Fleetwood Mac's Big Reunion: Rolling Stone
 

[It's not available yet, but Rolling Stone's cover for next month mentions "Fleetwood Mac's Big Reunion" as being among the contents.]

https://tv.yahoo.com/news/rolling-st...235538478.html

http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/n...stone-20140408

They should've been ON the cover instead of inside tbh

Rolling Stone Cover
 

I think Christine McVie likes the idea of Louis-Dreyfus on the front cover. She always said that she loves to watch Seinfeld when it was running and she said she watched all of the shows. I believe it might seem like a good omen for her that Fleetwood Mac big reunion article is also mentioned with Louis-Dreyfus cover picture, bet you she had a smile on her face when she saw it.

I never knew she liked Seinfeld.

I could have bet money they would have been on the cover. Instead we get Julia Louis Druyfus. Really?

Rolling Stone is supposed to be about music. We know their taste is horrible. They are trying to be politcal, which they should not. Fleetwood Mac should be on the cover. Plain and simple.

Rolling Stone isn't "supposed" to be about anything -- it can be about whatever the publishers want it to be, and if that changes over time from music to something else, well, it's their magazine. The public is free to buy or not buy it. Also, while they do often take political stands, the Julia Louis-Dreyfuss issue is not one of them.

Why should FM be "On The Cover Of The Rolling Stone"(think of the song) at this point in time when they haven't done anything other than announce that Christine has returned? When and if a new record comes out and it sells like hotcakes or receives critical acclaim then RS should put FM on the cover...

I agree. Well, I don't think the album has to sell like hotcakes. But I do think they deserve to make the cover when they have a new album. Yes, Christine's return is news, but that's all the news they have. They just came off a tour. That's not news. So, until they have done something that's worthy of a cover, or as my beloved Elaine would say "sponge-worthy," then No Cover For You.

Michele

exactly! i was just thinking the same while reading those posts saying they should be on the cover. what for? being a consistent nostalgia act for the last several decades? being good as selling themselves as "legendary" lately? not having any new music out since 2003? that's more than a decade ago!!

yup!

My RS subscription just lapsed .

I cant recall when was the last issue that FM was on the cover.Old age settling in.LOL......


Maybe Mac should do a cover of this tune by Dr Hook.LOL..............

They were on the cover for the Dance reunion.

The Dance reunion came with a new (albeit live) album / dvd. And also at a point when none of the songwriters had toured with the band for some time.

Also it was more of a true reunion...Mick broke up the Time band and Buckingham/Nicks returned...

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y17...ps30d837a4.jpg

Here it is, in a blown-up poster version that's currently hanging on my wall. (Bought it off EBay) :)

Duh.Thanks Yes.I should remember .I have several copies of that issue.

Besides his real estate deals, it was the worst decision he's made in regards to Fleetwood Mac. They immediately went from a band that was basically starting over, to an overpriced nostalgia act.

As I said in 1997, Fleetwood Mac is dead...long live Fleetwood Mac.

Yep...The "Rumours" curse strikes again...

I disagree with you guys. I said before that I'm a Rumours era purist. Although, I sometimes listen to their pre Buckingham/Nicks stuff, but nothing post Tango.

I'm a Fleetwood Mac purist, I rarely listen to anything that IS Rumours era :lol:

They shouldn't be on the cover yet, but hopefully they will have a reason to be soon. And Rolling Stone has always been political.

I don't think they had anything left in them trying to keep moving forward after Time. They were already a nostalgia act in 1995 except not a good one because they didn't have any of the original singers of the songs they were playing.

Now they're the greatest Fleetwood Mac tribute band ever:nod:

Fleetwood Mac is those five people, John, Mick, Christine, Stevie, and Lindsey are the original lineup, not technically, but they are the classic lineup.

I have no interest in anything after Tango in the Night, except for The Dance.

Hmm...you miss so much, the brilliance of Vito and Burnette, the developing voice of Ms Bramlett and the great Lindsey tracks on Say You Will. The Dance is an over-rated piece of trash though :)

[There's no bridges burning, it's just a soul crying. With this tour money, Lindsey will finally be able to get the help he needs]

http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...psaa731625.jpg

lol, i was looking where a soul is crying in the text. but nah, still just bridges burning. :laugh:

That bad? :laugh:

Yeah, I was paraphrasing a Stevie Nicks lyric about fire burning. The soul crying is from her.

Michele

anyone know when this article will be available online?