The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Rumours (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Is Rumours an album of catchy pop tunes (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=13987)

Hawkeye 04-25-2004 11:08 PM

Is Rumours an album of catchy pop tunes
 
Someone on the Lindsey tusk songs thread brought this up So i thought I'd make it an actual poll question Lux said that she thought Rumours was just an album full of catchy pop tunes. And I have a feeling alot of people feel this way about it. But really if you look at Rumours, I feel it's not even close. There's alot of catchy pop out there and I just don't see that in Rumours. The only songs I'd consider catchy pop tunes are Second Hand News, Don't Stop and Dreams. GDW sounds moe experimental then any of Stevie's Tusk songs. The Chain is not like any song I've ever heard by another artist. There's nothing catchy about Oh Daddy, Songbird, or NGBA. I Don't Want to Know is very country. I can see calling GYOW a catchy pop tune, but how can you with that scorching guitar solo. You Make Loving Fun is ctchy in some ways but it's so very bluesy and different. And like I said that leaves SHN, Dreams, and Don't Stop.

shackin'up 04-26-2004 03:30 AM

I voted Yes. But you made it difficult for me, because the question is : Is Rumours JUST a catchy popalbum? Because if I answered that literally I would say No. It's a catchy popalbum that appealed to the whole world, and still does. That's not JUST a catchy popalbum, that's a catchy popalbum that changed lifes, or at least sticks to a lot of lifes as an anchor of memories. It still hasn't lost it's vibration.

Mari 04-26-2004 04:09 AM

it was that "just"word that made me vote No.

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 07:31 AM

Having been alive at the time Rumors was released and having been a radio buff years before then, I can say that although Rumors became the standard for pop music, the actual songs were trendsetting it design and execution. Radio had never heard anything exactly like GYOW and GDW, esp. the percussion parts. Although Dreams is very popular to this say, Stevie's spacey and trippy execution of those brilliant lyrics was not really done before except perhaps by Heart. Don't Stop and YMLF are pop, but CM is/was a pop favorite and I love her for it. Havinmg said that, Oh Daddy is FAR from pop, esp. then when the whole Mid East vibe was nowhere on the radio. Interestingly, I think the only exact homnages to pure pop are IDWTK, which is straight Everly Brothers esq. two part harmony from the late 60's, and SHN which although brilliant, borrowed heavily from the Bee Gee's pop standard Jive Talking. Finally, Silver Springs was not pop in the sense that nothing that sounded like it was on the radio at the time. So, while yes, Rumors became the pop standard, it was different in design and execution than pretty much what was being played on the radio at the time. Thus, I vote no.

stefan 04-26-2004 07:52 AM

Come on now folks, being a fan is one thing, being objective a different thing.
You like Rumours- fine. But please now- it's not a catchy pop album? :rolleyes:

CarneVaca 04-26-2004 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Having been alive at the time Rumors was released and having been a radio buff years before then, I can say that although Rumors became the standard for pop music, the actual songs were trendsetting it design and execution. Radio had never heard anything exactly like GYOW and GDW, esp. the percussion parts.

This is an important point. "Dreams" picked up where the band had left off with "Rhiannon." The voice that had already enthralled millions was coming back in song that was just as mysterious and catchy, backed by the same rhythm section, and propelled into the sublime by the interplay of Stevie's voice with Lindsey's beautiful guitar licks. "Go Your Own Way," the first single, became a hit in spite of itself. "You Make Loving Fun" and "Don't Stop" are the true unabashed pop entries that were released as singles.

No question that Rumours is catchy pop; even the more obscure-sounding songs like "The Chain" and "Gold Dust Woman" had a palpable pop sensibility. But I wouldn't say it's "just" a catchy pop album. Not by a long shot. It's a lot more than that.

MacMan 04-26-2004 09:14 AM

I voted yes, not because it's JUST a pop album, but like someone said earlier, you'd have had to have been there in the 70's when this thing was unleashed to know exactly what the difference was between what was out there considered as pop and then Rumours... It was a pop album, but it changed the direction of music, or was a great part of that change in music....

It's a great Pop album from its generation and holds up today.. I think!!

dontlookdown 04-26-2004 10:26 AM

one of the reasons why i love the songs is because they were written in a minor key - with minor chords.
it's the same reason why i love neil young.

not exactly the recipe for "catchy pop" tunes....

HomerMcvie 04-26-2004 10:35 AM

Sting once said it's much easier to write songs in minor keys, than major keys.

mylittledemon 04-26-2004 11:17 AM

sting, the tantric one
 
Sting? Or "Stink" as I like to refer to him. He's hasn't been creating good music since he left the Police. No further comment necessary there.

Rumours is "just" a pop album? For sure. But it's also got more going on underneath the surface. If it were just a pop album of catchy tunes, it wouldn't have had the longevity its enjoyed. There are many, many catchy pop albums that are released every day. You won't be hearing songs from them 20 years from now on FM radio.

David 04-26-2004 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontlookdown
one of the reasons why i love the songs is because they were written in a minor key - with minor chords.

I'm not sure I understand. The album seems to me mostly a major-key bath: "Second Hand News," "Dreams," "Never Going Back Again," "Don't Stop," "Songbird," "I Don't Want to Know" are all predominantly in major keys. As are the verses of "Go Your Own Way" & the beautiful cascading wash of the chorus on "You Make Loving Fun."

I think "Rumours" is definitely a pop album, insofar as that category has (or had) any meaning. In fact, I think that just about every album with Buckingham on it & quite a few Mac albums without Buckingham are pop albums. The Beatles made some pop albums, too. It shouldn't be denigrating to call an album "pop" -- except maybe nowadays, when people think they're too "cool" for pop. (There is good pop & ****ty pop, by the way, which everyone knows.)

To me, pop is all about the song: as a distinct whole & piece by piece, fashioned (sometimes painstakingly) into a whole in which each element plays a key role, balanced against & complementing the other elements. In other words, "pop" as opposed to genres with other concerns, namely metal & prog.

sodascouts 04-26-2004 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux
Yes, the word 'just' is kind of manipulating.

I agree. It's obvious what you're "supposed" to answer because voting "Yes" to that question automatically limits Rumours, regardless of whether its tunes are catchy or not, and pigeonholes it into a perjorative space.

sodascouts 04-26-2004 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux
But that's not always true, Sgt Pepper went down well, so did Dark Side of the Moon. Maybe it's a conspiracy against Lindsey. That is the logical conclusion.

I think that was Lindsey's goal - make experimental popular. As much as he says he doesn't care about such things, I think in his dreams more people would eat up "Tusk" than ever bought Rumours. Nothing wrong with that, but would it then become "pop" and be something he had to get away from when making the next album? lol

CarneVaca 04-26-2004 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dontlookdown
one of the reasons why i love the songs is because they were written in a minor key - with minor chords.
it's the same reason why i love neil young.

not exactly the recipe for "catchy pop" tunes....

Hmm... I'm not sure it's that straight forward. I Don't Wanna Know, Go Your Own Way, Don't Stop, Never Going Back Again, Second Hand News and You Make Loving Fun are in major keys. And that's half the songs right there. Then you have songs, such as Dreams and The Chain, which fall somewhere in between major and minor.

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 12:42 PM

Well, Tusk was accessible in the sense that the song Tusk, although very different a la GYOW two years earlier, was a hit and the song Sara was a huge hit and still receives a relative ton of air play to this day. So, Tusk definitely had pop qualities to it in that regard :shrug: I think the double record aspect of it allowed the quirkier stuff (about 1/2) to get released.

stefan 04-26-2004 12:52 PM

I still can't get over the fact that the majority thinks the album is not a pop album. I mean it`s not like namecalling or cursespelling or something like that. You don't have to chew soap after saying this word. Here we go: Pop pop pop pop pop- see nothing happens to me. Pop pop pop- still I am alright. You still can like Rumours after someone says it`s pop. Pop pop pop- you still like it? Good. Still I think it`s pure pop. See I like pop albums. Although Tusk is my FM favourite (which I don't regard as a pure pop album) TITN is an example for a clear and pure pop album that I love. So nothing is wrong about pop albums in general imo. Now please admit that Rumours is a pop album. Would you all please do that? :laugh:

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stefan
I still can't get over the fact that the majority thinks the album is not a pop album. I mean it`s not like namecalling or cursespelling or something like that. You don't have to chew soap after saying this word. Here we go: Pop pop pop pop pop- see nothing happens to me. Pop pop pop- still I am alright. You still can like Rumours after someone says it`s pop. Pop pop pop- you still like it? Good. Still I think it`s pure pop. See I like pop albums. Although Tusk is my FM favourite (which I don't regard as a pure pop album) TITN is an example for a clear and pure pop album that I love. So nothing is wrong about pop albums in general imo. Now please admit that Rumours is a pop album. Would you all please do that? :laugh:

I do not think people are saying pop = bad music. I certainly am not. What I am saying is that when released, Rumors had some main stream stuff on it (SHN, IDWTK, and DS), but the remaining songs were not pop because they were very different than what was being played on the radio at that time. The album was a huge success. So, those different sounding songs became emulated and, thus, pop. In other words, the success of Rumors defines Rumors as pop even though the majority of it was not in the scheme of the times.

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux
Wait, does that mean that if it's different to the majority of what's on the radio that it isn't pop?

Well, yes :laugh: As noted earlier "pop" means what is popular. At the time Rumors was released, the vibe of music was turning from heavy 70's guitar crunching bands to disco. There was some in between stuff, but that was mainly it. So, in that sense Rumors broke new ground. I believe the press of the day called it a fresh California pop-rock sound. So, Rumors was pop in the sense that it defined radio for a long time. But, it was not pop in the sense that it was merely a restatement of the sounds currently playing on the radio at that time. In other words, it definitely set a trend and was a leader not a follower.

glitter_fades 04-26-2004 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Having been alive at the time Rumors was released and having been a radio buff years before then, I can say that although Rumors became the standard for pop music, the actual songs were trendsetting it design and execution. Radio had never heard anything exactly like GYOW and GDW, esp. the percussion parts. Although Dreams is very popular to this say, Stevie's spacey and trippy execution of those brilliant lyrics was not really done before except perhaps by Heart. Don't Stop and YMLF are pop, but CM is/was a pop favorite and I love her for it. Havinmg said that, Oh Daddy is FAR from pop, esp. then when the whole Mid East vibe was nowhere on the radio. Interestingly, I think the only exact homnages to pure pop are IDWTK, which is straight Everly Brothers esq. two part harmony from the late 60's, and SHN which although brilliant, borrowed heavily from the Bee Gee's pop standard Jive Talking. Finally, Silver Springs was not pop in the sense that nothing that sounded like it was on the radio at the time. So, while yes, Rumors became the pop standard, it was different in design and execution than pretty much what was being played on the radio at the time. Thus, I vote no.

I agree completely. With respect to it's time, it was not typical am radio pop. Disco and one hit wonders were the songs all over am radio in '77. Songs penned and produced by musical hit factories using paid songwriters and session musicians were thought of as pop. Back then am was pop music and fm including "FM" (the band) was album oriented rock. People listening to FM were looking for new sounds and harder sounds (especially harder guitar like we'd think of as metal today) Rumours crossed over both audiences as the singles propelled interest among the masses, but the early fans of Rumours were fm listeners who were more hard rock fans (fans of the blistering guitar, GYOW, DS) and what we called acid rock (freaky, head trip music you listened to while getting stoned, GDW, Oh Daddy) . The fact that Rumours was a whole concept, intentional or unintentional, and the songs ran the table in a variety of music styles, is the key reason it was the best selling album to that time. It was not considered just pop when it was first released. It became the standard of what I like to call classic rock. I still have a hard time calling it pop since those of us who were big radio listeners then, we didn't consider it pop when we first heard it.

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glitter_fades
I still have a hard time calling it pop since those of us who were big radio listeners then, we didn't consider it pop when we first heard it.

EXACTLY!!!!!

dissention 04-26-2004 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerMcvie
Sting once said it's much easier to write songs in minor keys, than major keys.

Good thing Jake isn't around, you'd have to run and hide for bringing up Stink's name. :wavey:

stefan 04-26-2004 02:08 PM

Pop music is accessible music. That's why they called the FM sound California pop rock. Of course there are slight variations between pop, rock, pop rock, soft pop and so on. Every child gets a name. But just because Lindsey adds a guitar solo here and there Rumours is not groundbreaking weird experimental stuff. And it never was. This is not the Tusk discussion thread. And of course is Oh daddy pop music (and a dragging one imo but that`s a different discussion)
Otherwise stuff like Scooter or other Eurotechno stuff would be pop music which it is clearly not although it receives heavy airplay over here.

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stefan
. . . But just because Lindsey adds a guitar solo here and there doesn't make Rumours groundbreaking weird experimental stuff. And it never was.

No song I had ever heard sounded like GYOW - the percussion and guitar work (esp. the countering acoustic) were very experimental for the time. As Carne has said, it was a big risk for GYOW to be a single because it was so relatively quirky when compared to what was on the radio at the time. Dreams as well. No one had had a voice dance around a bass line like that. Then The Chain (esp. the extended bass line bridge) and GDW (the shattering glass, the shieks, the moans, the heavy heavy lyrics) were all experimental for the times. As I said before, GDW could have been on Tusk and I think was a foreboding wave to the genre of Tusk. Then Oh Daddy with is Middle Eastern flavor, a genre that was nowhere on the radio at the time. So, I conclude Rumors was a fresh breath of creative influence that defined the late 70's California sound (with a little help from The Eagles of course :laugh: ).


But, yes, Rumors became and in fact defined pop for a long time.

dissention 04-26-2004 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Then Oh Daddy with is Middle Eastern flavor, a genre that was nowhere on the radio at the time.

Doesn't it just piss you off that they didn't use the version on the Rumours bonus disc? I mean, talk about bad decisions. That version chills me to the bone, man. What an amazing song.

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Doesn't it just piss you off that they didn't use the version on the Rumours bonus disc? I mean, talk about bad decisions. That version chills me to the bone, man. What an amazing song.

Yes. I always thought Stevie and the brilliant CM should have done a duet. That version of Oh Daddy is the closest thing to that we are ever gonna get. When I first heard that version I just stopped what I was doing and stood there and listened to it - mouth agape. I think that version is a perfect example of Stevie's incredible ability to use her voice as an instrument and her inate sense of harmony. Not to mention CM is never wrong IMO.

face of glass 04-26-2004 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
To me, pop is all about the song: as a distinct whole & piece by piece, fashioned (sometimes painstakingly) into a whole in which each element plays a key role, balanced against & complementing the other elements. In other words, "pop" as opposed to genres with other concerns, namely metal & prog.

Oh indeed. But then again that comment seems to ignore the intricacies that the most well-known prog bands put into their arrangements. Isn't the best, timeless pop music about that too? (think ABBA, Burt Bacharach's productions, the Beach Boys, the Beatles, the Rumours-era Fleetwood Mac, etc.)

I agree with Jason on this, pop music does not equal bad music. I think it's far more difficult to craft the perfect pop song than just to grab that old battered acoustic guitar and be confessional for the billionth time in one's career. Neil Young does that and yet he still has more integrity than many pop musicians, even the greatest. Damn 'em rules of coolness.

If catchiness equals bad then I don't agree with that sentiment either. Rumours is a catchy album almost throughout (I say the songwriting in "Dreams" doesn't have a coherent hook in it, when those guitars and harmonies appear then it finds its important #1 hook). "Gold Dust Woman" is one of Stevie's catchiest songs in the traditional sense and yet it's performed in a way that could get anyone disturbed in their sleep. The songwriting provides the accessibility, the performance comes directly from the Patti Smith book.

And everything on Tusk is as memorable as on Rumours; the writers didn't change their way of writing, they (or HE) changed the recording approaches.

Rumours isn't just a pop album, it's a song cycle, relative to the '60s classic albums. Compared to the seemingly random post-modernism of Tusk, it's no wonder it's more appealing. But I still won't say that the other is more artistic and the other is more superficial. Tusk may have its layers of emotions spreaded out here and there and might thush suffer in some people's eyes. Rumours speaks to people more directly and still avoids the banal trappings. 'S a great album, no matter how overplayed it is in the rest of the world. In Finland I can pretend it's the greatest underground album ever and complain how Peter Green is overrated in peace. ;)

(and sorry for the redundancy).

dissention 04-26-2004 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Yes. I always thought Stevie and the brilliant CM should have done a duet. That version of Oh Daddy is the closest thing to that we are ever gonna get. When I first heard that version I just stopped what I was doing and stood there and listened to it - mouth agape. I think that version is a perfect example of Stevie's incredible ability to use her voice as an instrument and her inate sense of harmony. Not to mention CM is never wrong IMO.

:nod:

I put it on repeat and listened to it ten times in a row. I think it's the best thing on the reissues (next to Planets and Brushes). If they had such good stuff, just imagine what could've been on in place of Mic the Screecher. :rolleyes:

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
:nod:

I put it on repeat and listened to it ten times in a row. I think it's the best thing on the reissues (next to Planets and Brushes). If they had such good stuff, just imagine what could've been on in place of Mic the Screecher. :rolleyes:

LOL - I think the screeching noise is the amplified noise of a razor lining up coke on a mirror :laugh: :laugh:

I also think the SHN news alt. version is better than the album cut.

stefan 04-26-2004 02:36 PM

To me the success of Rumours is based on the uncommon fact that there are 3 different songwriters and also singers, male and female, in one band and on one record. They grabbed first attention with a good success on the predecessor and so there was something to build on. Then you have the popular drama story we have heard about often enough as I guess. Honestly I would be glad never to hear about it again in any interview of the band. Never. But O.K. And then you have extremely catchy songs like GYOW and Don`t stop. Or Dreams-Stevies uncommon voice and the fact she was very pretty- that grabbed a lot of peoples attention. I couldn't name a lot of bands with 3 prominent front people- so that is a really extraordinary. You have got all you need here:
A story behind the music
A beautiful female star
Catchy pop tunes
3 different voices and songwriters

Strand I guess we can discuss it until we turn blue and green, seems like we have to state that we simply disagree. Completely disagree to be precise. I will go on stating that Rumours is a pure and plain pop album because it contents catchy pop and pop rock songs everyone could be familiar with at once. And I too lived back in 77 and listened a lot to the radio even though I was a child. I did not fall from the chair after hearing GYOW, which received a lot of airplay.

face of glass 04-26-2004 02:40 PM

There's bits where the homogenous harmony works fine and bits where you'd rather hear Stevie.

The album version of "GYOW" should be closer to the live versions in that Stevie should be allowed to be more prominent.

But then again, even though I think SN is one of the best harmonizers in rock (in that she doesn't blend in, she DEMANDS attention), the harmonies in the alternate "Oh Daddy" don't really add anything more to it than what the final cut has.

Why don't you just get a time machine and go kick LB's, KC's and RD's butts and tell them which takes they should use? ;)

strandinthewind 04-26-2004 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by face of glass
Why don't you just get a time machine and go kick LB's, KC's and RD's butts and tell them which takes they should use? ;)

Oh if I could :laugh:

glitter_fades 04-26-2004 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stefan
even though I was a child. I did not fall from the chair after hearing GYOW, which received a lot of airplay.




Different generations have different definitions of music. My kids liked Backstreet Boys and NSYNC when they were little but didn't fall off the chair hearing KORN. They're older teens now and know the difference. They also don't like any of those groups now either. :lol:

Hawkeye 04-26-2004 02:48 PM

Quote:

Are you trying to make an example of me? Perhaps I should not speak up, seems that whenever I do I'm either told I'm wrong or simply clinically insane.
..
No I'm not amkign an example of you. Your coments in the other thread just kind of spaked an idea in my hjead for this poll. You should be proud really.

Hawkeye 04-26-2004 02:51 PM

Quote:

it was that "just"word that made me vote No.
Man what a comotion one word can make. It seems many didn't like the word just. MAybe I should've should Is Rumours Mainly a Catchy Pop Album.

Hawkeye 04-26-2004 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Having been alive at the time Rumors was released and having been a radio buff years before then, I can say that although Rumors became the standard for pop music, the actual songs were trendsetting it design and execution. Radio had never heard anything exactly like GYOW and GDW, esp. the percussion parts. Although Dreams is very popular to this say, Stevie's spacey and trippy execution of those brilliant lyrics was not really done before except perhaps by Heart. Don't Stop and YMLF are pop, but CM is/was a pop favorite and I love her for it. Havinmg said that, Oh Daddy is FAR from pop, esp. then when the whole Mid East vibe was nowhere on the radio. Interestingly, I think the only exact homnages to pure pop are IDWTK, which is straight Everly Brothers esq. two part harmony from the late 60's, and SHN which although brilliant, borrowed heavily from the Bee Gee's pop standard Jive Talking. Finally, Silver Springs was not pop in the sense that nothing that sounded like it was on the radio at the time. So, while yes, Rumors became the pop standard, it was different in design and execution than pretty much what was being played on the radio at the time. Thus, I vote no.

You put it better them me or anyone else has.

Hawkeye 04-26-2004 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stefan
Come on now folks, being a fan is one thing, being objective a different thing.
You like Rumours- fine. But please now- it's not a catchy pop album? :rolleyes:

Oh I'm VERY objective, very very objective. I just don't believe that Rumours is like the definition of a catchy pop safe album and Tusk is like the definition of risk taking. Lindsey is moe guilty of this then any of us fans here. He seems to think that Rumours was like the safest possible thing they could've done.

dissention 04-26-2004 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye
Man what a comotion one word can make. It seems many didn't like the word just. MAybe I should've should Is Rumours Mainly a Catchy Pop Album.

No, it's just that some people are so uncomfortably anal that they're determined to make everyone else just as uncomfortable. Don't sweat it, man. If people want to quarrel over a word, just sit back and laugh.

Hawkeye 04-26-2004 03:01 PM

Quote:

TITN is an example for a clear and pure pop album that I love.
I agree that TITN is much more then Rumours what I'd consider a catchy pop album.

face of glass 04-26-2004 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye
Lindsey is moe guilty of this then any of us fans here. He seems to think that Rumours was like the safest possible thing they could've done.

In ChiliD's words: "Rumours was pop experimentation that became mainstream".

Rumours wasn't the safest thing they could have done but it was the safest thing they could have replicated. That's what I think Lindsey has always referred to.

Mari 04-26-2004 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
No, it's just that some people are so uncomfortably anal that they're determined to make everyone else just as uncomfortable. Don't sweat it, man. If people want to quarrel over a word, just sit back and laugh.

:rolleyes: now who's being anal... can't stand it if 'some people' have a different opinion, maybe? :p


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved