![]() |
Is Rumours an album of catchy pop tunes
Someone on the Lindsey tusk songs thread brought this up So i thought I'd make it an actual poll question Lux said that she thought Rumours was just an album full of catchy pop tunes. And I have a feeling alot of people feel this way about it. But really if you look at Rumours, I feel it's not even close. There's alot of catchy pop out there and I just don't see that in Rumours. The only songs I'd consider catchy pop tunes are Second Hand News, Don't Stop and Dreams. GDW sounds moe experimental then any of Stevie's Tusk songs. The Chain is not like any song I've ever heard by another artist. There's nothing catchy about Oh Daddy, Songbird, or NGBA. I Don't Want to Know is very country. I can see calling GYOW a catchy pop tune, but how can you with that scorching guitar solo. You Make Loving Fun is ctchy in some ways but it's so very bluesy and different. And like I said that leaves SHN, Dreams, and Don't Stop.
|
I voted Yes. But you made it difficult for me, because the question is : Is Rumours JUST a catchy popalbum? Because if I answered that literally I would say No. It's a catchy popalbum that appealed to the whole world, and still does. That's not JUST a catchy popalbum, that's a catchy popalbum that changed lifes, or at least sticks to a lot of lifes as an anchor of memories. It still hasn't lost it's vibration.
|
it was that "just"word that made me vote No.
|
Having been alive at the time Rumors was released and having been a radio buff years before then, I can say that although Rumors became the standard for pop music, the actual songs were trendsetting it design and execution. Radio had never heard anything exactly like GYOW and GDW, esp. the percussion parts. Although Dreams is very popular to this say, Stevie's spacey and trippy execution of those brilliant lyrics was not really done before except perhaps by Heart. Don't Stop and YMLF are pop, but CM is/was a pop favorite and I love her for it. Havinmg said that, Oh Daddy is FAR from pop, esp. then when the whole Mid East vibe was nowhere on the radio. Interestingly, I think the only exact homnages to pure pop are IDWTK, which is straight Everly Brothers esq. two part harmony from the late 60's, and SHN which although brilliant, borrowed heavily from the Bee Gee's pop standard Jive Talking. Finally, Silver Springs was not pop in the sense that nothing that sounded like it was on the radio at the time. So, while yes, Rumors became the pop standard, it was different in design and execution than pretty much what was being played on the radio at the time. Thus, I vote no.
|
Come on now folks, being a fan is one thing, being objective a different thing.
You like Rumours- fine. But please now- it's not a catchy pop album? :rolleyes: |
Quote:
No question that Rumours is catchy pop; even the more obscure-sounding songs like "The Chain" and "Gold Dust Woman" had a palpable pop sensibility. But I wouldn't say it's "just" a catchy pop album. Not by a long shot. It's a lot more than that. |
I voted yes, not because it's JUST a pop album, but like someone said earlier, you'd have had to have been there in the 70's when this thing was unleashed to know exactly what the difference was between what was out there considered as pop and then Rumours... It was a pop album, but it changed the direction of music, or was a great part of that change in music....
It's a great Pop album from its generation and holds up today.. I think!! |
one of the reasons why i love the songs is because they were written in a minor key - with minor chords.
it's the same reason why i love neil young. not exactly the recipe for "catchy pop" tunes.... |
Sting once said it's much easier to write songs in minor keys, than major keys.
|
sting, the tantric one
Sting? Or "Stink" as I like to refer to him. He's hasn't been creating good music since he left the Police. No further comment necessary there.
Rumours is "just" a pop album? For sure. But it's also got more going on underneath the surface. If it were just a pop album of catchy tunes, it wouldn't have had the longevity its enjoyed. There are many, many catchy pop albums that are released every day. You won't be hearing songs from them 20 years from now on FM radio. |
Quote:
I think "Rumours" is definitely a pop album, insofar as that category has (or had) any meaning. In fact, I think that just about every album with Buckingham on it & quite a few Mac albums without Buckingham are pop albums. The Beatles made some pop albums, too. It shouldn't be denigrating to call an album "pop" -- except maybe nowadays, when people think they're too "cool" for pop. (There is good pop & ****ty pop, by the way, which everyone knows.) To me, pop is all about the song: as a distinct whole & piece by piece, fashioned (sometimes painstakingly) into a whole in which each element plays a key role, balanced against & complementing the other elements. In other words, "pop" as opposed to genres with other concerns, namely metal & prog. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, Tusk was accessible in the sense that the song Tusk, although very different a la GYOW two years earlier, was a hit and the song Sara was a huge hit and still receives a relative ton of air play to this day. So, Tusk definitely had pop qualities to it in that regard :shrug: I think the double record aspect of it allowed the quirkier stuff (about 1/2) to get released.
|
I still can't get over the fact that the majority thinks the album is not a pop album. I mean it`s not like namecalling or cursespelling or something like that. You don't have to chew soap after saying this word. Here we go: Pop pop pop pop pop- see nothing happens to me. Pop pop pop- still I am alright. You still can like Rumours after someone says it`s pop. Pop pop pop- you still like it? Good. Still I think it`s pure pop. See I like pop albums. Although Tusk is my FM favourite (which I don't regard as a pure pop album) TITN is an example for a clear and pure pop album that I love. So nothing is wrong about pop albums in general imo. Now please admit that Rumours is a pop album. Would you all please do that? :laugh:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Pop music is accessible music. That's why they called the FM sound California pop rock. Of course there are slight variations between pop, rock, pop rock, soft pop and so on. Every child gets a name. But just because Lindsey adds a guitar solo here and there Rumours is not groundbreaking weird experimental stuff. And it never was. This is not the Tusk discussion thread. And of course is Oh daddy pop music (and a dragging one imo but that`s a different discussion)
Otherwise stuff like Scooter or other Eurotechno stuff would be pop music which it is clearly not although it receives heavy airplay over here. |
Quote:
But, yes, Rumors became and in fact defined pop for a long time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree with Jason on this, pop music does not equal bad music. I think it's far more difficult to craft the perfect pop song than just to grab that old battered acoustic guitar and be confessional for the billionth time in one's career. Neil Young does that and yet he still has more integrity than many pop musicians, even the greatest. Damn 'em rules of coolness. If catchiness equals bad then I don't agree with that sentiment either. Rumours is a catchy album almost throughout (I say the songwriting in "Dreams" doesn't have a coherent hook in it, when those guitars and harmonies appear then it finds its important #1 hook). "Gold Dust Woman" is one of Stevie's catchiest songs in the traditional sense and yet it's performed in a way that could get anyone disturbed in their sleep. The songwriting provides the accessibility, the performance comes directly from the Patti Smith book. And everything on Tusk is as memorable as on Rumours; the writers didn't change their way of writing, they (or HE) changed the recording approaches. Rumours isn't just a pop album, it's a song cycle, relative to the '60s classic albums. Compared to the seemingly random post-modernism of Tusk, it's no wonder it's more appealing. But I still won't say that the other is more artistic and the other is more superficial. Tusk may have its layers of emotions spreaded out here and there and might thush suffer in some people's eyes. Rumours speaks to people more directly and still avoids the banal trappings. 'S a great album, no matter how overplayed it is in the rest of the world. In Finland I can pretend it's the greatest underground album ever and complain how Peter Green is overrated in peace. ;) (and sorry for the redundancy). |
Quote:
I put it on repeat and listened to it ten times in a row. I think it's the best thing on the reissues (next to Planets and Brushes). If they had such good stuff, just imagine what could've been on in place of Mic the Screecher. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
I also think the SHN news alt. version is better than the album cut. |
To me the success of Rumours is based on the uncommon fact that there are 3 different songwriters and also singers, male and female, in one band and on one record. They grabbed first attention with a good success on the predecessor and so there was something to build on. Then you have the popular drama story we have heard about often enough as I guess. Honestly I would be glad never to hear about it again in any interview of the band. Never. But O.K. And then you have extremely catchy songs like GYOW and Don`t stop. Or Dreams-Stevies uncommon voice and the fact she was very pretty- that grabbed a lot of peoples attention. I couldn't name a lot of bands with 3 prominent front people- so that is a really extraordinary. You have got all you need here:
A story behind the music A beautiful female star Catchy pop tunes 3 different voices and songwriters Strand I guess we can discuss it until we turn blue and green, seems like we have to state that we simply disagree. Completely disagree to be precise. I will go on stating that Rumours is a pure and plain pop album because it contents catchy pop and pop rock songs everyone could be familiar with at once. And I too lived back in 77 and listened a lot to the radio even though I was a child. I did not fall from the chair after hearing GYOW, which received a lot of airplay. |
There's bits where the homogenous harmony works fine and bits where you'd rather hear Stevie.
The album version of "GYOW" should be closer to the live versions in that Stevie should be allowed to be more prominent. But then again, even though I think SN is one of the best harmonizers in rock (in that she doesn't blend in, she DEMANDS attention), the harmonies in the alternate "Oh Daddy" don't really add anything more to it than what the final cut has. Why don't you just get a time machine and go kick LB's, KC's and RD's butts and tell them which takes they should use? ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Different generations have different definitions of music. My kids liked Backstreet Boys and NSYNC when they were little but didn't fall off the chair hearing KORN. They're older teens now and know the difference. They also don't like any of those groups now either. :lol: |
Quote:
No I'm not amkign an example of you. Your coments in the other thread just kind of spaked an idea in my hjead for this poll. You should be proud really. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rumours wasn't the safest thing they could have done but it was the safest thing they could have replicated. That's what I think Lindsey has always referred to. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved