Larry King Live tonight! (1/17/06)

[mikeschmike]

Gays and religious conservatives will go head to (sparkly, perfectly accessorized) head debating the issues. All thanks to that damned mountain winning a few golden globes.

A friend of mine told me that he would only watch if the two guests were Mario Cantone and Pat Robertson. The old man and the queen. Personally, I want to watch if there are outspoken, in your face 100% red blooded FAGGOTS who will give the religious reich...er...right exactly what they have coming to them. I'm sure we'll end up with a few ministers squabbling with a lesbian in a power suit from the HRC, but a boy can dream, can't he?

Set your TiVo, it's gonna be a good one!

[JazmenFlowers]

no word on who the guests are?

[Brwn_eyes0511]

What about gay conservatives...why are they never thrown into the mix...

why always one extreme against the next?!?! I guess it makes for good TV...who knows.

[SuzeQuze]

Rachel Madows would be good. She's a lesbian progressive talk show host and could likely give those jackasses a real piece of her mind!

[dissention]

What about gay conservatives...why are they never thrown into the mix...

Because they're a joke.

I suspect that this show will be dominated by the fundamentalist whackos and that the gays will have as little airtime as possible. The fundies will bring up Leviticus and how disgusting same-sex anything is, and the gays will crow about their rights and will promptly be ignored.

[Brwn_eyes0511]

Because they're a joke.



Thanks. :wavey:

[dissention]

Thanks. :wavey:

Anytime. :woohoo:

In all seriousness, the Log Cabin Republicans and their ilk are ridiculous. They're unwanted by the very party that they support, yet they continue to lend their support. They have done next to nothing in terms of changing the party from within and they hold no power of any kind. A gay Republican is an oxymoron. A gay conservative who doesn't adopt the Republican moniker is essentially the same thing; they support the policies and politicians who want nothing to do with them and consider them second-class citizens. They are, respectfully, idiots.

[DavidMn]

Because they're a joke.

I suspect that this show will be dominated by the fundamentalist whackos and that the gays will have as little airtime as possible. The fundies will bring up Leviticus and how disgusting same-sex anything is, and the gays will crow about their rights and will promptly be ignored.Hallelujah!! praise god!! praise Jesus.;) :lol:

[Brwn_eyes0511]

Anytime. :woohoo:

In all seriousness, the Log Cabin Republicans and their ilk are ridiculous. They're unwanted by the very party that they support, yet they continue to lend their support. They have done next to nothing in terms of changing the party from within and they hold no power of any kind. A gay Republican is an oxymoron. A gay conservative who doesn't adopt the Republican moniker is essentially the same thing; they support the policies and politicians who want nothing to do with them and consider them second-class citizens. They are, respectfully, idiots.

Thanks :wavey:

[Brwn_eyes0511]

Anytime. :woohoo:

In all seriousness, the Log Cabin Republicans and their ilk are ridiculous. They're unwanted by the very party that they support, yet they continue to lend their support. They have done next to nothing in terms of changing the party from within and they hold no power of any kind. A gay Republican is an oxymoron. A gay conservative who doesn't adopt the Republican moniker is essentially the same thing; they support the policies and politicians who want nothing to do with them and consider them second-class citizens. They are, respectfully, idiots.

Thanks :wavey:

[dissention]

Thanks :wavey:

Anytime. :woohoo:

[dissention]

Hallelujah!! praise god!! praise Jesus.;) :lol:

Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior? Read Leviticus!

This Larry King show reminds me of the 360 show where Anderson had Falwell on and accidentally outed himself. CNN promptly edited the transcript. :laugh:

[DavidMn]

Thanks :wavey:Btw Brandon, what I said there was meant as a joke, so dont get too worked up k?

[mikeschmike]

no word on who the guests are?

CNN.com had no details about it. Which makes me think it will be some no-name civil rights person paired up with some lesbian vs. god and jesus:laugh:

[mikeschmike]

Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior? Read Leviticus!

This Larry King show reminds me of the 360 show where Anderson had Falwell on and accidentally outed himself. CNN promptly edited the transcript. :laugh:

Oh speaking of Leviticus (the most action packed book of the bible), I saw a woman wearing a shirt with mixed fabrics today. Now I have to decide whether to burn her or just chop her head off. In Jesus' name we pray...

[DavidMn]

Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior? Read Leviticus!

This Larry King show reminds me of the 360 show where Anderson had Falwell on and accidentally outed himself. CNN promptly edited the transcript. :laugh:I wanna be the next Jim Jones..:lol: I suppose you remember him?

[dissention]

Oh speaking of Leviticus (the most action packed book of the bible), I saw a woman wearing a shirt with mixed fabrics today. Now I have to decide whether to burn her or just chop her head off. In Jesus' name we pray...

How darksided! Fags, psychics, MIXED FABRICS!!!

[dissention]

I wanna be the next Jim Jones..:lol: I suppose you remember him?

Of course. Cyanide and Flavor-Aid. :shocked:

[DavidMn]

Of course. Cyanide and Flavor-Aid. :shocked:I think I was about 7 when that happened. I remember congressman from Ohio went down to Guyana to try and work things out, and he as shot and killed. Not a good move to say the least..

[Rickypt]

I think it is best for gays to refuse debating religious conservatives. It's impossible to have a real debate: the religious wingnuts have entrenched beliefs that are based on hocus-pocus. I'd rather they just get as ignored as possible.

Ah, here's the snippet from CNN.com

>>The debate over gay love and marriage heats up with "Brokeback Mountain's" big night. Gays face off with religious conservatives.<<

See, this is totally ridiculous. First of all, there is nothing to debate about "love". How insulting. And it's a bit of a stretch to think that BB Mountain is restirring the debate about gay marriage.

I'm dying to know which self-absorbed gay "leader" will come on and play this game.

[dissention]

I think it is best for gays to refuse debating religious conservatives. It's impossible to have a real debate: the religious wingnuts have entrenched beliefs that are based on hocus-pocus. I'd rather they just get as ignored as possible.

Ah, here's the snippet from CNN.com

>>The debate over gay love and marriage heats up with "Brokeback Mountain's" big night. Gays face off with religious conservatives.<<

See, this is totally ridiculous. First of all, there is nothing to debate about "love". How insulting. And it's a bit of a stretch to think that BB Mountain is restirring the debate about gay marriage.

I'm dying to know which self-absorbed gay "leader" will come on and play this game.

I particularly liked the "face off" part. It does nothing but feed into the mentality that these are issues that should be fought over instead of being appropriated to human beings like they rightfully should. How asinine.

[mikeschmike]

I think it is best for gays to refuse debating religious conservatives. It's impossible to have a real debate: the religious wingnuts have entrenched beliefs that are based on hocus-pocus. I'd rather they just get as ignored as possible.

Ah, here's the snippet from CNN.com

>>The debate over gay love and marriage heats up with "Brokeback Mountain's" big night. Gays face off with religious conservatives.<<

See, this is totally ridiculous. First of all, there is nothing to debate about "love". How insulting. And it's a bit of a stretch to think that BB Mountain is restirring the debate about gay marriage.

I'm dying to know which self-absorbed gay "leader" will come on and play this game.

I'm crossing my fingers for Donatella Versace. :]

[dissention]

I think I was about 7 when that happened. I remember congressman from Ohio went down to Guyana to try and work things out, and he as shot and killed. Not a good move to say the least..

And Jackie Speier survived the attack if I remember correctly. What a horrible thing to have to live with.

[Brwn_eyes0511]

How darksided! Fags, psychics, MIXED FABRICS!!!

oh now that is FUNNY! :lol:

[CreepingDeath]

Of course. Cyanide and Flavor-Aid. :shocked:

Flavor-Aid? Cheap bastard. When I kill my followers, I at least have the decency to use Kool-Aid.

[mikeschmike]

How darksided! Fags, psychics, MIXED FABRICS!!!

that chapter covered everything! it's only right that cotton/ploy blends are included on the "Don't!" list.

[Rickypt]

I particularly liked the "face off" part. It does nothing but feed into the mentality that these are issues that should be fought over instead of being appropriated to human beings like they rightfully should. How asinine.

Exactly, who else is expected to debate the right to exist?

[sparky]

I think what would really be interesting is to have it be one of the typical raving nutsack religious fanatics debating someone like Kristin Chenoweth.
As others have said, there is no controversy over Brokeback. The only conflict has been two theatres dropping it. The only people hooting and hollering about it are reporters who evidently have nothing else to hoot and holler about.

[DavidMn]

Maybe Fred Phelps will show up. Now that'd be a riot..:laugh:

[DavidMn]

Of course NO one and I mean NO ONE would be allowed to overshadow The King. he might be the only person with a bigger ego than John Holmes dick...:lol:

[dissention]

I turned on the telly to see who was on King and as I was typing channel 202 into my remote, I said to myself "Just watch, that bitch Janet Parshall will be staring back at me," but it was at a commercial break. As soon as they came back, whose fugly mug do I see? Janet ****ing Parshall.

[markolas]

I think it is best for gays to refuse debating religious conservatives. It's impossible to have a real debate: the religious wingnuts have entrenched beliefs that are based on hocus-pocus. I'd rather they just get as ignored as possible.

Ah, here's the snippet from CNN.com

>>The debate over gay love and marriage heats up with "Brokeback Mountain's" big night. Gays face off with religious conservatives.<<

See, this is totally ridiculous. First of all, there is nothing to debate about "love". How insulting. And it's a bit of a stretch to think that BB Mountain is restirring the debate about gay marriage.

I'm dying to know which self-absorbed gay "leader" will come on and play this game.

I agree with this completely. Conservative Christians disgust me. I'm trying to pretend they don't exist as much as is humanly possible.