GO INSANE Survivor Rounds 4-7

[sodascouts]

Results for Round 3


Bang the Drum – 10
Slow Dancing – 6
D.W. Suite – 6
Loving Cup – 3


With 10 votes, “Bang the Drum” is the third song eliminated from Go Insane survivor. “Bang the Drum,” please leave the tribal council area immediately. The rest of you may return to the camp.

Breakdown of Votes:
Bang the Drum – wondergirl9847
Bang the Drum – mondaymornin1
Bang the Drum – Patti
Bang the Drum – Dark Angel
Bang the Drum – Nico
Bang the Drum – dreamongypsydkm
Bang the Drum – golddustwoman77
Bang the Drum – Moony
Bang the Drum – Lux
Bang the Drum – trackaghost

D.W. Suite – sodascouts
D.W. Suite – CreepingDeath
D.W. Suite – ontheEdgeof17
D.W. Suite – glitter_fades
D.W. Suite – Mari
D.W. Suite – rezamatic

Slow Dancing – shackin’ up
Slow Dancing – AliP
Slow Dancing – dissention
Slow Dancing – msLinds
Slow Dancing – Sugar
Slow Dancing – Hawkeye

Loving Cup – Johnny Stew
Loving Cup – golden braid
Loving Cup – ReFleetwoodMac



----------------


The songs in play:
I Want You
Go Insane
Slow Dancing
Play in the Rain Pt. 1
Loving Cup
D.W. Suite

Voted off:
Bang the Drum 07/08/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 2 07/07/05
I Must Go 07/06/05

Immunity:
Another question about the back cover photo. When asked about the naked woman in it, what did Lindsey call her?

[sodascouts]

Maybe this question is too hard. If no one answers by 7:00 EST, I'll post an easier one.

[shackin'up]

Maybe this question is too hard. If no one answers by 7:00 EST, I'll post an easier one.

ohh, please not into the deep night again. I'm searching me insane. nothing found yet

[David]

Immunity:
Another question about the back cover photo. When asked about the naked woman in it, what did Lindsey call her?I think he called her a "good sport." Yeah? No? I want immunity for "I Want You."

But "Loving Cup" can kiss my ass!

[sodascouts]

ohh, please not into the deep night again. I'm searching me insane. nothing found yet

Well, I know of at least three people who know the answer, but none of them are interested in playing this game. So, I will go ahead and think up another question.

Edit: One of them just posted the right answer. lol

[sodascouts]

I think he called her a "good sport." Yeah? No? I want immunity for "I Want You."

But "Loving Cup" can kiss my ass!


Yay! Good deal! I didn't want to have to think of another question, and that thing you have going on in FM Survivor wouldn't work too well here.

I Want You is immune.

BEGIN ROUND 4.

[Johnny Stew]

Thanks, David! :wavey:

[dissention]

Results for Round 3


Bang the Drum – 10
Slow Dancing – 6
D.W. Suite – 6
Loving Cup – 3


With 10 votes, “Bang the Drum” is the third song eliminated from Go Insane survivor. “Bang the Drum,” please leave the tribal council area immediately. The rest of you may return to the camp.

Breakdown of Votes:
Bang the Drum – wondergirl9847
Bang the Drum – mondaymornin1
Bang the Drum – Patti
Bang the Drum – Dark Angel
Bang the Drum – Nico
Bang the Drum – dreamongypsydkm
Bang the Drum – golddustwoman77
Bang the Drum – Moony
Bang the Drum – Lux
Bang the Drum – trackaghost

D.W. Suite – sodascouts
D.W. Suite – CreepingDeath
D.W. Suite – ontheEdgeof17
D.W. Suite – glitter_fades
D.W. Suite – Mari
D.W. Suite – rezamatic

Slow Dancing – shackin’ up
Slow Dancing – AliP
Slow Dancing – dissention
Slow Dancing – msLinds
Slow Dancing – Sugar
Slow Dancing – Hawkeye

Loving Cup – Johnny Stew
Loving Cup – golden braid
Loving Cup – ReFleetwoodMac



----------------


The songs in play:
I Want You
Go Insane
Slow Dancing
Play in the Rain Pt. 1
Loving Cup
D.W. Suite

Voted off:
Bang the Drum 07/08/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 2 07/07/05
I Must Go 07/06/05

Immunity:
Another question about the back cover photo. When asked about the naked woman in it, what did Lindsey call her?


Dammit, my computer keeps freezing when I try to answer this. If I remember correctly, he called her a "sport."

Immunity to DW Suite.

[dissention]

Yay! Good deal! I didn't want to have to think of another question, and that thing you have going on in FM Survivor wouldn't work too well here.

I Want You is immune.

BEGIN ROUND 4.

:rolleyes:

Dammit. I probably got it wrong, anyway, because I didn't say "good sport." :laugh:

[shackin'up]

maybe you should stick to questions that are also fun for people outside of walking encyclopedia :lol: ;)

[dissention]

Slow Dancing must go.

[sodascouts]

:rolleyes:

Dammit. I probably got it wrong, anyway, because I didn't say "good sport." :laugh:

Eh, I would've given it to you. Your extended computer freeze came at a rather unfortunate time for you, as you posted the answer only a few minutes after David did. Life is hard.

[sodascouts]

maybe you should stick to questions that are also fun for people outside of walking encyclopedia :lol: ;)

I'll keep that in mind for next time. It's just everyone around here are such great Lindsey fans that it's hard to keep it challenging!

[dissention]

Eh, I would've given it to you. Your extended computer freeze came at a rather unfortunate time for you, as you posted the answer only a few minutes after David did. Life is hard.

And the kicker is that no one was going to vote off I Want You. :lol:

[chiliD]

I think he called her a "good sport." Yeah? No? I want immunity for "I Want You."

But "Loving Cup" can kiss my ass!


Jerk.


:wavey:

[shackin'up]

Jerk.


:wavey:

I'm with you here, ChiliD

[AliP]

David, what are you doing ???? ;) You should have voted for D.W. Suite to be immune. Well, since the gawd awful Play in the Rain part 1 is no longer immune, I hope it gets eliminated!!! woo.

[sodascouts]

Did you guys voting for "Slow Dancing" forget that Play in the Rain part 1 is still in the running?!

[AliP]

maybe you should stick to questions that are also fun for people outside of walking encyclopedia :lol: ;)

What are you talking about...you are the walking encyclopedia. :lol: I thought I was a fan....but I have no flippin clue what the answers to these questions are.

[ontheEdgeof17]

Is there anything left to say?

[dissention]

Did you guys voting for "Slow Dancing" forget that Play in the Rain part 1 is still in the running?!

Nooooooope. :]

[chiliD]

Did you guys voting for "Slow Dancing" forget that Play in the Rain part 1 is still in the running?!


No, I prefer BOTH "Play In The Rain"s over "Slow Dancing".

[shackin'up]

save play in the rain please

please people, nobody's waiting for angry posts about understanding Lindsey's art again, and voting in his spirit on a game at his side of the board about his art. And for you who writes those: don't feel offended, I agree. I'm just sick of those preaching posts.

[David]

Jerk.ROFL!!! That's one of your favorite songs on that album, isn't it? I forgot!

I suppose I could sum up my views thus, Chili: The track has orchestral strengths, undoubtedly. It's just that the textuality presupposes a certain static yet pre-lingual obsession with naive sexual guilt & hegemonic discrimination. It turns in on itself in an endless dismantling of its craving for origins: truth & presence. But outside this metaphysics of presence, the song seems too encased in its receding aporia, & I can't help thinking that Lindsey is fixated on the epoch of the full speech, suspended from the metal strings of his Turner Model 1 between a free reflection on the origin of writing-qua-writing & the subsuming of that fixated transcendence.

So, as you can see, I really had to vote it out.

[sodascouts]

save play in the rain please

please people, nobody's waiting for angry posts about understanding Lindsey's art again, and voting in his spirit on a game at his side of the board about his art. And for you who writes those: don't feel offended, I agree. I'm just sick of those preaching posts.

Sorry, sweetie. You know, I was going to post the question, "What did Lindsey say an entire album of songs like Play in the Rain would be?" But I thought that would be too pointed, as his answer was "self-indulgence."

[shackin'up]

What are you talking about...you are the walking encyclopedia. :lol: I thought I was a fan....but I have no flippin clue what the answers to these questions are.

last round was the first time I answered correctly. just because I've studied art half of my life I knew that answer without searching. The only thing that frightened me is that I even reminded the original Norwegian Title of that artwork: "skrik". :o :lol:

[chiliD]

ROFL!!! That's one of your favorite songs on that album, isn't it? I forgot!

I suppose I could sum up my views thus, Chili: The track has orchestral strengths, undoubtedly. It's just that the textuality presupposes a certain static yet pre-lingual obsession with naive sexual guilt & hegemonic discrimination. It turns in on itself in an endless dismantling of its craving for origins: truth & presence. But outside this metaphysics of presence, the song seems too encased in its receding aporia, & I can't help thinking that Lindsey is fixated on the epoch of the full speech, suspended from the metal strings of his Turner Model 1 between a free reflection on the origin of writing-qua-writing & the subsuming of that fixated transcendence.

So, as you can see, I really had to vote it out.

Would it change your mind if I told you he didn't PLAY his M1 on "Loving Cup"? :shrug:

[shackin'up]

Sorry, sweetie. You know, I was going to post the question, "What did Lindsey say an entire album of songs like Play in the Rain would be?" But I thought that would be too pointed, as his answer was "self-indulgence."

that one I would have known immediately! :lol:
And I even agree with that. But I'm sure he'll frown a brow when he sees his FANS vote such songs of so early. I KNOW that you agree with me on that.








somewhere deep down inside :lol:

[David]

No, I prefer BOTH "Play In The Rain"s over "Slow Dancing".Me, too.

"Play in the Rain," after all, is the only link this album has with the work of Varèse & Salzedo. If we get rid of it, there goes the only connection in all of Lindsey Buckingham's music to the pioneers of the "Liberation of Sound" movement & their break from European influences & their paralysis of the tempered system.

Might Varèse actually have been speaking for Lindsey Buckingham, when he told a group of students & professors in 1939: "When you listen to music, do you ever stop to realize that you are being subjected to a physical phenomenon? Not until the air between the listener's ear and the instrument has been disturbed does music occur. In order to anticipate the result, a composer must understand the mechanics of the instruments and must know just as much as possible about acoustics. I need an entirely new medium of expression: a sound producing machine (not a sound reproducing one)"?

[CreepingDeath]

**********

[ontheEdgeof17]

"Play in the Rain," after all, is the only link this album has with the work of Varèse & Salzedo. If we get rid of it, there goes the only connection in all of Lindsey Buckingham's music to the pioneers of the "Liberation of Sound" movement & their break from European influences & their paralysis of the tempered system.



So? :shrug:

[sodascouts]

ROFL!!! That's one of your favorite songs on that album, isn't it? I forgot!

I suppose I could sum up my views thus, Chili: The track has orchestral strengths, undoubtedly. It's just that the textuality presupposes a certain static yet pre-lingual obsession with naive sexual guilt & hegemonic discrimination. It turns in on itself in an endless dismantling of its craving for origins: truth & presence. But outside this metaphysics of presence, the song seems too encased in its receding aporia, & I can't help thinking that Lindsey is fixated on the epoch of the full speech, suspended from the metal strings of his Turner Model 1 between a free reflection on the origin of writing-qua-writing & the subsuming of that fixated transcendence.

So, as you can see, I really had to vote it out.

Your assessement is certainly eloquently phrased, yet I think there is a elemental flaw in it. What you regard as the song's textual presupposition is a problematic supposition in itself. The psychological implications you derive from the text are hardly clear-cut - this song appears far from naive to me. Yes, sexual guilt is apparent, but it is that of the world-weary cynic who's been around the block enough times to identify his destructive behavior even if he seems unable or unwilling to put an end to it (at least at that point). I think your metaphysical leanings have made you create your own metatext that is not necessarily true to authorial intent. If your poor opinion is the result of an arguable misreading of Lindsey's psyche, that would be a pity - but certainly, such a judgment is your right.

[David]

So? :shrug:Excellent point, Curtis. And while I fully agree, allow me to posit these additional views:

Based on your response, I would expect your expounded view to have two aspects: 1) the diagnosis of logocentrism, & its nature & its characteristic error, & 2) the exposition of a viewpoint that transcends the limitations of logocentrism. Implicit in your view is that a proper grasp of speech situations would also not allow that error to occur. As I implied in an earlier post (above), the very problem of a relationship between thoughts & words implies an illusion that universal substances exist -- an illusion which, by the way, you yourself have verbalized within your very eloquent critique of transcendence, Curtis.

[chiliD]

Your assessement is certainly eloquently phrased, yet I think there is a elemental flaw in it. What you regard as the song's textual presupposition is a problematic supposition in itself. The psychological implications you derive from the text are hardly clear-cut - this song appears far from naive to me. Yes, sexual guilt is apparent, but it is that of the world-weary cynic who's been around the block enough times to identify his destructive behavior even if he seems unable or unwilling to put an end to it (at least at that point). I think your metaphysical leanings have made you create your own metatext that is not necessarily true to authorial intent. If your poor opinion is the result of an arguable misreading of Lindsey's psyche, that would be a pity - but certainly, such a judgment is your right.


Actually, I think David just has a problem with Turner Model 1's.

[ontheEdgeof17]

Excellent point, Curtis. And while I fully agree, allow me to posit these additional views:

Based on your response, I would expect your expounded view to have two aspects: 1) the diagnosis of logocentrism, & its nature & its characteristic error, & 2) the exposition of a viewpoint that transcends the limitations of logocentrism. Implicit in your view is that a proper grasp of speech situations would also not allow that error to occur. As I implied in an earlier post (above), the very problem of a relationship between thoughts & words implies an illusion that universal substances exist -- an illusion which, by the way, you yourself have verbalized within your very eloquent critique of transcendence, Curtis.

http://users.pandora.be/eforum/emoticons4u/sleep/1.gif Wake me when the lecture is over.

[David]

Your assessement is certainly eloquently phrased, yet I think there is a elemental flaw in it. What you regard as the song's textual presupposition is a problematic supposition in itself. The psychological implications you derive from the text are hardly clear-cut - this song appears far from naive to me. Yes, sexual guilt is apparent, but it is that of the world-weary cynic who's been around the block enough times to identify his destructive behavior even if he seems unable or unwilling to put an end to it (at least at that point). I think your metaphysical leanings have made you create your own metatext that is not necessarily true to authorial intent. If your poor opinion is the result of an arguable misreading of Lindsey's psyche, that would be a pity - but certainly, such a judgment is your right.Nancy, I think you are absolutely correct, & you have very astutely ascertained the logocentric error in my position. I must confess, I have no adequate resolution to suggest, other than to offer the possibility that my error also may lie in my naive implication of a transcendental signified within the self-referential aporia I attempt to expose in "Loving Cup." My failure is nothing more than an attempt to undo the comfort of mastery & consensus that underlie the illusion that objectivity is situated somewhere outside the self.

[golden braid]

message left blank

[shackin'up]

Nancy, I think you are absolutely correct, & you have very astutely ascertained the logocentric error in my position. I must confess, I have no adequate resolution to suggest, other than to offer the possibility that my error also may lie in my naive implication of a transcendental signified within the self-referential aporia I attempt to expose in "Loving Cup." My failure is nothing more than an attempt to undo the comfort of mastery & consensus that underlie the illusion that objectivity is situated somewhere outside the self.


Stop! I want to go to bed! You crack me up, I'm refreshing the page every minute to see if there's follow up on this dialogue! Chili sleeps and I die laughing over here! :wavey:

nite dont let the bugs bite

[chiliD]

Stop! I want to go to bed! You crack me up, I'm refreshing the page every minute to see if there's follow up on this dialogue! Chili sleeps and I die laughing over here! :wavey:

nite dont let the bugs bite

I'm wide awake...that's Curtis snoring like a crosscut saw in the corner. :nod: Hey, Curtis...you got Apnea? :)

[ontheEdgeof17]

I'm wide awake...that's Curtis snoring like a crosscut saw in the corner. :nod: Hey, Curtis...you got Apnea? :)

I'm breathing well, thanks. ;)

[David]

Stop! I want to go to bed! You crack me up, I'm refreshing the page every minute to see if there's follow up on this dialogue! Chili sleeps and I die laughing over here! :wavey: I'm just running it all through this pomo translator thingy on the Web!!

[chiliD]

I'm breathing well, thanks. ;)

Just checkin' :wavey:

[sodascouts]

Nancy, I think you are absolutely correct, & you have very astutely ascertained the logocentric error in my position. I must confess, I have no adequate resolution to suggest, other than to offer the possibility that my error also may lie in my naive implication of a transcendental signified within the self-referential aporia I attempt to expose in "Loving Cup." My failure is nothing more than an attempt to undo the comfort of mastery & consensus that underlie the illusion that objectivity is situated somewhere outside the self.

David, the aporia of the song does not need to be "exposed." It's fairly obvious (well, I take that back. We probably have different ideas of what makes the song in some ways paradoxical - mine are less theoretical and more concerte, such as the paradox of speaking of self-defeating behavior as if it were a solution). In fact, I believe Lindsey's ironic dubbing of the "loving cup" as "magic" spells that out. The irony forces the acknowledgement of the aporia.

On the other hand, if your criticism of Loving Cup is some kind of social exercise designed to make Ledgies question their own personal realities, well, more power to ya.

[Dreammms]

see ya baby

[Sugar]

C'mon, Please?

[msLinds]

:wavey: :laugh: :p :blob2: :blob1: :] :rolleyes: :nod: ;)

[sodascouts]

last round was the first time I answered correctly. just because I've studied art half of my life I knew that answer without searching. The only thing that frightened me is that I even reminded the original Norwegian Title of that artwork: "skrik". :o :lol:

Ah! So that's why you put "skrik"! I must confess I did not know that. :o

[wondergirl9847]

I prefer Part 2, but it's gone. :mad: The FM Survivor is going to h*ll in a handbasket, so I came here for solace. Didn't find it. LOL

Sigh....goodbye Slow Dancing, I love thee. :distress:

[Dark Angel]

..................

[AliP]

goodbye Slow Dancing, I love thee. :distress:

I don't think it will be voted off. Goodbye Play in the Rain! :wavey:

[rezamatic]

I'm very surprised this song has gotten so much love when Part 2 came and went in a hiccup in this game.

[Nico]

I was listening to this album again and it's brilliant. I really love everything on it, except for this song and it's other half.

[Mari]

it's been raining too much around here.

[trackaghost]

Okay, I thought this was gone in the second round but I guess I should read the threads more carefully!

[Patti]

!@#$%^&*()

[Hawkeye]

and I want You has immunity UGH!!!

[sodascouts]

Results for Round 4


Play in the Rain Part 1 - 11
Slow Dancing – 8
Loving Cup – 4



With 11 votes, “Play in the Rain Pt. 1” is the fourth song eliminated from Go Insane survivor. “Play in the Rain Pt. 1,” please leave the tribal council area immediately. The rest of you may return to the camp.

Breakdown of Votes:
Play in the Rain Part 1 – AliP
Play in the Rain Part 1 – sodascouts
Play in the Rain Part 1 – ontheEdgeof17
Play in the Rain Part 1 – CreepingDeath
Play in the Rain Part 1 – golden braid
Play in the Rain Part 1 – Dreammms
Play in the Rain Part 1 – wondergirl9847
Play in the Rain Part 1 – rezamatic
Play in the Rain Part 1 – Nico
Play in the Rain Part 1 – Mari
Play in the Rain Part 1 – Patti
Slow Dancing – dissention
Slow Dancing – ChiliD
Slow Dancing – shackin’ up
Slow Dancing – Sugar
Slow Dancing – msLinds
Slow Dancing – trackaghost
Slow Dancing – Lux
Slow Dancing – Hawkeye
Loving Cup – David
Loving Cup – Johnny Stew
Loving Cup – Dark Angel
Loving Cup – ReFleetwoodMac


----------------


The songs in play:
I Want You
Go Insane
Slow Dancing
Loving Cup
D.W. Suite

Voted off:
Play in the Rain Pt. 1 07/09/05
Bang the Drum 07/08/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 2 07/07/05
I Must Go 07/06/05

Immunity:
What popular 80’s TV series has an episode in which “Go Insane” is played over a billiards montage?

[wondergirl9847]

Miami Vice? :shrug:

Immunity to DW Suite.

[sodascouts]

Miami Vice? :shrug:

Immunity to DW Suite.


Correct.

Immunity to DW Suite. BEGIN ROUND 5.

[Johnny Stew]

Yadda-yadda-yadda.

[CreepingDeath]

**********

[wondergirl9847]

This is getting VERY difficult.

[mylittledemon]

booyah-kuh! (ala Ali G)

[shackin'up]

[Immunity:
What popular 80’s TV series has an episode in which “Go Insane” is played over a billiards montage?



:confused: :confused: :confused:

Yesterday an hour later and today an hour earlier? How can i plan my playtime? I've got a social life too lovelies.




I'm sick about my fave losing so soon. I really don't get it: How can you love Go Insane without loving Play in the Rain? He went though hell and back to compose that thing. You can hear that. I really don't understand that while the titletrack and Slow dancing AND the Spartan Slasher is still in. I guess americans do not have a feel for things that make your taste be questioned.

[shackin'up]

although SD and GI are even weaker.

[sodascouts]

:confused: :confused: :confused:

Yesterday an hour later and today an hour earlier? How can i plan my playtime? I've got a social life too lovelies.




I'm sick about my fave losing so soon. I really don't get it: How can you love Go Insane without loving Play in the Rain? He went though hell and back to compose that thing. You can hear that. I really don't understand that while the titletrack and Slow dancing AND the Spartan Slasher is still in. I guess americans do not have a feel for things that make your taste be questioned.

Oh, I'm so sorry. I read my watch wrong and thought I was posting at 5:00. Geez, I feel so stupid, and it's not fair to you or others because you didn't have a chance to answer. How shall we fix this? Should we let it alone, or redo it?

[shackin'up]

Oh, I'm so sorry. I read my watch wrong and thought I was posting at 5:00. Geez, I feel so stupid, and it's not fair to you or others because you didn't have a chance to answer. How shall we fix this? Should we let it alone, or redo it?

just put play in the rain back on the list as one track and leave it.


;)



nah...no prob.

[sodascouts]

just put play in the rain back on the list as one track and leave it.


;)



nah...no prob.

Thanks. I know rezamatic will come back with "I can't leave her alone for one night, can I?" lol

[shackin'up]

Oh, I'm so sorry. I read my watch wrong and thought I was posting at 5:00.

Well you posted around 5.00 EST. but normally and following the rules you do it at 6.00 EST. The hour leap from yesterday must have made you hypercorrective. :eek: ;)

[sodascouts]

Well you posted around 5.00 EST. but normally and following the rules you do it at 6.00 EST. The hour leap from yesterday must have made you hypercorrective. :eek: ;)

What's really insane is that I'm on Central Time, so for me, 6:00 EST is 5:00 my time. Mass confusion reigns!

[Patti]

This album is very difficult to do!

[trackaghost]

I actually find the spoken intro to this a bit annoying, it goes on way too long.

[golden braid]

I'm glad DW Suite has immunity. :D

[sodascouts]

Spartan slasher or splasher? I don't want either. lol

[shackin'up]

I actually find the spoken intro to this a bit annoying, it goes on way too long.

I love the wake-up call though.

[Moony]

Not a fan.

[trackaghost]

I love the wake-up call though.

No, I like it too. I just wish it was a little shorter.

[ontheEdgeof17]

A fav of mine, but I must keep Loving Cup in the game. <333

[Nico]

This is the most difficult Lindsey Survivor thus far. I love all the songs left, bt I had to pick one...damn this game! Though it has become quite addictive. ;)

[msLinds]

:wavey: :laugh: :p :blob2: :blob1: :] :xoxo: :nod: ;)

[dissention]

That is all.

[Hawkeye]

FINALLY, its time is coming!!!

[Dark Angel]

..................

[rezamatic]

To Save "i Want You"

[WelshWitchPMD]

:shrug: :shrug: :shrug:

[face of glass]

Just to protect "Loving Cup", really. Although I'd rather see "Slow Dancing" already gone.

[AliP]

that is all

[sodascouts]

Results for Round 5


I Want You - 14
Loving Cup – 7
Slow Dancing – 1



With 14 votes, “I Want You” is the fifth song eliminated from Go Insane survivor. “I Want You,” please leave the tribal council area immediately. The rest of you may return to the camp.

Breakdown of Votes:
I Want You – CreepingDeath
I Want You – wondergirl9847
I Want You – shackin’up
I Want You – Patti
I Want You – trackaghost
I Want You – sodascouts
I Want You – ontheEdgeof17
I Want You – Nico
I Want You – msLinds
I Want You – Hawkeye
I Want You – Dark Angel
I Want You – WelshWitchPMD
I Want You – faceofglass
I Want You – AliP
Loving Cup – Johnny Stew
Loving Cup – mylittledemon
Loving Cup – golden braid
Loving Cup – Moony
Loving Cup – Lux
Loving Cup – ReFleetwoodMac
Loving Cup – rezamatic
Slow Dancing – dissention


----------------


The songs in play:
Go Insane
Slow Dancing
Loving Cup
D.W. Suite

Voted off:
I Want You 07/10/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 1 07/09/05
Bang the Drum 07/08/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 2 07/07/05
I Must Go 07/06/05

Immunity:
The woman to whom Go Insane is dedicated almost put out a book this year. What was the tentative title of it?

[CreepingDeath]

Storms: The Inside Story of Fleetwood Mac

Immunity to Loving Cup

[shackin'up]

Not the faintest.

Going insane.

Lovingcup immune

[sodascouts]

Storms: The Inside Story of Fleetwood Mac

Immunity to Loving Cup

Yep! You got it!


LOVING CUP immune.

Begin Round 6!

[trackaghost]

in the moonlight!

[shackin'up]

One time to early I embrace CreepingDeath

[shackin'up]

...............

[ontheEdgeof17]

10 Characters. :rolleyes:

[golddustwoman77]

I'm so glad "Loving Cup" is immune!!!!!!!!! :blob2: :blob1: Round 6 goes to "D.W. Suite;" I hope.

[CreepingDeath]

**********

[Hawkeye]

the suns coming up.

[Patti]

----------

[shackin'up]

**********DWSuite

:mad: I didn't squeeze hard enough!

[Dark Angel]

-----------------

[dissention]

Weakest song left.

[golden braid]

DW Suite must stay!!!

[msLinds]

:wavey: ;)

[sodascouts]

The one I like the least of the remaining, although it's a good song.

[CreepingDeath]

:mad: I didn't squeeze hard enough!

Hey, blame it on Nancy for making me choose any of these. :p

I love all of Go Insane.

[Moony]

..........

[Nico]

Blank message

[AliP]

nothing else matters.

[Johnny Stew]

Ah well... at least it made it this far!

[face of glass]

Ah, finally.

[shackin'up]

Hey, blame it on Nancy for making me choose any of these. :p

I love all of Go Insane.

I know, me too.

[Sugar]

Weakest song left.

For 5 frickin' rounds... :laugh:

[mondaymornin1]

...................................

[rezamatic]

Blast. Blast indeed.

[David]

Win one for the Gipper!

[sodascouts]

Results for Round 6


Slow Dancing – 16
DW Suite – 6


With 16 votes, “Slow Dancing” is the sixth song eliminated from Go Insane survivor. “Slow Dancing,” please leave the tribal council area immediately. The rest of you may return to the camp.

Breakdown of Votes:
Slow Dancing – trackaghost
Slow Dancing – shackin’ up
Slow Dancing – Hawkeye
Slow Dancing – Dark Angel
Slow Dancing – dissention
Slow Dancing – golden braid
Slow Dancing – msLinds
Slow Dancing – Moony
Slow Dancing – Lux
Slow Dancing – Nico
Slow Dancing – AliP
Slow Dancing – Johnny Stew
Slow Dancing – faceofglass
Slow Dancing – Sugar
Slow Dancing – mondaymornin1
Slow Dancing – David
DW Suite – ontheEdgeof17
DW Suite – golddustwoman77
DW Suite – CreepingDeath
DW Suite – Patti
DW Suite – sodascouts
DW Suite – rezamatic


----------------


The songs in play:
Go Insane
Loving Cup
D.W. Suite

Voted off:
Slow Dancing 07/11/05
I Want You 07/10/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 1 07/09/05
Bang the Drum 07/08/05
Play in the Rain Pt. 2 07/07/05
I Must Go 07/06/05

Immunity:
Counting all instances including repetitions at the end that are not necessarily included on the lyrics sheet, how many times does Lindsey say the phrase “I want you” in the song of the same name?

[Sugar]

That's my count Lux, post something to be immune!

[sodascouts]

23?

Hang on, that's confusing. What about the layered vocals? I wouldn't have a clue.

[edit]If so, D.W. Suite immunity (of course).

Since the layered vocals do not include the whole phrase, the answer is indeed 23.

DW SUITE is immune. BEGIN ROUND 7.

[WelshWitchPMD]

:shrug: :blob1: :lol:

[sodascouts]

The live one is so much better.

[sodascouts]

:shrug: :blob1: :lol:

DW Suite is immune this time, Pattie.

[face of glass]

I'd like "Loving Cup" to win the whole thing anyway.

[CreepingDeath]

**********

[WelshWitchPMD]

DW Suite is immune this time, Pattie.


Well, it wasn't at the time that I voted, :shrug:

[sodascouts]

Well, it wasn't at the time that I voted, :shrug:

Technically, it was, if you look at posting times. But do what you want, just don't expect it to get voted out. lol :)

[ontheEdgeof17]

She's a lot like you.

[shackin'up]

simple. That one should be chanceless anyway against those others.

[golddustwoman77]

I'd like "Loving Cup" to win the whole thing anyway.

Me too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :blob2: :blob1: I like "Go Insane," but I'm shooting for
"Loving Cup" for the win.

[AliP]

yikes. :eek:

[Nico]

'Course I love it and all, but I want the Suite to win, so this will have to go. Plus, yeah, the live version KICKS this. :nod:

[Johnny Stew]

For anyone who wants "D.W. Suite" to win, you may want to consider this before voting... "Loving Cup" is stronger competition than "Go Insane."

[WelshWitchPMD]

:rolleyes:

Loving Cup all the way!!

[shackin'up]

For anyone who wants "D.W. Suite" to win, you may want to consider this before voting... "Loving Cup" is stronger competition than "Go Insane."

If you play it that way i go for Go Insane to win. That relatively mediocre song is of course the fave of sweet melody-lickin chiffon nr 1. :rolleyes:

[golden braid]

This just isn't one of my favorites and I so want DW Suite to win.

[shackin'up]

I don't care here but anyone who votes out DW Suite next time will be treated to a lobotomy.

lobotomy....lobotomy!!!!!!

tatatatatata tatatatatata cool riff by the ramones.

[Patti]

Like the others said before me, the live version is SO much better!

[msLinds]

:wavey: :lol: ;)

[Dark Angel]

Because I want D.W. Suite to win....

[dissention]

DW Suite for the win.

[Hawkeye]

The live version is SOOO much better. and yes DW Suite to win next round.

[Moony]

.................................

[trackaghost]

Then change your vote to Loving Cup or DW Suite will struggle to win, and sigh, that would be a tragedy.

You're not allowed to change your vote once it's cast.

[trackaghost]

Prefer the live version...

[wondergirl9847]

Yep, it's totally amazing live....even though I do love this version too. :nod:

[mondaymornin1]

................................

[rezamatic]

This is too weird.

[dreamongypsydkm]

And DW to win.