Album Title & Release Date!!!

[sorcerer999]

Woah!!! Amazon.com has "Stevie Nicks ~In Your Dreams" listed for pre-order with a release date of May 3rd!!!

I think we have our answer!!! Amazon jumped the gun and beat Ellen (if they were going to announce it on the show, that is.)

[sorcerer999]

http://www.amazon.com/Your-Dreams-Stevie-Nicks/dp/B004IQMXD4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1294856534&sr=1-1

[Artemis]

May 3rd isn't as late as I had feared it would be.

Not so sure on the album title... anything that has "Dreams" in it seems a bit too... obvious for Stevie :laugh:

[Christopher]

Nice Find!! I looked yesterday. It's being released almost to the day of TISL. But I gotta admit I'm a bit disappointed with the album title. I was hoping for something more original and evocative, even if she didn't use one of the song titles as the album title.:angel: Oh well! I'll get over it real soon.

[Sahara]

^^ What Artemis said. Still extremely exciting :D
For what it's worth (argh, pun not intentional) I'm interpreting the "in your dreams" in a sarcastic, sassy way. ;) I hope that's what the song is like!

[RockAlot]

Hmmm intresting, I like In Your Dreams. Dream on silly dreamer!!

[Josh2003]

Don't like the title, very predictable, almost a bit cliché...but whatever...it will grow on me.

Yay news! It's starting!

[kak125]

I like the album title! I just wish we didnt have to wait till May but thank goodness we at least know the date now!!!

[TerraRhiannon]

Like Sahara said, it almost sounds like it could be sassy. Even if it's not intended to be, it's still a really sweet title. I wonder if one of her songs is called that too.
Oh no, i just realized the release date says May, not March. When I first read it I saw 'March.' :( But what another 2 months :shrug:

[BombaySapphire3]

Well i'm not too surprised or disappointed by the album title ..Stevie even as a young woman was proud that she doesn't change.I just hope the release date does not get pushed back even more though.

[CADreaming]

Belladonna

The Wild Heart

Rock a Little

The Other Side of the Mirror

TimeSpace

Street Angel

Enchanted

Trouble in Shangri-La

Crystal Visions

In Your Dreams

*****

Eh... :shrug:

It's ok, I guess. But, it does sound like a slap in the face. LOL.

[BombaySapphire3]

Like Sahara said, it almost sounds like it could be sassy. Even if it's not intended to be, it's still a really sweet title. I wonder if one of her songs is called that ::

Yep the song "In Your Dreams" has been described by David Wild as 'upbeat ,catchy" and similar to Tom Petty.

[RockAlot]

Like Sahara said, it almost sounds like it could be sassy. Even if it's not intended to be, it's still a really sweet title. I wonder if one of her songs is called that too.
Oh no, i just realized the release date says May, not March. When I first read it I saw 'March.' :( But what another 2 months :shrug:

Thats funny cause I did the same thing, my eyes read May but my mind registered it as March!! Wishful thinking!

[louielouie2000]

I actually like the name... it's very Stevie. :) God knows, it's better than some of the other things people have suggested around here! :p

As for the release date, we always, always knew it would be pushed back. That's the way Stevie rolls. May 3 isn't such a bad setback. I must say, I'm very pleased by all of today's news. Let the record be known! Louie isn't b!tching when it comes to La Nicks!! :laugh:

[TerraRhiannon]

Yep the song "In Your Dreams" has been described by David Wild as 'upbeat ,catchy" and similar to Tom Petty.

That made my day! I love her upbeat, catchy ones!

Thats funny cause I did the same thing, my eyes read May but my mind registered it as March!! Wishful thinking!

Hahah! I think it had to do with the fact that we've been told March for so long that we just see an "M," and we're automatically going "OMFG, MARCH. IT'S SO CLOSE!" :D Or that was my reaction, however that was shattered once I calmed down & looked closer at it :p

[TerraRhiannon]

I actually like the name... it's very Stevie. :) God knows, it's better than some of the other things people have suggested around here! :p

As for the release date, we always, always knew it would be pushed back. That's the way Stevie rolls. May 3 isn't such a bad setback. I must say, I'm very pleased by all of today's news. Let the record be known! Louie isn't b!tching when it comes to La Nicks!! :laugh:

You're being pleasant today:) Did you have a bowl of sunshine for breakfast? lol, Kidding. I was actually waiting to hear your opinion :laugh:

[BombaySapphire3]

[QUOTE=TerraRhiannon;933705]That made my day! I love her upbeat, catchy ones!



I'm betting it's also the first single.

[bluefox4000]

Well.....That title's.....boring......But I shan't Judge;)

Mick

[daniellaaarisen]

I actually like the name... it's very Stevie. :) God knows, it's better than some of the other things people have suggested around here! :p

As for the release date, we always, always knew it would be pushed back. That's the way Stevie rolls. May 3 isn't such a bad setback. I must say, I'm very pleased by all of today's news. Let the record be known! Louie isn't b!tching when it comes to La Nicks!! :laugh:

So I read Kathryn (Sahara)'s Facebook status announcing the title and release date, immediately ran to my school's library (I was walking to class when I saw the status) and now I'm sitting here amongst 50+ students who are actually doing schoolwork... as I squeal about Stevie. Typical.

ANYWAY.... I really like the title as well, but only because I initially read it to be sassy. Stevie and sass are my two favorite things, so I can totally approve of this idea. But it still has the whimsical quality that we need to feel like Stevie titled it herself! ;)

I am SOOOOOOOOOO excited.

[tilthefirefades]

The title is like others said, too cliche. I can name plenty of songs named In Your Dreams, and that is a first for Stevie.

[DefDumbandBlond]

Too exciting! Pre-ordering soon for sure. :blob1:

[jellyman10]

'In Your Dreams' reminds me of the way 'Bella Donna' was marketed in the UK (maybe everywhere?) back in the day.

They had ads in the music press that said 'Rumour has it there's a new Stevie Nicks album', hence triggering the association with FM via 'Rumours' (but you knew that).

What was funny, though, was that Ellen Foley (the woman who sang all those duets with Meatloaf on 'Bat Out of Hell') had had a solo album out a little bit before that that had the tagline 'Who the Hell is Ellen Foley?', which I don't think worked all that well.

Clearly it's an old tactic, but I figure SN should use every trick there is to get this album seen and heard, so I'm fine with it.:thumbsup:

[SuiteShangriLa]

YAAAAAAY!!!
im ok with the title.
no image available...:mad:
no track list...:mad:
oh well...soon enough ill have it in my hands!!

[gypsy4life]

LOVE the title, absolutely took it to be sassy!

I am so excited, I jumped up from desk at work, and repeatedly jumped up and down. My co-worker walked in and was like WTF??

[RockALittle250]

Woah!!! Amazon.com has "Stevie Nicks ~In Your Dreams" listed for pre-order with a release date of May 3rd!!!

I think we have our answer!!! Amazon jumped the gun and beat Ellen (if they were going to announce it on the show, that is.)

Yes, FINALLY!! Thank you for finding this. I've been scouring Amazon everyday, and the one day I don't it finally appears!

[Christopher]

With a May 3rd release date. I reason we're still a month or 2 away from seeing a 1st single drop :( I hope I'm wrong. Now I really want the track list revealed. I curious to see what old vault song(s) besides Annabel Lee she recorded.

[RockALittle250]

With a May 3rd release date. I reason we're still a month or 2 away from seeing a 1st single drop :( I hope I'm wrong. Now I really want the track list revealed. I curious to see what old vault song(s) besides Annabel Lee she recorded.

Well, Dave Stewart said on Twitter that it's a possibility that Stevie's single cover could be revealed on Ellen tomorrow, but he's not sure yet.

[Sanne2]

Love the title, dissapointed in the release date.

[mitzo]

LOL to me it reads "album is being released - IN YOUR DREAMS!"

[Dodfather]

Maybe the title will change - I'm not that sold on it to be honest but I can live with it for the fact tht we finally have a date! If it starts to get pushed back again though... aggghhh! I should be happier but I'm still a little cautious. It is exciting though!!

[sorcerer999]

LOL to me it reads "album is being released - IN YOUR DREAMS!"

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

[jkmaletic]

I like it. It has multiple meanings, like a lot of her songs.

[baboles]

Maybe Stevie will talk about why she chose this particular album title and put it into perspective. I don't hate the title, but I'm definitely not in love with it.

[nightbird28]

Isn't there a demo floating around called "in your dreams"? I vaguely remember having a demo collection called enchanted dreams and I believe it was on there.

[mylittledemon]

Maybe Stevie will talk about why she chose this particular album title and put it into perspective. I don't hate the title, but I'm definitely not in love with it.

Me neither... I prefer "For What It's Worth"... but hey, as long as the music is good I'm happy

[markolas]

It's a lame title, but so was Say You Will.

[Musicman408]

News=Exciting
Exciting= Ethan wanting to listen to Stevie again
Ethan wanting to listen to Stevie again= Whole Lotta Trouble :)
Whole Lotta Trouble+Exciting= ........ well...... I don't know

BUT!!!

This really is exciting and good new to hear!

[Jondalar]

It's a lame title, but so was Say You Will.

I don't think the title is lame. I think the album has been described as dreamy and I think it's a pretty good title. Very stevie.

[michelej1]

It's a lame title, but so was Say You Will.

But I like that it can have two meanings. The first one is weak, in your sweet dreams, la dee dah. But the second one is like, "In your dreams, over my dead body, go jump off a bridge" and I like that kind of attitude. The boasting, mocking demeanor that she can sometimes have (It's a shame that you wanted me, you didn't try . . .)

So, to the extent that "In Your Dreams" presents that side of Stevie, I like it as a title.

Michele

[Jondalar]

But I like that it can have two meanings. The first one is weak, in your sweet dreams, la dee dah. But the second one is like, "In your dreams, over my dead body, go jump off a bridge" and I like that kind of attitude. The boasting, mocking demeanor that she can sometimes have (It's a shame that you wanted me, you didn't try . . .)

So, to the extent that "In Your Dreams" presents that side of Stevie, I like it as a title.

Michele

Dave said before that Stevie was considering a couple of titles. I'm sure she put a lot of thought into that. She probably chose In Your Dreams.. because of its double meaning. Stevie has always been full of attitude. The title is perfect for her.

[daniellaaarisen]

But I like that it can have two meanings. The first one is weak, in your sweet dreams, la dee dah. But the second one is like, "In your dreams, over my dead body, go jump off a bridge" and I like that kind of attitude. The boasting, mocking demeanor that she can sometimes have (It's a shame that you wanted me, you didn't try . . .)

So, to the extent that "In Your Dreams" presents that side of Stevie, I like it as a title.

Michele

Agreed. That is exactly why I really like the title.

[louielouie2000]

It's a lame title, but so was Say You Will.

It feels like such a long time since I've actually found myself defending Stevie, but here I go! :p I don't think you can compare In Your Dreams to Say You Will in regards to title. Say You Will is just so literal... I think it's safe to say we all love Stevie because she's the polar opposite of literal. She's a delightfully/maddeningly out of touch, airy fairy, witchy, mystical, out there lady. That's what attracts us all to her. She's not Madonna, she doesn't reinvent herself. She is who she is, and for better or worse, she doesn't really change. I personally like the title... it's very Stevie. It's dreamy/airy fairy... but kinda snarky, too. Stevie's fantastic when she's kinda bratty and self empowered. That's what the title invokes in me.

[Nikolaj]

^ Louie, I see your point about Madonna, so only mean this conversationally, and concede that I am likely wrong, but here goes:
While I admire, I guess, her business acumen and media savvy, I really don't think Madonna has ever 'reinvented' herself once. She was always kind of skanky, but had mass appeal, and still it's about the same. Changing hair color and clothes doesn't reinvent a performer, exactly. I think she's the same as she always has been: shrewd, makes the most of her limited ability, appeals and/or panders to the gay community and makes forgettable, often subpar music. I admit some of it wasn't terrible. But her dancing ability never grew, her vocal ability didn't grow as much as her wealth allowed her to be recorded well by the best producers and engineers money can buy, and her music maybe got a little better, for a while.
But 'reinvent' herself? Her arms are more muscular, but her talent has always just been what it is, you like it, are indifferent to it, or don't like it. Her acting ability never matured, her media presentation has remained the same as it always had been, and she just wisely struck a nerve with her image that she hasn't changed an iota in all these years.
I don't dislike her, even. I do think she is an example of mediocrity polished into glossier mediocrity, but she was smart in every aspect she could be smart at. Sometimes she was loathsome and exploitive (the Britney Spears kiss- like Madonna needed more press coverage or attention, it was desperate fame mongering that made infamy ok to her, and it was ugly. Lesbians I knew thought she was despicable for 'faking it' for attention).
I loved how Stevie Nicks pointed out that Madonna was too old to be kissing a 21 year old girl or however old Brit was then. That, I think, was one comment that actually shut Madonna up for once in her life, there was nothing to say to trump SN's observation.
Mo's concert stage acts haven't changed or shown growth since the 80's, either. They always have been too backup dancer heavy, worse versions of her studio recordings, and just derivative, too stagey, too staged. She's never recorded or tried a rock song live. That would be interesting, at least.
Even early on, paying homage to Marilyn Monroe was nothing that was original or unique. Lucille Ball did it better in 1955 and without a dreadful song.
I know that Madonna entertains a lot of people, and I'm far from an authority on every move of her career, but I just don't see any reinvention at all. I guess she tried with 'Evita'.
That word- reinvention- is so misused, and I don't mean by you, Louie.
In my opinion- Meryl Streep- she reinvents herself- she's seldom the same and often is only nearly recognizable from role to role, but she has true talent and is a chameleon. Many of the stars that 'reinvention' is attributed to don't deserve that designation.
In my opinion, Madonna is still the same invention that she ever was: Madonna.

[Nikolaj]

^Terribly off topic:
I think the title Stevie has chosen is dandy and I can't wait to hear the cd!

[Nikolaj]

Will there really be a new single soon, after Ellen, maybe?
I so hope that is true!! Great start to the new year.
I'm even happy about the Rod Stewart tour, I would most especially love to hear some Stevie on 'Stay With Me'- maybe Rod's best song, probably his strongest rock song ever. Her voice could be beautiful on 'Sailing'- I hope any duets predate the late '70s Rod.
Though, there is one largely forgotten song Rod did in the 80s called 'Give Me Wings' that Stevie's rock voice could be astonishing on. The studio version of the song started out strong, then kind of ran out of steam, but SN could turn it into a scorcher, maybe.

[markolas]

Oh, I agree that it's a very "Stevie" title...I guess it just didn't strike me as particularly original, what with the word "Dreams" in there. I'll get used to it, like I got used to Say You Will.

[RockALittle250]

The album is now ranked at #173 for Amazon music sales...pretty impressive!

http://www.amazon.com/Your-Dreams-Stevie-Nicks/dp/B004IQMXD4/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1294870518&sr=1-1

[Sahara]

^^ Superb :thumbsup: Not too shabby at all, considering the short space of time we're talking about! :)

Wow, so much has happened since this was announced on Amazon ... *head spining!*

[PenguinHead]

It's a lame title, but so was Say You Will.

That's a nice concise way of putting it. I agree. Lame. Lazy. Predictable. Generic. Cliche'.

It's a common over-used phrase
It's a movie
It's a book
It's the name of numerous songs
It's completely unoriginal (just google it!)

Now it's the name of the supposed best, distinctive album Stevie has made in twenty-something years. Yuck!

[starshine]

The title is like others said, too cliche. I can name plenty of songs named In Your Dreams, and that is a first for Stevie. I have to agree with you about the title being cliche. Thats the first thing that came to my mind when I read the 'new' title. I was looking for something more creative really. To me 'in your dreams' is just too predictable. Can't say I'm not disappointed by it. I will try to keep an open mind though the the 'new' cd. I did go to her web site and just clinked on the link to preorder (but haven't ordered it yet) and heard the snip it of Secret Love (which is the old demo we have) interesting to hear. I'll wait til I hear all of it before I make any comments about it though. It will be interesting to hear what songs are on it new and old. I'm curious to really see how many new songs. I do wonder if its gonna be any sort of a deluxe packaging? Like 2 cds and a dvd?? or 1 cd and 1 dvd? I do wonder what the cover picture is. Though I am almost afraid since the title doesn't jump out at me. Anyway, just some thoughts. May 3rd will be an interesting day thats for sure. Lets hope that stays the release date too.:shrug::nod:

[GypsyNikita]

^^ Superb :thumbsup: Not too shabby at all, considering the short space of time we're talking about! :)

Wow, so much has happened since this was announced on Amazon ... *head spining!*

Today has been WILD!!! :nod: