PDA

View Full Version : Dave Remembers: Like a Cover Band


michelej1
08-25-2011, 12:52 PM
Posted: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:13 am
http://www.swtimes.com/features/article_eff4b9fe-cf24-11e0-8900-001cc4c002e0.html

In Concert: Cause Inspires Dave Mason By Scott Smith
TIMES RECORD • [email protected] The Times Record | 0 comments

Rock and Roll Hall of Fame member Dave Mason will dig deep into his solo career and his time with rock band Traffic next month in Fayetteville.

Known for the songs “We Just Disagree,” “Feelin’ Alright,” “Dear Mr. Fantasy,” “Hole in My Shoe” and “Only You Know and I Know,” the singer-guitarist will perform rock, pop, folk-rock and other styles for a fundraising concert at 8 p.m. Sept. 28 at George’s Majestic Lounge, 519 W. Dickson St. in Fayetteville.

The concert is part of Work Vessels for Veterans, a national, all-volunteer program co-founded by Mason that raises money and obtains work supplies and start-up tools for military veterans wishing to re-enter the civilian work force. Funds raised at the event will benefit Arkansas veteran Rick Brown, who was injured while on active duty and has a permanent seizure disorder, Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

“We’ve helped 65 veterans start their businesses, and we’ve gotten them everything from laptops to some farm equipment,” said the 65-year-old Mason during a recent telephone interview. “Those businesses range from blueberry farms in Florida to boating and trucking businesses across the country, and once the veteran’s business is profitable, that veteran begins to give back some proceeds that will be used to help other veterans. It’s a pay-it-forward deal for veterans.”

Mason, who co-founded Traffic with Steve Winwood and Jim Capaldi before recording with Jimi Hendrix, The Rolling Stones, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Michael Jackson and Fleetwood Mac, said he was “eager” to help Brown, who is hoping to acquire tools and open a workshop, where he can build guitars and sell and donate them to help other individuals and families.

“We do want people to know that we don’t look just for money,” said Mason, a native of Worcester, England, who now lives in Santa Barbara, Calif. “We look for people who can donate land, tools and equipment so we can pass that on to veterans who need help.”

Mason said his passion for Work Vessels for Veterans mirrors the team-player attitude he held as a young musician. Even though creative differences with Winwood edged Mason out of Traffic a second time following a 1971 tour, he sounds bitter-free.

“I thought Traffic’s ‘Welcome to the Canteen’ album was going to be a reunion thing for us, but it just didn’t happen for me,” Mason said before laughing. “So I did a solo career, partly out of not knowing what I was going to do next.”

Mason played acoustic guitar on Hendrix’s studio version of “All Along the Watchtower,” and he supplied some of the thundering drums and the strange-sounding horn to The Rolling Stones’ “Street Fighting Man” song. When asked why some websites claim he was uncredited on “Street Fighting Man,” Mason laughed.

“I don’t know if the band wrote me down on the list of credits or not, but all I know is I got my platinum album award for the song’s album, ‘Beggars Banquet,’” he said while still laughing.

At the dawn of the 1970s, Mason briefly joined Eric Clapton for the popular band, Derek and the Dominos, but Clapton’s work ethic at that time saw Mason replaced by Duane Allman before the group entered the studio.

“At that time, Eric had gone down the dark path,” Mason said. “I think it’s no secret now — it’s been widely reported — that Eric got involved in heroin, and I got bored with the band because there was a lot of sitting around. I had to move on, but I’d love to work with Eric Clapton any day now.”

In 1977, Mason scored his highest-charting single with his version of Jim Krueger’s “We Just Disagree,” which peaked at No. 12 on the Billboard Hot 100 Chart. The song’s charm carried through the decades, inspiring country singer Billy Dean to re-record it and release it as a single in 1993.

Working in Fleetwood Mac in the mid-1990s seemed like another solid chance for Mason to get near the top of the charts, yet what looked great on paper didn’t gel as well on the stage.

“That was kind of an odd time, because Christine McVie was with us when we recorded that ‘Time’ album, but she wouldn’t go on the road,” Mason said before laughing. “For me, it was kind of like being in a Fleetwood Mac cover band, and Warner Brothers did nothing to promote the record then. It just fell apart before I left and (Lindsey Buckingham and Stevie Nicks) came back to Fleetwood Mac.”

Mason’s “Save Me,” a 1980 collaboration with Michael Jackson, happened with fewer road bumps.

“Michael Jackson was in the studio next to me, working on his ‘Thriller’ album,” Mason said. “I had originally wanted someone to sing a high harmony with me, and with Michael working next door, I said to myself, ‘Well, Michael can sing high.’ So I went next door and asked him during a break, and Michael said he’d be right over. It was a fun experience.”

michelej1
08-25-2011, 12:53 PM
The Jackson 5 did a cover of "Feelin' Alright" on one of their first albums, so it's fitting that Michael Jackson appeared on Dave's Save Me. I would hope that Michael realized Dave was the writer of that earlier song.

Michele

wetcamelfood
08-26-2011, 04:05 PM
Strange, I think if Christine was there it would've felt like even more of a cover band to him because they would've undoubtedly performed more of her songs and less of his so if anything he should've been happy but guess not. :rolleyes

John

SteveMacD
08-26-2011, 08:29 PM
Strange, I think if Christine was there it would've felt like even more of a cover band to him because they would've undoubtedly performed more of her songs and less of his so if anything he should've been happy but guess not. :rolleyes
I don't follow. How could Fleetwood Mac be a cover band if Christine McVie, not Bekka Bramlett, sang Christine McVie-penned songs? :shrug:

But, if Christine hadn't quit touring, Stevie would have probably stayed, which means Rick and Billy would probably have stayed, which means Dave would never have gotten a shot at Fleetwood Mac.

MacShadowsBall
08-26-2011, 09:47 PM
Awhile back I posted a thread with Time era performances, in case anybody is curious about the on stage dynamics.

The problem was that they (Dave, Bekka, and Billy) were peforming songs by mainly Stevie and Christine. Fleetwood Mac lost that link from the previous incarnation that had been there since the beginning, Yeah Billy was there, but were any of his 3 BTM songs peformed? I don't think so. From those performance mention earlier, Billy is more in the "John McVie" position on stage. Its really Dave and mainly Bekka up front with she doing alot of Stevie and Christine songs. Dave seemed to be doing mostly non-Fleetwood Mac songs. So yeah I can see Dave Mason saying it felt like a cover band, especially since no new songs from Time were done until the end of the tour.

I wasn't there and was a child back in '95 who didn't know who the hell Fleetwood Mac was. This just is my opinion from seeing things today. :cool:

SteveMacD
08-26-2011, 10:33 PM
Awhile back I posted a thread with Time era performances, in case anybody is curious about the on stage dynamics.

The problem was that they (Dave, Bekka, and Billy) were peforming songs by mainly Stevie and Christine. Fleetwood Mac lost that link from the previous incarnation that had been there since the beginning, Yeah Billy was there, but were any of his 3 BTM songs peformed? I don't think so. From those performance mention earlier, Billy is more in the "John McVie" position on stage. Its really Dave and mainly Bekka up front with she doing alot of Stevie and Christine songs. Dave seemed to be doing mostly non-Fleetwood Mac songs. So yeah I can see Dave Mason saying it felt like a cover band, especially since no new songs from Time were done until the end of the tour.

I agree that they should have done at least one of Billy's "Behind The Mask" songs. But, I disagree that Billy was in the John McVie position. NOT EVEN CLOSE! I saw them twice on that tour (and have a few bootlegs somewhere), and I'd say it was pretty equal between Billy and Dave. Dave had more solo lead vocals, but Billy did more duets with Bekka. It was pretty clear at the shows that the real chemistry was between Bekka and Billy. Also, they usually did "Blow By Blow" early in the tour, as it was released on the "Soccer Rocks The Globe" album. It appears that it got dropped when "Dreamin' The Dream" was added.

Here was a typical set list:

The Chain (all three)
You Make Loving Fun/Say You Love Me (Bekka)
Oh Well (Billy and Bekka)
We Just Disagree (Dave)
Blow By Blow (Dave)
Gold Dust Woman (Bekka)
Only You Know And I Know/Dear Mr. Fantasy (Dave -and Bekka on OYKAIK)
World Turning (Bekka and Billy)
Go Your Own Way (Billy)
Don't Stop (Bekka and Billy)
Imagine/Dreamin' The Dream (Bekka)

Other songs they sometimes played include (I've only seen a couple of these done on bootlegs):

Dreams (Bekka)
All Along The Watchtower (Dave)
The Bigger The Love (Billy)
Tear It Up (Billy)

MacShadowsBall
08-26-2011, 10:56 PM
Interesting setlist; I'll respond more tomorrow. :cool:

wetcamelfood
08-27-2011, 06:26 AM
I don't follow. How could Fleetwood Mac be a cover band if Christine McVie, not Bekka Bramlett, sang Christine McVie-penned songs? :shrug:

Well let's face it, if there is history between those two I doubt he really wanted her there and he never really looked in to it whenever they did songs other than his so I'd be surprised if he could honestly say he'd have perfered her being there since that would've meant he'd then only be able to do less of his songs (i.e. the ones he was in to doing). That's all I meant, though I agree that I'm glad this line up existed as I'm sure you're right on what would've happend if Chris stayed. :)

John

MacShadowsBall
08-27-2011, 01:41 PM
So adding all those songs together, Bekka is solo on 5 songs, Billy and Dave are each solo on 3, Bekka and Billy duet on 3 while Bekka and Dave duet on 1.

Bekka is on 8 songs, Billy 6 songs, and Dave 4 songs. I was half-correct in that Bekka was the front-person/woman, if you will.

They seemed to do alot of non-Fleetwood Mac songs, especially Dave.

shackin'up
08-27-2011, 05:57 PM
Yeah it was a Fleetwood Mac cover band & Fleetwood Mac covering bands at the same time.

SteveMacD
08-27-2011, 07:31 PM
Yeah it was a Fleetwood Mac cover band & Fleetwood Mac covering bands at the same time.

Really no differrent than when they did Stand Back, Has Anyone Ever Written, Tear It Up, or Go Insane, or when Jeremy Spencer was in the band.

It's funny to me that nobody calls it a cover band when Stevie, Lindsey, Christine, Peter, or Welch do their Mac songs as solo artists. At least with Mick and John doing the songs, there are TWO people who were actually part of the original recordings.

MacShadowsBall
08-27-2011, 07:40 PM
Really no differrent than when they did Stand Back, Has Anyone Ever Written, Tear It Up, or Go Insane, or when Jeremy Spencer was in the band.

It's funny to me that nobody calls it a cover band when Stevie, Lindsey, Christine, Peter, or Welch do their Mac songs as solo artists. At least with Mick and John doing the songs, there are TWO people who were actually part of the original recordings.

I've never been of fan of Fleetwood Mac incorporating solo songs into the setlists or greatest hits album releases, a la "Stand Back" from The Chain and "Go Insane" from The Very Best of Fleetwood Mac.

However, oddly enough, I don't really have a problem with Fleetwood Mac songs on a solo setlist. Stevie does Landslide, Rhiannon, Dreams, and Gold Dust Woman pretty much on all her solo shows/tours. Though I do feel that those songs should be a small minority in the setlist. Fleetwood Mac is one thing - various solo careers are another.

Anyway, back to Dave Mason, why didn't he do any Fleetwood Mac songs when, you know, he was in Fleetwood Mac? :shrug:

WildHearted
08-27-2011, 08:21 PM
Really no differrent than when they did Stand Back, Has Anyone Ever Written, Tear It Up, or Go Insane, or when Jeremy Spencer was in the band.

It's funny to me that nobody calls it a cover band when Stevie, Lindsey, Christine, Peter, or Welch do their Mac songs as solo artists. At least with Mick and John doing the songs, there are TWO people who were actually part of the original recordings.

But they're singing songs they wrote. How can they be covering themselves?

So then, do you think Stevie's recording of 'Crystal' is a cover? :shrug:

If Lindsey went out on a solo tour and started singing You Make Loving Fun, or Stevie went out and played Go Your Own Way, that'd be a little different.. but.. :shrug:

SteveMacD
08-27-2011, 10:23 PM
Anyway, back to Dave Mason, why didn't he do any Fleetwood Mac songs when, you know, he was in Fleetwood Mac? :shrug:
What, Blow By Blow isn't a Fleetwood Mac song? :D

Really, he had enough popular songs from his own career. In a 10-11 song set, he only got a couple, and one that often got played was also one that was relevant to Bekka.

But they're singing songs they wrote. How can they be covering themselves?
But Mick and John are playing the parts they came up with on the original songs. How can they be covering themselves?

So then, do you think Stevie's recording of 'Crystal' is a cover? :shrug:

If Lindsey went out on a solo tour and started singing You Make Loving Fun, or Stevie went out and played Go Your Own Way, that'd be a little different.. but.. :shrug:
I don't think any of them are covers.

The only song that is really in the gray is, ironically, "Dear Mr. Fantasy" since Dave wasn't on the original Traffic version (though WAS on the album), but was on a live version released by Traffic a few years later, although the Mac version was a completely different arrangement.

wetcamelfood
08-28-2011, 06:08 AM
"Dear Mr. Fantasy" since Dave wasn't on the original Traffic version

According to the Winwood Finer Things box set notes he played bass on the studio version.

John

WildHearted
08-28-2011, 08:40 AM
But Mick and John are playing the parts they came up with on the original songs. How can they be covering themselves?
.

Mick and John weren't, but whoever was doing the vocals was, in a sense.

HomerMcvie
08-28-2011, 11:36 AM
Mick and John weren't, but whoever was doing the vocals was, in a sense.

So like Steve said, when Lindsey does Oh Well, they become a FM cover band? When they do SYLM or Don't Stop now, IT'S THE SAME THING!!!!!!!

It never ceases to amaze me, the, how the Rumours fans view the band with rose colored glasses.

WildHearted
08-28-2011, 06:21 PM
So like Steve said, when Lindsey does Oh Well, they become a FM cover band? When they do SYLM or Don't Stop now, IT'S THE SAME THING!!!!!!!

It never ceases to amaze me, the, how the Rumours fans view the band with rose colored glasses.

No, I agree with this. They're covering Peter Green's song and then they're covering Christine's songs. :shrug:

MacShadowsBall
08-28-2011, 08:12 PM
Fleetwood Mac should be performing Fleetwood Mac songs. No solo songs or songs from other artists/bands.

I think that sometimes we get mixed up on what is a Fleetwood Mac song and what is a Stevie Nicks, Christine McVie, Peter Green, etc. song.

SteveMacD
08-28-2011, 10:07 PM
Mick and John weren't, but whoever was doing the vocals was, in a sense.
So, then, the people who back Stevie/Lindsey/Peter/Christine/Welch are just a bunch of cover artists? Stevie Nicks is fronting a Fleetwood Mac cover band when she does a solo show?

PenguinHead
08-28-2011, 11:57 PM
Strange, I think if Christine was there it would've felt like even more of a cover band to him because they would've undoubtedly performed more of her songs and less of his so if anything he should've been happy but guess not. :rolleyes

John

As a new member of Fleetwood Mac, performing Fleetwood Mac songs, how would that equate to a cover band?

Even if Christine toured with that line-up, Dave would have had his alotted moments, both for a new Time album song, as well a solo hit. I don' think he expected that the name of band was going to change to Fleetwood Mason.

PenguinHead
08-29-2011, 12:09 AM
Fleetwood Mac should be performing Fleetwood Mac songs. No solo songs or songs from other artists/bands.

I think that sometimes we get mixed up on what is a Fleetwood Mac song and what is a Stevie Nicks, Christine McVie, Peter Green, etc. song.

I used to think that way. especially when Fleetwood Mac started performing Stand Back. I still have issues with that song, only because it's such a self-defining Stevie solo song, and so incongreous with Fleetwood Mac's style.

But I've come around that to see that it's nice when they can incorporate some solo songs. Unfortunately, their choices aren't the best. I think Lindsey's song Trouble would have worked well in a Fleetwood Mac format..(Go Insane was ok, but it was just Lindsey in an acoustic solo, with no band participation.) Also, there are numerous Christine McVie solo songs to choose from that would blend perfectly into a Fleetwood Mac performance. I have to think what solo Stevie song would be appropriate, but it isn't Stand Back.

I always thought it would have been cool if, during the middle of a show, Stevie, Lindsey and Christine, would each do a solo song, with the full band backing each of them.

wetcamelfood
08-29-2011, 06:17 AM
As a new member of Fleetwood Mac, performing Fleetwood Mac songs, how would that equate to a cover band?

Even if Christine toured with that line-up, Dave would have had his alotted moments, both for a new Time album song, as well a solo hit. I don' think he expected that the name of band was going to change to Fleetwood Mason.

Exactly. This is why I think it's strange that, according to the article, he felt it was a cover band as it is. :)

John

chriskisn
08-30-2011, 06:51 AM
Given most of the fans never accepted this version of FM (I remember the discussions when Time was released and the SN fans really didn't take to Bekka), Dave Mason does have a point. If it wasn't seen as a legitimate lineup or a new Fleetwood Mac, then they were pretty much a cover band or another Elmer Gantry & co.

The fact that Mick and John were there gave the band a bit of credibility but not a lot. If Mick had joined Elmer Gantry, Kirby, etc back in the seventies would that have been enough for them to be the REAL Fleetwood Mac?

Dave's comments about the cover band are probably made in hindsight and from talking to fans over the years. He probably didn't think it was a cover band when he was there.

I think the Time lineup had great potential, especially Bekka & Billy. I'm not a DM fan though...

SteveMacD
08-30-2011, 02:57 PM
Given most of the fans never accepted this version of FM (I remember the discussions when Time was released and the SN fans really didn't take to Bekka), Dave Mason does have a point. If it wasn't seen as a legitimate lineup or a new Fleetwood Mac, then they were pretty much a cover band or another Elmer Gantry & co.

The fact that Mick and John were there gave the band a bit of credibility but not a lot. If Mick had joined Elmer Gantry, Kirby, etc back in the seventies would that have been enough for them to be the REAL Fleetwood Mac?
Apples and oranges between the Fake Mac and Time. The Fake Mac was trying to pass itself off as Fleetwood Mac. The Time band WAS Fleetwood Mac. Big difference. I really don't see much of a difference between the time band and other transitional versions of the band (Future Games, Penguin, the first Stevie/Lindsey album). The only difference was the scale.

Can we, with a straight face, say that the Time band was MORE radical than when the band went from being Green/Spencer/Kirwan to Kirwan/Welch/McVie in just over a year?

HomerMcvie
08-30-2011, 06:12 PM
Apples and oranges between the Fake Mac and Time. The Fake Mac was trying to pass itself off as Fleetwood Mac. The Time band WAS Fleetwood Mac. Big difference. I really don't see much of a difference between the time band and other transitional versions of the band (Future Games, Penguin, the first Stevie/Lindsey album). The only difference was the scale.

Can we, with a straight face, say that the Time band was MORE radical than when the band went from being Green/Spencer/Kirwan to Kirwan/Welch/McVie in just over a year?

+10, Steve.

These people that can only see FM as the rumours incarnation, are the epitome of being myopic. Mason/Bramlett is NO different that Welch/Weston. Only the latter duo didn't have to follow the death knell couple of FM creativity.:D:wavey::D

chriskisn
08-31-2011, 07:11 AM
Apples and oranges between the Fake Mac and Time. The Fake Mac was trying to pass itself off as Fleetwood Mac. The Time band WAS Fleetwood Mac. Big difference. I really don't see much of a difference between the time band and other transitional versions of the band (Future Games, Penguin, the first Stevie/Lindsey album). The only difference was the scale.

Can we, with a straight face, say that the Time band was MORE radical than when the band went from being Green/Spencer/Kirwan to Kirwan/Welch/McVie in just over a year?

I'm not saying it was right, just that I do see where Dave is coming from. The other difference was that the Rumours lineup was one of the biggest bands ever, and no amount of personnel changes would ever get that back.

I guess it would be like the Christian churches stopping preaching about Jesus and now preaching about a short fat guy called Frank.

MacShadowsBall
09-01-2011, 11:58 AM
Dave's comments about the cover band are probably made in hindsight and from talking to fans over the years. He probably didn't think it was a cover band when he was there.

That's the way I feel, too. Back in '93/94, I'm sure he took it seriously and put a full 100% into the new Fleetwood Mac. However without the proper backing of management/record label, there is only so much FM could have done.

After 15 years, one's opinion on something will most likely change so I don't fault/blame Mason for his "cover band" response. Plus look at what happened afterwards i.e Christine, Lindsey, Stevie riding in on their white horses to "save" Fleetwood Mac. ;)

Don't forget the Dance reunion was just a year or so after the Time era.