trump's 3 rd wife
 

these are funny they keep popping up on line

there are so many post your favorite

'Donald is intensely loyal' says third wife Melania Trump,

Can you imagine Hillary saying that about Bill?

so until they own it the press is going to stay focused on her speech and the half empty arena

I usually dislike most of them but those memes are cute!

I can only imagine some for Trump Jr. where he went on about his dad seeing the potential in the little people and promoting them, they just happen to be his own offspring of course that rise to the top (as soon as they can walk). Coal mining and factory work for others.

Exactly! LOL

But has Hillary said that of Bill?
Thats the point!

their marriage has outlasted all 3 of trumps

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-f1zUM3hID...66141298_n.jpg

'I read it once over, and that's all because I wrote it with as little help as possible'

Meredith McIver: 'I'm sorry, this was my mistake, I wrote it'
Oops

True. It must be shocking to most of you here but in almost half of the marriages at one point or another has happened infidelity and more than half of the couple successfully decided to remain together.
Also this concerns the cases in which the infidelity has been discovered. It's safe to say that almost all of you here have been cheated or have cheated on the partner. And in my still limited knowledge as almost-psychologist, those of you who are so inflexible about it are the most likely to be "guilty".

Hmmm. Are you sure that's not just Italian statistics? No offence, but I think Italians have a bit of a reputation- particularly Italian 'gentlemen'. :nod:

how did the previous 2 mrs trumps pass away ?:lol:

You can infer it from this interesting report from NY Times that I had posted on one of the old election threads that conveniently got closed just after I posted it: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/15/us...omen.html?_r=1

True, nothing in comparison with you lukewarm british men. Always chasing after tea instead of women.

You can't beat a nice cuppa!

At what point does it become cheating?

And if I were married to Hillary...

Well, that depends from person to person. But if I were you I wouldn't ask your wife, she could get suspicious.

Taking those 3 sentences from Michelle's speech was wrong - but Melania didn't write it. Hillary doesn't write her own speeches either...

And since when does the left side care about honesty and integrity? You realize your presumptive nominee was "extremely careless" and put our national security at risk.

Donald Trump Promised the Truth. We Checked the Facts.

CLEVELAND — Donald J. Trump’s acceptance speech here was filled with Trump-like hyperbole and the kind of vague political rhetoric that is hard to pin down.

But there were also facts.

In describing the problems that he would seek to fix from the Oval Office, Mr. Trump offered a series of grim facts about crime, the economy, and foreign policy. “Here at our convention, there will be no lies,” Mr. Trump said.

Many of Mr. Trump’s facts appear to be true, though the Republican presidential nominee sometimes failed to offer the entire story, or provide all of the context that might help to explain his numbers.

And in some cases, the facts seemed inflated or misleading, part of a broader ideological message that Mr. Trump was hoping to convey.

Our fact-checks of some of his claims:

• “Homicides last year increased by 17 percent in America’s fifty largest cities. That’s the largest increase in 25 years.”

Fact Check: Those statistics are based on one analysis of preliminary crime data released by the Justice Department, and they accurately reflect what officials say is a spike in murders in some big cities. It leaves out the drop in others, like New York City, which saw a 25 percent drop in homicides in the first three months of 2016.


• “In our nation’s capital, killings have risen by 50 percent. They are up nearly 60 percent in nearby Baltimore.”

Fact Check: Those statistics are based on an analysis performed by The Washington Post, which found no clear pattern in which cities saw increases in homicides.


• “In the president’s hometown of Chicago, more than 2,000 have been the victims of shootings this year alone. And almost 4,000 have been killed in the Chicago area since he took office.”

Fact Check: This is largely true. The Chicago police department reports 2,242 shootings so far in 2016. And while it is unclear exactly what Mr. Trump means by “the Chicago area,” that figure appears to track with reported murders since the start of 2009.


• “The number of police officers killed in the line of duty has risen by almost 50 percent compared to this point last year.”

Fact Check: In fact, the Officer Down Memorial Page, which tracks officer deaths, reports that 68 police officers have been killed so far this year, almost exactly the same as the 69 who were killed in the same period last year.


• “Nearly 180,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records, ordered deported from our country, are tonight roaming free to threaten peaceful citizens.”

Fact Check: Those numbers come from a report by the Department of Homeland Security, which told Congress late last year that nearly 1 million undocumented immigrants have been ordered deported but remain in the country. Mr. Trump did not mention that most of those 180,000 are likely people charged with nonviolent crimes.


• “The number of new illegal immigrant families who have crossed the border so far this year already exceeds the entire total from 2015.”

Fact Check: This is true, according to reports from the Border Patrol, which said that more than 51,000 families have been apprehended on the border in the first nine months of the fiscal year, compared to about 40,000 last fiscal year. But that is still less than 2014, when a surge of families across the border caused a political stir.


• “Nearly four in 10 African-American children are living in poverty, while 58 percent of African-American youth are not employed.”

Fact Check: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate of African Americans ages 16-19 in June was 31.2 percent (among whites of the same age, it was 14.1 percent).


• “Household incomes are down more than $4,000 since the year 2000.”

Fact Check: This is mostly true. Median household income in 2000 was $57,724; in 2014, which has the most recent available data, it was $53,657.


• “Our manufacturing trade deficit has reached an all-time high – nearly $800 billion in a single year.”

Fact Check: The goods deficit — more imported goods, less exported goods — was $763 billion last year. But that includes agricultural products and raw materials like coal. Moreover, the total trade deficit last year was only $500 billion because the U.S. runs a trade surplus in services.


• “President Obama has doubled our national debt to more than $19 trillion, and growing.”

Fact Check: The national debt was $10.6 trillion on the day Obama took office. It was $19.2 trillion in April, so not quite double, but close.


• “Forty-three million Americans are on food stamps.”

Fact Check: As of October, this figure was largely accurate, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.


• “In 2009, pre-Hillary, ISIS was not even on the map. Libya was cooperating. Egypt was peaceful. Iraq was seeing and, really, a big, big reduction in violence. Iran was being choked by sanctions. Syria was under control.”

Fact Check: Mr. Trump is mostly right. But Libya, Syria and Egypt were swept up in the Arab Spring, an uprising out of Mrs. Clinton’s and Mr. Obama’s control. And the sanctions on Iran were just getting ramped up at that time; they became far tougher under the Obama administration than they were during the Bush administration. That helped force Tehran to the negotiating table for last year’s deal.


• “This was just prior to the signing of the Iran deal, which gave back to Iran $150 billion and gave us nothing — it will go down in history as one of the worst deals ever negotiated.”

Fact Check: The deal does not directly give Iran money, but by easing or terminating sanctions, it would allow Iran to have access to many billions of dollars of its own money that has been frozen in overseas accounts. And the exact value of those sanctions is debatable.


• “My opponent has called for a radical 550 percent increase in Syrian refugees on top of existing massive refugee flows coming into our country under the leadership of President Obama.”

Fact Check: This is true, as Mrs. Clinton said in September she wanted to “move from what is a good start with 10,000 to 65,000.” But she also said she would improve the already extensive vetting process, especially from Syria.

the Poorly Educated don't care .... it's not a lie if you believe it !

The fact she didn't write the speech is not a big deal- at the end of the day most politicians use writers for their speeches- that's pretty well known. The big mistake she made is to claim she mostly wrote it herself- she didn't. She should not have said anything- keep quiet, don't lie. It seems as if the bit she wrote herself is actually the bit that was lifted from Michelle. It just shows she thinks nothing of blatently lying- influenced by her husband?

The biggest issue is how the whole Trump campaign/GOP convention looks shoddily put together. For a campaign that costs a billion US dollars to run, it's riduculous nobody properly checked the speeches (neither Melania nor Ted Cruz). That's just rather amateurish. Be sure, for the Democrat convention they'll be vetting the speeches with a fine tooth comb. When you add in the whack-job speakers like Antonio Sabato who seems to have the intellect of a drainpipe, you've got to question whether Trump and his camp could properly organise a piss-up in a brewery. Your Republican party is fast making itself unelectable which isn't good. It needs to move away from being the 'nasty party' if it genuinely wants to be elected again in a hurry.


By the way, if anyone hasn't yet seen it; Michelle Obama is one of the coolest women on the planet. I hope she plays a significant part in politics herself one day. She's lovely;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3wAdRAim4

My wife Candice Swanepoel (she didn't take my last name) is
very secure in our relationship. No suspicions.

The cheating thing, I was asking you. None of this person
to person thing.

You're both very lucky.

Then I didn't understand your question. What do you mean with "At what point does it become cheating?"

If you're in a relationship what would you
consider cheating?

In other words. Where's the line to cross
to where it becomes cheating?

Kind of personal I know. But you usually
give good answers.

I don't have a personal answer to this, in my very young life it still hasn't happened to me.

However it's true that it varies from person to person and new technologies are influencing this area as well, for example there's a great gap between those who consider sexting cheating and those who consider as cheating sexual exchanges through phone conversations and video.

There's a incredibly slight cultural difference however between men and women in what they consider cheating, and it is that men are usually a little more sensitive to sexual cheating and women are a little more sensitive toward emotional cheating. Like, would it be worse to hear that your significant other has had sex with another men/woman or that s/he has fallen in love with someone else, and thus isn't in love with you anymore? And obviously there are also those cases in which it's both of them. Obviously both men and women suffer the same in both cases but our culture enables this small gap.

Personally I think the cheating starts with the first lie. For example, from a clinical point of view, a typical scenario could be: a man/woman meets someone that likes them, is clearly interested in them and strokes their ego. Obviously nothing happens but having some light and fun conversation, and the other person may even be informed of the fact that they already are in a relationship, so the man/woman think "This is good. I'm not doing anything bad but having some innocent fun so it's not necessary to stop". Their significant other may be jealous, so they may not find necessary to tell him/her of their new acquaintance, after all they're not doing anyhting bad and it would only uselessly worry their partner; in fact it may be even seem to the man/woman that they're hiding it to do a favour to their significant other.
And that's how auto-justification strikes. It's a thin line then to cross over. At that point it isn't really cheating but when a person enables himself/herself so much it's almost impossible to go back. That's the first step.

You have beautiful i's

Stop your flirting. I don't want Candice jealous.

I didn't realize you were so young.

I hope this comes as a complement, but you write older
than your years. Whatever year that is.

I think, speaking as a man that one type of cheating hurts
the ego. The other type hurts the heart.

Yes, actually I'm like an old woman inside the body of a girl of twenty-cough. I like generally passing the time napping, reading and sipping tea or infusions while judging others.

If you're coughing at twenty (something) wait until
you hit thirty.

That Italian way of life sounds good. But you might
want to read The Little Red Hen. Just make sure it's
the one illustrated by J.P. Miller.

I know it's meant to point out ironically Trump making a point of loyalty, but I remember thinking back when there was all this news and investigations of Bill Clinton's dumb affairs with women that I really only care if someone can do their job. Short of breaking a law I really could care not at all about politicians' personal lives or the airing of these things either as positives or negatives. I don't think less of Trump for having three marriages or more of someone else for having one or none. I don't want personalities for me to like or to love or to hate... I just want someone who can do the job and says they will do it the ways I most think are best. Then again I never watch stuff like TMZ or buy People magazine etc.

Just some thoughts sparked here. If outsiders are fashionable I have never felt more like one.

:woohoo:

I agree with you but on another note a politician personal life does tells something about how he does his job. Would it really be OK for a president to be an excellent president but in his private life he is an alcoholic/drug addicted/sex addicted/serial gambler etc? More than enything would a thing like this even be possible?
Even a "light" mistake like that of Clinton could have make him corruptible, and a president shouldn't be of all things corruptible.
But here I'm even not talking about mistakes, those are human, I'm talking about ways of life that condition and in turn are conditioned by one's work. We have someone that changes wife to the new model after a certain number of years and talks about loyalty and values. Inserted in his overall boasting, superficial, histrionic, susceptible, moody, exploiting, envious personality this paint someone that is ill-suited to such a power position.

Yes, you're right there... people can be blackmailed by personal affairs.

while he is enjoying his 3rd wife there are Americans who were just given the right to their 1st ans his lovely running mate wants to take that away # Christian Love !

you democrats have your own problems. so instead of picking on someone since they have been married three times (even though your nominees husband raped MANY women and was even impeached because of the lewinsky scandal).

Oh come on, don't be such an idiot.
I truly hope America will one day look back on this campaign as a shameful period.
By the way, Trump has been accused of rape on several occasions I believe.
Hillary Clinton hasn't to the best of my knowledge.

i'm an idiot? seriously?

how many times does Hillary have to break the god damn law until you finally realize she's corrupt.

Also JFK and Schwarzenegger have been accused numerous times of rape and sexual harassment.

It's a very idiotic thing to say.
There is one allegation of rape involving Bill Clinton from the 1970's that was never followed up through the courts. Whether he is guilty or not, I have no idea. It is not something that has ever been proved one way or the other. To say he has raped 'many' women is pretty awful. It's even more awful the Republican party has been selling 'RAPE' T-shirts at the convention- gutter politics. To my knowledge the Democratic party has never brought up the fact Trump has been accused of rape 3 times (once by a previous wife and once by a 13 year old girl). Bill Clinton is not standing for election- Hillary Clinton is. In fact I'd go as far as to call it disgusting. I cant believe its even allowed. In the UK somebody would be arrested for slander. Dont get caught up with this increasingly desperate Trump bid. America will one day look back in shame- on the world stage it really looks bad.