The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Chit Chat (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   New Paris Hilton Photo. (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=17285)

½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ® 12-15-2004 12:33 AM

New Paris Hilton Photo.
 
Look at the all that bush. Very nice indeed. I’d like to get into that thang. That’s some kind of erection in the background too. http://wshoward.com/01234.jpg Feel free to delete this. I had to do it.

ontheEdgeof17 12-15-2004 12:44 AM

:shocked: :shocked: :shocked:

You are one crazy Ledgie.

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 12:51 AM

Not only that - but everyone who has been in Paris Hilton says it is awful and needs some cleaning :cool:

GODDESS6 12-15-2004 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Not only that - but everyone who has been in Paris Hilton says it is awful and needs some cleaning :cool:

OMG!!!!!!!!!!! :eek: ~ rotflmao :eek: !!!!~

77Rumours77 12-15-2004 07:36 AM

Hahahaha
 
OMFG!
I can honestly say I was not expecting that!
LMAO!
Thanks ½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ® What a way to start the morning. :laugh: :thumbsup:

ontheEdgeof17 12-15-2004 09:47 AM

The sad part is that we all looked at it thinking it was a naked lady. :wavey:

estranged4life 12-15-2004 11:58 AM

Ahhh....
 
I was hoping it showed Pari-skank Hilton impaled on a cast iron fence face down after commiting suicide, With 2 metal rods piercing her eye sockets...

Man, That would have made for a great Christmas card too :thumbsup:

Oh Well, A person can always hope...And dream!

Brian j.

½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ® 12-15-2004 01:01 PM

Tee Hee. I got 80 of you and counting LOL. :laugh:

½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ® 12-15-2004 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by estranged4life
I was hoping it showed Pari-skank Hilton impaled on a cast iron fence face down after commiting suicide, With 2 metal rods piercing her eye sockets...

Man, That would have made for a great Christmas card too :thumbsup:

Oh Well, A person can always hope...And dream!

Brian j.

Really! She is one butt ugly skinny looking rich freak isn’t she?

sparky 12-15-2004 01:55 PM

Clever. All I can say is that it is a good thing she has money because she has a face like my foot. Even after all the surgery.

gldstwmn 12-15-2004 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sparky
Clever. All I can say is that it is a good thing she has money because she has a face like my foot. Even after all the surgery.

Bwah! What I want to know is, who bought her the damn car? Does daddy know how precious really earns her living? ;)

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
Bwah! What I want to know is, who bought her the damn car? Does daddy know how precious really earns her living? ;)

I am confident her trust fund(s) are several hundred million PLUS she has access to all Hilton properties including planes, etc. I do not think she needs to do anything. To her credit, she works in the t.v. things and has a clothing (handbags I think ) line. I mean she is not my fav. in the world, but she is a productive member of society at least when compared to other billionairesses :laugh:

The Tower 12-15-2004 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I mean she is not my fav. in the world, but she is a productive member of society at least when compared to other billionairesses :laugh:

Hey, Jason.......

Whatever drugs you are on, couldja please forward some to me? I wanna live in that clueless-blissland of yours, too.

;)

amber 12-15-2004 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ®
Really! She is one butt ugly skinny looking rich freak isn’t she?

She is like the human equivalent of a weird looking overbred (expensive, purebred) dog. Like the whippets, or something.

amber 12-15-2004 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Tower
Hey, Jason.......

Whatever drugs you are on, couldja please forward some to me? I wanna live in that clueless-blissland of yours, too.

;)

I was just gonna say something similar.... :D By being out in public and on TV and such, she's actually a detrimental part of society. Cause she's such a skanky dumbass.....

estranged4life 12-15-2004 03:27 PM

I thought she...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
She is like the human equivalent of a weird looking overbred (expensive, purebred) dog. Like the whippets, or something.

was the female version of Mr.Hankey-The talkin' Christmas Poo, But that would be very insulting to that talented pile of doo...

She needs to be inbredded into the ground...If ya catch my drift :thumbsup:

Brian j.

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Tower
Hey, Jason.......

Whatever drugs you are on, couldja please forward some to me? I wanna live in that clueless-blissland of yours, too.

;)

So - Paris is not working and contributes nothing :shrug: No person has a job because of her, her series, or her clothing line - all of which are silly IMO but they make money :shrug: I think these people with these jobs would accept that reality even though you are being silly and not doing so :wavey: Again, all I am saying is Paris Hilton (ridiculous as she is) chose to take her celebrity and make money off of it - for that she is a contributing member of society. The truth hurts and it obviously hurts you Mr. ostrich head in the sand :laugh: :p :xoxo:

amber 12-15-2004 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
So - Paris is not working and contributes nothing :shrug: No person has a job because of her, her series, or her clothing line - all of which are silly IMO but they make money :shrug: I think these people with these jobs would accept that reality even though you are being silly and not doing so :wavey: Again, all I am saying is Paris Hilton (ridiculous as she is) chose to take her celebrity and make money off of it - for that she is a contributing member of society. The truth hurts and it obviously hurts you Mr. ostrich head in the sand :laugh: :p :xoxo:

That's reaching. She's not doing anything. :shrug: Those people could have other, more worthwile jobs. That's cool if you want to defend rich, dumb people who get to be on TV even though they already have plenty of money and are total morons. Oh, make that a moron who makes fun of people and seemingly doesn't know how to be polite, respectful, or WORK.

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
That's reaching. She's not doing anything. :shrug: Those people could have other, more worthwile jobs. That's cool if you want to defend rich, dumb people who get to be on TV even though they already have plenty of money and are total morons. Oh, make that a moron who makes fun of people and seemingly doesn't know how to be polite, respectful, or WORK.

No - she gets up and gets on the set and acts - even if it is acting like an ass :shrug: Again, those people would not have a job if she did not do that - her popularity is helping sell that show - no two ways about that. I am unsure how you can argue against that - but you have said sillier things :laugh:

AND - I think you should tell all of those people that they "could have other, more worthwile jobs" :rolleyes: Better yet - why don't you find them those jobs :laugh:

GateandGarden 12-15-2004 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
She is like the human equivalent of a weird looking overbred (expensive, purebred) dog. Like the whippets, or something.

You know, I had never thought of that, but that is a perfect analogy! And that dog she carries around is pretty damn ugly, too. (Or does she have more than one?)

I sometimes think that if she dressed in a way that was more...wholesome, and didn't have that perpetual and pathetic "come-hither" look, she might look alright, but I don't know.

Hillary

amber 12-15-2004 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
No - she gets up and gets on the set and acts :shrug: Those people would not have a job if she did not do that. I am unsure how you can argue against that - but you have said sillier things :laugh:

AND - I think you should tell all of those people that they "could have other, more worthwile jobs" :rolleyes: Better yet - why don't you find them those jobs :laugh:

Dude, there would just be some other show they'd get a job on. You know, if that show was not on, there WOULD BE ANOTHER ONE. One that would also provide jobs for whoever worked on it. It's not like they'd have dead air if her show wasn't on. :shrug: Those people would have a job if anyone else got up on the set and acted, too. :shrug: . And as far as "you've said sillier things"? Well, go f*** yourself! You deserve it! :wavey: :)

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Dude, there would just be some other show they'd get a job on. You know, if that show was not on, there WOULD BE ANOTHER ONE. One that would also provide jobs for whoever worked on it. It's not like they'd have dead air if her show wasn't on. :shrug: Those people would have a job if anyone else got up on the set and acted, too. :shrug: . And as far as "you've said sillier things"? Well, go f*** yourself! You deserve it! :wavey: :)

Again, go shut down production - which will cost the jobs of the people on the set, the pre and post production people, the ad people, the people in the towns they are in, the news people, etc. - and find ALL of these people alternate work :laugh: Tell them they are all out of work until you find them better and more suitable work just because you do not like the popular show and hate Paris Hilton because she is rich :rolleyes:

Again, assinine statement and an immature response. But, so be it :wavey:

amber 12-15-2004 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GateandGarden
You know, I had never thought of that, but that is a perfect analogy! And that dog she carries around is pretty damn ugly, too. (Or does she have more than one?)

I sometimes think that if she dressed in a way that was more...wholesome, and didn't have that perpetual and pathetic "come-hither" look, she might look alright, but I don't know.

Hillary

Yeah. I don't really care about how she dresses, but she has no real life in her eyes. She is pretty, it's just in that weird overbred way. And her eyes are strange, to me. Plus, i think she's incredibly rude, thoughtless, and moronic - so that doesn't really make her more attractive in my eyes.

amber 12-15-2004 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Again, go shut down production - which will cost the jobs of the people on the set, the pre and post production people, the ad people, the people in the towns they are in, the news people, etc. - and find ALL of these people alternate work :laugh: Teel them they are all out of work until you find them better and more suitable work just because you do not like the popular show and hate Paris Hilton because she is rich :rolleyes:

Again, assinine statement and an immature response. But, so be it :wavey:

Actually, I thought your statement in defense of Paris was pretty assinine. And you can call me immature, but it still doesn't make you right. :wavey: And, in fact, you called my statement silly first. (ie, you started it)
But, you clearly have some kind of issue with me, (which you've demonstrated repeatedly) so I'll just wave and be on my way. :wavey:
Have a good one. :)

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Actually, I thought your statement in defense of Paris was pretty assinine. And you can call me immature, but it still doesn't make you right. :wavey: And, in fact, you called my statement silly first. (ie, you started it)
But, you clearly have some kind of issue with me, (which you've demonstrated repeatedly) so I'll just wave and be on my way. :wavey:
Have a good one. :)

I have no issue with you and I think you know that. But telling me to **&&^ myself is hardly mature :shrug:

Again, I am just saying the facts, which are that Paris Hilton's stardom is one of the main reasons for the success of that show, which is ongoing. Many people have jobs because of that. Participating in something that is providing jobs is a way of being a contributing member of society. Therefore, Paris Hilton is a contributing member of society, which, as I originally stated, seemingly separates her from many people like her, who do no work. I may not like her, but I cannot take that away from her - she is working. You, on the other hand, are willing to overlook the fact that she works and just want to slam her. So, go right on ahead - be my guest and do so - even though you are just wrong for doing it.

GateandGarden 12-15-2004 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I am unsure how you can argue against that - but you have said sillier things :laugh:

Ummmmmm...*would insert appropriate emoticon but can't find one*

Honestly, if she hadn't been on "The Simple Life," they could've had some other rich and famous chick on it in her place, no jobs lost to my knowledge. I know the discussion's old at this point, but I thought Amber had a point. :shrug:

Hillary

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GateandGarden
Ummmmmm...*would insert appropriate emoticon but can't find one*

Honestly, if she hadn't been on "The Simple Life," they could've had some other rich and famous chick on it in her place, no jobs lost to my knowledge. I know the discussion's old at this point, but I thought Amber had a point. :shrug:

Hillary

Perhaps - but she went back and did it again when she did not have to - she could have said I do not want to do that - thus, she is working and has been working - which is what I asserted :shrug: I guess they could have substituted someone else, but it may not have been a hit, the network also could just as easily have dropped the project, :shrug: Maybe it will if she does not do another season. But, that she did two makes her a contributing member of society. I am unsure how anyone can argue against that - but apparently people hate her so much they are willing to disregard the facts and spin it. So be it :cool:

Also, I cannot believe people are taking offense at me stating that Paris Hilton is working and has been working - so much drama over Paris Hilton :laugh:

GateandGarden 12-15-2004 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Perhaps - but she went back and did it again when she did not have to - she could have said I do not want to do that - thus, she is working and has been working - which is what I asserted :shrug: I guess they could have substituted someone else, but it may not have been a hit, the network also could just as easily have dropped the project, :shrug: Maybe it will if she does not do another season. But, that she did two makes her a contributing member of society. I am unsure how anyone can argue against that - but apparently people hate her so much they are willing to disregard the facts and spin it. So be it :cool:

Also, I cannot believe people are taking offense at me stating that Paris Hilton is working and has been working - so much drama over Paris Hilton :laugh:

I see what you're saying. I think it's the way you've expressed it that has thrown us. When people think of someone contributing to society, they tend to imagine teachers and social workers, right? I know you didn't intend to compare her looking sexy and acting like an ass to those jobs, but I was associating them with the whole concept. It just seems like such a small contribution to society, and one that is based on something completely shallow, so it's not much to speak of. But it is a contribution, yes. I'm sure we all regret to have to acknowledge that.

Hillary

amber 12-15-2004 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I have no issue with you and I think you know that. But telling me to **&&^ myself is hardly mature :shrug:

Again, I am just saying the facts, which are that Paris Hilton's stardom is one of the main reasons for the success of that show, which is ongoing. Many people have jobs because of that. Participating in something that is providing jobs is a way of being a contributing member of society. Therefore, Paris Hilton is a contributing member of society, which, as I originally stated, seemingly separates her from many people like her, who do no work. I may not like her, but I cannot take that away from her - she is working. You, on the other hand, are willing to overlook the fact that she works and just want to slam her. So, go right on ahead - be my guest and do so - even though you are just wrong for doing it.

Dude, I think a person like her being in the public eye is detrimental. It's better if she doesn't work. She is contributing disgustingness, rudeness, and worse (ie, the danger of dropping 50-100 iq points while watching her show) to society when she "works" And i still submit that people could work on a different show if hers wasn't on. And, if there ARE other people like her who don't work? Thank god, they made the right choice. Cause i don't want to see other people like her, it's bad enough that she is being viewed by millions of people.
And this? === > "I have no issue with you and I think you know that. But telling me to "
The history of what you've written to me says different. 'sokay, though, i'm a big girl.
Have a great day :)

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GateandGarden
I see what you're saying. I think it's the way you've expressed it that has thrown us. When people think of someone contributing to society, they tend to imagine teachers and social workers, right? I know you didn't intend to compare her looking sexy and acting like an ass to those jobs, but I was associating them with the whole concept. It just seems like such a small contribution to society, and one that is based on something completely shallow, so it's not much to speak of. But it is a contribution, yes. I'm sure we all regret to have to acknowledge that.

Hillary

LOL - I would never compare Paris Hilton and her antics to one of those :laugh:

GateandGarden 12-15-2004 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Dude, I think a person like her being in the public eye is detrimental. It's better if she doesn't work. She is contributing disgustingness, rudeness, and worse (ie, the danger of dropping 50-100 iq points while watching her show) to society when she "works"

Well, yes, definitely, but the same could be said of lots of the idiots the networks put on TV these days. It's difficult to sort through all of them; there are just so many people who are on television for no reason, not just Paris Hilton.

Hillary

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 04:52 PM

Edit: deleted - I was too obnoxious

amber 12-15-2004 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GateandGarden
Well, yes, definitely, but the same could be said of lots of the idiots the networks put on TV these days. It's difficult to sort through all of them; there are just so many people who are on television for no reason, not just Paris Hilton.

Hillary

Yes, that's definitely true - good point.

The Tower 12-15-2004 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
So - Paris is not working and contributes nothing :shrug: No person has a job because of her, her series, or her clothing line - all of which are silly IMO but they make money :shrug: I think these people with these jobs would accept that reality even though you are being silly and not doing so :wavey: Again, all I am saying is Paris Hilton (ridiculous as she is) chose to take her celebrity and make money off of it - for that she is a contributing member of society. The truth hurts and it obviously hurts you Mr. ostrich head in the sand :laugh: :p :xoxo:

Saying that Paris Hilton contributes to society is like saying cancer and AIDS contribute to society. If society cures AIDS, lots of people will be out of work.

Generating the ability to make money does not automatically equate to contributing to society. With that logic, I should probably admire Al Capone for all the great things he did. Sometimes the things that generate revenue come with detrimental consequences that far outweigh the economic benefit. In this case, the fact that Paris Hilton's mere presence has a lethal "dumbening down" effect on our culture is more than enough to offset any benefits that her escapades may produce.

strandinthewind 12-15-2004 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Tower
Saying that Paris Hilton contributes to society is like saying cancer and AIDS contribute to society. If society cures AIDS, lots of people will be out of work.

Generating the ability to make money does not automatically equate to contributing to society. With that logic, I should probably admire Al Capone for all the great things he did. Sometimes the things that generate revenue come with detrimental consequences that far outweigh the economic benefit. In this case, the fact that Paris Hilton's mere presence has a lethal "dumbening down" effect on our culture is more than enough to offset any benefits that her escapades may produce.

Ah - subjectivity and reality t.v. - the same was said about rock and roll when it started - alas it remains - thank goodness to me but much to the chagrain of others :shrug:

Clearly, I was speaking in terms of economics - obviously my point was lost. So, be it because I was not in any way trying to praise the validity of her work - I was just saying she was working, which was unlike most of her peers :cool:

BTW - did you just compare P. Hilton to AIDS :eek: :laugh: - Did I just compare reality shows to rock and roll :eek: :laugh:

amber 12-15-2004 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takenbythesky
. I'm certain James Thurber is rolling over in his grave...
-Justin

You think so? I love James Thurber. That's hot. :laugh: (couldn't resist - I really do love James Thurber, though)

takenbythesky 12-15-2004 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
You think so? I love James Thurber. That's hot. :laugh: (couldn't resist - I really do love James Thurber, though)

:laugh::laugh::laugh: DAMN YOU!
-Justin

amber 12-15-2004 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takenbythesky
:laugh::laugh::laugh: DAMN YOU!
-Justin

:laugh:
Sorry - I never say it otherwise. I didn't know a bunch of people were saying it, but i guess i should've figured. Plus, then i saw that SNL sketch of "paris" and "nicki" apologizing, and they said it a bunch. :rolleyes:

½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ® 12-15-2004 06:47 PM

Look at this mess. I made this thread to be a joke and gave an opinion on her looks but come on. Paris Hilton is going to be anybody she wants to be. Let it go. :xoxo: Look at it this way. If you had all that money and fame would you want society to have an image of you like she has? If you can defend that image by throwing up a smoke screen of illusions you need more help then she does. ;)

gldstwmn 12-16-2004 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I am confident her trust fund(s) are several hundred million PLUS she has access to all Hilton properties including planes, etc. I do not think she needs to do anything. To her credit, she works in the t.v. things and has a clothing (handbags I think ) line. I mean she is not my fav. in the world, but she is a productive member of society at least when compared to other billionairesses :laugh:

My understanding is that she has to work. Everything is not what it appears to be, I'm told.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved