Please Help Save NPR and PBS
 

A House panel has voted to eliminate all public funding for NPR and PBS, starting with "Sesame Street." This would be the most severe cut in the history of public broadcasting. NPR and PBS are under attack, but Americans trust them over the commercial networks. Sign the petition to save NPR, PBS and our local public stations from losing their funding.

Dear MoveOn member,

You know that email petition that keeps circulating about how Congress is slashing funding for NPR and PBS? Well, now it's actually true. (Really. Check the footnotes if you don't believe us.)

A House panel has voted to eliminate all public funding for NPR and PBS, starting with "Sesame Street," "Reading Rainbow," and other commercial-free children's shows. If approved, this would be the most severe cut in the history of public broadcasting, threatening to pull the plug on Big Bird, Cookie Monster and Oscar the Grouch.

Sign the petition telling Congress to save NPR and PBS:

http://www.moveon.org/publicbroadcas...p9JcUwZysA&t=3

If we can reach 250,000 signatures by the end of the week, we'll put Congress on notice. After you sign the petition, please pass this message along to any friends, neighbors or co-workers who count on NPR and PBS.

The cuts would slash 25% of the federal funding this year—$100 million—and end funding altogether within two years.1 In particular, the loss could kill beloved children's shows like "Sesame Street," "Clifford the Big Red Dog," "Arthur" and "Postcards from Buster." Rural stations and those serving low-income communities might not survive. Other stations would have to increase corporate sponsorships.

This shameful vote is only the latest partisan assault on public TV and radio. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which exists to shield public TV and radio from political pressure, is now chaired by Kenneth Tomlinson, a staunch Republican close to the White House. Tomlinson has already forced one-sided conservative programs on the air, even though Tomlinson's own surveys show that most people consider NPR "fair and balanced" and they actually trust public broadcasting more than commercial network news.2

Tomlinson also spent taxpayer dollars on a witch hunt to root out "liberal bias," including a secret investigation of Bill Moyers and PBS' popular investigative show, "NOW." Even though the public paid for the investigation, Tomlinson has refused to release the findings.3

The lawmakers who proposed the cuts aren't just trying to save money in the budget—they're trying to decimate any news outlets who question those in power. This is an ideological attack on our free press.

Talk about bad timing. Every day brings another story about media consolidation. Radio, TV stations and newspapers are increasingly controlled by a few massive corporate conglomerates trying to maximize profits at the expense of quality journalism. Now more than ever, we need publicly funded media who will ask hard questions and focus on stories that affect real people, instead of Michael Jackson and the runaway bride.

As the House and Senate consider this frightening effort to kill public broadcasting, they need to hear from its owners—you.

http://www.moveon.org/publicbroadcas...p9JcUwZysA&t=4

Thank you for all you do,

–Noah, Wes, Jennifer, Eli and the MoveOn.org Team
Tuesday, June 14th, 2005

P.S. You can learn more about the threat to public broadcasting from our friends at Free Press at:

http://www.moveon.org/r?r=748

Sources:

1. "Public Broadcasting Targeted By House," Washington Post, June 10, 2005
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=745

2. "CPB's 'Secrets and Lies': Why the CPB Board Hid its Polls Revealing Broad Public Support for PBS and NPR," Center for Digital Democracy, April 27, 2005
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=746

3. "Republican Chairman Exerts Pressure on PBS, Alleging Biases," New York Times, May 2, 2005
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0502-01.htm

I can't believe this is really a possibility. :mad:

I signed of course.

Signed.


Thanks for the head's up on this, Suze.

I waffle on this issue all of the time. I think we need to feed the hungry and insure the poor before funding this. But, then I think this is so little money in the big scheme of things. So, I say fund it.

I think they are voting on this right now. MoveOn got over 300,000 signatures yesterday but I think it is still important to go and sign it if you believe these media should be funded.

Do you really think that will ever happen? :cool:

I signed it, but this puppy will probably be drowned. It dares to sometimes report from a POV that is not conservative. And uses government money. In this administration, the government only wants to support it's own POV.Therefore, it will be shut down. It will be a feather in the caps of Shrubbie and all of his Tabernacle Taliban buddies.

I am an optimist :cool: amongst pessimists I know - but I remain so nontheless :laugh:

You must be making fun of Dissention with this statement, right ?

I would never make fun with --- I mean of -- Dissention :woohoo:

I signed. I hope it helps!

From what I see, some GOP congressmen are starting to break ranks with the hardliners. I hope they use their heads and not their partisan leaning hearts. We know how irrational decisions from the heart can be.

What pisses me off is that this isn't about trying to save money. It's about control of the media... the republicans feel threatened by PBS and NPR because they are still independent media entities. They are just trying to silence another voice of dissention. :distress:

YOU GOT IT. The Gestapo must control all the information.

Oh, really? Just look at this current administration. ANYTHING that narrows the minds of "the people" is their goal. "Free country" my a$$. Rigged elections twice in a row, The Patriot Act, Homeland Security, etc. Us Americans are living in a Fascist State these days...c'est la vie "GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE".

Or...

...what Ken said.

I guess I should've read the WHOLE thread.