Stevie @ Tribeca Film Fest

[EnchantedSLN]

http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2005/04/11/tribeca_film_festival.php

Special Screening:
All We Are Saying - In a quest to understand how one balances life with art, Rosanna Arquette interviews Stevie Nicks, Sting, Steven Tyler, Mary J. Blige, Peter Gabriel, and Joni Mitchell.

Anyone going?

[catinthedark]

Sounds like it'd be cool. I hope the film gets released elsewhere...

[GardenStateGirlie]

Hopefully it will be released to smaller theaters. I'll definitely be on the lookout for it because it sounds interesting. Thanks for the heads up, Tiff!

[Livia]

They showed it here during SXSW - I really wanted to see it, but there was no way I was gonna make the 1:30 PM showing the day after the music awards.

I've read tons of stuff about this film, and this is the first mention of Stevie being in it - now I'm bummed I didn't see it! Grrr....

[EnchantedSLN]

trailer: http://www.allwearesaying.net/. there are a couple brief clips of stevie.

[GODDESS6]

cooooool! :nod: ~

[strandinthewind]

Thank you so much for posting that!!!!!

Can I just say La Hynde is a TRIP and I LOVE her, esp. when she says something about fashion made her despise the business :laugh:

[dissention]

If it's anything like Arquette's first documentary, I'll pass. :laugh:

[strandinthewind]

If it's anything like Arquette's first documentary, I'll pass. :laugh:

You HAVE to look at the clip as D. Harry is in it briefly, C, Hynde is a scream, and La Nicks obviously was unaware of the angle of the camera
:cool:

[dissention]

You HAVE to look at the clip as D. Harry is in it briefly, C, Hynde is a scream, and La Nicks obviously was unaware of the angle of the camera
:cool:

:laugh:

Check out "Searching For Debra Winger" and you'll be convinced that Arquette sets up unflattering shots on purpose.

[strandinthewind]

:laugh:

Check out "Searching For Debra Winger" and you'll be convinced that Arquette sets up unflattering shots on purpose.


Well, she is supine on the coach in this one with the camera on her chest (can you say GEL FILTER worthy of any steady cam :eek: :laugh: :wavey: ) shooting an up sout of Chrissie H. I suggest that is not the most flattering shot of anyone much less her :eek:

[dissention]

Well, she is supine on the coach in this one with the camera on her chest (can you say GEL FILTER worthy of any steady cam :eek: :laugh: :wavey: ) shooting an up sout of Chrissie H. I suggest that is not the most flattering shot of anyone much less her :eek:

Well, I just watched the trailer and it looks like trash about "artists" complaining about what they "gave up" to become stars (oh Stevie, who cares, honestly :laugh: ) and bitching about music downloading (my heart bleeds for Steven Tyler). How entertaining.

I do think Stevie looks great, though, as does Debbie. And I will see it somehow just for Chrissie, she's a RIOT. :laugh: Tom Petty and David Crosby had me rolling, too.

[xxxmx]

it looks like trash about "artists" complaining about what they "gave up" to become stars

i'm going to make a documentary about fans telling what they 'gave up' in order to get those front row seats, or go to those two extra shows, or to buy that $40 shirt... and it won't even be 'complaining' because we don't see it that way. sure, i'll complain about the FOUL stevie/douchebag-don prices at the borgata, but i somehow didn't mind paying much much more than that for my FM tix at the same venue. it won't be complaining, it will be glorious...

[wondergirl9847]

WTH is up with Thom Yorke's eye? Is it always that freaky?! It reminds me of that talking eye commercial. LOL

[Livia]

Coolness! Another great Stevie quote! And ITA w/ Tom Petty!!!

[amber]

Oh, man, after watching that trailer, i totally want to see this! Stevie's so great, I love how the trailer starts with her. Chrissie is also rad. Tom Petty <3. And Gwen! Gwen is in it! Yay! I'm such a whore for famous people talking... :laugh:
thanks for the heads up, Tiff.

[golden braid]

I hope this movie gets released. I really want to see it, and not just for Stevie! I like Tom Petty and David Crosby's comments. :laugh:

[xdreamsunwindx]

Awww, Stevie's so cute. And, Chrissie's so crazy. <3 And Tom! Gwen! Patti! I really wanna see this. :[

[catinthedark]

You HAVE to look at the clip as D. Harry is in it briefly, C, Hynde is a scream, and La Nicks obviously was unaware of the angle of the camera
:cool:

What? I don't get what you mean? I thought Stevie looked beautiful. What was wrong with the camera angle?

[strandinthewind]

What? I don't get what you mean? I thought Stevie looked beautiful. What was wrong with the camera angle?

It is just a technical thing that probably only I and Dissention would notice :laugh: I thought she was up shot and did not realize it. She usually is photgraphed dead to front or maybe a little to the side. But, I agree she looked very good.

[dissention]

I hope this movie gets released. I really want to see it, and not just for Stevie! I like Tom Petty and David Crosby's comments. :laugh:

If the past is any indication, it'll get a premiere on Cinemax. Arquette's stuff usually does.

[catinthedark]

It is just a technical thing that probably only I and Dissention would notice :laugh: I thought she was up shot and did not realize it. She usually is photgraphed dead to front or maybe a little to the side. But, I agree she looked very good.

Yeah. Well. Sorry. I guess the 10 years I've worked in TV have been as big old waste of time. :rolleyes:

Personally, I thought she looked completely natural. And I'd bet the camera sitting to her left was just a little more than a little obvious to her. Tough to hide those buggers. People vary camera positions all the time for interviews. Especially when they know they will be intercutting them, as in an interview-heavy doc. It helps to have some people looking left, some right, some just to off centre, etc.

[amber]

Yeah. Well. Sorry. I guess the 10 years I've worked in TV have been as big old waste of time. :rolleyes:

Personally, I thought she looked completely natural. And I'd bet the camera sitting to her left was just a little more than a little obvious to her. Tough to hide those buggers. People vary camera positions all the time for interviews. Especially when they know they will be intercutting them, as in an interview-heavy doc. It helps to have some people looking left, some right, some just to off centre, etc.
yeah, exactly, about your first point. :laugh: :thumbsup:
I thought the angle was totally normal. :shrug: It was from the side and didn't seem upshot, either.

[LiquidBlue5000]

yeah, exactly, about your first point. :laugh: :thumbsup:
I thought the angle was totally normal. :shrug: It was from the side and didn't seem upshot, either.

I think she looks great... Actually, she looks thinner than she does now... I wonder when that interview with her was shot... my guess would be either 2001 or before...

~brian

[strandinthewind]

Yeah. Well. Sorry. I guess the 10 years I've worked in TV have been as big old waste of time. :rolleyes:

Then you should be able to tell that she looks like she is talking into the the wrong camera :laugh: :wavey:

Personally, I thought she looked completely natural. And I'd bet the camera sitting to her left was just a little more than a little obvious to her. Tough to hide those buggers. People vary camera positions all the time for interviews. Especially when they know they will be intercutting them, as in an interview-heavy doc. It helps to have some people looking left, some right, some just to off centre, etc.

But seriously, I think the angle of that shot looks different to what she normally does and she she usually looks at the camera. It works though and I am not slamming it or, for that matter, you :)

Also and unrelated to the above, everyone else's shots are pretty candid with little lighting and with what appears to be more than one hand held camera. Her shot, lord love her, appears less than candid and with fab. lighting :cool: -- I do not blame her as it makes her look great. I mean that is a woman in her 50's and she looks much younger than that.

[Serrart]

http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2005/04/11/tribeca_film_festival.php

Special Screening:
All We Are Saying - In a quest to understand how one balances life with art, Rosanna Arquette interviews Stevie Nicks, Sting, Steven Tyler, Mary J. Blige, Peter Gabriel, and Joni Mitchell.

Anyone going?

The angle she's chosen to tell the story seems intriguing, I'm curious to see it.

Romy

[skcin]

I really want to see this. I love how Chrissie said something about hating that fashion has anything to do with R&R. All I could think of was Stevie's outfits. :laugh:

And how cute is Stevie saying "half-assed?" :nod:

Steven Tyler? Shut up please. I'm sure your music is worth a bit more than 12 cents. :rolleyes:

[LiquidBlue5000]

I really want to see this. I love how Chrissie said something about hating that fashion has anything to do with R&R. All I could think of was Stevie's outfits. :laugh:

And how cute is Stevie saying "half-assed?" :nod:

Steven Tyler? Shut up please. I'm sure your music is worth a bit more than 12 cents. :rolleyes:

Isn't it always the richest of the rich who complain about downloading?? Steven Tyler, Metallica, Madonna.. gimme a break people... you make more money at one single concert than most do in 5 years... stop your bitching already..

[strandinthewind]

Isn't it always the richest of the rich who complain about downloading?? Steven Tyler, Metallica, Madonna.. gimme a break people... you make more money at one single concert than most do in 5 years... stop your bitching already..

This is such a pet peeve of mine. The "you are too rich already so I am going to steal from you" is a lame excuse that no one wants applied to them.

Who determines who makes so much that they should work for free and/or not mind when people steal their work product? That is an arbitrary standard by which none of us would like to be judged. I am sure none of us want some homeless person walking into our homes and taking food off of our table and justifying it by saying "you have too much already" :shrug: Surely in that instance the homeless person is correct in that most of us have far more than they do :shrug: Downloading for free someone's commercially available product is the same thing as that just on a smaller scale.

Then, what about the people the record companies have to let go because sales decline? I am sure they would just love your reasoning :rolleyes: In fact, I think they should come to your house and stay with you when they lose their homes. After all, under your reasoning that is enough to justify taking your house :shrug:

Finally, I think the minute we all have enough to sustain us at the barest minimum, we should just give our services and the remainder of our money away. Better yet, I think GM makes too much money, so why don't I just go and steal myself a car :rolleyes: You could also just walk into Target and take the CD, after all I am sure Target makes enough money as well.

Again, this is a huge pet peeve of mine. If you want the music, buy it. If you cannot afford it - tough, you have to wait until you can afford it. You are owed nothing in this world and it is stealing to take it without paying for it no matter how you rationalize it.

On another note, I think the music industry is silly not to recognize the marketing potential of downloading. But that is a whole other topic.

[dissention]

This is such a pet peeve of mine. The "you are too rich already so I am going to steal from you" is a lame excuse that no one wants applied to them.

Who determines who makes so much that they should work for free and/or not mind when people steal their work product? That is an arbitrary standard by which none of us would like to be judged. I am sure none of us want some homeless person walking into our homes and taking food off of our table and justifying it by saying "you have too much already" :shrug: Surely in that instance the homeless person is correct in that most of us have far more than they do :shrug: Downloading for free someone's commercially available product is the same thing as that just on a smaller scale.

Then, what about the people the record companies have to let go because sales decline? I am sure they would just love your reasoning :rolleyes: In fact, I think they should come to your house and stay with you when they lose their homes. After all, under your reasoning that is enough to justify taking your house :shrug:

Finally, I think the minute we all have enough to sustain us at the barest minimum, we should just give our services and the remainder of our money away. Better yet, I think GM makes too much money, so why don't I just go and steal myself a car :rolleyes: You could also just walk into Target and take the CD, after all I am sure Target makes enough money as well.

Again, this is a huge pet peeve of mine. If you want the music, buy it. If you cannot afford it - tough, you have to wait until you can afford it. You are owed nothing in this world and it is stealing to take it without paying for it no matter how you rationalize it.

On another note, I think the music industry is silly not to recognize the marketing potential of downloading. But that is a whole other topic.

Here we go again...

Save yourself energy and time by just linking to the same opus from a previous thread, darling. :xoxo:

[strandinthewind]

Here we go again...

Save yourself energy and time by just linking to the same opus from a previous thread, darling. :xoxo:

I know - I thought about it but then realized I was in a particularly foul mood - thus the diatribe :eek:

[dissention]

I know - I thought about it but then realized I was in a particularly foul mood - thus the diatribe :eek:

I'm in a good mood, so I didn't particularly feel like arguing with you. Thus the short response to your diatribe. :laugh:

[strandinthewind]

I'm in a good mood, so I didn't particularly feel like arguing with you. Thus the short response to your diatribe. :laugh:

I already know what you are gonna say you boob :xoxo:

[dissention]

I already know what you are gonna say you boob :xoxo:

I anticipated your response to the downloading topic, so I suppose we're even. ;)

[strandinthewind]

I anticipated your response to the downloading topic, so I suppose we're even. ;)

evenly matched :woohoo:

[LiquidBlue5000]

This is such a pet peeve of mine. The "you are too rich already so I am going to steal from you" is a lame excuse that no one wants applied to them.

Who determines who makes so much that they should work for free and/or not mind when people steal their work product? That is an arbitrary standard by which none of us would like to be judged. I am sure none of us want some homeless person walking into our homes and taking food off of our table and justifying it by saying "you have too much already" :shrug: Surely in that instance the homeless person is correct in that most of us have far more than they do :shrug: Downloading for free someone's commercially available product is the same thing as that just on a smaller scale.

Then, what about the people the record companies have to let go because sales decline? I am sure they would just love your reasoning :rolleyes: In fact, I think they should come to your house and stay with you when they lose their homes. After all, under your reasoning that is enough to justify taking your house :shrug:

Finally, I think the minute we all have enough to sustain us at the barest minimum, we should just give our services and the remainder of our money away. Better yet, I think GM makes too much money, so why don't I just go and steal myself a car :rolleyes: You could also just walk into Target and take the CD, after all I am sure Target makes enough money as well.

Again, this is a huge pet peeve of mine. If you want the music, buy it. If you cannot afford it - tough, you have to wait until you can afford it. You are owed nothing in this world and it is stealing to take it without paying for it no matter how you rationalize it.

On another note, I think the music industry is silly not to recognize the marketing potential of downloading. But that is a whole other topic.


Whoa... quite a reaction from you on this... first of all, i never said that this was right or wrong.. i just said that the richest of the rich should quit their bitching... if downloading affects anyone, it's the smaller artists who are just trying to establish themselves in the music industry... someone like Steven Tyler or Madonna shouldn't have a hissy fit over it... If an artist is too lazy to get off their ass and WORK for their money and go out on the road and make REAL money, then that's their problem.. so now Madonna, who used to tour every 6 years, has to tour every 5 years to make the same kind of money she used to... poor Madonna, must be such a struggle for her.. :rolleyes:

[amber]

Whoa... quite a reaction from you on this... first of all, i never said that this was right or wrong.. i just said that the richest of the rich should quit their bitching... if downloading affects anyone, it's the smaller artists who are just trying to establish themselves in the music industry... someone like Steven Tyler or Madonna shouldn't have a hissy fit over it... If an artist is too lazy to get off their ass and WORK for their money and go out on the road and make REAL money, then that's their problem.. so now Madonna, who used to tour every 6 years, has to tour every 5 years to make the same kind of money she used to... poor Madonna, must be such a struggle for her.. :rolleyes:
Just so you know, Strand really hates this. You may get another diatribe...teehee.

[dissention]

Just so you know, Strand really hates this. You may get another diatribe...teehee.

You wench, you didin't even buy Say You Will! Your greediness caused numerous people in the music industry to lose their jobs, their cars, and their homes! You prevented Stevie from getting a few extra pennies to buy her dog a new diamond studded collar! Damn you to hell and I hope you're prosecuted! :mad:













:lol::laugh::lol:

[amber]

You wench, you didin't even buy Say You Will! Your greediness caused numerous people in the music industry to lose their jobs, their cars, and their homes! Damn you to hell! :mad:













:lol::laugh::lol:

:laugh: :lol: :laugh:
Well, at least we know how he feels. Of course I have to say again....IT WAS A GIFT! I DIDN'T EVEN ASK FOR IT!!!! I DIDN'T MEAN TO!!! I'M SORRY!!! :lol:

[dissention]

:laugh: :lol: :laugh:
Well, at least we know how he feels. Of course I have to say again....IT WAS A GIFT! I DIDN'T EVEN ASK FOR IT!!!! :lol:

DOESN'T MATTER!!!!!!

You took part in THIEVERY!!!!

My ass is going to have your ass in so much trouble with the RIAA that you're going to go to prison for a long while, little miss. Forget about license plates, you're going to be manufacturing CDs for the very industry you singlehandedly robbed of a few pennies!

[golddustwoman77]

I would totally love to see it, but since I live on the unhip, backside of Podunkville, I won't be seeing it. Damn it! :mad:

[strandinthewind]

Whoa... quite a reaction from you on this... first of all, i never said that this was right or wrong.. i just said that the richest of the rich should quit their bitching... if downloading affects anyone, it's the smaller artists who are just trying to establish themselves in the music industry... someone like Steven Tyler or Madonna shouldn't have a hissy fit over it... If an artist is too lazy to get off their ass and WORK for their money and go out on the road and make REAL money, then that's their problem.. so now Madonna, who used to tour every 6 years, has to tour every 5 years to make the same kind of money she used to... poor Madonna, must be such a struggle for her.. :rolleyes:

With all due respect, I think Steven Tyler knows more about how it has effected him than you know. Furthermore, I think you make too much money. I'll be over later to take what I want and think you really do not need :wavey:

[LiquidBlue5000]

DOESN'T MATTER!!!!!!

You took part in THIEVERY!!!!

My ass is going to have your ass in so much trouble with the RIAA that you're going to go to prison for a long while, little miss. Forget about license plates, you're going to be manufacturing CDs for the very industry you singlehandedly robbed of a few pennies!

LMAO! too funny.. :p

[LiquidBlue5000]

With all due respect, I think Steven Tyler knows more about how it has effected him than you know. Furthermore, I think you make too much money. I'll be over later to take what I want and think you really do not need :wavey:

Sure, no problem.. i'm going out later, but i'll leave the key under the mat for ya.. ;)

[dissention]

With all due respect, I think Steven Tyler knows more about how it has effected him than you know. Furthermore, I think you make too much money. I'll be over later to take what I want and think you really do not need :wavey:

With all due respect, I think Steven Tyler is a rich asshole prone to great bouts of exaggeration. My soul weeps tears of pain and sympathy for him.

[strandinthewind]

Sure, no problem.. i'm going out later, but i'll leave the key under the mat for ya.. ;)

Of course, i'll have a pot roast and potatoes waiting when you return :cool:

Seriously, I tend to go off on downloading music files. Perhaps it is because I used to do it but stopped and am pissed I won't do it anymore. Jealousy is never pretty :laugh:

[dissention]

Of course, i'll have a pot roast and potatoes waiting when you return :cool:

Seriously, I tend to go off on downloading music files. Perhaps it is because I used to do it but stopped and am pissed I won't do it anymore. Jealousy is never pretty :laugh:

I download one or two songs from albums I know I'm not going to buy and I have no qualms about doing so. I wanted one song from the Moulin Rouge soundtrack and I wasn't about to plunk down $15 and suffer through Lady Marmalade before getting to it, so I downloaded it. ;)

But then I broke down and bought it for the Bowie songs and Kidman's songs, so that wasn't a very good example, actually. :laugh:

[strandinthewind]

I download one or two songs from albums I know I'm not going to buy and I have no qualms about doing so. I wanted one song from the Moulin Rouge soundtrack and I wasn't about to plunk down $15 and suffer through Lady Marmalade before getting to it, so I downloaded it. ;)

But then I broke down and bought it for the Bowie songs and Kidman's songs, so that wasn't a very good example, actually. :laugh:


See, I think if the recording industry marketed with that tech., it would be a good thing. I think most people would buy the records. I also think that even if many did not buy them, the artist would still recoup some of the loss. But, they cannot see the light - so they will lose in the end.

[LiquidBlue5000]

Of course, i'll have a pot roast and potatoes waiting when you return :cool:

Seriously, I tend to go off on downloading music files. Perhaps it is because I used to do it but stopped and am pissed I won't do it anymore. Jealousy is never pretty :laugh:

Ahhh, but you still can download... from Napster and a few others.. I think they charge $1 per track.. i can't be sure though, because i still use the free sites ;)

[strandinthewind]

Ahhh, but you still can download... from Napster and a few others.. I think they charge $1 per track.. i can't be sure though, because i still use the free sites ;)


I use iTunes (about $1 a song) , though Napster seems to be the better deal at like $15 per month with unlimited downloads.

[dissention]

Ahhh, but you still can download... from Napster and a few others.. I think they charge $1 per track.. i can't be sure though, because i still use the free sites ;)

Me, too. :laugh:

I mostly just download stuff that's hard to find, like rare Deborah Harry jazz songs or soundtrack songs that you can't find anywhere.

[strandinthewind]

Me, too. :laugh:

I mostly just download stuff that's hard to find, like rare Deborah Harry jazz songs or soundtrack songs that you can't find anywhere.


I used to use Kazaa for concert boots and demos, but it messed up my comp. - so I stopped using it.

[dissention]

I used to use Kazaa for concert boots and demos, but it messed up my comp. - so I stopped using it.

Ugh, Kazaa is crap. I only use WinMX and LimeWire (sometimes). But I don't donwload stuff often, only when I have an itch to hear something or want to find something rare. I found Debbie's cover of Mind Over Matter on LimeWire last night and almost had an orgasm. That's quite the rarity. :laugh:

[LiquidBlue5000]

Me, too. :laugh:

I mostly just download stuff that's hard to find, like rare Deborah Harry jazz songs or soundtrack songs that you can't find anywhere.

Oh yeah, same here... i like alot of dance/trance hard-to-find house music... I use the sites for that reason only... i have never downloaded a whole album or anything like that... but some songs are so hard to find... downloading is great for that purpose..

[LiquidBlue5000]

Ugh, Kazaa is crap. I only use WinMX and LimeWire (sometimes). But I don't donwload stuff often, only when I have an itch to hear something or want to find something rare. I found Debbie's cover of Mind Over Matter on LimeWire last night and almost had an orgasm. That's quite the rarity. :laugh:

Kazaa IS crap... it's infested with spyware.. never use it..