PDA

View Full Version : GREAT interview with Stevie


catinthedark
02-25-2006, 04:55 PM
sorry - i did a quick scan and didn't see this posted yet. i think it's one of the best interviews with her in a long time. it's long - and well worth the read.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/6/story.cfm?c_id=6&ObjectID=10369751

25.02.06
By Graham Reid


Stevie Nicks - the fairy queen singer in Fleetwood Mac - is in a Melbourne hotel room ready to go off to another rehearsal. In a few days she will perform her ethereal songs with the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra, but the waiting around is killing her.

She has been in Australia a fortnight and, as she says, three days in a hotel is enough for her. She just wants to get on with her Australasian tour.

She likes Australia however - last year she came down for the Stevie Nicks Plate, a horse race named in her honour - but can't recall whether she has met her support act John Farnham before.

Nicks: I'm sure I have but I can't bet on that absolutely. But his name is so familiar to me. I think at some time when Fleetwood Mac was here many years ago we must have come in contact with him. He's Farnzie right? I thought that was great I could say, 'Yo, Farnzie' when I meet him.

Reid: I'd like to talk to about your music but not in specifics at this point. It seems to me that if I listen to the rock'n'roll going around today much of it is channelling angst or anxiety. But you come from a different generation where music was part of a collective spirit, an art form which brought people together even though the songs might have been entirely personal.

Yeah, and I think we had a lot more fun with our music. It was more fun and romantic. Definitely our music covered angst-ridden subjects but at the same time there was an uplifting, really fun and romantic thing that I fail to see today.

I hear romance in r'n'b, but that is one of the few areas you do hear it today.

Yeah, and who knows why that is. I don't know why people would be so different but personally I think the whole computer/internet thing has made kids very anti-social. I know about kids between 8 and 15 and if you walk by them and they are on the computer its like, 'Talk to the hand, don't bother me'. You think, wouldn't you like to go outside? and they are, 'No I'm on the computer, go away'. That freaks me out, I have a serious problem with that.

It's a good thing I didn't have any kids, I would have moved them to New Zealand and taken them out of the midst of all that. I'm sure you have your own problems in New Zealand as well, but Los Angeles is making the kids so old.

The 12-year olds I know you'd honestly think they were 18.

It's like, Where has your childhood gone? My sister and I were saying the other day to these kids that they have a long time to be old, so the first 15 years of your life you should enjoy and try to be a child and enjoy the fun of childhood. You are going to be an old person for a long time and you only have that 15-18 years to be a kid.

For many people who matured in the 60's and 70's their interactions were social and you did stuff. Now it's just all about phones, text, computers, e-mail, MySpace. I'm horrified. In terms of what you do, you often write things which ethereal and mystical. Is that as a result of the generation you grew up in, or your childhood?

For me the idea of wearing a long gossamer fairy dress, beautiful shoes, ribbons in my hair, a long velvet cape with a hood, and getting on a white horse and riding into the sunset... That to me as a little girl, was my ideal. I don't know if my parents put that into me, I think that just came very naturally.

I remember in the 4th grade going to a Halloween party as a fairy princess, and not just as a little girl fairy princess but a faaabulous fairy princess. And from that moment on, from the second I put on that full length dress, I was mesmerised and I just wanted to be a fairy queen and wear a crown.

My mom says I started writing poems about that even in the 4th grade. I still try hard to bring that state of mind to people when I perform for them and when I meet them. I try to instil that love of the mythological and the interesting and mysterious, as opposed to everything being so right out there now.

I think the mystery of life has been taken away and that is so sad.

Art is a place where you can indulge mystery.

Exactly, the world is not a very nice place. It wasn't a very nice place then in the 60s and 70s either, so that's not changed. But its kids, they've changed.

Was there a sense that this was an escape for you in your childhood? You grew up in Phoenix, right in the middle of America.

I was born there but we moved away when I was a baby. I was in Los Angeles when I was five, then New Mexico for two years, then El Paso in Texas for the third to the seventh grade, then I was in Salt Lake City in Utah for the 8th and 9th grade, then to Los Angeles for the 10th and 11th - and then to San Francisco for my senior year and that was glorious because I'd moved right into the middle of the hugest thing that was happening. There was Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix, all those amazing San Francisco bands, and Bill Graham's Winterland and the Fillmore.

I couldn't have picked a more magical city to move to as a songwriter, and I'd started writing songs when I was 15 so I was already a serious songwriter by the time I was in the 12th grade.

Music was always going to be it for you?

It was. I pretty much stated that to my parents when I wrote my first song at 15 and cried and got hysterical and said this is what I wanted to do. And my mom and dad were very much like, Okay. But you are still going to go to school.

They very much supported my music - but I did have to go to college.

All the dressing up? You've never shied away from the fact that while this is an art form, it is also entertainment too.

Of course it is.

Many musicians forget that and are not actually entertaining on any level.

No, because they don't hang out. I think young kids have trouble talking to people because they don't have social skills. In my life we moved so much that I was always the new girl, and if you are the new girl you better have some social skills.

You could have gone the other way.

Yes, I could have become a recluse, but I chose to adapt and my mom would say, Honey, there is always a better house when we were packing to move and I'd go, okay, cool.

Every time we moved I thought we'd get a better house and even as a little girl, designer that I am, I thought, great, a better house. So I never took the moving as a bad thing. But my brother on the other hand, who is five years younger than me, didn't adapt well at all. So I think I was lucky in that I enjoyed the travel even then.

And that prepared you for a lifetime of it.

It did. The fact we've been in Melbourne now for two weeks is bothering me because I am a traveller. We can do a hotel for three days and then I want out.

I noticed that after the Fleetwood Mac 'Say You Will' tour there was a short hiatus, and then you were back out on the road with your own tour.

I got two months off. I was actually supposed to take last year off but what happened was I got an offer from Las Vegas to do four nights in Celine Dion's theatre in Caesar's Palace and if you turn that down you are stupid. So I went to Vegas - and saw Elton and Celine back-to-back which was a lucky thing, she was on her way to the Bahamas and he was coming in. So I got to see both shows on that 111-foot wide stage and thought, I have to build a world here because you can't just take your little band into a place like this.

So after I'd doing those four shows Don Henley called and said, 'Let's go out and do 25 dates. I said, I can't Don, I'm having time off but he was like, C'mon we could talk about this all night, but let's just go and do it. Which we did. Of course he bailed on the last 15 shows because the Eagles summoned him!

So there I was out on the East Coast and I thought, Well, I'm not going home, this ball is rolling so we scurried around and got Vanessa Carlton to come in and do a 30 minute opening and we changed a few of the venues.

It was so expensive to go through your months of rehearsal and getting all your stuff together and your people... So I thought, Let's forget this year off idea, let's just do it.

So I didn't get back until September last year, and after that I was extremely busy with a lot of other things: my visits to Walter Reed Hospital; I bought a new house; moving out of the old one and into a new one; corporate things we do every now and again ... So in that October period through Christmas it seemed like I never stopped, and then I had a month in January to work with an arranger for the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra show.

That was extremely difficult because you are working with someone who is writing string arrangements for your songs - which is amazing, but you have to know where they are going at every moment because when you put an orchestra with a rock'n'roll band you don't want The Sound of Music. You want Kashmir. You want Led Zeppelin, not Julie Andrews and the Von Trapp Family.

I guess I am really lucky because I don't have to stop. When I stop it'll be because nobody wants to see what I do anymore. But I never look at it as bad thing.

I'd like to have the time off, but as Don Henley would say, We'll sleep when we're dead.

You said you will keep doing this as long as people want you to do it. People want you to do it because, I suspect, that over time the meanings of your songs change and they mean something very different now to what they meant to people say 10 or even 20 years ago. And to you also, perhaps?

I think so. For example Edge of Seventeen was written about John Lennon's death but I was in New York on 9/11 and we were there for the four days and went on to Atlantic City on the Saturday - 9/11 happened on the Tuesday - so when I walked out to do that show, which was extremely difficult, every one of my songs became totally about 9/11 for people.

My songs are not all written about love and romance, so each one of them became very different.

Now, with the war in Iraq different meanings are coming in for me and for the audience. So I feel lucky I didn't just write a bunch of fluffy stupid love songs because I couldn't still be singing them now.

Songwriters feel very precious about their songs - they are your babies - but you do lose possession of them to an audience. That was always going to happen, wasn't it?

I think the people take the songs where they want to take them. I throw them out there, and it doesn't matter that I wrote Landslide in 73 and have been singing it since then, which was two years before I joined Fleetwood Mac.

Whenever I sing that song I remember clearly writing that song while I was sitting in the house in Aspen and wondering whether I was going to give Lindsey and the music another chance, or whether I was just going to stay in Aspen and follow my own music career there.

So whenever I sing that song I can just close my eyes and be taken back to looking out that window and seeing the Rocky Mountains. I'm able to then sing the song with that in mind.

My songs don't get old for me because of that, and if one does, then I drop it from the set immediately. And I wait, and down the line it comes back.
[B]
You also have plenty of others to choose from.

Absolutely. So many. You know Fleetwood Mac did my song Beautiful Child for the first time ever on stage and I've decided to bring it here to Melbourne to be orchestrated because it is so beautiful. There's a multitude of stuff I could add if I were to get tired of this stuff. You've got a leeway of maybe four or five songs you can bring in as new, but its fun to do it.

When you come to New Zealand I take it you will be bring a set of predominantly, maybe 75 per cent, of your solo material?

No, there is a lot of Fleetwood Mac stuff. It's about half and half.

You mentioned Lindsey before. People have said that while you have worked with other writers and producers, like Sheryl Crow for example, that he still brings the best out of you. Despite whatever else that has happened between you, in a working relationship you can still do it even today.

Yes, that's fair. I have a lot of respect for his ability to take one of my songs and ... I'm not the best musician in the world so if I sit down at the piano and play Sara for example it is very, very simple. And very, very long. Someone like Lindsey can take a 15 minute song and - much to my horror - edit it down to seven minutes then makes it build and arrange it. That blows my mind because that is something that I can never do.

So we have a great relationship when it comes to making our music.

And where does the Mac thing sit now?

We just finished 135 shows not quite two years ago but when I go home after this tour I am going to take October and November off, and we are discussing whether Fleetwood Mac wants to tour next year. It's 50:50 there and its just down to what we decide over the next few months.

We had a meeting right before I left and it looks good. Its good for me to keep the both going because its fun and they are very different. Never a boring moment if you have both. I've had the both since 1980 so I run back and forth between the two.

What about your own writing? I read recently that you'd just written your first song in six months, it was about New Orleans.

I have. I have an amazing amount of writing in my journal and on the left hand side of the journal is where I take what I've written in prose and make into poetry, so we can go through the journals and pull all the poetry out.

I probably have, since the Say You Will tour began, about 30 poems. I don't go to the piano until I'm ready to start writing songs, but the hard part has been done which is the words. Due to the fact I only really know four chords, if you haven't written the words and are trying to make stuff up ... I don't do that. I don't make stuff up, I write about what is happening.

In the last year I have written a lot about Walter Reed Hospital and the soldiers, and the metamorphosis of Fleetwood Mac, and of course Lindsey and I write about each other constantly because even though it has been 300 years since we broke up - and he has a wife and three kids - we feel totally right about each other.

So we will always be that amazing inspiration for each other, because we will always be mad at each other is some shape or form, and that makes for good material for songs.

Cant live with him and ...

Exactly. The love-hate things stands as a beacon for writers, and for both of us.

Let me talk to you about Walter Reed. Musicians are known for doing good work but I'm more impressed by people who, like yourself, do it without photographers present. What does it mean to you to be visiting those wounded soldiers?

I first went last summer in the middle of my tour. I was in Washington DC and they invited me and I really had no idea. I just went, Sure, I'm up for anything. I walked in there a fairly happy, single, 57-year old woman with no children - and I walked out a mother and a nurse and a doctor and girlfriend and sister and patients' advocate. From that moment I became a soldiers' advocate because they need it.

I have no comment or opinion about the war itself, but when those guys get back and are horribly injured then that is my business. But really, what can you do?

I decided I'd gather all my friends together and get as many iPods as I could and every time I go I take as many iPods as there are soldiers in Walter Reed. And that's what I've done.

I've been four times, the last time was at Thanksgiving. Mick [Fleetwood] and I went and I was there for three days, and after that much time you know what's going on.

And you talk to the guys about their experiences.

I walk in and sit down on the bed and say, Move over, and tell me what happened to you. They need to tell you and get it out, and they do. You stay for 15 to 20 minutes, as long as you can, and you become extremely attached. Then I go home, write about it in my journal, and I go back again the next day.

It certainly makes you walk around and think, I have no problems because they have so many. It's going to take so long for many of them to come back to being any sort of normal at all.

I imagine some of these people open up more to you than they do to wives or partners because we often open up more to a stranger.

Absolutely, because I'm more neutral and at first people told me not to mince words, just go in and ask what happened because they need to tell people and it makes them feel better. It's like therapy.

So I sit there with my big eyes, listening and taking it all in. You try not to burst into tears because that's not going to help, so you put this thin plastic seal up where you can listen and discuss and be a sounding board without getting upset because they are so badly injured.

You found that hard the first time?

Very hard. I'd walk into the hallway and cry and then I'd suck it back up and go back, room after room after room. And when you come out they say, and in this room this boy... And in this room this girl ... I started to feel like what it must be like to be a doctor there. The doctors and nurses and techs are astounding. And what the doctors are doing in medical terms is amazing. The best place you could possibly be is at Walter Reed.

Yet despite seeing all this you have no comment on the war? These are the victims.

I can't have an opinion.

Why not?

Because I have to be there for them. And anyway, all the people I have talked to are very upbeat about what they were doing and would turn around and go back [to Iraq]. I've never talked to one soldier who wouldn't go back. They tell me stories about stuff that happened directly to them and you sit there with your mouth open.

If you made a statement against the war ... You would not be welcome there. You'd be Jane Fonda.

Yes. My job is when they get back and are in the hospital, then they are my responsibility. Them lining up and going is not my responsibility. But when they are back, if I can get a little of that mysterious, childlike innocence thing and give that to them, that's what I can do. I didn't have kids and I can look at them as my enormous group of fantastic children.

You also make healing music.

I try.

After all that serious stuff, let me ask you a more frivolous question: your style of clothing. About 18 months ago I noticed a lot of young people, driven by fashion houses, were wearing what we might call Stevie Nicks clothes. Did you ever think you'd become a fashion icon?

I never did. I thought my clothes were terrific and thought others might think they were fabulous and they loved seeing me wearing them, but I never thought people would go, Oh I'm going to wear that too.

I'm thrilled about it because I'm a fashion nut too. Every magazine I pick up there is something that could belong to me. And people say, That's a Stevie Nicks hat. That is great. I still think it's a terrific way to dress. My style fits in to any of the styles even as they change. I just tweak it a bit.

That has been a lot of fun for me and I've been with the same designer since 75.

Ever worn a pair of jeans?

I wore jeans in high school and college, but I don't wear jeans now. I wear pants now, little Janis Joplin-type silky pants.

I've never seen a photo of you in jeans.

There is one, from about 1977. I have that photo.

If Levis called you tomorrow with a major contract you wouldn't take it.

Probably not. The one photo of me in jeans I had a horrifying hangover and I couldn't be bothered putting all my stuff on so I just wore my jeans, it was an outdoor show and somebody got it on film.

We are delighted you make the effort to dress up. It was 1980 the last time you were in New Zealand. I guess you remember that.

The big Fleetwood Mac fight. It has become a thing of mythology that night. I remember it quite well because Lindsey and I got into a fight at the end of the show when I was singing during one of his solos and he threw his guitar at me. He didn't hit me because I ducked and it missed me. The song ended and we went off stage. It was the only time in our whole existence we did not do an encore.

It was as unprofessional as Fleetwood Mac have ever been. Needless to say he was not forgiven for 10 years. We felt bad because so many people were there and had been bussed in from all over New Zealand. And for something that stupid to happen, we were so angry with him.

Is what kept Fleetwood Mac together was that anything could happen offstage and be difficult emotionally and personally, but when you got up under the lights you were there for the music and the show?

When you got on stage you were a professional and you rose above your private problems, so that was an unacceptable moment. It's also something now that everybody knows about all over the world. The fight that went around the world.

You can't do much in private in front of 60,000 people.

No, you can be loving and emotional and maybe even angry - but you can't let it become what is going on between you.

wheart
02-25-2006, 06:07 PM
Thanks for the post! Great interview, indeed. I always prefer Stevie's interviews that she does overseas, for whatever reason. I think the interviewers ask more direct questions than those in the states...and not always the same old stuff about Rumors. They always seem more fresh.

Sahara
02-25-2006, 06:41 PM
A very intelligent interview. Thanks for posting.

Jyqm
02-25-2006, 06:43 PM
I really appreciate her attitude toward the war and the soldiers. There are plenty of people to talk about the right and wrong and where things are going and what should be happening, but we (and especially the returning soldiers) also need people who are willing to take a neutral stance politically and simply offer emotional support for the people who don't have the luxury of sitting back on Capitol Hill in a suit and tie and arguing the theoretical stuff.

I hope the other 50 of the 50-50 chance that Fleetwood Mac will tour next year is that they'll cut another album instead... Unless they're planning to dig quite a bit deeper into their catalogue, I've got no desire to see any kind of redux nostalgia tour again. Somebody write in to John and beg him to convince the others to play some different stuff...

Her comments of "Oh, there's such a multitude of other material I can play if I want to" is always so exciting, and then she has to dash it immediately with "But of course, I probably won't." Better than false hopes, I suppose.

(And dude, never seen a photo of Stevie in jeans? Where've you been? I think she was far sexier back in '75 with the jeans than she's ever been with the witchy dresses.)

Sahara
02-25-2006, 06:44 PM
I really appreciate her attitude toward the war and the soldiers. There are plenty of people to talk about the right and wrong and where things are going and what should be happening, but we (and especially the returning soldiers) also need people who are willing to take a neutral stance politically and simply offer emotional support for the people who don't have the luxury of sitting back on Capitol Hill in a suit and tie and argue the theoretical stuff.

I agree. I often wonder what she really thinks about the whole situation but her position as a 'soldier's advocate' as she puts it is very worthy. I really admire her for it.

StreetAngel86
02-25-2006, 06:46 PM
I know about kids between 8 and 15 and if you walk by them and they are on the computer its like, 'Talk to the hand, don't bother me'.

OMG I LOVE THIS!!!!!!!
i do that haha
DONT BOTHER ME WHEN IM ON THE LEDGE :D

You want Kashmir. You want Led Zeppelin, not Julie Andrews and the Von Trapp Family.

okay. im going to wet my pants
god i love her :lol:

Jyqm
02-25-2006, 06:49 PM
Reid: I'd like to talk to about your music but not in specifics at this point. It seems to me that if I listen to the rock'n'roll going around today much of it is channelling angst or anxiety. But you come from a different generation where music was part of a collective spirit, an art form which brought people together even though the songs might have been entirely personal.

Yeah, and I think we had a lot more fun with our music. It was more fun and romantic. Definitely our music covered angst-ridden subjects but at the same time there was an uplifting, really fun and romantic thing that I fail to see today.

Also, blah blah blah. There's more angsty whining going on in these few sentences than in most popular music right now. This is 2006, kids, not 1994. Between hip-hop and dance-punk alone, there's a hell of a lot fun going on in the music world.

StreetAngel86
02-25-2006, 06:53 PM
um..........not to stir sh!t or anything

BUT

Stevie's taking Oct & November off

she gets back to LA mid March

does that mean she's going to retour the US?

:eek: :eek: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

and of course Lindsey and I write about each other constantly because even though it has been 300 years since we broke up - and he has a wife and three kids - we feel totally right about each other.

okay. i have butterflies
me thinks there's going to be some Liddy love
on her next bunch of songs
::hyperventilating::

NEW RECORD

NEW RECORD

Serrart
02-25-2006, 07:29 PM
It's really one of the best interviews to Stevie I've read in recent years, kudos to the journalist (and Stevie of course). I especially like the part about the soldiers and the war. But this is absolutely my favourite segment:
What about your own writing? I read recently that you'd just written your first song in six months, it was about New Orleans.

I have. I have an amazing amount of writing in my journal and on the left hand side of the journal is where I take what I've written in prose and make into poetry, so we can go through the journals and pull all the poetry out.

I probably have, since the Say You Will tour began, about 30 poems. I don't go to the piano until I'm ready to start writing songs, but the hard part has been done which is the words. Due to the fact I only really know four chords, if you haven't written the words and are trying to make stuff up ... I don't do that. I don't make stuff up, I write about what is happening.

In the last year I have written a lot about Walter Reed Hospital and the soldiers, and the metamorphosis of Fleetwood Mac, and of course Lindsey and I write about each other constantly because even though it has been 300 years since we broke up - and he has a wife and three kids - we feel totally right about each other.

So we will always be that amazing inspiration for each other, because we will always be mad at each other is some shape or form, and that makes for good material for songs.


Excellent news! :thumbsup:

Romy

StreetAngel86
02-25-2006, 07:38 PM
let's hope she's SUPER inspired to do a new album
after she leaves us here :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

MacMan
02-25-2006, 07:48 PM
um..........not to stir sh!t or anything

BUT

Stevie's taking Oct & November off

she gets back to LA mid March

does that mean she's going to retour the US?

:eek: :eek: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

and of course Lindsey and I write about each other constantly because even though it has been 300 years since we broke up - and he has a wife and three kids - we feel totally right about each other.

okay. i have butterflies
me thinks there's going to be some Liddy love
on her next bunch of songs
::hyperventilating::

NEW RECORD

NEW RECORD


I bet she'll be out on the road with Don Henley this summer to finish what they started.

StreetAngel86
02-25-2006, 08:58 PM
I bet she'll be out on the road with Don Henley this summer to finish what they started.

um....
he walked out on her
during THEIR tour
he doesn't deserve to join her again :nod:

i think she she co-tour with Vanessa..........PROPERLY

now THAT would rock!

JWS
02-25-2006, 09:50 PM
Thank you Cat for posting this.

JWS
02-25-2006, 09:59 PM
I just had a thought to add. Stevie's family moved to the Bay Area in 1966 for her senior year in HS. What if they didn't? What if she finishes at Arcadia HS in LA? She probably goes to Cal State Northridge, not CS San Jose. She doesn't meet LB...she doesn't join FM. Fate? As Stevie says in the interview...she was at the right place at the right time...the infamous San Francisco "summer of love" in 1967.

StreetAngel86
02-25-2006, 11:30 PM
I just had a thought to add. Stevie's family moved to the Bay Area in 1966 for her senior year in HS. What if they didn't? What if she finishes at Arcadia HS in LA? She probably goes to Cal State Northridge, not CS San Jose. She doesn't meet LB...she doesn't join FM. Fate? As Stevie says in the interview...she was at the right place at the right time...the infamous San Francisco "summer of love" in 1967.


everybody now............"back in the summer of sixty-seven" :woohoo:

have you been depressing yourself in the other thread of S&L and who made who famous? :lol:

Gypsy-Rhiannon
02-26-2006, 04:19 AM
I bet she'll be out on the road with Don Henley this summer to finish what they started.
The Eagles are playing dates in the UK in June

tuigirl
02-26-2006, 04:36 AM
Oh yes, a much better interview, than the last one! Hopefully she may have had time to reflect about the last interview and almost redeem herself a bit, in LB's direction anyway.
Ha..so she reckoned she'd have immigrated to NZ if she'd had kids (or words to that effect) Stevie now your'e talking..good idea.

WelshWitchPMD
02-26-2006, 06:31 AM
The Eagles are playing dates in the UK in June

When aren't The Eagles touring?:laugh:

Bryan
02-26-2006, 10:51 AM
This is 2006, kids, not 1994. Between hip-hop and dance-punk alone, there's a hell of a lot fun going on in the music world.

You've gotta be joking. All I see nowadays is sludge,**** and more ****.It's all here today,gone tomorrow.
Jog back about 3 or 4 years ago..look at how many acts have already been dropped in favour of new ones.And the acts that were big even 2 years ago and are trying to sell now but nobody's real interested because music is product now.It's just consumed like fast food.
The latest songs are full of loops and samples usually put together by someone in their bedroom 'studio' ,as opposed to musicians actually playing anything. :confused: I fail to see the appeal of any of these modern crazes.
Still,it's nice to know it only has a short life span,roll on the next fad.

jwd
02-26-2006, 12:43 PM
You've gotta be joking. All I see nowadays is sludge,**** and more ****.It's all here today,gone tomorrow.
Jog back about 3 or 4 years ago..look at how many acts have already been dropped in favour of new ones.And the acts that were big even 2 years ago and are trying to sell now but nobody's real interested because music is product now.It's just consumed like fast food.
The latest songs are full of loops and samples usually put together by someone in their bedroom 'studio' ,as opposed to musicians actually playing anything. :confused: I fail to see the appeal of any of these modern crazes.
Still,it's nice to know it only has a short life span,roll on the next fad.

AMEN TO THAT!

diamondsnake
02-26-2006, 01:40 PM
Great interview! The most exciting thing for me was that she said she has written thirty poems/songs. I hope she is going to do a new album! Maybe that is what she is doing this summer. Wishful thinking, I know!

Jyqm
02-26-2006, 01:43 PM
You've gotta be joking. All I see nowadays is sludge,**** and more ****.It's all here today,gone tomorrow.
Jog back about 3 or 4 years ago..look at how many acts have already been dropped in favour of new ones.And the acts that were big even 2 years ago and are trying to sell now but nobody's real interested because music is product now.It's just consumed like fast food.
The latest songs are full of loops and samples usually put together by someone in their bedroom 'studio' ,as opposed to musicians actually playing anything. :confused: I fail to see the appeal of any of these modern crazes.
Still,it's nice to know it only has a short life span,roll on the next fad.

Must be fun being old and bitter, huh!

Is there a lot of ****ty music out there? Sure is, just as there was twenty, thirty, forty years ago.

Are there a lot of short-lived fads? Sure are, just as there were twenty, thirty, forty years ago.

"Music is product now?" Do you think there weren't people saying this in the 80s? the 70s? the 60s? the 50s? "All I see nowadays is sludge, **** and more ****. It's all here today gone tomorrow." Thanks a lot, grandpa. Don't worry, that Lawrence Welk rerun will be on in a few minutes.

All this bitching and moaning about "rock is dead" and "music ain't as good as it used to be" has been going on for decades. It's never been true before, and it's not true now.

The one major difference in the popular music industry right now is that with media conglomerates set up the way they are, most of the best musicians don't make it to the top of the charts or have as much commercial success as they might have twenty years ago or more. But that doesn't mean those people aren't out there making brilliant music.

I understand that it might be easier to sit back and whine and jerk off to the good old days instead of taking the time to seek out all of the wonderful music that's being made in the world right now. But just because you've got your head up your ass and it's dark in there doesn't mean the sun isn't shining outside.

JWS
02-26-2006, 01:52 PM
have you been depressing yourself in the other thread of S&L and who made who famous? :lol:

OK...... who?

desertangel
02-26-2006, 01:53 PM
:laugh: :lol: :laugh: :lol:

:wavey:

JWS
02-26-2006, 02:09 PM
Must be fun being old and bitter, huh!

Is there a lot of ****ty music out there? Sure is, just as there was twenty, thirty, forty years ago.

Are there a lot of short-lived fads? Sure are, just as there were twenty, thirty, forty years ago.

"Music is product now?" Do you think there weren't people saying this in the 80s? the 70s? the 60s? the 50s? "All I see nowadays is sludge, **** and more ****. It's all here today gone tomorrow." Thanks a lot, grandpa. Don't worry, that Lawrence Welk rerun will be on in a few minutes.

All this bitching and moaning about "rock is dead" and "music ain't as good as it used to be" has been going on for decades. It's never been true before, and it's not true now.

The one major difference in the popular music industry right now is that with media conglomerates set up the way they are, most of the best musicians don't make it to the top of the charts or have as much commercial success as they might have twenty years ago or more. But that doesn't mean those people aren't out there making brilliant music.

I understand that it might be easier to sit back and whine and jerk off to the good old days instead of taking the time to seek out all of the wonderful music that's being made in the world right now. But just because you've got your head up your ass and it's dark in there doesn't mean the sun isn't shining outside.


Ha! Thank you. I had the same conversation with my father in 1965. In his view the Rolling Stones and Beatles were disgusting degenerate hoodlums....a fad...gone in a year. Cut that hair off and send them to boot camp!

Forty years later they're playing at the Super Bowl!

catinthedark
02-26-2006, 11:15 PM
You've gotta be joking. All I see nowadays is sludge,**** and more ****.It's all here today,gone tomorrow.
Jog back about 3 or 4 years ago..look at how many acts have already been dropped in favour of new ones.And the acts that were big even 2 years ago and are trying to sell now but nobody's real interested because music is product now.It's just consumed like fast food.
The latest songs are full of loops and samples usually put together by someone in their bedroom 'studio' ,as opposed to musicians actually playing anything. :confused: I fail to see the appeal of any of these modern crazes.
Still,it's nice to know it only has a short life span,roll on the next fad.

you've gotta get out of the mainstream. the real music, the real art can be found in the indie scene. you just have to look and listen. i don't know the US indie scene very well, but canada's is unbelievable. i discover new music almost daily. i also have friends who are into the same kind of sound and content as me, and we share new discoveries. iTunes is a wonderful place to discover stuff, too. but trust me, there is unbelievable music being made these days.

DestinyRules
02-26-2006, 11:45 PM
"I got an offer from Las Vegas to do four nights in Celine Dion's theatre in Caesar's Palace and if you turn that down you are stupid."

Best. Quote. Ever. :lol:

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 03:40 AM
you've gotta get out of the mainstream. the real music, the real art can be found in the indie scene. you just have to look and listen. i don't know the US indie scene very well, but canada's is unbelievable. i discover new music almost daily. i also have friends who are into the same kind of sound and content as me, and we share new discoveries. iTunes is a wonderful place to discover stuff, too. but trust me, there is unbelievable music being made these days.

I don't know if the US has any single scene that's as big and interesting as what's been going on in Montreal the past few years, but we've been mooching off that plenty!

PenguinHead
02-27-2006, 05:07 AM
I really enjoyed this interview. It felt like I just had my own conversation with Stevie. It was very intimate. The interviewer did a great job. Stevie has never been more candid, direct and eloquent. Age and experience have very much seasoned her. She has a warm, sage-like intelligence.

Sounds like she's really drawing a lot of inspiration from her visits with the war victims. I look forward to seeing how this comes through in her new songs, or better yet -- a new album.:)

Bryan
02-27-2006, 10:17 AM
you've gotta get out of the mainstream. the real music, the real art can be found in the indie scene. you just have to look and listen. i don't know the US indie scene very well, but canada's is unbelievable. i discover new music almost daily. i also have friends who are into the same kind of sound and content as me, and we share new discoveries. iTunes is a wonderful place to discover stuff, too. but trust me, there is unbelievable music being made these days.

It's the indie scene I despise the most!!!:lol:
I'm well in tune with all the scenes around at the moment and I can honestly say none of it excites me. Particularly here and in the UK indie music has become very mainstream..so it's all very tabloid at the moment. It's been raped.So it's not really indie anymore it's pop.
I don't doubt there's something special in music out there somewhere but it hardly seems fair that it won't get the attention that it deserves through TV and radio rather than having to seek it out through MySpace and iTunes. And with that, the whole thing's overpopulated anyway because of iTunes and MySpace..everyone and their dog has a MySpacemusic with their 'songs' on it. So really good artists are going to get swamped in. That's really what I mean about music not being exciting--everyone has the means nowadays to become popular/famous because of reality TV and the internet. That's no fun. It's no longer reserved for people with *that* charisma that can hold an audience's attention.

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 10:36 AM
I don't doubt there's something special in music out there somewhere but it hardly seems fair that it won't get the attention that it deserves through TV and radio rather than having to seek it out through MySpace and iTunes.

Since when has the music industry ever been fair? There have always been wonderful musicians who never achieved much commercial success.

And with that, the whole thing's overpopulated anyway because of iTunes and MySpace..everyone and their dog has a MySpacemusic with their 'songs' on it. So really good artists are going to get swamped in. That's really what I mean about music not being exciting--everyone has the means nowadays to become popular/famous because of reality TV and the internet.

I think you're the only person I've ever heard complain about the fact that musicians now have more avenues through which their music can be heard and they can reach an audience.

First you complained that music is "product." Now the problem is that there are too many people who are now able to release their music without commercializing it.

It's no longer reserved for people with *that* charisma that can hold an audience's attention.

Yeah, not like the good old days when Tony Orlando and Dawn were heating up the charts.

catinthedark
02-27-2006, 11:46 AM
It's the indie scene I despise the most!!!:lol:
I'm well in tune with all the scenes around at the moment and I can honestly say none of it excites me. Particularly here and in the UK indie music has become very mainstream..so it's all very tabloid at the moment. It's been raped.So it's not really indie anymore it's pop.

i guess the indie scenes are different depending what country, or even what city, you're in. i'm in toronto. and actually, i was dismayed this weekend to see a several-page spread in the new york times magazine about my beloved broken social scene from this fair city. the worst thing to ever have happened to montreal's the arcade fire was that they became popular!! :laugh: that being said, there is definitely a non-mainstream scene in toronto, and other canadian cities. what i have observed, though, is that if a band goes mainstream, and i lose interest, there is always, but always, another band or musician hovering under the radar. and i loooove finding them. sometimes i feel like i want to keep him/her/them all to myself - but inevitably, i wind up sharing them with someone who shares my love of original and brilliant music.


I don't doubt there's something special in music out there somewhere but it hardly seems fair that it won't get the attention that it deserves through TV and radio rather than having to seek it out through MySpace and iTunes. And with that, the whole thing's overpopulated anyway because of iTunes and MySpace..everyone and their dog has a MySpacemusic with their 'songs' on it. So really good artists are going to get swamped in. That's really what I mean about music not being exciting--everyone has the means nowadays to become popular/famous because of reality TV and the internet. That's no fun. It's no longer reserved for people with *that* charisma that can hold an audience's attention.

this seems contradictory to me - maybe i'm reading you wrong. you seem to be unhappy with the fact that it's not fair that indie musicians with huge talent may not get the mainstream attention - yet you go on to say that it takes nothing anymore - no talent, no charisma - to get that mainstream popularity. i guess for me, if i discover music i love, i don't care if it's played on the radio or MTV (or muchmusic, as the case may be here in canada). in fact, i never listen to the radio anymore. radio content is aimed at the 12-25 age group - of which, ahem, i am no longer a member. i crave more than a 4-minute pop song with a hook i'll love for a day and then get tired of. i can hear a song and not love it - but if, on second listen, i discover there is even one line that cuts a hole in my heart, i will fall in love with that song. and even though i am long past the going to every concert and show stage of my life, i do still love seeing my favourite artists live, and i'd rather see a small time indie act in an intimate, little bar than struggle to see them on the big screen in an arena packed with 60,000 other screaming fans.

ya know? :)

Boots
02-27-2006, 11:49 AM
Ok.....going back to topic....

Great interview!!! Although I read the actual newpaper version online, and there were so many errors - probably typographical - because I got thrown when Stevie mentioned her "sister"? I'm thinking she was referring to Lori - her sister-in-law.

I love what she said about Lindsey...so true, and very realistic. I didn't know that the "Big Mac Blowout" was in New Zealand? I heard that LB kicked her...is that a separate moment in their thwarted love affair?

Music today doesn't all suck. There is much good music to be had out there - you just have to look for it. Unfortunately, the good stuff is usually found in the non-commerical rung of the music world. The corporate bottom line is tauting the music you hear commercially. It's not that the music is bad (which some of it is), its not just a generational thing - that all the kids are listening to loud, horrible music. No. In my mind that's not it. The majority of commercial music fits into a safe corporate mold, not taking chances. Even the new exciting bands that I'm loving...such as Arctic Monkeys, Interpol, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, The Strokes, White Stripes...as fanastic...but they are derivative of bands from 20 plus years ago. The beauty is that they borrow, yet take that the retro sound and kick it up a notch to make it their own. Anyway...there is good music out there...we just have to be good consumers and go off the beaten track to find it...not just settle for commerical.

CatintheDark.....BSS ROCKS!!! I've been listening to their latest album in my car...did you know that a review I came across on social scene compared their latest cd to "Tusk"? It's because it they created something that was entirely different than what was expected of them - and it's a 2 CD set of crazy, quirky take them or leave them songs. So, the Tusk comparison was made. How cool that the FM album - so panned 25 years ago - is being held up as a touchstone! WOO!

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 11:56 AM
i guess the indie scenes are different depending what country, or even what city, you're in. i'm in toronto. and actually, i was dismayed this weekend to see a several-page spread in the new york times magazine about my beloved broken social scene from this fair city. the worst thing to ever have happened to montreal's the arcade fire was that they became popular!! :laugh:

I'll let you claim Broken Social Scene for Toronto, but Montreal only gets to lay claim to half the Arcade Fire!

I didn't read the Times article, was it any good? BSS have been due for some major press for a while now. All of them are too all over the place in too many projects to escape notice.

catinthedark
02-27-2006, 12:00 PM
I'll let you claim Broken Social Scene for Toronto, but Montreal only gets to lay claim to half the Arcade Fire!
I didn't read the Times article, was it any good? BSS have been due for some major press for a while now. All of them are too all over the place in too many projects to escape notice.


okay, okay. i'll give you that. :)

the article was very good. it's on the nytimes website. go to the magazine section, and follow the links. worth the read for sure.

it's funny - i actually love the individual parts of BSS more than the sum of the parts. jason collett is a particular obsession of mine. his show earlier this year (or late last year) was one of the best musical nights i've ever spent. leslie feist, emily haines - so much talent. don't get me wrong, i love BSS, too. but you're right - too many projects - and too much talent - to escape notice.

DavidMn
02-27-2006, 12:02 PM
You know what I really like? She's one celebrity that isnt afraid to keep her mouth shut with war opinions. I dont neccarily have a problem with someone having an opinion, but so many of these yahoos open their mouth just to expose THEMSELVES to more attention.

David
02-27-2006, 12:13 PM
I love what she said about Lindsey...so true, and very realistic. I didn't know that the "Big Mac Blowout" was in New Zealand? According to Stevie. It's probably all she can remember at this point. I'm sure there were many instances of dastardly doings onstage back then.
So, the Tusk comparison was made. How cool that the FM album - so panned 25 years ago - is being held up as a touchstone! WOO!Why do so many people say this (that Tusk was so widely panned)? Read the big reviews in Rolling Stone & the major dailies in the Blue Letter Archives. For the most part, Tusk got excellent reviews. (An excellent review doesn't ipso facto mean that the reviewer doesn't have criticisms to make.) Stephen Holden's review of Tusk in Rolling Stone was a very positive review, Robert Hilburn's review in the Los Angeles Times was a very positive review, Ken Tucker's review in the Philadelphia Enquirer was a very positive review, the Washington Post review was a very positive review. You could go on & on citing specific instances of major metropolitan dailies lauding the Tusk album back in 1979.

Boots
02-27-2006, 12:39 PM
David - the album was deemed unsuccesful - compared to Rumours. And yes, it did get less than enthusiastic reviews back then, despite this library of reference you've seemed to unearth. I was around back then...I read other reviews at the time. Members of the band were less than thrilled, but it wasn't a disaster by a long shot. I personally loved Tusk..always have...always will.

Each response from you to me is a contrarian remark. I didn't come on this site for debates.

My comments around here bug you too much. Put me on "ignore" so I don't continue to irk you.

chiliD
02-27-2006, 12:55 PM
I'd like to have the time off, but as Don Henley would say, We'll sleep when we're dead.


:laugh: She doesn't realize that Henley was quoting Warren Zevon? :shrug: C'mon, she knew Warren, she even sang on his album that had the SONG "I'll Sleep When I'm Dead".

David - the album was deemed unsuccesful - compared to Rumours. And yes, it did get less than enthusiastic reviews back then, despite this library of reference you've seemed to unearth. I was around back then...I read other reviews at the time. Members of the band were less than thrilled, but it wasn't a disaster by a long shot. I personally loved Tusk..always have...always will.

ANY album they would've released as the follow-up to Rumours would've been considered "unsuccessful". Tusk STILL sold multi-millions...and being a double-album, with an inflated price tag...was phenomenal. And, I DO have to go with David on this one...despite the record company (and to some degree the band itself) crapping & dissing Tusk, more often than not, and especially in the large media markets, the critical response was MORE than favorable.

Each response from you to me is a contrarian remark. I didn't come on this site for debates.

It's what we do here. :shrug:

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 12:56 PM
David - the album was deemed unsuccesful - compared to Rumours. And yes, it did get less than enthusiastic reviews back then, despite this library of reference you've seemed to unearth. I was around back then...I read other reviews at the time.

"Less than enthusiastic" isn't quite the same as "panned," though. As David mentioned, there were a lot mostly positive reviews in many of the major publications upon Tusk's release.

Each response from you to me is a contrarian remark. I didn't come on this site for debates.

My comments around here bug you too much. Put me on "ignore" so I don't continue to irk you.

Boots, meet David. David, meet Boots. Boots, as before, don't take things personally that aren't personal.

Bryan
02-27-2006, 01:06 PM
First you complained that music is "product." Now the problem is that there are too many people who are now able to release their music without commercializing it.


What I mean altogether is that it was much better to have a band or artist with something to say and a persona good enough to last number of years and span numerous albums. Now it's packed full of one trick ponies.That goes for people on MySpace AND signed to record labels.
Just out of curiosity,what acts do you deem worthwhile in today's music?

Boots
02-27-2006, 04:50 PM
Here's one, Bryan:

What you gon' do with all that junk?
All that junk inside your trunk?
I'ma get, get, get, get, you drunk,
Get you love drunk off my hump.
My hump, my hump, my hump, my hump, my hump,
My hump, my hump, my hump, my lovely little lumps. (Check it out)



Perfection! Sheer poetry.:rolleyes:

(I know only one example - not necessarily indicative of today's music - but geez louise....)

JazmenFlowers
02-27-2006, 04:55 PM
Here's one, Bryan:

What you gon' do with all that junk?
All that junk inside your trunk?
I'ma get, get, get, get, you drunk,
Get you love drunk off my hump.
My hump, my hump, my hump, my hump, my hump,
My hump, my hump, my hump, my lovely little lumps. (Check it out)



Perfection! Sheer poetry.:rolleyes:

(I know only one example - not necessarily indicative of today's music - but geez louise....)
speaking of this...isn't this song sampling something else? I swear I can't figure it out. I know they didn't just come up with that beat and these words all on their own. anyone know? got liner notes?

BlackWidow
02-27-2006, 05:18 PM
um..........not to stir sh!t or anything

BUT

Stevie's taking Oct & November off

she gets back to LA mid March

does that mean she's going to retour the US?

:eek: :eek: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

and of course Lindsey and I write about each other constantly because even though it has been 300 years since we broke up - and he has a wife and three kids - we feel totally right about each other.

okay. i have butterflies
me thinks there's going to be some Liddy love
on her next bunch of songs
::hyperventilating::

NEW RECORD

NEW RECORD
I suspect a Tour of Europe!
http://www.nicksfix.com/sn0013.jpg

skcin
02-27-2006, 05:20 PM
Nice interview, nothing really new but I liked it.

"Not just as a little girl fairy princess, but a faaaabulous fairy princess." :cool:

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 05:43 PM
What I mean altogether is that it was much better to have a band or artist with something to say and a persona good enough to last number of years and span numerous albums. Now it's packed full of one trick ponies.That goes for people on MySpace AND signed to record labels.

How is this different than any other time in the history of pop music since the 1950s, though? There have been one trick ponies since day one, starting with Bill Haley & the Comets. Watch some of those "One Hit Wonders" specials they air on VH1 and other such networks. They're chock full of artists and songs from every decade, who disappeared as quickly as they hit #1.

Of course it's easy to see the past in terms of the best bands with the greatest music and the most longevity, because those are the artists who have been remembered or who are still around today, while most of the crap has fallen by the wayside. But that doesn't mean the crap wasn't there.

And of course, we don't yet know which artists today are going to be "good enough to last a number of years and span numerous albums" because, well, they haven't yet had the chance to succeed or fail in that respect.

Just out of curiosity,what acts do you deem worthwhile in today's music?

Among relatively new artists (as in, been around for maybe 10-15 years tops): Arcade Fire, Ted Leo & the Pharmacists, Four Tet, Wilco, Skalpel, Kanye West, Iron & Wine, The Shins, Sufjan Stevens, The White Stripes, The Black Keys, Common, Bright Eyes, Super Furry Animals, Will Oldham, Spoon, The Roots... There are plenty more, but those are at least most of the ones who have inspired to buy an album or two in recent years.

(Boots, shame on you. Let us never mention the Black Eyed "Induce Vomiting Now" Peas on this forum again.)

(I was in Europe in the fall of 2003, when "Where Is The Love?" became the big hit single of the season, and I was really pissed off when I came back to the US to discover that they were somehow popular there as well. Now suddenly everybody gives a **** what Will.i.am thinks? How did this happen?)

JazmenFlowers
02-27-2006, 05:45 PM
The Shins
:xoxo: love.them.

that's all.

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 05:50 PM
:xoxo: love.them.

that's all.

It's too bad they seem be developing a bad case of Buckinghamitis.

Maybe Zach Braff kidnapped them and is holding them hostage in his basement, forcing them to play "New Slang" every time he walks in the room until he gets the inspiration to write another movie.

JazmenFlowers
02-27-2006, 05:51 PM
It's too bad they seem be developing a bad case of Buckinghamitis.

Maybe Zach Braff kidnapped them and is holding them hostage in his basement, forcing them to play "New Slang" every time he walks in the room until he gets the inspiration to write another movie.
:eek: too creepy...I'm listening to Oh, Inverted World now and New Slang is next up

*looks around to see if Jyqm has silently snuck in*


EDIT: do you, by chance, like Red House Painters as well?

Rickypt
02-27-2006, 06:36 PM
Bright Eyes

Absolutely, and Josh Rouse comes to mind. I don't think music is any better or worse now than other times of the modern era.

catinthedark
02-27-2006, 07:04 PM
Iron & Wine

oh, love him. the trapeze swinger is among the most perfect 7 minutes and 8 seconds of music on this planet.

Jyqm
02-27-2006, 07:21 PM
Absolutely, and Josh Rouse comes to mind.

Yes, actually, shame on me for forgetting to mention Josh. I'm looking forward to seeing him this summer at the Roskilde festival. Wonderful songwriter.

Jason: I'm afraid I don't really know the Red House Painters at all, though the name sounds very familiar to me.