The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Chit Chat (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   "I came to bury Caesar, not to praise him." (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=14700)

gldstwmn 06-06-2004 02:45 PM

"I came to bury Caesar, not to praise him."
 
So here it is. If you wish to discuss the Reagan era good or bad then this is the place. For those of you who are going to scream that this is inappropriate, I don't see how having a discussion of this man's legacy is in poor taste.
While I am sorry for his family's loss, many people will take this time as an opportunity to immortalize President Reagan. Those of you too young to remember might want a more objective view of what went down from 1980-1988.
Reagan was elected after what is now referred to as the "October Surprise," an event which followed the kidnapping of 52 Americans at the US Embassy.
While then President Carter worked tirelesssly to bring the hostages home, including a failed rescue mission and an agreement in October 1980 (one month before the election) to unfreeze Iran's assests in exchange for safe return of the hostages, they were never released until the day Reagan was sworn in as President. Carter's seeming failure to bring the hostages home cost him the election.
It's been widely reported that in October of 1980, George H.W. Bush, then the vice presidential candidate, took a secret trip to Paris to meet with envoys of the Iranian government and cut a deal with them in exchange for arms and money from the US to hold the hostages until after the election.
Reagan's presidency saw the onset of AIDS, which he completely ignored, letting it rage out of control because it was mainly considered by his administration to kill only homosexuals and intravenous drug users. He was also responsible for the largest budget deficits of the time and he gutted FDR's New Deal programs. One large side effect of this was that residents of state and federally funded mental institutions were turned out onto the street creating a homeless population as yet unseen by America.
Then there was Iran-Contra and the myth that he won us the Cold War. Anyone want to give their input on those?
I wish I could find something positive about his presidency to post but I can't. Reagan was Godfather of what we now know as the NeoCon movement.
"Friends, Romans, country men, lend me your ears; I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him. The evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones; so let it be with Caesar."

dissention 06-06-2004 03:30 PM

Reagan was a man who only thought of himself, first and foremost, as evidenced back in the fifties when McCarthy was holding his witch trials. Reagan readily accused other actors and actresses of being communists when called upon.

Contrary to popular belief, he did not end the Cold War. The Soviet Union imploded, with really no significant help for Reagan or his administration.

His involvement with Iran Contra affair is one of the most sickening things a president has ever had a hand in. He should've been impeached and tried by a jury.

He was biased against gay men and women and waited years to finally help fight the AIDs virus when he could have done somehting to stop its spread.

His presidency was the beginning of the Invasion of the Neocons, a terrible invasion which has crippled our country and it's people.

GypsySorcerer 06-06-2004 04:36 PM

I have nothing against Reagan and I respected him. I will say this, though: When Reagan was elected, in my opinion, that ended the moderate wing of the Republican Party's prominence. In fact, every Democrat I've ever asked said they preferred Nixon over Reagan.

gldstwmn 06-06-2004 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GypsySorcerer
I have nothing against Reagan and I respected him. I will say this, though: When Reagan was elected, in my opinion, that ended the moderate wing of the Republican Party's prominence. In fact, every Democrat I've ever asked said they preferred Nixon over Reagan.

Give the lady a cigar!

DeeGeMe 06-06-2004 04:58 PM

Reagan's Record
 
For those of you too young to remember, or for those who have a faulty memory:

1.First to turn America into a DEBTOR nation
2. First to increase DEBT faster than growth of national income in eight years
3. First to increase DEBT faster than growth of gdp over eight years
4. First to double the deficit in just eigh t years
5. First to “almost”: triple the national DEBT in just eight years
6. First to increase SPENDING by 80%--over 8 years.
7. First to SPEND more in eight years than was spent in prior 50 years.
8. First to have “real” INTEREST RATES of 8% after averaging 1% over 35 years.
9. First to keep PRIME INTEREST RATES at 20%.
10.First to over value the dollar to the yen at rate of 262 yen to 1 dollar.
11.First to have served as Governor and increase STATE SPENDING by 112%
12.First to have HOME LOAN INTEREST RATES as high as 16%
13. First to CUT TAXES by 60% for his rich pals
14. First to allow the SAVINGS AND LOAN INDUSTRY to be raided after signing a deregulatory bill and proclaiming “I think we have hit the jackpot”. Come and get it the vaults are unguarded.
15. First to deal with TERRORISTS
16. First to send an AUTOGRAPHED BIBLE to a man he called “The Satan of Terrorists”.
17. First to have an ADMIRAL plead the Fifth Amendment.
18. First to have a stealing, lying, gutless wife abusing MARINE LT. COLONEL plead the Fifth Amendment.
19. First to have a “sitting” CABINET MEMBER INDICTED
20. First to have an ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE INDICTED.
21. First to have an ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SENT TO PRISON.
22. First to have over 100 MEMBERS OF AN ADMINISTRATION CHARGED WITH CRIMES..
23. First to have more members of his administration charged with crimes than CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF ALL OTHER PRESIDENTS in the twentieth century
24. First to set a record for the LARGEST ONE DAY PERCENTAGE DECLINE in the DOW in history. 10-19-87
25. First to have over $10,000,000 INCREASE IN WEALTH from serving for 8 years as president.
26. First to testify ”under oath” 130 times that ”I DON’T REMEMBER” .
27. First to have an Admiral with a photographic memory testify 128 times “ I DON’T REMEMBER”.
28. First to undergo BRAIN SURGERY a few months after leaving office. No pain no gain.
29. First to, repeatedly, FALSIFY HIS WIFE’S AGE. As tho anyone cared.
30. First to promote his religious faith and never have an ACTIVE CHURCH MEMBERSHIP.
31. First to never use the term JESUS CHRIST in speeches.
32. First to seek GUIDANCE FROM THE STARS not from God
33. First to have had a SHOTGUN WEDDING.
34. First to have worked as a SHILL in Las Vegas.
35. First to call a Stealing, Lying, Psychotic, wife abusing Marine a “LIAR.
36. First to have been OPENLY ALIENATED from his children.
37. First To have served with ALZHIMERS
38. First to have UNEMPLOYMENT AT 10.8% since great depression.
39. First to attack a small unprotected nation with 88,000 inhabitants and 10,000 bb guns then PROCLAIM -“America stands tall again”— “we have whipped the Vietnam Syndrome”-we have defeated communism”. Gosh! What if we had whipped Cyprus?.
40. #1-in FARM FORECLOSURES
41. #1-In BANK FAILURES
42. #1-In SAVINGS AND LOAN FAILURES
43. #1-In Percent increase in PERSONAL BANKRUPTCIES
44. #1-In recorded MISSTATEMENTS
45. #1-In never having a single press conference in which he did not make at least one or more INCORRECT STATEMENTS.
46. #1-In needing a staff person standby during press conferences to tell the press “WHAT HE REALLY MEANT”.
47. #1-In having SERVICEMEN KILLED during peacetime.
48. #1-In largest DROP IN POPULARITY in one week.
49. #1-In being first to HONOR NAZI STORM TROOPERS by calling them” Innocent Victims”
50. #1-In being first to be labeled “BRAIN DEAD AFFABLE DUNCE’ by this writer.
51. First to lie-over and over-to reporters “I DO NOT DYE MY HAIR my barber uses a special shampoo”
52. First to have a wife who ”forced” him to WEAR THREE SUITS in one day
53. First to boast “Not bad for a DUMB GUY who worked only 20 hours per week”.
54. First to have his wife sit nearby and WHISPER ANSWERS to questions
55. First to FALL ASLEEP while the Pope spoke
56. First to invite the Pope to visit the White House and “BRING THE WIFE AND KIDS”
57. First to have his press secretary remove him from the microphone because he could not answer questions. Then, as the reporter
yelled out “answer my question” he replied “MY HANDLERS WON’T LET ME SPEAK”. Quick get the white coat.
58. First 20th Century president to have historians RATE HIM BELOW every president of the 20th except for Richard Nixon. 1994 Poll.
59. First to give us a First Lady with a past reputation for giving the BEST BJ in Hollywood.
60. First to suggest his eldest son undergo PSYCHIATRIC examination
61. First to have been voted in British polls (twice) as the ”MOST FEARED LEADER IN THE WORLD” sic em Rambo.

62. First to serve as Governor on a ”conservative” platform and INCREASE SPENDING BY 112%.
63. First Governor TO INCREASE personal income taxes by 60%, tax increase on cigarettes by 200%, state tax collections by 152%.
64. First to have a Special Assistant say on national TV “sometimes you had to HIT HIM ON THE HEAD with a 2 x 4 to get his attention”
65. First to have his official biographer state on national TV ‘After he was shot in 1981he GOT SLOWER AND SLOWER EACH YEAR. His speech got slower. He deliberated more and he hesitated more when he spoke. He lost his physical quickness and would not make decisions on the spot. It was a very, very slow and steady mental and physical decline”.
66. First to have a POPULARITY RATING OF ONLY 35% after his first two years in office.
67. First president to have been DIVORCED
68) First President to have the Geriatrics Department of a major
university study his behavior and conclude that AFTER THREE YEARS IN OFFICE HE HAD ALZHIEMERS.

markolas 06-06-2004 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
He was also responsible for the largest budget deficits of the time and he gutted FDR's New Deal programs. One large side effect of this was that residents of state and federally funded mental institutions were turned out onto the street creating a homeless population as yet unseen by America.

And then, he had the gall to go on national television and say that the homeless were "homeless by choice."

Yes, it's sad that he had Alzheimer's and that he died the way he did, but it's not as sad as the thousands and thousands of AIDS victims who died just as excruciatingly as he did, while he and his administration sat back and did nothing.

He was not a great president, or a great human being, or a great anything, and it annoys me to no end to see all these articles gushing over his alleged "achievements," while ignoring the numerous people who suffered as the result of his policies.

darklinensuit 06-06-2004 06:02 PM

I can't think of the guy without thinking of others' comments.
I highly recommend these:

- Linda Ellerbee's description (in And So It Goes) of Nancy sitting under Cocoa Puffs while RR shot a commercial.

- Whoopi Goldberg's 1988 act, describing how AIDS got any funding.

- Tip O'Neal's autobiography (Man Of The House), describing how his friend Reagan would make fun of him in the press and how Reagan napped through --- well, let's just say through.

- Geraldine Ferraro's more serious autobiography, describing Mondale's frustration.

Also, who can forget Pat Schroeder calling RR The Teflon President (nothing stuck to him).

- Jake

strandinthewind 06-06-2004 06:12 PM

I thought his self-deprecating humor was priceless - in fact I miss it. It was a quality I admired in him. As for his political stuff, there are good and bad things. All in all, I'd give him a B, mainly for the fall of the Soviet Union, building up our military, the ability to make all politicians like him on a personal level despite any political disagreements, his admiration for FDR, and giving the nation what seemed like hope again after the Nixon fiasco, the inept Carter administration (and mind you I really like and admire Jimmy Carter - he was just to pure and puritanical IMO to be effective in D.C.), and the Iranian hostage fiasco. The bad things were the poor economy (which I never credit or discredit solely to the Pres.), the rise of the current push to a Theocracy. I guess the AIDS crisis was a bad deal for him as well. He should have acted sooner. That he did not is sad because many may have altered their behavior and not contracted the virus had they known earlier. Having said that, many govt.'s on the local levels did try to act earlier but the gay community would have none of it - not really their fault because not much was really known for sure about the disease and thus, the acts of the local govt.'s were seen as an oppressive acts attempting to shove gays back into the closet and gay rights were just really coming about, etc.

Note: this is my opinion and I am not going to debate it, lest we have WWIII :laugh:

BTW - I think Nancy ALWAYS looked fantastic (yea I know "on the backs of the people" but hey all do it :shrug: ) and say what you want about her, but a friend of mine was in her personal security detail and said, years later and under no apparent duress, that she was one of the classiest and nicest people he ever knew much less worked for. Interestingly, I loved the fact that she had an astrologer and the fact that she seemingly bucks the far right wing of today a la the FDR off of and RR onto the currency.

dissention 06-06-2004 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markolas
And then, he had the gall to go on national television and say that the homeless were "homeless by choice."

Yes, it's sad that he had Alzheimer's and that he died the way he did, but it's not as sad as the thousands and thousands of AIDS victims who died just as excruciatingly as he did, while he and his administration sat back and did nothing.

He was not a great president, or a great human being, or a great anything, and it annoys me to no end to see all these articles gushing over his alleged "achievements," while ignoring the numerous people who suffered as the result of his policies.

Bravo. You rock. ;)

estranged4life 06-06-2004 07:09 PM

All one has to do...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
Reagan's presidency saw the onset of AIDS, which he completely ignored, letting it rage out of control because it was mainly considered by his administration to kill only homosexuals and intravenous drug users.[/I]

to see how Reagan ignored the onset of AIDS is watch the HBO movie "And the Band Played On" (Which I say should be a recommended movie for all to see) or read the book of the same name by Randy Shilts on which this mini-series was based upon (Who succumbed to AIDS in 1994).

Brian j.

Hawkeye 06-06-2004 09:05 PM

Quote:

to see how Reagan ignored the onset of AIDS is watch the HBO movie "And the Band Played On"
.
.
And the Band played On. Is anyoen else singing Come when they read that.

Hawkeye 06-06-2004 09:07 PM

Didn't the Sovt Union collapse during Bush senior's presidency.

strandinthewind 06-06-2004 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye
Didn't the Sovt Union collapse during Bush senior's presidency.

The actual demise was spread out over time after 1987 (the Baltics) and concluded in 1991, during the first Bush Administration. But clearly RR was the initial and most significant advocate - I mean he suggested in one summit (Iceland ?) that both America and the USSR disarm the nukes (not all but a bunch). Interestingly, the Soviet Union was going to collapse anyway - it could no longer function economically or politically. So, from that aspect, RR did not really do all that much outside of US economic trade policies, etc. But, RR did significantly facilitate it and helped the USSR through it by making it America's, if you will, friend - at least through his freindship with MG. The Vatican also had a significant hand in the demise of the USSR as well because the RCC HATED the USSR and did everything it could to facilitate its fall. In sum, no one entity or person can claim sole responsibility for the fall of the USSR other than their version of communism did not work, but it can be said with accuracy that RR did a bunch to facilitate it.

Here are some websites on the demise of the USSR:

http://www.coldwar.org/articles/90s/...iet_union.php3

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/storie...08/21/015.html

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/2612360

There are many, many more.

gldstwmn 06-06-2004 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye
Didn't the Sovt Union collapse during Bush senior's presidency.

Technically, yes it did. Bush had been in office for almost 2 years at the time of the collapse. However, Reagan is largely credited with "bankrupting the Soviet Union." It simply isn't true. Soviet military spending stayed the same as it ever was during the entire Reagan presidency. The collapse of the Soviet Union can be attributed to the flawed Communist/Totalitarian economic system under which it operated.
Reagan did institute what is known as the Reagan Doctrine to fight anti-communist forces around the world including Nicaragua and most importantly, Afghanistan. This little deal our government had with the mujahideen in Afghansitan brought an end product that probably was not forseen at that time: His name was Osama Bin Laden.

sara1998 06-07-2004 04:55 AM

Thanks for the insight, everyone. I remember Regan in office, but am too young to know what went on. I am sick of hearing the praise of that man, because I know no US president can be put up as high on a pedistal as Regan has been.

Maria

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sara1998
Thanks for the insight, everyone. I remember Regan in office, but am too young to know what went on. I am sick of hearing the praise of that man, because I know no US president can be put up as high on a pedistal as Regan has been.

Maria

Bingo and Bravo!!!!!

to complete Goldie's intro header "The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones; So let it be with Caesar."

Although I think the inverse is true here, the point is once people are dead and a few years go by it seems people remember the good old days as if they were that, they forget the bad stuff. Maybe in the end, that is a good thing :shrug:

dissention 06-07-2004 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux
I think it's more lucky than anything. That is when these good memories are at the expense of those who suffered because of this person.

:nod:

There was a caller on CSPAN this morning that said she found it ironic that Reagan died from the very thing that he had a hand in not funding properly for the relief of others (he cut health programs and federal funding drastically).

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 09:05 AM

Leave it to the NYTimes and an opt-ed by Mikhail Gorbachev to put it in a great way IMO:

Ronald Reagan

June 7, 2004

Ronald Reagan, who died on Saturday after his long battle
with Alzheimer's disease, projected an aura of optimism so radiant that it seemed almost a force of nature. Many people who disagreed with his ideology still liked him for his personality, and that was a source of frustration for his political opponents who knew how much the ideology mattered. Looking back now, we can trace some of the flaws of the current Washington mindset - the tax-cut-driven deficits, the slogan-driven foreign policy - to Mr. Reagan's example. But after more than a decade of political mean-spiritedness, we have to admit that collegiality and good manners are beginning to look pretty attractive.

President Reagan was, of course, far more than some kind of chief executive turned national greeter. He will almost certainly be ranked among the most important presidents of the 20th century, forever linked with the triumph over Communism abroad and the restoration of faith in free markets at home.

He profited from good timing and good luck, coming along when the country was tired of the dour pedantry of the Carter administration, wounded by the Iranian hostage crisis, frustrated by rising unemployment and unyielding inflation. Mr. Reagan's stubborn refusal to accept the permanence of Communism helped end the cold war. He was fortunate to have as his counterpart Mikhail Gorbachev, a Soviet leader ready to acknowledge his society's failings and interested in reducing international tensions.

Mr. Reagan's decision to send marines to Lebanon was disastrous, however, and his invasion of Grenada pure melodrama. His most reckless episode involved the scheme to supply weapons to Iran as ransom for Americans who were being held hostage in Lebanon, and to use the proceeds to illegally finance contra insurgents in Nicaragua.

Mr. Reagan showed little appetite for power, even less for the messy detail of politics. He joked about his work habits. "It's true hard work never killed anybody," he said in 1987. "But I figure, why take the chance?" His
detachment from the day-to-day business of government was seductive for a nation that had tired of watching Mr. Carter micromanage the White House.

The nation's 40th president was absent from the public eye for a long time before his death, but his complicated legacy endures. Although Mr. Reagan did reverse course and approve some tax increases in the face of mounting deficits - in stark contrast to President Bush nowadays - he was
still responsible for turning the Republican Party away from its fiscally conservative roots. The flawed theory behind the Reagan tax cuts, that the ensuing jolt to the economy would bring in enough money to balance the budget, is still espoused by many of the Republican faithful, including President Bush.

One of Mr. Reagan's advisers, David Stockman, later wrote that the real aim of fiscal policy was to create a "strategic deficit" that would slam the door and reduce the size of the federal government. Such thinking is far too prevalent in Washington to this day, and helps explain why plenty of conservatives don't seem all that bothered by the government's inability to balance its books.

When Ronald Reagan was elected, the institution of the presidency and the nation itself seemed to be laboring under a large dark cloud. Into the middle of this malaise came a most improbable chief executive - a former baseball announcer, pitchman for General Electric, Hollywood bon vivant and two-term California governor with one uncomplicated message: There was no problem that could not be solved if Americans would only believe in themselves. At the time, it was something the nation needed to hear. Today, we live in an era defined by that particular kind of simplicity, which expresses itself in semi-detached leadership and a black-and-white view of the world. Gray is beginning to look a lot more attractive.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/07/op...4c0be2e2f1cd12

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 09:59 AM

from http://money.cnn.com/2004/06/07/news...reut/index.htm

'Reaganomics' remembered

Former president's tax-cutting, deficit-running legacy remains hotly debated.
June 7, 2004: 7:54 AM EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Few leaders have whole movements named for them, especially one as emotionally laden as "Reaganomics" -- the late President Ronald Reagan's blend of tax cuts and massive military spending that got the economy moving again but tripled the nation's debt.

It was a policy former President Bill Clinton dubbed "reckless" as he pressed to use budget surpluses to pay down debt instead of cutting taxes.

Reagan's prescription, coupled with a drive to lighten government's regulatory hand, was denounced as "trickle-down economics" by detractors who believed tax cuts for the wealthy would mean only crumbs for the poor.

But its supporters counter that it helped snap the economy out of a lethargy that had reigned for much of the 1970s.

The U.S. economy expanded steadily from late 1982 to July 1990, creating nearly 20 million jobs and triggering a boom in stock markets that carried on until 2000.

Nonetheless, nearly a quarter-century after Reagan was first elected in 1980 to the first of his two four-year terms, his economic legacy remains deeply polarizing.

Whether Reaganomics was good or bad for America, fair or unfair to different income groups, may never be resolved.

"The disagreement over the 1980s ... will almost certainly become a prominent feature of intellectual life," wrote Reaganomics proponent Robert Bartley in his book "The Seven Fat Years."

The debate has its echoes under the administration of President Bush, who has presided over big tax cuts and a return to deficits. However, that massive fiscal stimulus seems now to be paying off with the recovery from the 2001 slump at last kicking into high gear.

Stomping out inflation
Veterans of the Reagan administrations and conservative scholars say the bold policy helped end a period of malaise in the 1970s when inflation soared and interest rates were sky high.

Critics point to massive debts of the era -- the country owed more than $3 trillion by the end of the decade -- and say Reaganomics triggered a "decade of greed" with Wall Street traders in red suspenders grown rich on bond dealing.

Officially, the Reagan doctrine was known as supply-side economics, a policy based on the expectation that big cuts in marginal tax rates would mean workers would keep -- and spend -- more of their wages, thus creating the need for more production. This would lead to more investment and more jobs.

It would also generate rapidly growing output that would ease inflationary pressures and stimulate a greater flow of revenues to keep budget deficits in check.

William Niskanen, former acting chairman of President Reagan's Council of Economic Advisers who is now chairman of Washington-based think tank the Cato Institute, said much -- but perhaps not all -- of the theory worked.

One reason is that supply-side stimulus was implemented at the same time as Reagan began a vast military buildup now credited with helping trigger the collapse of the Soviet Union by simply out-spending it.

"The two greatest accomplishments of the Reagan era were breaking the back of inflation and substantially reducing marginal tax rates," Niskanen said. "One of the major charges is that there was a big accumulation of debt and that is accurate."

"But I would contend that ending the Cold War and breaking the back of inflation made it worthwhile," he added.

In 1980 when Reagan was elected, inflation was running at 13-1/2 percent annually. It was under 5 percent when he left office in 1989.

Ending 19% interest rates
Under the guidance of cigar-chomping former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, the federal funds rate that influences lending rates throughout the economy soared to 19 percent in 1981 -- compared with today's 1 percent -- and the economy slid deep into recession before recovering in late 1982.

"That tight money policy, first under Volcker and then under (current Fed Chairman Alan) Greenspan could not have been done without strong backing from the president," Niskanen said. "Reagan backed up Volcker throughout that politically difficult time until growth finally resumed in November 1982."

The offsetting influence against tight money, and a key part of Reaganomics, was a dramatic reduction in tax rates. From a peak of 70 percent when he took office, the top marginal rate was slashed to 28 percent for most working Americans.

Niskanen said it was "a bum rap" to claim the benefits of tax cuts went to the wealthy while the debt burden was shared by all.

"The actions taken initially in 1981 set us on a sustainable growth path and they were absolutely necessary to get on to that path," he added. Remarkably, the will to apply the stern medicine of stiff interest rates and to risk cutting taxes so dramatically came from a president who received small credit for grand thinking.

"Reagan was always too casually dismissed by intellectuals who missed the point that he has extraordinarily good convictions," Niskanen said. "I don't know where he got his convictions because he wasn't greatly interested in analysis, but they were extremely good."

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 10:01 AM

A President Who Listened

June 7, 2004
By MIKHAIL GORBACHEV

MOSCOW - I have just sent to Nancy Reagan a letter of condolence for the passing of Ronald Reagan. The 40th president of the United States was an extraordinary man who in his long life saw moments of triumph, who had his ups and downs and experienced the happiness of true love.

It so happened that his second term as president coincided with the emergence of a new Soviet leadership - a coincidence that may seem accidental but that was in effect a prologue to momentous events in world history.

Ronald Reagan's first term as president had been dedicated to restoring America's self-confidence. He appealed to the traditions and optimism of the people, to the American dream, and he regarded as his main task strengthening the economy and the military might of the United States. This was accompanied by confrontational rhetoric toward the Soviet Union, and more than rhetoric - by a number of actions that caused concern both in our country and among many people throughout the world. It seemed that the most important thing about Reagan was his anti-Communism and his reputation as a hawk who saw the Soviet Union as an "evil empire."

Yet his second term as president emphasized a different set of goals. I think he understood that it is the peacemakers, above all, who earn a place in history. This was consistent with his convictions based on experience, intuition and love of life. In this he was supported by Nancy - his wife and friend, whose role will, I am sure, be duly appreciated.

At our first meeting in Geneva in 1985 I represented a new, changing Soviet Union. Of course, the new Soviet leadership could have continued in the old ways. But we chose a different path, because we saw the critical problems of our country and the urgent need to step back from the edge of the abyss to which the nuclear arms race was pushing mankind.

The dialogue that President Reagan and I started was difficult. To reach agreement, particularly on arms control and security, we had to overcome mistrust and the barriers of numerous problems and prejudices.

I don't know whether we would have been able to agree and to insist on the implementation of our agreements with a different person at the helm of American government. True, Reagan was a man of the right. But, while adhering to his convictions, with which one could agree or disagree, he was not dogmatic; he was looking for negotiations and cooperation. And this was the most important thing to me: he had the trust of the American people.

In the final outcome, our insistence on dialogue proved fully justified. At a White House ceremony in 1987, we signed the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty, which launched the process of real arms reduction. And, even though we saw the road to a world free of nuclear weapons differently, the very fact of setting this goal in 1986 in Reykjavik helped to break the momentum of the arms race.

While addressing these vital tasks, we changed the nature of relations between our two countries, moving step by step to build trust and to test it by concrete deeds. And in the process, we - and our views - were changing too. I believe it was not an accident that during his visit to Moscow in the summer of 1988 President Reagan said, in reply to a reporter's question, that he did not regard the perestroika-era Soviet Union as an evil empire.

I think that the main lesson of those years is the need for dialogue, which must not be broken off whatever the challenges and complications we have to face. Meeting with Ronald Reagan in subsequent years I saw that this was how he understood our legacy to the new generation of political leaders.

The personal rapport that emerged between us over the years helped me to appreciate Ronald Reagan's human qualities. A true leader, a man of his word and an optimist, he traveled the journey of his life with dignity and faced courageously the cruel disease that darkened his final years. He has earned a place in history and in people's hearts.

Mikhail Gorbachev is the former president of the Soviet Union. This article was translated by Pavel Palazhchenko from the Russian.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/07/op...6641b3a2fc97cc

gldstwmn 06-07-2004 10:08 AM

Here's Greg Palast's take on it:

http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=336&row=0

KILLER, COWARD, CON-MAN
GOOD RIDDANCE, GIPPER ...
MORE PROOF ONLY THE GOOD DIE YOUNG
Sunday, June 6, 2004


by Greg Palast

You're not going to like this. You shouldn't speak ill of the dead. But in this case, someone's got to.

Ronald Reagan was a conman. Reagan was a coward. Reagan was a killer.

In 1987, I found myself stuck in a crappy little town in Nicaragua named Chaguitillo. The people were kind enough, though hungry, except for one surly young man. His wife had just died of tuberculosis.

People don't die of TB if they get some antibiotics. But Ronald Reagan, big hearted guy that he was, had put a lock-down embargo on medicine to Nicaragua because he didn't like the government that the people there had elected.

Ronnie grinned and cracked jokes while the young woman's lungs filled up and she stopped breathing. Reagan flashed that B-movie grin while they buried the mother of three.

And when Hezbollah terrorists struck and murdered hundreds of American marines in their sleep in Lebanon, the TV warrior ran away like a whipped dog … then turned around and invaded Grenada. That little Club Med war was a murderous PR stunt so Ronnie could hold parades for gunning down Cubans building an airport.

I remember Nancy, a skull and crossbones prancing around in designer dresses, some of the "gifts" that flowed to the Reagans -- from hats to million-dollar homes -- from cronies well compensated with government loot. It used to be called bribery.

And all the while, Grandpa grinned, the grandfather who bleated on about "family values" but didn't bother to see his own grandchildren.

The New York Times today, in its canned obit, wrote that Reagan projected, "faith in small town America" and "old-time values." "Values" my ass. It was union busting and a declaration of war on the poor and anyone who couldn't buy designer dresses. It was the New Meanness, bringing starvation back to America so that every millionaire could get another million.

"Small town" values? From the movie star of the Pacific Palisades, the Malibu mogul? I want to throw up.

And all the while, in the White House basement, as his brain boiled away, his last conscious act was to condone a coup d'etat against our elected Congress. Reagan's Defense Secretary Casper the Ghost Weinberger with the crazed Colonel, Ollie North, plotted to give guns to the Monster of the Mideast, Ayatolla Khomeini.

Reagan's boys called Jimmy Carter a weanie and a wuss although Carter wouldn't give an inch to the Ayatolla. Reagan, with that film-fantasy tough-guy con in front of cameras, went begging like a coward cockroach to Khomeini pleading on bended knee for the release of our hostages.

Ollie North flew into Iran with a birthday cake for the maniac mullah -- no kidding --in the shape of a key. The key to Ronnie's heart.

Then the Reagan roaches mixed their cowardice with crime: taking cash from the hostage-takers to buy guns for the "contras" - the drug-runners of Nicaragua posing as freedom fighters.

I remember as a student in Berkeley the words screeching out of the bullhorn, "The Governor of the State of California, Ronald Reagan, hereby orders this demonstration to disperse" … and then came the teargas and the truncheons. And all the while, that fang-hiding grin from the Gipper.

In Chaguitillo, all night long, the farmers stayed awake to guard their kids from attack from Reagan's Contra terrorists. The farmers weren't even Sandinistas, those 'Commies' that our cracked-brained President told us were 'only a 48-hour drive from Texas.' What the hell would they want with Texas, anyway?

Nevertheless, the farmers, and their families, were Ronnie's targets.

In the deserted darkness of Chaguitillo, a TV blared. Weirdly, it was that third-rate gangster movie, "Brother Rat." Starring Ronald Reagan.

Well, my friends, you can rest easier tonight: the Rat is dead.

Killer, coward, conman. Ronald Reagan, good-bye and good riddance.

Greg Palast is author of the New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. www.GregPalast.com

dissention 06-07-2004 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
Ronald Reagan was a conman. Reagan was a coward. Reagan was a killer.

That sums him up perfectly. Bravo.

Enough with the "aura of optimism" or "his radiant personality" bull****. Talk about what he did and what he didn't do, that's what is important. While the rest of the nation falls over and pees itself over this dog, I'll sit back and roll my eyes. Because that's what this three-ring circus is: ridiculous.

dissention 06-07-2004 11:10 AM

The real Reagan record:

1) Illegally dealt with the Iranians to have them hold the American hostages until after the elections, so as to ensure success in the elections. Sent George Bush and Mitchell to Paris to negotiate the deal that also opened exchanges of arms through Israeli shipping in exchange for cash that could be left unaccounted, and thus transferred to the Nicaraguan war. This act of treason holds a death penalty, but went underreported in spite of witness by two Iranian ex-Presidents, an Israeli ex-President, and the nation's own GAO.

2) Sent arms to both Iraq and Iran, including chemical weapons, making those two countries the two biggest US arms trading partners at precisely the time when it was illegal to trade with either due to both US and UN laws.

3) Used drug trafficers to transport illegal arms to Nicaragua, allowing a massive and immediate increase in cocain traffic into Arizona and California.

4) Illegally used the CIA to mine harbors and ferry Contra troops in Nicragua.

5) Lied about all of this activity before Congress, and had his Secretary of Defense lie as well.

6) Made George Bush his drug czar and terrorist czar, upon which Bush oversaw the entire operation of trading arms to terrorists and allowing drug cartels free airspace in exchange for illegally smuggling arms to terrorists in Nicaragua.

7) Oversaw the biggest example of state sponsored terrorism in US history, by supporting ex-Samoza National Guard thugs in Nicaragua who were totally unsupported by their own people, and thus who systematically murdered tens of thousands of border farmers.

8) Removed the Jimmy Carter mandate that all US support was based upon valid human rights records, allowing for right wing nationalist thugs to run free in Haiti, San Salvador, Hondorus and Nicaragua.

9) Took the world to a dangerous brink of nuclear war, and then used that as an excuse for claiming sole credit for the USSR breaking up, when in fact it was an economic issue in the USSR that forced the breakup.

10) Put nuclear missile into Europe, violating the very prevision that was the settlement to the Cuban missile crisis.

11) Instigated trickle-down economics. Within the first year of the policy, we were in a depression caused by the policy. The 27% cut was slewed two to one in favor of those making over $200,000 per year, in percentages, and far more in real dollars. By the end of the second year, increases in state and local taxes more than made up for the cut for the middle class. Then Reagan increased the Social Security tax, doubling effective tax on the middle income, and widening the disparity.

12) Wages throughout Reagan/Bush remained negative in real dollars for the next 12 years, the longest and worst growth performance in middle class wages in US history. Average national growth was the lowest since the early 30s. Trickle down is proven to be the worst economic idea is US history when the squeeze on savings and the drain on investment capital force another recession in 1990.

13) Lied about the HUD scandal that was a mega-billion dollar handout to Republican contributors. Said, 58 times, before the Senate in the HUD scandal, "I don't remember," including in reference to the name of his own Secretary of Defense.

14) Appointed some of the worst strict constructionists to the Supreme Court, leading us to the move whereby guys like W are appointed President, and men found innocent of murder in subsequent investigations are allowed to die on death row due to no appeal process.

15) Oversaw the law that removed an FCC restriction upon fairness on the airwaves, ensuring that big business money would make the AM stations into 24 hour per day propaganda operatives and allowing the slow erosion of news on TV to what it is today.

16) Broke labor unions by striking first at the Air Traffic Controllers, leading to massive safety shortfalls in the air industry, and more importantly, a slow erosion of US worker wages and benefits.

17) Reduced clean water and air standards. Reduced labor safety standards.

18) Increased the defense budget to 240% previous levels, bankrupting the national treasury in the face of trickle-down.

19) Deregulated Banking and Credit Bureaus, leading to the 800 billion dollar bailout of the early 90s when the results of that deregulation forced the middle class to pay off rich folk for cheating us.

20) Declared ketchup to be a vegetable, and claimed trees caused air pollution...

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
20) Declared ketchup to be a vegetable, and claimed trees caused air pollution...


http://sneakykitchen.com/Ideas/ketchup.htm

:eek: :eek: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

CarneVaca 06-07-2004 11:45 AM

I'd have to think about it for days to come up with something I liked about Reagan. Well, I might have to think about it forever.

But I will say this: Reagan never struck me as fundamentally evil the day Dubya and his daddy always have.

In fact, I almost miss the simplicity of those quaint "us vs. the reds" days.

dissention 06-07-2004 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
http://sneakykitchen.com/Ideas/ketchup.htm

:eek: :eek: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

:lol:

Ketchup is not a vegetable. If anything, it's a sweet. There's so much sugar in ketchup it isn't edible.

chiliD 06-07-2004 12:34 PM

I got lost through the thread...

Has anyone brought up the theory that the Republican Party was behind the John Lennon assassination? That with Reagan coming into office and Lennon coming back into public life, the Republicans wanted Lennon out of the way due to his publicly anti-"establishment" (read: Nixon/Republican) views earlier in the '70's.

I'm sorry for the family's loss, but I'm not sad to see Reagan pass on...he was a bad actor, a bad Governor and a worse President.

I have serious doubts he was even lucid during his second term. Daddy Bush seemed to be at the control of the "puppet strings" attached to Ronnie those last four years. The Bush family is scary...VERY scary...the sooner we get them out of power, the better for all of us.

dissention 06-07-2004 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD
I got lost through the thread...

Has anyone brought up the theory that the Republican Party was behind the John Lennon assassination? That with Reagan coming into office and Lennon coming back into public life, the Republicans wanted Lennon out of the way due to his publicly anti-"establishment" (read: Nixon/Republican) views earlier in the '70's.

I'm sorry for the family's loss, but I'm not sad to see Reagan pass on...he was a bad actor, a bad Governor and a worse President.

I have serious doubts he was even lucid during his second term. Daddy Bush seemed to be at the control of the "puppet strings" attached to Ronnie those last four years. The Bush family is scary...VERY scary...the sooner we get them out of power, the better for all of us.

I never heard that Lennon theory, but I wouldn't put anything past those bastards.

As for Reagan, his doctor told him that he was showing signs of Altzheimers three years into his first, I can only imagine how it progressed the next five years. But, that's neither here nor there because all he did was read the teleprompter and sign the bills the Rethugs put in front of him.

Now, as for the Bushes, I agree. :lol: The Bushes remind me of Charles Manson and their supporters remind me of the Manson family.

The Tower 06-07-2004 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
It was the New Meanness.

I think the worst thing about Reagan overall was the idea listed above.

Reagan actively wanted to snip 1956 through 1980 right out of history and just forget that the "awakening" of America ever happened. People then had carte blache to treat everyone else who didn't live up to the moral standards of the 1948 like ****- meaning gays, the poor, anyone who committed or (even more importantly) suspected of committing any kind of crime, free thinkers, those who opposed authoritarian abuse, etc. It was a really deep, dark reversal that this country has still not recovered from.

I remember being in high school during the absolute height of Reagan/Falwell salivation central. Dudes would come to school in suits, praising Reaganomics and the Moral Majority without even understanding what the policies were, who was being disenfranchised and the horrifying consequences to follow. It was pathetic.

Nixon definitely was evil- but his evil came from desiring power and devotion. Reagan didn't want anyone to love him, he didn't care. He was evil because he wanted to force his morality on the rest of the world. Forget the fact that the idiot hadn't advanced mentally since 1941- everyone else could f**k off and go straight to hell.

Reagan really WAS the beginning of true hypocrisy in politics. He was an awful man who never should have been in power. The only people he ever helped were the wealthy, all the while instilling shame in the masses to silence them from noticing the incredible shift of wealth, not to mention all the other evil things that were going on.

While I could care less whether or not Reagan is alive or dead (he already did all his damage), I would have liked him to kick the bucket after the election. You just know the republican convention is going to have a ten hour suckfest trying to manipulate the public into voting for scuzzbag Dubya.

On the other hand, at least he didn't die during October/November when it could have REALLY done some damage. Post 2000 America's short attention span can't even hold onto images for more than a week at best. Maybe Britney will get caught on tape or Paris Hilton will get married to Nick Carter :eek: .

dissention 06-07-2004 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Tower
Maybe Britney will get caught on tape or Paris Hilton will get married to Nick Carter :eek: .

And it will be blamed on the liberals. :xoxo:

gldstwmn 06-07-2004 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarneVaca
I'd have to think about it for days to come up with something I liked about Reagan. Well, I might have to think about it forever.

But I will say this: Reagan never struck me as fundamentally evil the day Dubya and his daddy always have.

In fact, I almost miss the simplicity of those quaint "us vs. the reds" days.

It was his greatest role ever.

gldstwmn 06-07-2004 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD
I got lost through the thread...

Has anyone brought up the theory that the Republican Party was behind the John Lennon assassination? That with Reagan coming into office and Lennon coming back into public life, the Republicans wanted Lennon out of the way due to his publicly anti-"establishment" (read: Nixon/Republican) views earlier in the '70's.

I've heard that touched on briefly but never heard anything substantial to back it up.

gldstwmn 06-07-2004 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
I never heard that Lennon theory, but I wouldn't put anything past those bastards.

As for Reagan, his doctor told him that he was showing signs of Altzheimers three years into his first, I can only imagine how it progressed the next five years. But, that's neither here nor there because all he did was read the teleprompter and sign the bills the Rethugs put in front of him.

Now, as for the Bushes, I agree. :lol: The Bushes remind me of Charles Manson and their supporters remind me of the Manson family.

More like Don Corleone...

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
I've heard that touched on briefly but never heard anything substantial to back it up.

That has never stopped you before :shrug:

(I am just joking BTW :laugh: )

chiliD 06-07-2004 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD
I got lost through the thread...

Has anyone brought up the theory that the Republican Party was behind the John Lennon assassination? That with Reagan coming into office and Lennon coming back into public life, the Republicans wanted Lennon out of the way due to his publicly anti-"establishment" (read: Nixon/Republican) views earlier in the '70's.
I've heard that touched on briefly but never heard anything substantial to back it up.

"substantial"? Sort of like "Iraq's WMD's"? It would be the same as "who killed JFK?" Would ANYONE really know? The only "reality" is that John Lennon (as well as JFK, RFK, MLK Jr) are no longer with us, lives cut significantly short.

gldstwmn 06-07-2004 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD
"substantial"? Sort of like "Iraq's WMD's"? It would be the same as "who killed JFK?" Would ANYONE really know? The only "reality" is that John Lennon (as well as JFK, RFK, MLK Jr) are no longer with us, lives cut significantly short.

No. I heard a two minute blurb on a talk show once and that's all I ever heard about it. That's what I mean. I'm not saying it's implausible at all. :shrug:

gldstwmn 06-07-2004 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
That has never stopped you before :shrug:

(I am just joking BTW :laugh: )

http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/...o/asshole2.gif

dissention 06-07-2004 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn
More like Don Corleone...

They need to take Shrub out like Fredo... :lol:

dissention 06-07-2004 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

:lol: :lol: :lol:

How did you save it?! :laugh:

PS: I just got the Madonna show in the mail; thnaks! I'm listening to it now. :cool:

strandinthewind 06-07-2004 02:11 PM

A search of "ronald reagan john lennon death kill" on Google reveals a bunch of articles and other information. Food for Thought.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved