The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Rumours (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Why in 1975? (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=19590)

HomerMcvie 06-01-2005 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dudden22
I think the only way Say You Will would have sold more is if Christine was on it. I do not think a shorter album would have made much of a difference in sales unless she was on it.

Amen brother!!! Preach the gospel!!!! :nod: :nod: :nod:

Gailh 06-01-2005 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I do not think so because In the Meantime did not sell well at all :shrug: I mean I love CM, but I think there was no saving SYW even if she had been on it. I think, save for some fluke, FM's days of selling millions of records is over. Plus, SYHA had CM on it and it was a hat tip to the days when FM sold millions of records. Yet, even it could not save SYW. Also, Temp. One was not a hit off of The Dance and CM had had no hits of any significance since 1987, though As Long as You Follow, Save Me, and Skies the Limit did chart (I think). So, I think loyal Mac fans bought the record and the same or maybe a little more would have if CM had been there.

Note - I mean no slam on CM - I am just calling it as I see it.

On edit - the five together though would have made a better record - they always do when it is the five.

I think SYW was too long given the fact that there were only two songwriters. With Christine on board they could have kept the same number of songs but there would have been the balance that (IMO) was missing from SYW.

what a pity they sacked her! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Gail

dudden22 06-01-2005 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
On edit - the five together though would have made a better record - they always do when it is the five.

That is all I meant, their albums have never done as well without all five. It is just not the same.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gailh
. . .

what a pity they sacked her! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Gail

Yep - like Donald Trump - LB screamed in his singing voice (which are one in the same) YOU'RE FIRED while La Nicks hit her on the head repeatedly with her tambourine saying "you are no longer an emerald sister of Rhiannon," Mick asked what day it was with white powder on his lip, and John said FINALLY and GOOD RIDDENCE :laugh: :rolleyes: :laugh:

chiliD 06-01-2005 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I do not think so because In the Meantime did not sell well at all :shrug: I mean I love CM, but I think there was no saving SYW even if she had been on it. I think, save for some fluke, FM's days of selling millions of records is over. Plus, SYHA had CM on it and it was a hat tip to the days when FM sold millions of records. Yet, even it could not save SYW. Also, Temp. One was not a hit off of The Dance and CM had had no hits of any significance since 1987, though As Long as You Follow, Save Me, and Skies the Limit did chart (I think). So, I think loyal Mac fans bought the record and the same or maybe a little more would have if CM had been there.

Note - I mean no slam on CM - I am just calling it as I see it.

On edit - the five together though would have made a better record - they always do when it is the five.


Disagree. In The Meantime was released on a relatively small label, with only minimal promotion. Had the album been released on WB (like her 1984 album), there would've been a lot more promotion.

Plus, with "the five" doing a whole album of new material, it would've been more of "an event" with all five of the Rumours crew been on board. More attention to both album & tour. More airplay of the new material, etc.

Airplay = sales.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD
Disagree. In The Meantime was released on a relatively small label, with only minimal promotion. Had the album been released on WB (like her 1984 album), there would've been a lot more promotion.

Plus, with "the five" doing a whole album of new material, it would've been more of "an event" with all five of the Rumours crew been on board. More attention to both album & tour. More airplay of the new material, etc.

Airplay = sales.


I agree, but I was just noting that no one, save us loons, was chomping at the bit to get new material from her and it was advertised here a little. I fully agree that if SYW had had the five on it, it would have had a better, though still slim, chance of being a mega hit - though this is all speculation.

chiliD 06-01-2005 02:24 PM

It'll be interesting to see how the upcoming new Eagles album of all new material fares. I'm anticipating a big let down.

dissention 06-01-2005 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I agree, but I was just noting that no one, save us loons, was chomping at the bit to get new material from her and it was advertised here a little. I fully agree that if SYW had had the five on it, it would have had a better, though still slim, chance of being a mega hit - though this is all speculation.

No one was exactly chomping at the bit for the Buckingham Nicks, pseudo-Fleetwood Mac album that came out two years ago, either. No one but us fans really chomp at anything released by any of them.

dissention 06-01-2005 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD
It'll be interesting to see how the upcoming new Eagles album of all new material fares. I'm anticipating a big let down.

Materialwise or saleswise? If it's anything like Hole In the World, expect both. :laugh:

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
No one was exactly chomping at the bit for the Buckingham Nicks, pseudo-Fleetwood Mac album that came out two years ago, either. No one but us fans really chomp at anything released by any of them.


Well, it still sold like 800,000 or so copies and THAT was after two disasterous live performances on national t.v. :shrug:

dissention 06-01-2005 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Well, it still sold like 800,000 or so copies and THAT was after two disasterous live performances on national t.v. :shrug:

You think 800,000 copies is a big success and indicates that many people were chomping at the bit for new Mac album? I think not. Their first week sales were a huge success, and then it dropped off the charts (not as quickly as TISL, though). Their days of successfully selling records have been over since Tango (or The Dance, but that success was because of pure nostalgia).

ontheEdgeof17 06-01-2005 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Well, it still sold like 800,000 or so copies and THAT was after two disasterous live performances on national t.v. :shrug:


I loved the GYOW/Peacekeeper intro in the same song on TODAY. :cool:

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
You think 800,000 copies is a big success and indicates that many people were chomping at the bit for new Mac album? I think not. Their first week sales were a huge success, and then it dropped off the charts (not as quickly as TISL, though). Their days of successfully selling records have been over since Tango (or The Dance, but that success was because of pure nostalgia).


Compared to 50,000 that she sold (was that the number) it is eons more chomping :laugh:

Plus, I think I made it clear "FM's days of selling millions of records is over" :shrug:

dissention 06-01-2005 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Compared to 50,000 that she sold (was that the number) it is eons more chomping :laugh:

I thought that ChiliD already explained that to you. :shrug: People weren't "chomping at the bit" because they didn't know it was out there.

No promotion = low sales.

ontheEdgeof17 06-01-2005 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Compared to 50,000 that she sold (was that the number) it is eons more chomping :laugh:

Plus, I think I made it clear "FM's days of selling millions of records is over" :shrug:


I takes one song to make or break an album in it's first week. It takes the other 11 or so to keep it on the charts. Peacekeeper was a bad first single, and the running order killed it from selling more. What casual fan would want to listen past Murrow?

dissention 06-01-2005 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ontheEdgeof17
I loved the GYOW/Peacekeeper intro in the same song on TODAY. :cool:

Oy. If I wasn't a fan and had just tuned into Today and Leno to see who Fleetwood Mac was, I would have gone running for earplugs.

jbrownsjr 06-01-2005 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Oy. If I wasn't a fan and had just tuned into Today and Leno to see who Fleetwood Mac was, I would have gone running for earplugs.


i agree 10893409384092384029380938049238034928%

those vocals were scary

dissention 06-01-2005 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbrownsjr
i agree 10893409384092384029380938049238034928%

those vocals were scary

It sounded like karaoke night at The Apollo. You would never listen to those performances and believe for a second that Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham actually have careers as singers. :laugh:

David 06-01-2005 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r
There's no way in hell I'm ever going to turn my friends on to them or her. To everyone else, other than FM diehard fans, they're a washed up, 70s band trying to capitalize on their *once* success and set up their retirement funds. Come would be laughable I think to someone other than a big fan.

"Come" is pretty laughable to the typical teen today. Our perspective as Mac fans is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooo different from that of the half-naked kids jammed together on the beach, wriggling to 50 Cent or Trick Daddy & Lil' Kim while MTV cameras are filming another installment of "Spring Break."

"Promotion" is not just a single blanket term with the same equivalence in all instances, either. Promotion is a bunch of different things: Fleetwood Mac shooting a video of "Peacekeeper" is promotion & Gwen Stefani baring her ripped abs in a performance on the Grammys is also promotion. Which "promotion" do you think is going to translate into substantial sales? I mean, d'uh, George, right?

In fact, the "Spring Break" context is a far more accurate gauge of popularity & sales among the key music demographic than whether Fleetwood Mac is appearing on the Morning Show or something. If a performer or a band sounds hot to the wriggling, skanking naked kids on "Spring Break," then it's a hit! So all you folks who keep talking about "Well if they had done this to the album, or if they had kept that person in the band, or if they had gotten some more airplay on the Adult Contemporary stations, or if they had appeared on Howard Stern, they'd have sold a lot more," try to imagine how far four aging, paunching 55-year-olds singing "Peacekeeper" would have gotten on that beach stage on "Spring Break" with the audience out there.

Puhleeze.....

Everybody who wanted "Say You Will" bought "Say You Will." Fleetwood Mac was hot in 1976-1978. Every year after that, even if they had a #1 hit album, they were widely considered yesterday's news. Today, they aren't even yesterday's news -- they're like something out of the primeval pools of petroleum. It isn't called "dinosaur rock" for no reason.

but WE love 'em -- & that's really all that matters.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
I thought that ChiliD already explained that to you. :shrug: People weren't "chomping at the bit" because they didn't know it was out there.

No promotion = low sales.


My point, again, is many of CM's fans knew she was releasing a record and it was advertised. She did some press for it as well. So, it is not like it went out without anything whatsoever. But, you will never concede that so that is all.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
It sounded like karaoke night at The Apollo. You would never listen to those performances and believe for a second that Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham actually have careers as singers. :laugh:


She was good on Rhiannon :shrug: and SYW - as good as she can be on that. I think it was LB that sunk that boat.

ontheEdgeof17 06-01-2005 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
She was good on Rhiannon :shrug: and SYW - as good as she can be on that. I think it was LB that sunk that boat.


They should have picked songs they could actually sing fairly well at 8 in the morning. Rhiannon and SYW were not good choices, IMO. :shrug:

dissention 06-01-2005 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
Everybody who wanted "Say You Will" bought "Say You Will." Fleetwood Mac was hot in 1976-1978. Every year after that, even if they had a #1 hit album, they were widely considered yesterday's news. Today, they aren't even yesterday's news -- they're like something out of the primeval pools of petroleum. It isn't called "dinosaur rock" for no reason.

Brilliantly put, David.

David 06-01-2005 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Well, it still sold like 800,000 or so copies and THAT was after two disasterous live performances on national t.v. :shrug:

TV didn't change anybody's minds. I bet the only people talking about that TV appearance were we fans.

Everyone who wanted SYW bought it. The millions who didn't want it ... didn't buy it. Their minds weren't changed by TV appearances in freezing-cold weather or other aspects of "promotion" -- they just didn't want it to begin with. What would a typical System of a Down headbanger fan want with "Say You Will"? to use as a clay pigeon?

dissention 06-01-2005 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
She was good on Rhiannon :shrug: and SYW - as good as she can be on that.

Yeah, if you're deaf.

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I think it was LB that sunk that boat.

It was both of them. :shrug: He stunk, vocally and musically, and she was lethargic and half-assed. It was Dullsville through and through.

David 06-01-2005 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ontheEdgeof17
They should have picked songs they could actually sing fairly well at 8 in the morning. Rhiannon and SYW were not good choices, IMO. :shrug:

I liked watching them perform on that show because they were cold, & there's something about cold weather -- have you ever noticed? -- that makes the performer look sort of more alert & vibrant, I guess because your body is burning more calories trying to stay warm.

As opposed to extreme heat, which makes people look sluggish & lethargic & a little sick.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
TV didn't change anybody's minds. I bet the only people talking about that TV appearance were we fans.

and, respectfully, you'd be wrong. The radio stations here panned them the morning after and I heard people who are not fans laughing about how bad it was. So, the nonfans saw it and were talking about it. Interestingly, for any of those millions who watch that very popular show who would even think about maybe buying that record, that ruined it. But, I agree with you that SYW was never going to sell millions of records outside of some fluke.

ontheEdgeof17 06-01-2005 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
It was both of them. :shrug: He stunk, vocally and musically, and she was lethargic and half-assed. It was Dullsville through and through.


I loved her scarf.

Yup. That's it.


Oh, the GYOW/Peacekeeper intro....I roll in laughter everytime I watch it. Lindsey LOOKED PISSED! :thumbsup:

dissention 06-01-2005 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
TV didn't change anybody's minds. I bet the only people talking about that TV appearance were we fans.

Everyone who wanted SYW bought it. The millions who didn't want it ... didn't buy it. Their minds weren't changed by TV appearances in freezing-cold weather or other aspects of "promotion" -- they just didn't want it to begin with. What would a typical System of a Down headbanger fan want with "Say You Will"? to use as a clay pigeon?

Say You Will was very heavily promoted by Warners. Songs were showcased on three television shows (That 70s Show, Third Watch, and Friends), the band was named the Artist of the Month by AOL (owned by Warners, surprise surprise), they appeared on the top-rated morning show and the top-rated late night show, there were commercials for the album which gave you a number to order it, the first single got rather decent airplay, etc.

And after all of that, the album only sold 800,000. It only proves that you're 100% correct in your assertion that not a whole helluva lot of people were interested in it. They can promote it until everyone in the Western Hemisphere knows that it's in stores, but if they don't want it, they're aren't going to buy it. And that's exactly what happened.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Say You Will was very heavily promoted by Warners. Songs were showcased on three television shows (That 70s Show, Third Watch, and Friends), the band was named the Artist of the Month by AOL (owned by Warners, surprise surprise), they appeared on the top-rated morning show and the top-rated late night show, there were commercials for the album which gave you a number to order it, the first single got rather decent airplay, etc.

And after all of that, the album only sold 800,000. It only proves that you're 100% correct in your assertion that not a whole helluva lot of people were interested in it. They can promote it until everyone in the Western Hemisphere knows that it's in stores, but if they don't want it, they're aren't going to buy it. And that's exactly what happened.


ITA - and that is sad to me, but that is the way it is.

dissention 06-01-2005 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ontheEdgeof17
I loved her scarf.

Yup. That's it.

The only thing I could focus on was her coat. If it was real, someone should have pulled a Joan Rivers on her ass.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
The only thing I could focus on was her coat. If it was real, someone should have pulled a Joan Rivers on her ass.


then how could you know how bad they were if all you were doing is watching the coat :lol: :lol: :lol:

SWISH :woohoo:

dissention 06-01-2005 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
then how could you know how bad they were if all you were doing is watching the coat :lol: :lol: :lol:

SWISH :woohoo:

Because my ears were bleeding at the same time I was imagining throwing red paint all over Nicks.

lagringader&r 06-01-2005 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Say You Will was very heavily promoted by Warners. Songs were showcased on three television shows (That 70s Show, Third Watch, and Friends), the band was named the Artist of the Month by AOL (owned by Warners, surprise surprise), they appeared on the top-rated morning show and the top-rated late night show, there were commercials for the album which gave you a number to order it, the first single got rather decent airplay, etc.

And after all of that, the album only sold 800,000. It only proves that you're 100% correct in your assertion that not a whole helluva lot of people were interested in it. They can promote it until everyone in the Western Hemisphere knows that it's in stores, but if they don't want it, they're aren't going to buy it. And that's exactly what happened.

And possibly FM has realized this and made the decision to "throw in the towel"? However sad that might be for us..

lagringader&r 06-01-2005 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ontheEdgeof17
Oh, the GYOW/Peacekeeper intro....I roll in laughter everytime I watch it. Lindsey LOOKED PISSED! :thumbsup:

Can you elaborate? I didn't see this appearance. What happened? :confused:

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Because my ears were bleeding at the same time I was imagining throwing red paint all over Nicks.


so you were red and wanted her to be red :laugh:

BTW - I get that animal rights people are nuts, but if anyone ever through red paint on me, I would try and resist the urge to respond in kind to their battery by beating the living hell out of them and instead I would have them thrown in jail, press full charges, make sure they stayed there a long long time, and then sue the living crap out of them :wavey:

dissention 06-01-2005 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind
so you were red and wanted her to be red. BTW - I get that animal rights people are nuts, but if anyone ever through red paint on me, I would try and resist the urge to respond in kind to their battery by beating the living hell out of them and instead I would have them trown in jail, press full charges, make sure they stayed there a long long time, and then sue the living crap out of them :wavey:

Then don't kill animals for fur. Simple as that. I think it says a lot about someone who can skin an animal without a care in the world just for fashion and then walk around wearing said skin. Makes me vomit.

ontheEdgeof17 06-01-2005 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r
Can you elaborate? I didn't see this appearance. What happened? :confused:


The band started playing Peacekeeper and Lindsey started GYOW. It's a riot! :laugh: Quite a combo.


Sounds like they had a sudden change in the set that the band didn't know about.

strandinthewind 06-01-2005 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention
Then don't kill animals for fur. Simple as that. I think it says a lot about someone who can skin an animal without a care in the world just for fashion and then walk around wearing said skin. Makes me vomit.


No, destroying anyone's property is just wrong regardless of how you or anyone else feels about it. AND - the law fully supports me on this. If someone does not want fur in clothing, they need to get some to rule it illegal or get it made against the law vis the legislature. But, taking the law into one's own hands is just stupid and anytime anyone does that, they better be prepared to pay for the consequences of it. I mean what if that paint blinded someone or caused them to suffocate because they were allegeric to it? What if it caused them to silp and fall and injure or kill themselves? Would that be worth it? Would that achieve any goal other than saisfying personal rage? No, it would not. Thus, throwing things at people is assinine.

lagringader&r 06-01-2005 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ontheEdgeof17
The band started playing Peacekeeper and Lindsey started GYOW. It's a riot! :laugh: Quite a combo.


Sounds like they had a sudden change in the set that the band didn't know about.

Oh sh*t! :lol:

Were they able to laugh it off? How long did it take the band to stop? I didn't see it, so sorry for all the questions. Was it all of FM or just Stevie and Lindsey with the house band? Gawd! I wish I'd seen this!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved