Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
As much as I love the album, it has no continuity, none of it blends together at all, and it turns out just being mess. It's just too much for one to handle, many of the die-hards on this board have even said as much. And if it's hard for the big fans to swallow, just imagine how hard a pill it was for the general public to swallow.
Reading the user reviews on Amazon is very telling because most of them come from simply casual fans. Boiled down, most people missed Christine, found Lindsey's tracks were off-putting, and Stevie either left people scratching their heads or loving what were seen as the only commercial tracks on the blasted thing.
|
Yet, many of those things can be said of 'Tusk,' too, and that album is regarded as a masterpiece around here.
'Tusk' is definitely a mishmash of styles. Need I remind anyone that the CLOMP! CLOMP! CLOMP! of "What Makes You Think You're The One" follows the languid six-minute piano & acoustic guitar laced "Sara"? And that the edgy, brash and punk-tinged "WMYTYTO" then leads into "Storms"... another slow and mournful ballad?
Or that "The Ledge"... a quirky head-scratcher of a song if ever there was one... is only the second track on the album, following on the heels of Christine's ballad, "Over And Over," and then leading into the Top 40 sounding "Think About Me"?
The album is filled with jarring moments like that.
And as far as missing Christine... well, on 'Tusk' there's a span of
nine songs between two of Christine's tunes, and people seem to get through that all right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
What gets our jollies off as fans is really off-putting to casual fans.
|
Well, the band makes up for it with the casual fans, by sticking to all the big hits in their concert setlists. ;)
As usual, it's a damned if you do/damned if you don't situation. The "commercial" moments on the album... "Say You Will," "Steal Your Heart Away," etc.... were met with groans of displeasure from the "diehards." But the edgy material that many of us here love, elicited groans from the casual fans (and, hell, even many of the diehards too!).
They have material on this album that SHOULD please both factions... and, yet, neither seem pleased. One group wishes the album was entirely "like the Mac of old," and the other group wishes the entire album was dark and edgy.
I'm a weird little goober, because I love Fleetwood Mac's "variety pack" albums, and the fact that many moods and styles are reflected in the selection.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
The album could have been a big hit, but the actual content of it prevented that from happening. I think Warners did a phenomenal job marketing it, the public just didn't care for the product very much. :)
|
Had the band capitalized on the success of 'The Dance' and released an album like this within a year and a half of that monster seller, I think it could have sold MUCH better.
But, they didn't strike while the iron was hot... a six year wait is a LIFETIME in the music industry... so a safer album would have been an "easier sell," and might have helped them overcome the length of time between releases.
Instead, they released a very eclectic album which required more investment from its audience.
From a business standpoint, it wasn't at all wise... but if the band feels satisfied with the album creatively, then it was definitely a success in the end. :)