The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Rumours (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Is a 2007 tour a sure thing? (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=28450)

jannieC 08-27-2006 10:30 AM

Is a 2007 tour a sure thing?
 
I may have missed where this was discussed, but are we certain that FM is doing a 2007 tour or is it only speculation?

joe 08-27-2006 12:09 PM

i'm pretty sure it's speculation. i think john may have hinted at something in his q&a. but with lindsey's upcoming solo projects and mick's reforming of the zoo, i really doubt anything will happen next year as a collective fm tour.

the question should be regarding the "electric" version of Lindsey's. Is it actually done? I think I recall it wasn't quite finished. Maybe he said it was 3/4 done (too lazy to reread numerous posts on LB board). Gee, could that missing 1/4 be Stevie? In other words, will this electric album morph into a FM album? Yes, it could. AND...who is playing bass and drums on that record? If it aint mcvie/fleetwood then i doubt it will morph into a fm album.

Kelly 08-27-2006 01:01 PM

Stevie has told fans about it, too. I think she told a fan from this board that FM was probably coming back to Oz next year as well. I read a review from a fan who attended a Petty show and met Stevie backstage over on Seven Wonders and Stevie did say that the FM tour next year was a "farewell" tour. Jana and Taku have both been asked about an upcoming FM tour and one or both said rehearsals were starting early next year. (January) I am sure stuff could change but I don't think Lindsey's supposed electric cd will change any scheduled FM tour. He could even use the platform to do some of his new solo songs. (didn't Tom Petty just do that? Don't the Eagles do that?) I am sure Mick wants to milk the anniversary. :rolleyes:

HomerMcvie 08-27-2006 01:27 PM

But really, don't only the diehards care about it being the 40th Anniversary?

I HOPE they'll do something special.....but instead they'll just tour to support Rumours again.:shocked:

UnwindedDreams 08-27-2006 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerMcvie (Post 565301)
But really, don't only the diehards care about it being the 40th Anniversary?

I HOPE they'll do something special.....but instead they'll just tour to support Rumours again.:shocked:

Anything they do is perfectly fine...I'm just so happy they're coming back:nod: :woohoo:

SteveMacD 08-27-2006 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe (Post 565279)
i'm pretty sure it's speculation. i think john may have hinted at something in his q&a. but with lindsey's upcoming solo projects and mick's reforming of the zoo, i really doubt anything will happen next year as a collective fm tour.

Well the Zoo (now just called the Mick Fleetwood Band) is just a casual thing. Billy Burnette and George Hawkins are currently touring with John Fogerty, so I doubt it would be something that would stop a Fleetwood Mac tour. But, in an interview made during the Mick Fleetwood Band rehearsals, Mick said that there would be a Fleetwood Mac tour in 2007. Given comments by John and Stevie, I would say that a Fleetwood Mac tour in 2007 isn't speculation at this point.

What is speculation is what type of tour it will be. I think if it's a farewell tour or a 40th Anniversary tour, it would have to be pretty different from the last two tours. I know Stevie has said that it's going to be a farewell tour, but I don't know if Mick and John are ready for that, yet. It'll be interesting to see what happens in the next year or so.

UnwindedDreams 08-27-2006 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveMacD (Post 565307)
Well the Zoo (now just called the Mick Fleetwood Band) is just a casual thing. Billy Burnette and George Hawkins are currently touring with John Fogerty, so I doubt it would be something that would stop a Fleetwood Mac tour. But, in an interview made during the Mick Fleetwood Band rehearsals, Mick said that there would be a Fleetwood Mac tour in 2007. Given comments by John and Stevie, I would say that a Fleetwood Mac tour in 2007 isn't speculation at this point.

What is speculation is what type of tour it will be. I think if it's a farewell tour or a 40th Anniversary tour, it would have to be pretty different from the last two tours. I know Stevie has said that it's going to be a farewell tour, but I don't know if Mick and John are ready for that, yet. It'll be interesting to see what happens in the next year or so.

off topic...but I love Fogerty...have you seen him live...he's INCREDIBLE!!!

SteveMacD 08-27-2006 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnwindedDreams (Post 565309)
off topic...but I love Fogerty...have you seen him live...he's INCREDIBLE!!!

I wanted to see him a couple of weeks ago (opening for Willie Nelson...now THAT's a ticket!), but I already had tickets to B.B. King.

UnwindedDreams 08-27-2006 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveMacD (Post 565316)
I wanted to see him a couple of weeks ago (opening for Willie Nelson...now THAT's a ticket!), but I already had tickets to B.B. King.

I saw him at the Garden back in September and I was going to se him in AC but I already had tickets to Heart...but Heart was AWESOME!!! How was BB? What's he like 80 now?

Villavic 08-27-2006 09:32 PM

Tours usually follow an album.. and there's no evidence of an upcoming album yet

SteveMacD 08-28-2006 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 565398)
Tours usually follow an album.. and there's no evidence of an upcoming album yet

"Usually" but not always.

chiliD 08-28-2006 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villavic (Post 565398)
Tours usually follow an album.. and there's no evidence of an upcoming album yet

Sure there is. If there's not a NEW album, they'll find SOME reason to re-release Rumours yet again.

UnwindedDreams 08-28-2006 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD (Post 565483)
Sure there is. If there's not a NEW album, they'll find SOME reason to re-release Rumours yet again.

:nod: he's right...

Red 08-29-2006 12:48 AM

So wouldn't that make it the 30th anniversary tour, not the 40th?? Rumours came out the year I was born and, ack!..:eek: I'll be 30 next year.

Gailh 08-29-2006 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerMcvie (Post 565301)
But really, don't only the diehards care about it being the 40th Anniversary?

I HOPE they'll do something special.....but instead they'll just tour to support Rumours again.:shocked:

I don't see the point unless it's going to be a spectacular affair with past members making an appearance.

If it's just another "Greatest Hits" tour so Mick can pay his tax bill then I think I'll pass

Gail

SteveMacD 08-29-2006 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnwindedDreams (Post 565318)
How was BB? What's he like 80 now?

:distress:

He talked so much that I had to leave the show early. There may have been like 20 minutes left, and he had only played about five songs. He told more old man jokes than played the blues.

SteveMacD 08-29-2006 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 565798)
So wouldn't that make it the 30th anniversary tour, not the 40th?? Rumours came out the year I was born and, ack!..:eek: I'll be 30 next year.

The 40th Anniversary is in reference to the band's 40th anniversary, and why a lot of fans want to see a tour with some former members.

chiliD 08-29-2006 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gailh (Post 565815)
I don't see the point unless it's going to be a spectacular affair with past members making an appearance.

If it's just another "Greatest Hits" tour so Mick can pay his tax bill then I think I'll pass

Same here, but THIS TIME, instead of just bitching about it on message boards, I'm going to actually write to Mick via his management company to let him know how I feel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 565798)
So wouldn't that make it the 30th anniversary tour, not the 40th?? Rumours came out the year I was born and, ack!..:eek: I'll be 30 next year.

Hard to conceive that Fleetwood Mac was around for a whole decade with 9 different incarnations before you were born, eh? :shrug: :laugh:

UnwindedDreams 08-29-2006 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveMacD (Post 565821)
:distress:

He talked so much that I had to leave the show early. There may have been like 20 minutes left, and he had only played about five songs. He told more old man jokes than played the blues.

You should've ran to catch some Fogerty:laugh:

HomerMcvie 08-29-2006 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gailh (Post 565815)
I don't see the point unless it's going to be a spectacular affair with past members making an appearance.

If it's just another "Greatest Hits" tour so Mick can pay his tax bill then I think I'll pass

Gail

Mick's all about the money. This'll be another Rumours Geezer Tour. How freakin' pathetic.


gawd, I hope I'm wrong.....

Red 08-29-2006 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD (Post 565824)
Hard to conceive that Fleetwood Mac was around for a whole decade with 9 different incarnations before you were born, eh? :shrug: :laugh:


Oh, you are very funny.:rolleyes: ;)

No, what I meant was, it was my understanding that this was a like Rumours anniversary tour...making it 30 years. But I can always appreciate a lil' sarcasm...:xoxo:

chiliD 08-29-2006 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 565863)
Oh, you are very funny.:rolleyes: ;)

No, what I meant was, it was my understanding that this was a like Rumours anniversary tour...making it 30 years. But I can always appreciate a lil' sarcasm...:xoxo:

But isn't EVERY Fleetwood Mac tour a "Rumours anniversary tour"? By looking at their concert sets since 1982, you'd sure think so.

Red 08-29-2006 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD (Post 565867)
But isn't EVERY Fleetwood Mac tour a "Rumours anniversary tour"? By looking at their concert sets since 1982, you'd sure think so.

Well, you got me there. But try telling them any different. After all, Lindsey likes to play I'm So Afraid, because it's sooo varied and completely different, every single time he plays it live. :rolleyes:

chiliD 08-29-2006 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 565987)
After all, Lindsey likes to play I'm So Afraid, because it's sooo varied and completely different, every single time he plays it live. :rolleyes:

Well, now he's got "Murrow" to play (and he would've had "Tango In The Night" in 1987 had he stayed in the band)...so he can still play the same solo in a different song.

Red 08-30-2006 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD (Post 565992)
Well, now he's got "Murrow" to play (and he would've had "Tango In The Night" in 1987 had he stayed in the band)...so he can still play the same solo in a different song.


I'll take a "new" and "spontaneous version of Murrow any day over the other option, be that as it may.:)

SteveMacD 08-30-2006 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red (Post 566120)
I'll take a "new" and "spontaneous version of Murrow any day over the other option, be that as it may.:)

"Spontaneous" and Lindsey Buckingham :lol:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved