![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Stevie is gonna beat the pants off of the other 2. Even is you combine CM and LB's scores. :lol:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
realistically, stevie probably has more like 80 fans on TL, many of them who never seem to check Rumours forum, and not just 40+ who voted in this poll. results so far: Christine McVie 12 Lindsey Buckingham 20 Stevie Nicks 43 or christine+lindsey - 32 stevie - 43 just show you how ridiculous is to do polls in which stevie's songs are pitted against the songs from other 2 songwriters (all you people who voted to do them:wavey: - such as current poll MSB has opened - just look at the results in it so far :laugh:). such poll results in most cases remind me of the US Congress - most votes are divided down the party lines :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We're like the Peter Lorre character in "M." We don't want to be murderers, but the drive is too strong for our ability to control it, & our actions torment us because of that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I voted for Stevie because, like David, I just have to. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Christine has the best in-studio voice, and has lost none of her range. She has trouble live when the sound is way up.
Stevie can sing live and in studio and makes the most of her diminished range. Lindsey can't really sing anymore. He just sorta shouts and/or talks. |
Quote:
Christine really is amazing, that age only seemed to make her voice better. That's really unusual. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Michele |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I've voted Christine because although i prefer Stevie's solo stuff a little more Christine's Mac stuff is just beautiful and I feel a more emotional connection to her material. I also think she's a little underrated and she has a wicked very English sense of humour and lovely legs. LOL.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess none of us will know for sure unless (until?) she puts an album out again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and i don't know what happened, but his solo live voice has been incredible all last year. you can argue that some of that has been pre-engineered and mixed in at live shows, but we've also heard him sing live at 92Y, without even a proper mic let alone any engineering (check a bit earlier in this thread for Hejira's recording of one of the songs he did then). EDIT: and, i hate what he did to his voice on SWS. all 6 songs from that album are much better live, with his regular voice - imo, of course. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i wouldn't necessarily say he's got his voice "back" because he definitely doesn't have the high range anymore, not surprisingly. a lot of his sounding so good might be due to putting his songs in the key he can actually sing them in. just a speculation, but might be possible that with FM, with both his and SN's voice loosing range, they cannot find the range in which both of their voices can do their best. another caveat, i don't like his young high girly-sounding voice. the voice he has now is lower, much fuller, and all around pretty impressive when you hear it during solo shows. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I had a similar experience when I first heard Michael Jackson's 2000 Watts. I was thinking, "whoa, who is this man? Where's Michael been hiding him?" Michele |
To be hyperbolic, this was a real Sophie's Choice for me. I'm a "package deal" kinda gal. I do love all of Lindsey's solo albums (as opposed to about 75% of Stevie's) but ultimately had to vote Chiffon in 2012. I have a tambo tattoo, 'nuff said.
|
Quote:
"Chiffon in 2012" - I LOVE that!! :wavey: |
Quote:
I don't care if Lindsey is high or low, I just want the whisper-voice to go! As for my pick: I am thinking... Stevie may be the glamorous glue. But I'm not ready to vote yet. |
Had to go with...
LB (With all respects to Christine), burnt out on Stevie.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved