View Full Version : Heroes are Hard to Find cover
singertobe
01-04-2014, 09:08 PM
Is that Mick's daughter?:shocked:
michelej1
01-04-2014, 09:28 PM
Is that Mick's daughter?:shocked:
Yes. :laugh:
singertobe
01-05-2014, 08:20 PM
Yes. :laugh:
:eek: Awkward!
holidayroad
01-17-2014, 08:16 PM
I was a teen when I found that album. My mom almost didn't let me get it after she saw the cover! :lol:
aleuzzi
01-17-2014, 09:06 PM
Worst cover ever. The back jacket photo, however, is great.
SteveMacD
01-17-2014, 09:50 PM
Almost all of the covers Mick has been on have been questionable. Mr. Wonderful, English Rose, HAHTF, Rumours...I don't think he can help himself
aleuzzi
01-18-2014, 01:18 AM
Almost all of the covers Mick has been on have been questionable. Mr. Wonderful, English Rose, HAHTF, Rumours...I don't think he can help himself
The Rumours and White Fleetwood Mac album are great covers. But yes, the three other Mick's cover appearances were misfires.
I just love this outtake back cover shot for Heroes:
singertobe
01-18-2014, 04:20 AM
Almost all of the covers Mick has been on have been questionable. Mr. Wonderful, English Rose, HAHTF, Rumours...I don't think he can help himself
Yeah, you're right. Gee, Mick's got balls. Get it?! Balls?!:lol:
jenniferuk
01-18-2014, 08:22 AM
The Rumours and White Fleetwood Mac album are great covers. But yes, the three other Mick's cover appearances were misfires.
I just love this outtake back cover shot for Heroes:
That shot is one of my all time favourites...fabulous photo!
Murrow
01-29-2014, 04:56 PM
I've often thought these days that photo would be barred and deemed borderline child porn.
I also often thought Mick looks rather like John Cleese here.
chiliD
01-29-2014, 06:02 PM
I also often thought Mick looks rather like John Cleese here.
John Cleese is who Mick at one time said he wanted to play him in a bio-pic. Which I thought was at one point, great casting.
But, isn't Cleese much older than Mick to begin with??
wetcamelfood
01-29-2014, 07:17 PM
John Cleese is who Mick at one time said he wanted to play him in a bio-pic. Which I thought was at one point, great casting.
But, isn't Cleese much older than Mick to begin with??
Depends on which year of birth you go by for Mick (since we've seen everything from '42 to '47). Cleese was born in '39 (so if Mick was born in '42 then that would be do-able, '47, not so much, or well, I think it would work but I guess it'd just be more hours in the make up room for Mick if that was the case).
John
Mr Scarrott
01-30-2014, 08:12 AM
Depends on which year of birth you go by for Mick (since we've seen everything from '42 to '47). Cleese was born in '39 (so if Mick was born in '42 then that would be do-able, '47, not so much, or well, I think it would work but I guess it'd just be more hours in the make up room for Mick if that was the case).
John
I was sceptical about Mick being born in 1947- 20 just seemed too young for him to be in 1967... but then according to Genes Reunited, which uses official data, he really was born in 1947. So that looks open and shut to me! Try it with your own details if you were born in England or Wales. Look on the link- he's the 6th entry
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/search/results?sourcecategory=birthsutf002c%20marriages%20utf0026%20deaths&collection=births%20utf0026%20baptisms&datasetname=england%20utf0026%20wales%20births%201837-2006&firstname=michael&firstname_variants=true&lastname=fleetwood&birthyear=1947&birthyear_offset=2®ion=great%20britain
chiliD
01-30-2014, 02:08 PM
I can go with the '47 birthyear. Most of those British blues "kids" were in their late teens/early 20s when they started out :nod: , so Mick would've been 20 when Fleetwood Mac debuted. No dispute on this end. :shrug:
Fleetwood Mac wasn't one of the groundbreakers on that end...they were actually coming in late in the game as far as the British blues scene was concerned. Hence their quick switch to more experimental music as the 70s were dawning.
chriskisn
02-01-2014, 06:38 AM
I can go with the '47 birthyear. Most of those British blues "kids" were in their late teens/early 20s when they started out :nod: , so Mick would've been 20 when Fleetwood Mac debuted. No dispute on this end. :shrug:
Fleetwood Mac wasn't one of the groundbreakers on that end...they were actually coming in late in the game as far as the British blues scene was concerned. Hence their quick switch to more experimental music as the 70s were dawning.
Mick's own book says he was born "post-war". I mean, I know Mick's book is a bit questionable on some stuff, but you'd think he'd get his own birthdate right.
Wendy Welch
02-05-2014, 12:35 AM
Let's face it, Mick can't act. He could never play John Cleese. That would be a horrible joke. Great drummer, but no actor.
:]:]:]:]:]:]:]:]
Wendy Welch
02-05-2014, 12:36 AM
Let's face it, Mick can't act. He could never play John Cleese. That would be a horrible joke. Great drummer, but no actor.
:]:]:]:
Mr Scarrott
02-05-2014, 10:07 AM
Let's face it, Mick can't act. He could never play John Cleese. That would be a horrible joke. Great drummer, but no actor.
:]:]:]:
I don't know- I could imagine Mick as Basil Fawlty, Chris as Sybil, Stevie as Polly, John as Manuel.. Lindsey as... (ok, maybe not as the major....)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.