![]() |
Lindsey's thoughts on BN on cd...
From 2007......
Gazette: OK. So the last thing I want to ask ... I have to strike a blow for the collectors here because so many ... Buckingham: (Laughs) It's the Buckingham Nicks collection, isn't it? Gazette: You got it. Everybody's always asking. Are there any plans to issue this thing on CD? Buckingham: You know, my answer is always yes. And I believe that that's a truthful answer. It's the best answer I can give, but it's also a situation which is symptomatic of one of the things that can be wrong with Fleetwood Mac, or certainly with Stevie's and my situation. We can't always get things on the same page or get organized. There's a certain inertia to that and there's kind of a sense of well, when is it going to make sense to do it? Or is it ever going to make sense to do it? So I don't know. I have to say yes, but I don't know. Call up Stevie's people and ask 'em. (Laughs). Full article: http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazet...3-2efbd2879f45 |
I wish they will stop bickering and release the dam thing before its to late.
|
It reeks of apathy, and it's insult to the long-time devoted fans who have given them a very cushy life. To prep the album would take minor effort/cost, and it would mean so much to their fans. In the vast amount of time between albums, you think they would have re-released it. But they are being very snotty about it.
Perhaps social media can push them into releasing it: a twitter campaign, a facebook page, etc. We can shame them into it. |
Quote:
|
Well I wish they'd get a wiggle on - no one's getting any younger!
|
Honestly, these two...
I would love to sit them down in a room together to talk this ish out- I'll mediate- and everyone will be happy with the outcome. I mean, they're both on the same page, it can't be that difficult. Or can it??? |
Quote:
Seriously though, the whole Buckingham Nicks CD Release thing has just turned into a giant "It's not me, it's him/her!" flip flop thing between the two of them, they need to get a grip :laugh: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9khzunz3hn8cj |
Thanks for B&N downloads... much appreciated:thumbsup:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only point of an official CD release of that material is if it's not just that material. They could make a decent package of bonus tracks, alt versions, demos and rareties, with good liner notes and pics etc. That would be worth it, but otherwise, I have no idea why people clamour for a CD. Those particular vinyl rips are excellent. As to why it doesn't happen? I have a hunch that Stevie is the block for two reasons. One is the cover. I think she doesn't want to field questions about posing topless, or backhanded compliments about how great she looked (past tense), and have her judgement as a young woman in the '70s music business questioned from the perspective of the present day. Sure, they could change the cover, but then people would probably talk about the original one even more! The other reason is that, with the exception of the always-tenuous FM, the BN album is the great Unfinished Business between her and LB. And if they deal with that, then they really are 'done'. And I don't think Stevie will ever want to be truly done with LB!:lol::lol: Loz |
Quote:
I do agree that any reissue is pointless, even with a tour, if they don't throw in other songs. I want "Without You", "Farewell Failure", "Sorcerer", etc. on a second CD in the same set. What I do NOT want (but fear) is the sort of stuff we got with some of the FM reissues. I do not want a reissued BN with a couple of scaled down/unfinished/alternate versions of songs we already know and like better in current form. - Jake |
Quote:
Sorry I'm not buying that. There are plenty of other Buckingham Nicks pictures that could be used as an alternate cover if they could be bothered actually putting it out. |
Quote:
|
I just think they BOTH don't want to go back there while they are Both still releasing new music. It would kind of be a distraction and possibly interfere with sales of the current CDs. They might do it when they "retire" and need some dough for a world cruise.;)
|
I think they're waiting until they're done with everything else, if that makes sense, so that can be their last hoorah, so to speak. Coming full circle and ending things how they began. We all know how Lindsey loves his cycles.
Could just be wishful thinking though. |
Stevie recently said that Keith Olsen is also a "co-owner" and so they have to reach some sort of agreement with him to re-release it. She says it will happen.
|
Has anyone gotten Stevie to autograph the cover of BN? My friend and I caught up with her at the Oprah taping and she wouldn't do it.
:shrug: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sorry. I didn't mean that to sound as if I was having a go at you. I actually agree with you and think that Stevie may well give that as an actual reason and if she does then I wouldn't accept it as a reason from her. |
The moment they officially remaster and re-release Buckingham Nicks on CD is the moment the cult of this record diminishes or dies. Do they really want BN to lose its novelty and mystique?? Most everyone who loves or cares about this record has a digital rip of it from some source (the links jeffd8382 provided in this thread are superior and highly recommended - thanks Jeff!) So yeah, they would have to put out a special package (with extras) of some sort if it were to be released, and that would take some effort and agreement from all camps involved. A label & distribution deal would have to be secured, which obviously is more challenging these days. IDK, it feels to me that the opportunity has sorta passed. I'll be happy, but shocked if the day actually comes. With CD sales in steep decline, remasters are becoming even more of a rarity and more like a liability for labels unless there is great demand & great possibility for a decent profit:cool:
|
Sadly, it's going to take one of them leaving this plane of existence before that'll be officially released.
|
Quote:
I agree with you though on the mystique dieing if they release BN. I wonder though if part of their feelings are; "Well...... (gotta get a Stevie well in there) if it didn't sell back in the day why would we want to release it now?" Meaning if it wasn't good enough then to be appreciated and sell why now when their fame would be the main factor for it selling and back to what you said about the mystique. If you read between their lines they both are skating around the answers to questions about it. And, sadly, it may very well mean both of them passing over before it comes out.....unless it's tied up in wills....but you know someone is invariably going to get greedy and want money from releasing it. |
Quote:
|
OK I do love these two but they are beginning to frustrate me in terms of this record. Everytime I see an interview with them about this they always blame it not coming out on the other one ;)! I have heard all of the Buckingham Nicks songs thanks to some people on this board ;) and youtube and am kind of in love with them:nod:! Now if they did what you said (adding extra songs and what not) there's a chance that many people would buy it. Especially those that really have only heard of the record but not actually have heard it, if that makes sense. or people who only listened to the album back when it was first released might see it, and pick it up for nostalgia reasons. And I'm more than sure that if they sell it people are going to see their two names and faces on the cover, know who they are and want to check out the album. Which would help boost sales. I don't know :shrug:. I guess I'm just trying to remain positive because I really, really, really want this album to come out.
|
Ok, my question is, why bother with paying for it when there are EXCELLENT versions out in Webweb land to download for free...INCLUDING the unused demos, live tracks, etc?
YOU HAVE the Buckingham Nicks album available to you already, why would you WISH to give up your hard earned cash for it? If you "need" to hold it in your hands, burn it to disc...use somebody's "light scribe" to etch artwork onto the disc itself...use a jewel case labelling software to recreate the album artwork. It's a "DIY" world now. The reason Lindsey & Stevie DON'T release it is that for all intents, it HAS been released...those who want/wanted it, HAVE IT. They don't have to invest (read: risk) their own money 1) to recreate the artwork for a CD package, 2)compile/remix/remaster the songs, 3) find a label to distribute it....THEN have to track its sales. They'd be losing money in the long run. It's more financially sound to NOT release it. And, from what I've read, the original multi-track master tapes of the album are in seriously bad shape...from what Keith Olsen has said, they'd only survive one or two runs (IF that) through the tape machine and they'd be destroyed. |
The real reason: the cover.
Stevie probably wants her frilly blouse airbrushed on. Lindsey's probably yammering about art (although he wouldn't mind airbrushing the slight man boobs). I have the album cover as part of my living room decor. People think (rightly so) that I'm a bit... touched. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:laugh::laugh: |
Stevie even said on Ellen that it's hard to sell a CD these days. It's been out there in bootleg format, so it's not like people couldn't have an official looking CD in that format. And if they make it as an iTunes/Amazon download only project it won't be any different from what we already have. It's seriously a project that just won't make a profit these days. Imagine someone asking you to go to work on your day off and spend your time re-writing an old document that would require hours of work and effort all to have very little payout in the end. Would you be thrilled to do it? I mean, sure I'd buy it just to have it but it would sit on my shelf practically untouched (right next to my LP of it) because the music is already on my iPod.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
in my dreams
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There would be no point in releasing the CD unless, as others have stated, there was some sort of special package along with it. Demos, live recordings, something. Just putting it out on CD as-is is kind of futile. And even then, I think the suggestion of the Soundstage-esque DVD/CD combo would be the most plausable and appealing option.
If they don't plan on doing something special with it ever, then I don't see why they couldn't just release it on iTunes. At least that way it is easily and officially available to the public (as in, people who may not know of it and/or haven't taken the time to seek a downlaod of it already) AND they can make money from it. |
Quote:
- Jake |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved