![]() |
Oh, whatever. Stevie circa 1982 still needed Fleetwood Mac as much as they needed her. Sure, she had her burgeoning solo career, but would her second solo album have sold as much as it did if the FM connection had been severed?
Plus, lets not understate Christine McVie's popularity in 1981. She very easily could have had a #1 album in 1981, as Stevie did. |
Tis true. And Christine had a really popular solo record in 1984...which remains a good pop album. All star musicians and catchy tunes! I think her contribution to the Mac has been key, even if it has been overshadowed by Buckingham/Nicks. Now don't get me wrong, you know I love Stevie and Buck... but I think Fleetwood Mac works better with Christine. I think it's hard and will continue to be difficult for Lindsey and Stevie to strike the balance you're looking for. But, I hope they CAN do it! ;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's the crux of the matter isn't it? Whether they can make an album that seems unified? I wonder if getting a little bit more loose with Mick and John might help? Who can say?
I think it might help if Lindsey and Stevie approached writing new material together? I think if they could come up with something at least as cohesive as Buckingham Nicks, we might have something on our hands. I agree that SYW felt too much like a puzzle put together incorrectly... And having a new blood producer on the project would allow Lindsey perhaps to step back and look at Stevie from a different perspective and (including his own material) in a different light. |
Quote:
Say You Will on the other hand was helmed by a ****load of people: three main producers (Lindsey, Rob Cavallo, John Shanks), five different engineers, two separate mixing men, & five other musicians laying down tracks, not counting Christine (Sheryl Crow, Jamie Muhoberac, Dave Palmer, John Pierce, & John Shanks). The tracks used on the album were also recorded over a span of at least eight years, possibly longer, in various locations. If the band wants to sound "unified" on a new album, they're going to have to record it from the ground up (no bringing in old tracks & parts of tracks) in the same locale, using the same equipment, & throw the party of additionals out the door. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wish we could get that across to them, I really do. I don't know if they're going to reach that conclusion on their own. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who knows, maybe the fumbled effort that is SYW will only push them to get it together and do it right next time around. I suspect neither Stevie nor Lindsey would want SYW to be the Mac's closing note. Whether or not they can all actually find common ground and a common vision to correct that is what will remain to be seen. |
Quote:
The girl needs to bring some better songs to the table. Doesn't matter who the producer is if all he has to work with is crap. (I'm running now) |
Quote:
|
I also think they should go back to that sound that made them famous, or at least the Buckingham Nicks era of Fleetwood Mac. Get rid of the gimmicks that were prominent on "Say You Will", which in say ten years will not have stood the test of time well, and make a more organic Californian rock sound. They had their own style, which made the song instantly indentifiable with the band before anyone started singing. The only reason why a listener would know "Say You Will" was a Fleetwood Mac album (bar the likes of "Destiny Rules" and "Thrown Down") was because they could hear Stevie and/or Lindsey singing.
|
Quote:
And I certainly don't think Stevie sacrificed more than they did for the band. As far as her needing the band less than Christine or Lindsey did, that depends on how you define "need." If you mean she needed the band to sell out concerts and to make money as a solo artist less than they did, you're definitely correct. She had a name value of her own. Financially, I don't think they needed the money more than she did. So, they needed FM for its star power, to sell records. At the time, I don't think their "need" to be with FM was greater in any other sense than that. Right now, I would say that yes what Lindsey wants from his career today makes him desire and need Fleetwood Mac more than Stevie (possibly more than John too, I don't know what John wants), but I don't think that was true in the eighties or nineties, not it in the least. After SYW came out, even when they were still doing the publicity for SYW, Lindsey said that he wanted to work on a FM album from the ground up and that he wanted them to put out songs that were written with the band in mind from the start, so he had some sense on how to make something more cohesive back then. Hopefully, they follow through. Michele |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On a more positive note, I can't express enough how much I ADORE Destiny Rules. I really do put it right up there with Gypsy... it's just classic Stevie through and through, and defines everything that I love about Fleetwood Mac. I love Not Make Believe nearly as much... it's a shame it didn't make the album. Thrown Down is a good effort too, but I still prefer the original 'wall of sound' take from TISL. I think the one the we can all agree on is this: Lindsey doesn't need to bring fully finished songs to the table next time around, and Stevie needs to leave her dusty '70s and '80s demos at home! Except for If You Were My Love :D. |
Quote:
Truly, one could almost argue Christine was far more 'loyal.' She stuck with the band through multiple lineups, through anonymity, riches and poor, she stayed after her divorce from the band member who brought her into the group to begin with, kept traveling for decades with the band despite her fear of flying, and gave 30 years of her prime to the band that in many senses took her for granted. I think if you were to place Stevie and Christine side by side, Chris is the one who stuck with the band through thick and thin. She was there for years before the band became a household name, and only left to retire from the business. Stevie left the band in '90 out of personal disagreements. |
I think Christine and Lindsey were more loyal than Stevie.
Stevie kept songs for herself such as E of 17, Stand Back etc which could have been good hits for FM. What if: SYW didn't happen, instead Christine returned and made an album and it turned out like this: 1, Did you Miss Me 2, Friend 3, Planets of the Universe 4, Love Runs Deeper 5, Sorcerer 6, Fall from Grace 7, Right place to Fade 8, Love is 9, You are 10, Underground That would sell millions. |
Quote:
Stevie was not talking about a new album from FM, during the SYW period. The most hope she gave us on that score was this year. Michele |
Quote:
(puts on running shoes) I'm with you. I guess it's a matter of taste, but I think she's written better songs that will likely never see the light of day, such as The Dealer, Forsaken Love, Space Needle. A re-work of any of those songs would, for me, have been more favourable than most of her songs on SYW (and the albums after Mirage to be very honest). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That track list looks brilliant but we know the songs as solo efforts, they might have turned out completely differently were threy Fleetwood Mac songs. |
Quote:
However, Stevie did not leave the band in 1990. She was on tour with the band throughout 1990. As for her loyalty to the band, if I made a list of FM members who were most loyal to the band, I'm not even sure Stevie would crack the Top 5. If the argument is that Stevie was more popular with the public than Lindsey and Christine and so her staying to grace those slugs with her magical presence meant more than anyone else being in the band meant, well . . . Michele |
Quote:
As stellar as it is, given the chance, FM probably wouldn't have used EO17. Michele |
Quote:
1. Someone's Gonna Change Your Mind 2. Illume 3. Down on Rodeo 4. Thrown Down 5. Red Rover 6. Destiny Rules 7. Gift of Screws 8. Say You Will 9. Right Time to Fade 10. Everybody Finds Out 11. I Am Waiting 12. Goodbye Baby |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As usual, you take the words out of my mouth. "Loyal" may have been the wrong word on my part-- Louie's summary of Christine's loyalty to the band definitely proves that she blows Stevie out of the water in that category, and I completely agree with that. I do think, however, that we can't discredit Stevie's presence throughout all the albums and tours since Rumours. |
Quote:
HAHA... Riiiight. Like Stevie was "back in the studio" hardcore for Tango in the Night. Yeeaaah. ;) Stevie did leave the band I believe in 1991? All the way thru to The Dance... And while I hate that Lindsey backed out of the Tango tour, at least we've got him back in the band now. |
Quote:
As I said, Christine was more loyal, I agree. I just think we can't discredit Stevie for her own efforts with the band. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Switch "Goodbye Baby" with "Running Through The Garden", put "Destiny Rules" as the last song and then that would be the perfect album in my opinion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is one of the "ground up" comments that I was remembering. Lindsey said it to USA Today in April 2003:
Quote:
Quote:
Michele |
I've got an idea. For the next Fleetwood Mac album Stevie should
get up out of the chair and belt out a few songs. I know there's a big difference in her age, but watch the Tusk Documentary where she's recording "Angel". And then watch Destiny Rules, I can't remember which song she's singing, but she's sitting down. Unless you're playing an instrument, it would be nice if the person putting down vocals would stand up and put a little energy into it. "Thrown.........down.......like...a ba.....", hey I think I need to sit down. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved