![]() |
Lindsay Lohan
Well, I thought someone would start a thread about her, about how she's supposed to go to jail for 90 days. I don't think she's going to serve the whole 90 days. I actually felt sort of sorry for her when she was there crying, but I hope any time in jail will help her realize that she needs help. Maybe she'll straighten out now.:shrug:
Lee :( |
She had f*ck u written on one of her nails. Doubt it. :shrug:
|
I felt sorry for her until it dawned on me -- she's.an.actress.
|
lindsay is a complete moron~ what does she expect?~ her crying in front of the judge lying that she thought she was in compliance made me giggle~
then showing up w/ F U on her nails & did ya notice she kept using that finger to wipe under her eye? does she think we are as dumb as she is?~ i am glad she is going to jail & rehab~ she needs to before she kills herself or someone else~ she obviously hasn't learned anything from the situation, even after being given many chances~ she's not that old & she looks so aged it's pathetic~ & seriously what career?, i mean lately, WTF has she been doing besides partying?~ she is a far cry from the girl i thought was so good in 'mean girls'~ also isn't there some big birthday bash scheduled for her in some big nightclub, is she going to show?~ i'd hope for her sake not, but she isn't following a smart road right now~ i don't buy the whole "this is awake-up call for me" BS she was spewing~ she got caught & spoiled little girl wanted her way once again~ kudos to the judge~ tho i don't see it happening, i don't think lindsanity has reached her rock bottom, i do hope this does wake her up~ i mean look what jail did for robert downey jr?, it can be done~ |
I'd be suprised if she serves more than 10 days.
|
Quote:
|
It doesn't matter, let's not pretend she's going to ~learn~ from this...
|
The sentence was too harsh.
|
Quote:
sadly the sentence was too light~ |
At least she got a jury of her peers.
The bad news? They were all Stevie Nicks fans. http://www.mtv.com/shared/promoimage...10/281x211.jpg |
Quote:
|
She's not gonna learn anything, and one day they'll find her dead in her bathroom. Sad but probably true.
Mick |
Quote:
still her sentence wasn't too light IMO~ |
I think she needs to serve time for the repeated dui's, but I will never understand this country's obsession with filling our prisons with nonviolent drug offenders. I have no interest in my tax money going to punish you into "recovery." Let Lindsay live her life. As long as she isn't hurting anyone (and again, I did say she should serve for the dui's), who really cares how she spends her free time? She has the money for recovery. If she wants it, she'll get it. If she doesn't, she won't. Either way, it's her life and her choice.
|
Quote:
if she's a big girl & can handle her alcohol & drugs as she'd have us believe, then take responsibility like a big girl when you get caught~ |
Quote:
The lying about drug related offenses doesn't bother me, though. It's a stupid law. Sure, she countered it with equally stupid lies, but why quiety comply with idiot policy if you think you have a shot at getting out of it? Owning your actions if you've committed a crime like theft is one thing. It shows integrity. Owning your actions when you've committed a crime that shouldn't be called such? Eh. :shrug: |
^ i disagree. everyone is aware that drug use is illegal, even if it is a stupid law. when you engage in illegal behavior, you have to be willing to face the consequences, even if you think it's stupid & that you could get out of it.
|
^ i love bad blood. :cool:
|
Quote:
i've been on a binge lately. watched all of season 5 and some of 6 in the last week and a half. and other selected greatest hits from the earlier seasons. and requiem, of course. :rolleyes: |
I'm not saying she shouldn't do the time as the law stands now, though. Just that her lies aren't...upsetting to my intrinsic values. I understand where you're coming from that even if you engage in civil disobedience, you should understand and accept how it might end. I admire people who believe that. I just don't :laugh: I hold my own moral code higher than my country's. If I don't believe I deserve punishment for what I've done, I'm going to do my best to avoid that punishment.
|
Quote:
aaah, requiem. one of the best eps, except for the last 5 minutes. |
Quote:
and i am a sucker for the last 5 minutes of requiem. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: yes, i make myself sick. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
yes, this is important. |
Quote:
i like that there's more floof in season 5. i agree, though, that season 7 was a f*cking travesty. |
Quote:
'Spoiled actress' or not, she really got effed over, by her advisers, her doctors, and her attorney (who I think looked on the verge of laughter). I still believe LL's constitutional rights have been violated by her twice being forced to wear a Scram bracelet, becoming essentially a poster girl for it, when there has been no documented testing of the device, except for by the manufacturer of Scram, who admit that it does have glitches that need to be worked out. It's not illegal to drink alcohol. 3 years ago, she should have paid a steep fine, perhaps had her license revoked, and/or been placed in a 28 day sobriety program. Instead, she was set up to fail by a too-long probation and she got sicker, though she's been under medical care for a long time. 90 days jail time* plus 90 days in rehab immediately after serving her sentence means that she is all but locked up until next year. She just turned 24 years old, and the thought of what she faces in the next six months is scary, not only the confinement, but the detox and withdrawals are awful. * I agree she will only serve a fraction of the 90 days in jail, but I still think it's all so wrong. I think a good lawyer would and could have an order for that SCRAM bracelet to be off of her tomorrow, and use the time she was forced to wear it (twice) as time where her personal freedom and or constitutional rights were denied her, and it should be applied to her upcoming jail sentence, negating it. The judge made a name for herself in this case, yet it's tough because she also could have made a name for herself as someone who was bought off and/or smitten with celebrity. What has happened is that justice has not been served and the young woman is in more danger now than ever. Her state of mind (this is an ill person) and concept of time (6 months seems like 6 years at that age) makes this, to me, a really sad case of 'celebrity' actually being used against a person who is not a hardened criminal, but a struggling and vulnerable young girl. |
Quote:
can't beat that. but hey, to each their own. :cool: |
Quote:
speaking of crazy ... i went to the OS the other day. :shocked: |
what?!?! that place still exists?! :laugh:
what the f were you thinking? |
Quote:
|
Let me elaborate - I agree that people need to have consequences for their actions but in Lindsay's case, the punishment does not fit the crime. By that I mean do people really think 90 days of jail time and mandatory rehab is going to "fix" Lindsay and/or teach her a lesson? A person really cannot be helped or change until they truly want to and are ready to surrender. I do not believe Lindsay is at that point (but couldn't say for sure obviously). I agree she should serve some jail time and maybe she'll "learn" a few things about herself in rehab but nothing will change until Lindsay is ready and willing.
|
I don't think she is going to learn anything or change her lifestyle in any way, regardless of the punishment. You can tell that she sees herself as the victim and is in no way taking responsibility for any of her choices. Until she does at least those 2 things, nothing will change.
|
Quote:
"Fault" is not a word that would be used if LL had cancer. She has a disease, an addiction to prescription drugs, which is not her 'fault'. It's not her doctors' fault, either, but there are indications that the medications only worsened her condition, perhaps due to alcohol or illegal drugs. Another disease or two, there. But, at the root of her troubles seem to be the dependency on 2 particular drugs, which she may need to be on for the rest of her life. Hire her a driver, take away her license, but the jail time is unwarranted for reasons I listed in my previous message. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I feel sorry for her, for many reasons. Mostly because I think she is a person who genuinely needs help. 90 days in jail? pointless, stupid, stupid, and harsh. 90 days in rehab? yes, appropriate, helpful.
Edit: Actually, the more I think about it, what she needs most is a true support system. In order for a user to completely recover, they must get rid of everything that reminds them of whatever they were using, or their past life, etc, etc. |
The more I'm reading, I think I do have to make an amendment to my opinion that her problems are not her doctors "fault"-- She is so overmedicated right now, if the list on TMZ is accurate-- dilaudid??? From her dentist?
I've long thought she is an opiate addict, which is caused by a clinical low-grade depression, for which there is no cure. If you have it, you have it, and usual anti-depressants have absolutely no chance of working, so her being on Zoloft is useless. Likely, the adderall is just as much to get her out of bed than it is for ADHD, and the adderall doesn't seem to be a problem. It's helpful and no fun if misused. She'd previously been on oxycodone and percocet, both opiates, which seem to have been discontinued, as she likely couldn't take only the prescribed dosage. The shrink(s) saw that she 'could' ( I assume) 'handle' the other drugs- i.e., take them as directed. The opitates she had trouble with. So she had some dental work and got a prescription for Dilaudid, such a powerful opiate that likely she won't be able to abuse it. Her shrinks need to determine if she indeed does have the 'low grade clinical depression' which explains why her brain needs opiates- in persons with the low grade clinical depression, the craving for opiates is that it gives the brain a sense of well-being that most people have, naturally. It's complicated, and a very serious neurological disorder. There's an excellent web site about the stigma that opiate dependency has, because 'you' feel like it's your fault, but the medical fact is that the brain of the person with clinical low-grade depression suffers from damaged opiate receptors, which causes all kinds of problems, and low grade clinical depression is still largely going undiagnosed. ( I had been on 5 anti-depressants, including Prozac, Zoloft, Effexor and Cymbalta, with no results, wasting more than a year, before I got diagnosed correctly). So, yes, I know about all of this from first hand experience. I decided 17 days ago when I ran out of my Percocet 2 weeks early, that I was going to quit after 7 years on the drug. The withdrawal was intense, really bad. My doctor put me on a new drug called Suboxone- which I took for 3 days, then against my doc's advice, stopped. I was dehydrated and so ill, and so depressed, and felt worse than I've ever felt in my life. If you really hate someone, tell them to take Suboxone. It is used to treat opiate dependency, but it was far too strong for me and after the third day, I was supposed to increase my dosage by 300% and I knew my body couldn't take it. Basically, I threw away $400+ dollars between my consultation and filling the prescription for the drug from Hell. I'm in my 4os. You trust your doctors, generally. But I knew the suboxone was either going to kill me, or I'd face a horrible detox from it months from now, so I bypassed my doctor, talked to 2 pharmacists, and they told me 'your body can't tolerate it, get off it now' and I did. And I feel a million times better. Of course, I stand a good chance at a relapse into percocet dependency, I was on 10mgs a day, 3 times a day, for more than 7 years. But right now, I feel good and don't want to see another opiate again in my life, I'll just 'deal' with the low grade clinical depression. Just having turned 46, I was ready. LL is just turning 24 now, and see, all these medications are just too much for a small woman's body. Or for a man's larger body. I am still on the Adderall (has never been a problem) and a small-ish dosage of Xanax, and that's plenty. 17 days without one Opiate after 2700 days of 30 mg a day. I'm amazed. I don't feel 'great' but I feel good about it. See, in my 40s, I was 'ready' finally to say 'this is bull**** and no way to live'. Even last year, the thought of running out of my opiates put me into such panic, I'd overmedicate. One builds up a tolerance quite quickly, and I was trying very hard to take the meds as directed. For Lindsay Lohan, I feel very bad. She'd been following doctors orders to the best of her ability, and the drugs she is allowed to take does not set off that misbegottenly-ordered Scram Bracelet and she is not a criminal, she is ill. Likely, she's been misdiagnosed and is way, way, overmedicated is my best guess, and I admit that it is a guess. But those are serious meds she is on, five of them. The opiate craving is the giveaway- low grade clinical depression, which in many or most cases, those of us who have it , have had it since childhood. Her doctors seem to have missed even considering the possibility, or they wouldn't have her on the Zoloft, which is doing nothing. I know the look of being on too many opiates. I had the look. The girl is sick. Ok, young woman. And the assholes are sending her to jail, when they should be looking closely at 'diminished capacity' due to the long laundry-list of drugs her doctors have had her on since she was a teenager. And her wearing the Scram bracelet, which allowed her to register 'clean' while under the influence of a synthetic morphine--- was, I believe, a violation of her legal rights and it needs to be removed, and all the time she wore the Scram bracelet needs to be credited towards her jail sentence. LL has been in a prison already, for a long time, and the more I read, the more I think her doctors have been the biggest enablers of all. The lawyer should have had all her medications documented and the possibility (ha!) that she is being gravely overmedicated has every bearing on whether or not she was able to comply or 'show up' for certain obligations. |
This is all starting to sound like a rerun of the Stevie Nicks - Klonipin saga.
This is really a simple matter. Lindsay Lohan had two DUI's and a drug conviction. She avoided jail the first time around by accepting probation. She has violated the terms of probation by repeatedly skipping out on appointments. Probation was thus revoked. She is not a victim. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think she is a victim. You think she isn't. I don't see how she had the mental capacity to accept or even understand the terms of the probation. Charlie Sheen, well into his 40s, turned down a probation deal with no jail time served for his current domestic violence charges. He'd rather do time in jail than be forced to endure random drug and alcohol screening for years. He knows himself well, I guess. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved