![]() |
Stevie's Lesbian Twin Sister
Carrie is going to have to put some old towels on her chair. Sorry about the load times, but Imageshack could suck the Amazon River dry right now.
http://i4.tinypic.com/44tprvl.jpg http://i14.tinypic.com/2il1zyg.jpg http://i4.tinypic.com/2ur1ci8.jpg http://i18.tinypic.com/4hvuo9k.jpg http://i2.tinypic.com/2ia7uqh.jpg http://i2.tinypic.com/47j41za.jpg http://i1.tinypic.com/2ds44r7.jpg http://i13.tinypic.com/2u8gg1x.jpg |
Thanks for the pics! A few I haven't seen before. :wavey:
|
The Boots, THE BOOTS!!
Thank you! :xoxo: |
The woman w/ the scarf tied around her head is Margi Kent.
Mary's got a blow-up doll look about her, doesn't she? :D |
Here is a previous thread about Mary. It includes some screen shots on page 2 that I made.
http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showth...eferrerid=1277 |
i should've heeded your warning.
time to get out the wet/dry vac. :cool: thanks for the pics. they're awesome. :thumbsup: |
Quote:
wow. just wow. |
Quote:
looking at these pics again it amazes me how perfect Stevie's face and features are and how I wish all this was going on in today's time when we could really revel in all these pictures and concerts and albums. c'est la vie. |
Wow, that lady in those photos is kind of scary looking....I'm really not trying to be mean, but.....I think it's her eyes....anyways, it doesn't help that Stevie's sitting next to her, looking delicate and as always, absolutely gorgeous.......
|
Quote:
*edited as to no offend certain groups of the population |
Quote:
|
The ones where they're all 80's-ed out (Stevie's collar turned up!) are a hoot! Thanks!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I love these pics. I haven't seen them before. Stevie is soooo beautiful
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^^^^^
No offense, but it's kind of weird how you keep bringing out old threads, just to say nothing in them. I mean, I just don't get it. I'm not the boss of you or anything, and I like posting as much, or more, as the next person, but it's usually because I have something else to say about the subject. I don't really post that much just to agree with someone, or say how rad their post was. Sometimes, sure, b/c some **** is just too funny or insightful to let pass by without a hearty kudos/laughie emoticon. But if I were to resurrect an old thread, I'd have to have a good reason. Like, something of substance to add to it, for instance. So, tell us, why do you do that? Why are you doing it now with the old threads? I keep thinking it is because you might have a very important opinion to share with us, with points, and thoughts, and things to be considered that we haven't thought of - or maybe even a good joke. So then I click on the thread. And goodness knows I'm all for recycling, and not starting a new thread if there is an old thread on the exact same subject - but - But then when I look at the old thread you resurrected, and what you said, none of that is in evidence. There's no new thoughts or different points or fresh info or funny jokes. :confused: I'm not mad at you, or trying to insult you, I'm just curious why you are doing that, bringing up the old threads without adding anything to them. It seems strange to me. :confused: |
Does anyone have a clearer version of the 2nd to last pic? I love Stevie's pose and facial expression in that shot.
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
luv, Shel |
Quote:
|
The funny thing about that particular pic is that this session was from 25 or so years ago, yet, in that pic, that is almost exactly what Stevie looks like now, and it looks like it was taken around the TISL era.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved