeper on TV I would like it better. Does this make sense? :laugh:

DownOnRodeo 02-25-2003 08:00 PM

Stefan - thanks for letting us know about the burnish.net version. A big difference - much more prominent Lindsey vocal etc! And of course the real thing will have an awesomely better sound again.

I think it is a great first single. Timely, catchy, clever, innovative... it's GYOW for 2003!

Sorcerer386 02-26-2003 01:43 AM

I can see why something like Peacekeeper would be a great song to release back in the 60's and 70's, but I don't think music is too much into politics these days. I haven't heard the album cut yet though, so I guess I should before I judge. But if you're thinking this will make a good single just because of it's place in what's going on in the world, I'd give it a second thought. Today we like to hide from things...we don't like to face them. I just really hope they know what they're doing, because this first single is pretty much everything for the album (unless it gets a rush with a second or third single). AND, they better not waste this album by releasing only two video'd singles!

Livia 02-26-2003 05:28 PM

That's cool! I posted in the Third Watch thread that our local adult alternative/contemporary station didn't have any info yet about the first single.

Quote:

I don't think music is too much into politics these days
I see your point about that, considering all the Vietnam era music, but I think it's just a matter of time before artists get their new post 9-11/anti-war music recorded and out there. Bruce Springsteen kinda beat everyone to it with "The Rising." And I'm sure there will be more to come. For example, Stevie's "Illume" won't be out until April 15, nearly 2 years later.

Who knows? It may even be a purposeful marketing thing by the record company. A controversial pop song with a catchy, radio-friendly hook.

SilverGirl 02-26-2003 07:18 PM

I think musicians, celebrities, and the general public are becoming increasingly more into politics and anti-war protest in this country than at any other time since the vietnam era... there are more tools available due to technology to make voices heard:


(Feb. 26) - Sheryl Crow was ridiculed for wearing a "War is not the answer" T-shirt to an awards show, Sean Penn was castigated for visiting Baghdad and Martin Sheen was slammed for exploiting his TV role as a fictional U.S. president by fronting an anti-war ad promoting a ``virtual march'' on Washington.

In response, hundreds of thousands of war opponents called and faxed their senators and the White House Wednesday, jamming many congressional telephone lines for several hours.

Tom Andrews, a former Democratic representative from Maine who is running the organization, said more than 500,000 people had signed up on the Internet to take part and a half a million more were also expected to participate without registering on the group's web site (Moveon.org).

"We have hundreds of thousands of calls and faxes that we know are going in. It's a first-of-its-kind protest and a tremendous success already," he said. "People are making their voices heard loud and clear -- don't invade and don't occupy Iraq."

The Web site had a running total of what it said was the number of calls placed. As of 5 p.m., the number was almost 400,000. The Web site was flashing the names of individual protesters above a map of the United States with quotes from e-mails sent to the headquarters and to lawmakers. Each comment included the name and hometown of the protester.

Rainman 02-27-2003 12:31 AM

Good choice
 
Hey Christy and SilverGirl, I agree completely that it's a timely choice. I hope Christopher's radio station got its information right. Perhaps the state of the world was a factor in choosing Peacekeeper as the first single. If so, good on 'em.

The more I listen to this new version, the more I'm okay with it. Not that anyone at FM gives a $#@% whether I'm okay with it or not, but I am.

Should be an interesting week.

tommer 02-27-2003 02:26 AM

this track's gonna get them being asked all sorts of current political questions, i hope they know what they are doing.
i REALLY hope they know what they're doing.
(is this the smell of trouble or was it just my cat who farted???) :shrug:

BombaySapphire3 02-27-2003 06:57 AM

While the sentiment of this song will go over well here (The Bay Area)and western Europe it may not be so warmly embraced in middle America aka the Bush/Bible belt. where the perception of forgein affairs is generally not as sophisticated. I'm very glad it is the first single although from what i can hear of "Say You Will; its very catchy as well.

blinker12 02-27-2003 09:27 AM

I think it's incredibly cool that they're releasing "Peacekeeper" as the first single. The Mac have never been particularly political in the past _ although I guess they had politics foisted on them in 1992 during Clinton's campaign _ so this is a dramatic change of pace for them.
The lyrics are very eloquent. But I admit I may be biased because I happen to agree with the song's message. :)
You know, I wonder what, specifically, Lindsey wrote this song about. He must have written it long before Bush's stand-off with Iraq began building... but he may have written it during one of our past airstrikes on the Iraq or Yugoslavia.

strandinthewind 02-27-2003 11:05 AM

Hopefully, LB will go into what it is about during the hopefully pending media hoopla.

I think its great they are releasing it because whatever it is about (we could be way off base you know :D ), it certainly fits the times and timing has never been FM's forte - e.g. Illume - great sentiment, but the fact remains it is two and half years after the fact. More importantly, Peacekeeper apparently is not really an in your face I am against war no matter what the reason and no matter what they say, Bush is just a warmonger leading a coalition of the bribed for oil kind of song.

Hopefully, Warner/Reprise is thinking this will get it played on the radio. As mentioned, any help FM can get is this area is great as they are all over 50 and not rapping or exposing navels to get the publicity :eek: :eek: :D :D

Karen 02-27-2003 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BombaySapphire3
While the sentiment of this song will go over well here (The Bay Area)and western Europe it may not be so warmly embraced in middle America aka the Bush/Bible belt. where the perception of forgein affairs is generally not as sophisticated.
What an awful thing to say about Middle America (and the rest of the U.S.A.)! Are you basically implying that the people of “The Bay Area” know more about international affairs than the rest of us? Maybe you should read your statement over again to figure out why some people may find this a bit offensive. What about William J. Clinton? He’s from Arkansas, but does this make his perceptions of the world less sophisticated? :confused:

Besides, why does Peacekeeper have to be about politics? I remember that Stevie once said in an interview that she’s the peacekeeper in the band. The song could be about the band, or maybe it’s about something that is more on a personal level. The song was also a prefect fit for the theme of the Third Watch episode. It could be about anything. Just a thought.

BombaySapphire3 02-27-2003 04:13 PM

Hey we did not elect Shrub here!(Well technically
I don't think you did in Florida either!)I also just saw a poll where about 60% of people here opposed the war that figure was reversed nationally with 60% supporting it.Those veiws don't jibe with much of the rest of the world.Maybe I shoud not have just picked on "Middle America'I know there are a preponderance of war hawks down in San Diego and Orange county as well.I am also aware of the 40% nationally that oppose it so there is hope.

Rainman 02-27-2003 04:38 PM

"they are all over 50 and not rapping or exposing navels to get the publicity"

Strandinthewind, I don't know about you, but if John exposes his navel in concert with a navel ring, I'm gonna go back to country music. :D

Karen 02-27-2003 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BombaySapphire3
Hey we did not elect Shrub here!(Well technically
I don't think you did in Floridia either!)I also just saw a poll where about 60% of people here opposed the war that figure was reversed nationally with 60% supporting it.Those veiws don't jibe with much of the rest of the world.Maybe I shoud not have just picked on "Middle America'I know there are a preponderance of war hawks down in San Diego and Orange county as well.I am also aware of the 40% nationally that oppose it so there is hope.

I thought we were talking about Middle America & Peacekeeper. How does the Presidential election figure into this picture (and the war polls for that matter)?

You have your opinion and I have mine. If you want to turn this into a political debate, then go right ahead. I just don't think this is the proper forum for it.

Sorcerer386 02-27-2003 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Karen
Besides, why does Peacekeeper have to be about politics? I remember that Stevie once said in an interview that she’s the peacekeeper in the band. The song could be about the band, or maybe it’s about something that is more on a personal level. The song was also a prefect fit for the theme of the Third Watch episode. It could be about anything. Just a thought.
I've said many times already that Peacekeeper might be a kind of rebuttal after Lindsey hearing the line from Fall from Grace, "High priestess, she's the keeper of the peace in this..." It all depends on when the song was written though.

strandinthewind 02-27-2003 05:12 PM

Rainman
___________________________________________________

Strandinthewind, I don't know about you, but if John exposes his navel in concert with a navel ring, I'm gonna go back to country music.
___________________________________________________

Maybe John can wear a pig tailed wig and make up as well. Maybe his navel ring could get caught in Mick's "balls" during World Turning (yet another reason not to do that song ;) ) AARRGGHH!!!!! :wavey: :D :laugh: :] :] :woohoo: :D :):wavey:

Karen 02-27-2003 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sorcerer386
I've said many times already that Peacekeeper might be a kind of rebuttal after Lindsey hearing the line from Fall from Grace, "High priestess, she's the keeper of the peace in this..." It all depends on when the song was written though.
This is exactly what I was thinking about. For all we know, Peacekeeper could have been written many moons ago. Does anyone know when Fall From Grace was written by Stevie? Anythings possible, right? :)

jwd 02-27-2003 05:50 PM

Politics
 
Quote:

While the sentiment of this song will go over well here (The Bay Area)and western Europe it may not be so warmly embraced in middle America aka the Bush/Bible belt. where the perception of forgein affairs is generally not as sophisticated.
What kind of BULL**** statement is that!? I think people in middle America and other places in the world can think just fine for themselves without having the liberally controlled media brainwashing our minds. You're way off base on your statement and it is offensive.

Thank you Karen for your replies(rebuttals).....I agree wholeheartedly!



Joe

Livia 02-27-2003 06:11 PM

I work in an office full of attorneys who are all diehard DEMOCRATS. In fact, one of our partners was the Travis County Chairperson for the Democratic Party for several years. Did I mention that I live in Austin, Texas? That's right, baby! Good ol' George Dubbya used to be our idiotic governor and now he's an idiotic President! In other words, we don't all support him here in the "bible belt."

President Clinton spoke here recently and reiterated a point I've worried about for a long time, which is that North Korea is a bigger threat to us (and the world) than Iraq, and that Bush should be paying more attention to them. Something else I read recently referred to North Korea as the "nuclear missile Wal-Mart of the world."

Anyone care to move this conversation to the "chit-chat" forum?

But back to the original topic of this thread - I don't think Lindsey writes retaliatory songs back to Stevie anymore. I think they are past that, well at least Lindsey is. Stevie seems to live in the past more than he does, especially when you consider that so many of her old songs from the 70's are still being released as new material. I think the "peacekeeper" phrase is just a coincedence. Just my 2 cents - song interpretations have always boggled my mind.

kristin 02-27-2003 06:34 PM

I believe that Fall From Grace was written around the time of The Dance......I heard somewhere that it was about her relationship with Lindsey at the time....although that could just all be speculation.....I really don't know. Don't ya just love how we find a way to make all of their songs about eachother?? HA! In a perfect world.....

Kristin

Karen 02-27-2003 07:05 PM

Re: Politics
 
Quote:

Originally posted by jwd
What kind of BULL**** statement is that!? I think people in middle America and other places in the world can think just fine for themselves without having the liberally controlled media brainwashing our minds. You're way off base on your statement and it is offensive.
Joe - I feel the same way. It just blew me away that someone would intentionally put down the rest of the U.S. (and other parts of the world) with such generalizations.

Kristen - Thanks for clearing up the timeline regarding Fall From Grace. Peacekeeper may not be a rebuttal to this song, but you never know. I just find it hard to believe that it's about what's currently going on in the world.

Livia - If you want to start a thread about politics in the Chit-Chat Forum, then that would probably be the place to do it. I'm sure that there are others who may find it interesting.

seteca 02-27-2003 09:32 PM

Re: CATCHY AS HECK!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by wondergirl9847
but it's DANG CATCHY, that's for sure...
Absolutely...:nod: This is an addictive song, and is very radio friendly. Great choice to have it as the new single!:nod::thumbsup:

:wavey: :wavey: :wavey:

wondergirl9847 02-27-2003 09:46 PM

GOOD GRAVY!!
 
Back to the TOPIC at hand...PEACEKEEPER...THE SONG!! LMAO!!

I have been singing the song ALL DAY AT WORK!! LOL Well, under my breath, since I work in a "SILENCE OR ELSE" kind of workplace. (I do data entry...OOOH FUN!! :rolleyes: ) I have pretty much remembered the lyrics, except for the second verse at the end, I have trouble there..LOL I LOVE IT!!!!!

APRIL 15TH...GET HERE SOON!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :blob1::blob2:

BombaySapphire3 02-28-2003 08:11 AM

'Joe - I feel the same way. It just blew me away that someone would intentionally put down the rest of the U.S. (and other parts of the world) with such generalizations." I called the statements generalizations when i made them but I do feel that a fair percentage of the US is tragically out of touch if they feel this "war' is right .and Joe most of the world is not controlled by the 'liberal media 'and they do not agree with it either.This is my opinion and if people find it offensive then I suggest you never travel abroad and ask people in other countries what they think of US forgiein policy. My remarks will seem innoucous indeed compared to what you may hear.

strandinthewind 02-28-2003 12:00 PM

In her journal entries on Nicksfix, she refers to writing some of the lyrics (the chorus perhaps) of Fall From Grace at the Four Season hotel in Atlanta, Ga. She also said somewhere that the song Fall From Grace came out of The Dance tour and is somewhat about being onstage with FM. Stevie also seems to take things from different poems or journal entries written at differet times and incorporate them into songs (Angel, Destiny, Enchanted, etc.)

I know she lived at the Four Seasons for about six months in 1999 (maybe 2000). In fact, I saw her in the bar there (no I wasn't stalking - realy - I swear;) :D ). Actually, I also sort of knew the guy who did her hair at a salon here in Atlanta. He said she was totally grey, she was very nellow, she complained alot about Atlanta's traffic (which sucks), she drank exotic tea, and was a wonderful and nice person. I am such a gossip today:wavey:

sodascouts 02-28-2003 01:23 PM

I think Peacekeeper is a great choice for a first single. The chorus is so melodic - it appealed to me instantly. Thrown Down and Say You Will are good, too, but I believe Peacekeeper excels them both by (honestly) a wide margin.


P.S.

Quote:

Originally posted by BombaySapphire3
While the sentiment of this song will go over well here (The Bay Area)and western Europe it may not be so warmly embraced in middle America aka the Bush/Bible belt. where the perception of forgein affairs is generally not as sophisticated.
It's just this kind of elitist, condescending perpetuation of degrading stereotypes that turns independent voters away from the Democratic party. So go ahead and alienate everyone outside of San Francisco, but don't whine if"Shrub" gets re-lected because of the perception that Democrats are contemptous of the "regular guys" everywhere else. This perception may not be accurate, but when people read statements like yours, what are they supposed to think?

Johnny Stew 02-28-2003 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sodascouts
Don't whine if "Shrub" gets re-lected because of the perception that Democrats are contemptous of the "regular guys" everywhere else.
I'm not meaning to jump into the fray here, because I'd just as soon leave politics out of all discussions... but I got a good chuckle out of the irony in that statement, so I thought I'd say something.

And I'm not laughing at what you said, just in the disparate nature of the various perceptions... as I think a lot of Democrats (and a lot of Independents) actually feel that it's Republicans who are contemptuous of the "regular guys"... ie: Blue-collar workers.
Hence the continual tax-cuts and tax-breaks for those with higher incomes, while programs such as Medicare and Social Security... which most benefit the "working class"... are often the first things to be hit when a Republican government needs to tighten the proverbial belt.

I got a kick out of it recently, when a Republican analysist said that people in the middle and lower-classes, wouldn't argue with President Bush's current economic plan... which seemingly favors the upper-classes... because, he says, "people in the lower-classes wish they were rich too."
Which has to be about the most blatant "let them eat cake" kind of statement I've ever personally heard.

Anyway, I'm not meaning to favor one side or the other here, as I think both sides have their faults, and their degrees of corruption... I just found it interesting and ironic that both "sides" seem to feel that the other side is guilty of snobbery towards the middle and lower-classes.
Apparently though, we ALL wish we were rich! ;) :laugh:



Johnny Stew

Karen 02-28-2003 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johnny Stew
Anyway, I'm not meaning to favor one side or the other here, as I think both sides have their faults, and their degrees of corruption... I just found it interesting and ironic that both "sides" seem to feel that the other side is guilty of snobbery towards the middle and lower-classes.
Apparently though, we ALL wish we were rich! ;) :laugh:

Well, I think this statement just about sums everything up. :nod:

There are no rules when it comes to politics. You just have to read between the lines and decide for yourself.

Tusk57 03-01-2003 11:40 PM

I know I'm in the vast minority here, but I believe President Bush is doing a great job under very difficult circumstances. I guess that makes me one of those unsophisticated rednecks that doesn't happen to live in San Francisco. Nobody wants to wage war, but sometimes the alternative is worse. Give it a thought.
Bill

CarneVaca 03-02-2003 12:19 AM

Re: Politics
 
Quote:

Originally posted by jwd
What kind of BULL**** statement is that!? I think people in middle America and other places in the world can think just fine for themselves without having the liberally controlled media brainwashing our minds. You're way off base on your statement and it is offensive.

I have to bristle at this. The "liberal media" is one of the greatest myths the Republicans have ever conjured up. In fact, people like Rush Limbaugh (who admits he's in it for the entertainment value), Pat Buchanan and Bill Crystal have admitted that it is a myth. Joe, how do you reconcile the fact that most mediat outlets are owned by huge corporations with your accusation of a liberal bias? Did you see what the media did to Clinton? I've been part of the media. In my last media job, every single one of my superiors was Republican, all the way up to and including the CEO. Do you think Michael Eisner is a liberal? Rupert Murdoch? Joe, think it through before you make that statement again. Just some friendly advice from a fellow Ledgie.

Moving on to the original topic, I hate to say it, but based on the snippet from Burnish.com, which admittedly is not in stereo so there are some quality issues, I would have to say that the harmonies in Thrown Down, which some of you may recalled I panned some time ago, are better than Peacekeeper. I can't imagine what Lindsey was thinking by tracking both voices throughout the verses. It simply doesn't work. In the chorus, they almost have it, but, sorry, folks, the song has lost some of its sheen for me. If Peacekeeper and I Don't Wanna Know are distant cousins in the harmony department, I Don't Wanna Know will never admit the family link. I'm just glad I have the original version.

The more I hear of this upcoming album -- Thrown Down, the Say You Will snippet and now this -- the more I worry.

I will also go on a limb and predict that Peacekeeper will not get much air play.

CarneVaca 03-02-2003 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tusk57
I know I'm in the vast minority here, but I believe President Bush is doing a great job under very difficult circumstances. I guess that makes me one of those unsophisticated rednecks that doesn't happen to live in San Francisco. Nobody wants to wage war, but sometimes the alternative is worse. Give it a thought.
Bill

Bush is ruining this country. He has managed to alienate all our important allies with the exception of the UK, he has done nothing to protect us at home despite the laughable creation of the homeland department, and he is chasing ghosts in Iraq for oil. Those of us who are living with the constant threat of terrorism where the terrorists have already struck simply cannot understand the logic. That's because there is no logic. And I won't even go into the methodical destruction of environmental protections and the economy. Bush and his people will go down as one of the worst administrations this great nation has ever had to endure -- a bunch of greedy, power-hungry clowns who managed to turn an unprecedented amount of goodwill from our friends abroad into disgust and distrust.

And Tusk57, with all due respect, there is no such thing as a "vast minority."

Sorcerer386 03-02-2003 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CarneVaca
Bush is ruining this country. He has managed to alienate all our important allies with the exception of the UK, he has done nothing to protect us at home despite the laughable creation of the homeland department, and he is chasing ghosts in Iraq for oil. Those of us who are living with the constant threat of terrorism where the terrorists have already struck simply cannot understand the logic. That's because there is no logic. And I won't even go into the methodical destruction of environmental protections and the economy. Bush and his people will go down as one of the worst administrations this great nation has ever had to endure -- a bunch of greedy, power-hungry clowns who managed to turn an unprecedented amount of goodwill from our friends abroad into disgust and distrust.
Well CarneVaca, what do ya know...we FINALLY agree on something, lol. I just hope voters will see this terrible behavior next election and get the Bush monarchy the Hell out of office. After all, we know Daddy and the crew are running things. But apparently, we need to catch Bush doing something REALLY bad like having an affair in order to get him out of there. :eek: What did I say?!?

jwd 03-02-2003 12:50 PM

Quote:

I know I'm in the vast minority here, but I believe President Bush is doing a great job under very difficult circumstances. I guess that makes me one of those unsophisticated rednecks that doesn't happen to live in San Francisco. Nobody wants to wage war, but sometimes the alternative is worse. Give it a thought.
Tusk57 count me in as one of the "vast minority". ;)


Quote:

Bush is ruining this country. He has managed to alienate all our important allies with the exception of the UK, he has done nothing to protect us at home despite the laughable creation of the homeland department, and he is chasing ghosts in Iraq for oil. Those of us who are living with the constant threat of terrorism where the terrorists have already struck simply cannot understand the logic. That's because there is no logic. And I won't even go into the methodical destruction of environmental protections and the economy. Bush and his people will go down as one of the worst administrations this great nation has ever had to endure -- a bunch of greedy, power-hungry clowns who managed to turn an unprecedented amount of goodwill from our friends abroad into disgust and distrust.

My dear friend Carne this sounds like a lot of liberal propaganda to me.





Sorry Karen........I triiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiied!




Joe


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved