PDA

View Full Version : Bush's Address and Laura's dress


strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 04:13 PM
Transcript: Bush's Address

Thursday, January 20, 2005

WASHINGTON — Following is President George W. Bush's inaugural address:

Vice President Cheney, Mr. Chief Justice, President Carter, President Bush, President Clinton, reverend clergy, distinguished guests, fellow citizens:

On this day, prescribed by law and marked by ceremony, we celebrate the durable wisdom of our Constitution, and recall the deep commitments that unite our country. I am grateful for the honor of this hour, mindful of the consequential times in which we live, and determined to fulfill the oath that I have sworn and you have witnessed.

At this second gathering, our duties are defined not by the words I use, but by the history we have seen together. For a half century, America defended our own freedom by standing watch on distant borders. After the shipwreck of communism came years of relative quiet, years of repose, years of sabbatical - and then there came a day of fire.

We have seen our vulnerability - and we have seen its deepest source. For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny - prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder - violence will gather, and multiply in destructive power, and cross the most defended borders, and raise a mortal threat. There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.

We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.

America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one. From the day of our Founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the Maker of Heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave. Advancing these ideals is the mission that created our Nation. It is the honorable achievement of our fathers. Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation's security, and the calling of our time.

So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.

This is not primarily the task of arms, though we will defend ourselves and our friends by force of arms when necessary. Freedom, by its nature, must be chosen, and defended by citizens, and sustained by the rule of law and the protection of minorities. And when the soul of a nation finally speaks, the institutions that arise may reflect customs and traditions very different from our own. America will not impose our own style of government on the unwilling. Our goal instead is to help others find their own voice, attain their own freedom, and make their own way.

The great objective of ending tyranny is the concentrated work of generations. The difficulty of the task is no excuse for avoiding it. America's influence is not unlimited, but fortunately for the oppressed, America's influence is considerable, and we will use it confidently in freedom's cause.

My most solemn duty is to protect this nation and its people against further attacks and emerging threats. Some have unwisely chosen to test America's resolve, and have found it firm.

We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right. America will not pretend that jailed dissidents prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and servitude, or that any human being aspires to live at the mercy of bullies.

We will encourage reform in other governments by making clear that success in our relations will require the decent treatment of their own people. America's belief in human dignity will guide our policies, yet rights must be more than the grudging concessions of dictators; they are secured by free dissent and the participation of the governed. In the long run, there is no justice without freedom, and there can be no human rights without human liberty.

Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of liberty - though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of freedom ever seen, is an odd time for doubt. Americans, of all people, should never be surprised by the power of our ideals. Eventually, the call of freedom comes to every mind and every soul. We do not accept the existence of permanent tyranny because we do not accept the possibility of permanent slavery. Liberty will come to those who love it.

Today, America speaks anew to the peoples of the world:

All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.

Democratic reformers facing repression, prison, or exile can know: America sees you for who you are: the future leaders of your free country.

The rulers of outlaw regimes can know that we still believe as Abraham Lincoln did: "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."

The leaders of governments with long habits of control need to know: To serve your people you must learn to trust them. Start on this journey of progress and justice, and America will walk at your side.

And all the allies of the United States can know: we honor your friendship, we rely on your counsel, and we depend on your help. Division among free nations is a primary goal of freedom's enemies. The concerted effort of free nations to promote democracy is a prelude to our enemies' defeat.

Today, I also speak anew to my fellow citizens:

From all of you, I have asked patience in the hard task of securing America, which you have granted in good measure. Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill, and would be dishonorable to abandon. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this nation, tens of millions have achieved their freedom. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts, we have lit a fire as well - a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power, it burns those who fight its progress, and one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.

A few Americans have accepted the hardest duties in this cause - in the quiet work of intelligence and diplomacy … the idealistic work of helping raise up free governments … the dangerous and necessary work of fighting our enemies. Some have shown their devotion to our country in deaths that honored their whole lives - and we will always honor their names and their sacrifice.

All Americans have witnessed this idealism, and some for the first time. I ask our youngest citizens to believe the evidence of your eyes. You have seen duty and allegiance in the determined faces of our soldiers. You have seen that life is fragile, and evil is real, and courage triumphs. Make the choice to serve in a cause larger than your wants, larger than yourself - and in your days you will add not just to the wealth of our country, but to its character.

America has need of idealism and courage, because we have essential work at home - the unfinished work of American freedom. In a world moving toward liberty, we are determined to show the meaning and promise of liberty.

In America's ideal of freedom, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence, instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of liberty that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. And now we will extend this vision by reforming great institutions to serve the needs of our time. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools, and build an ownership society. We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance - preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater freedom from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous and just and equal.

In America's ideal of freedom, the public interest depends on private character - on integrity, and tolerance toward others, and the rule of conscience in our own lives. Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self. That edifice of character is built in families, supported by communities with standards, and sustained in our national life by the truths of Sinai, the Sermon on the Mount, the words of the Koran, and the varied faiths of our people. Americans move forward in every generation by reaffirming all that is good and true that came before - ideals of justice and conduct that are the same yesterday, today, and forever.

In America's ideal of freedom, the exercise of rights is ennobled by service, and mercy, and a heart for the weak. Liberty for all does not mean independence from one another. Our nation relies on men and women who look after a neighbor and surround the lost with love. Americans, at our best, value the life we see in one another, and must always remember that even the unwanted have worth. And our country must abandon all the habits of racism, because we cannot carry the message of freedom and the baggage of bigotry at the same time.

From the perspective of a single day, including this day of dedication, the issues and questions before our country are many. From the viewpoint of centuries, the questions that come to us are narrowed and few. Did our generation advance the cause of freedom? And did our character bring credit to that cause?

These questions that judge us also unite us, because Americans of every party and background, Americans by choice and by birth, are bound to one another in the cause of freedom. We have known divisions, which must be healed to move forward in great purposes - and I will strive in good faith to heal them. Yet those divisions do not define America. We felt the unity and fellowship of our nation when freedom came under attack, and our response came like a single hand over a single heart. And we can feel that same unity and pride whenever America acts for good, and the victims of disaster are given hope, and the unjust encounter justice, and the captives are set free.

We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom. Not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability; it is human choices that move events. Not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation; God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because freedom is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages; when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty; when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner "Freedom Now" - they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.

When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, "It rang as if it meant something." In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims liberty throughout all the world, and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength - tested, but not weary - we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.

May God bless you, and may He watch over the United States of America.
_______________________________________________________________

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144976,00.html

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 04:15 PM
Despite the rhetoric that the cipher spewed (as all do on this day) - Laura's creme outfit was TO DIE FOR :cool: Kudos to her for having the taste to wear that - even if IMO her taste in men is less :laugh:

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 04:25 PM
Our nation relies on men and women who look after a neighbor and surround the lost with love. Americans, at our best, value the life we see in one another, and must always remember that even the unwanted have worth. And our country must abandon all the habits of racism, because we cannot carry the message of freedom and the baggage of bigotry at the same time.

I think is the section I have the most trouble with.

America (Republican and Democrat) denies gay peoples' rights all of the time here.

For example, gay people cannot be openly gay and fight for their country. The rationale is that the sheer autrocity of being openly gay will lessen the morale of the troops. Interestingly, America did not have the sand to stand by that bigotry when we asked Australia and Great Britian to fight with us. After all, their military is aligned with ours and they allow openly gay people to serve there. I guess English and Aussie fags are less troublesome in terms of morale. Of course, if those two were not there, then the American armed forces would be 99.9% of the coalition - Oh well, I guess the American armed forces can "tolerate" foreign openly gay people when they have to :rolleyes:

I mean could you imagine getting off of the plane with the people you risked your life to protect and vice versa and stepping onto the soil of the US that you fought perhaps to the death of another to protect and that W has pronounced free of the baggage of bigotry - then when you get the part where the public greets you - all of the straight soldiers run up and kiss and hug their wives and family - yet you, as a dirty immoral sinning fag, must hide yourself in shame and have no one greet you or if they do, perhaps a handshake, but no more lest the eyes of big brother (who you just risked your life for) see and deem you to have told. I guess they are just "sorry, but it is their faith and it has to be that way" :rolleyes:

Sadly, I know people who have gone through this - Sickening and reminiscent of "colords in the back of the bus because you are too dirty to sit with the white people" isn't it :mad:

Edit: I realize not all Christians feel this way - I speak only of the ones who do :cool: also edited for typos

The Tower
01-20-2005, 04:57 PM
Jason-

It's all bull****. Dubya is such a sleaze-bag. The hypocrisy is so overwhelming it's to the point of ludicrousness. He just spouts out whatever lip service he needs to keep the flock in line and then does whatever the hell he wants regardless of his "stand".

It's vomit inducing and the lowest point in the history of the U.S.

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 05:12 PM
If the dress she was wearing last night was green, it could have been my duvet cover. :wavey:

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 05:18 PM
If the dress she was wearing last night was green, it could have been my duvet cover. :wavey:

Well, my duvet is green as well - so . . . . .

I am taking about this outfit. I think just the coat is creme colored. The dress underneath is a different color - though it was hard to tell in the pics I have scene.

Look at the slide show at www.nytimes.com

The pics there show the protestors as well.

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 05:37 PM
The pics there show the protestors as well.

that's the only reason I'll look. :laugh:

SuzeQuze
01-20-2005, 05:44 PM
I'm wearing all black for ignoreguration day (Morning Sedition's term). Can't bear to even look although I checked out Laura's coat, it is pretty just like her second home in Stepford. :eek:

dissention
01-20-2005, 05:47 PM
I'm wearing all black for ignoreguration day (Morning Sedition's term). Can't bear to even look although I checked out Laura's coat, it is pretty just like her second home in Stepford. :eek:

Laura creeps me out, personally. She looks like she could be the spokesperson for any random sedative, she has no personality, and if she got wet, I bet sparks would fly out of her ears and she'd malfunction.

SuzeQuze
01-20-2005, 05:49 PM
Laura creeps me out, personally. She looks like she could be the spokesperson for any random sedative, she has no personality, and if she got wet, I bet sparks would fly out of her ears and she'd malfunction.

She's very wooden. She could be an ad for botox, eye tuck, facelift, whatever she has had done to make her look frozen and wide eyed.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 05:54 PM
I think she comes across as warm. I can actually listen to interviews with her. I think she is a nice person who is married to a creep.

But, I am not blinded by Bush rage like some :eek: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :wavey: :p

Might I point out there is really no reason to discuss this one any further :laugh:

SuzeQuze
01-20-2005, 05:56 PM
I think she comes across as warm. I can actually listen to interviews with her. I think she is a nice person who is married to a creep.

But, I am not blinded by Bush rage like some :eek: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :wavey: :p

Might I point out there is really no reason to discuss this one any further :laugh:

I also think she is nice and married the wrong guy. I just hate admitting that because of my blind hatred for people named "Bush". :laugh: But I also think she's phony, she has to be to smile in public.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 05:59 PM
I also think she is nice and married the wrong guy. I just hate admitting that because of my blind hatred for people named "Bush". :laugh: But I also think she's phony, she has to be to smile in public.

Every now and then she drops a zinger! Like when she was first in office - she said she liked to read Willa Cather and could are a less about her being a lesbian - she has said similar things as evidenced here http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/multi-page/documents/02537874.htm

Plus, she has Scotties - which I submit cannot make her ALL bad :laugh: :laugh:

dissention
01-20-2005, 06:31 PM
I also think she is nice and married the wrong guy. I just hate admitting that because of my blind hatred for people named "Bush". :laugh: But I also think she's phony, she has to be to smile in public.

I agree. She comes across as nice, but she also comes across as a phony.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 06:32 PM
I agree. She comes across as nice, but she also comes across as a phony.

well, that is all politicians and their ilk to me :laugh:

SuzeQuze
01-20-2005, 06:33 PM
I agree. She comes across as nice, but she also comes across as a phony.

I was in Borders last nite and there are lots of books on the Bushes and I want to read one. Has anyone read one that they would recommend? Of course, it will probably make me hate them more, if that is possible.

GateandGarden
01-20-2005, 07:15 PM
I agree. She comes across as nice, but she also comes across as a phony.I think so too. Has anyone seen her commercial with Elmo? It's freaking hilarious. "Will Mrs. Bush read Elmo a story?"

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 07:23 PM
Well, my duvet is green as well - so . . . . .

I am taking about this outfit. I think just the coat is creme colored. The dress underneath is a different color - though it was hard to tell in the pics I have scene.



You love that off white color. I saw some footage of Pickles and she could barely turn her head. Her kevlar vest must be pretty heavy.

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 07:29 PM
I agree. She comes across as nice, but she also comes across as a phony.

I was watching footage of the breakfast(?) on CSPAN and Shrub walked past his mother gave her a kiss and she gazed at him in a way that was nice for the photogs.
The Laura came through and didn't even glance in Ma Barker's direction. Do I sense a little tension? :eek:

catinthedark
01-20-2005, 07:35 PM
Well, I've always felt like I was alone in my perception of the Stepford Wi... I mean... First Lady. She frickin creeps me right out. She looks like a figure straight out of a wax museum, terrifed to say anything against her bully of a husband. Maybe it's just me, but I wouldn't be surprised of years from now, it comes out that W. was a wife abuser. Mentally for sure, but I bet he's raised a hand to her in a drunken state. She just has that look of "smile and nod, don't rock the boat, don't contradict, everything will be alright." It infuriates me. And it makes me wonder why, in this day and age, this is the kind of person chosen to lead the US.

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 07:36 PM
Here's a good one:

<img src="http://photos1.blogger.com/img/232/2133/400/fratbench.jpg">

dissention
01-20-2005, 07:39 PM
Here's a good one:

<img src="http://photos1.blogger.com/img/232/2133/400/fratbench.jpg">

:shocked: :laugh:

That is in such bad taste, but it's hilarious.

sodascouts
01-20-2005, 07:41 PM
Well, I've always felt like I was alone in my perception of the Stepford Wi... I mean... First Lady. She frickin creeps me right out. She looks like a figure straight out of a wax museum, terrifed to say anything against her bully of a husband. Maybe it's just me, but I wouldn't be surprised of years from now, it comes out that W. was a wife abuser. Mentally for sure, but I bet he's raised a hand to her in a drunken state. She just has that look of "smile and nod, don't rock the boat, don't contradict, everything will be alright." It infuriates me. And it makes me wonder why, in this day and age, this is the kind of person chosen to lead the US.

Maybe because in this day and age, people don't vote based on their perceptions of the first lady's facial expressions.

dissention
01-20-2005, 07:42 PM
Maybe because in this day and age, people don't vote based on their perceptions of the first lady's facial expressions.

Unless it's Teresa Heinz Kerry.

sodascouts
01-20-2005, 07:46 PM
Unless it's Teresa Heinz Kerry.

lol! Yeah, right.

dissention
01-20-2005, 07:56 PM
lol! Yeah, right.

I'm still baffled at how people viewed Teresa so harshly. Granted, the comment about Laura Bush never holding a real job didn't help, but while the Vice President can tell Leahy to go f*ck himself on the Senate floor, everyone is up in arms because Teresa had the audacity to say "Shove it!" to a reporter with an obvious agenda who was deliberately misquoting her. It boggles my mind. :nod:

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 08:04 PM
I'm still baffled at how people viewed Teresa so harshly. Granted, the comment about Laura Bush never holding a real job didn't help, but while the Vice President can tell Leahy to go f*ck himself on the Senate floor, everyone is up in arms because Teresa had the audacity to say "Shove it!" to a reporter with an obvious agenda who was deliberately misquoting her. It boggles my mind. :nod:

Sshe was a foreigner - plain and simple!!!!!!

Of course it did not help that she told people EXACTLY what she thought of them. Again, politics is ALL about perception and, right or wrong, most of America still views a strong woman in power as an outcast or an undesireable. There are rare exceptions like little old Southern ladies with a fiesty attitude, but those are few and far between. Interestingly, I think Barbara Bush got away with much more than she should have because she looked like a grandmother :shrug:

sodascouts
01-20-2005, 08:22 PM
I'm still baffled at how people viewed Teresa so harshly. Granted, the comment about Laura Bush never holding a real job didn't help, but while the Vice President can tell Leahy to go f*ck himself on the Senate floor, everyone is up in arms because Teresa had the audacity to say "Shove it!" to a reporter with an obvious agenda who was deliberately misquoting her. It boggles my mind. :nod:

I didn't really think much of her one way or the other, although that comment about Laura Bush was pretty tacky. In the end, I doubt Kerry's wife deterred anyone from voting for him.

dissention
01-20-2005, 08:25 PM
I didn't really think much of her one way or the other, although that comment about Laura Bush was pretty tacky. In the end, I doubt Kerry's wife deterred anyone from voting for him.

Eh, I don't think so. I've met people who didn't vote for him based on Teresa, which is absolutely ridiculous.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 08:26 PM
I didn't really think much of her one way or the other, although that comment about Laura Bush was pretty tacky. In the end, I doubt Kerry's wife deterred anyone from voting for him.

which comment - TK's of Dissention's comment. I did not think TK's was. I think she just mispoke and she later apologized for that. I do not think it was a catfight though :shrug:

But, here are the quotes:

"Well, you know, I don't know Laura Bush. But she seems to be calm, and she has a sparkle in her eye, which is good. But I don't know that she's ever had a real job -- I mean, since she's been grown up. So her experience and her validation comes from important things, but different things."
______________________________________________________________

"It didn't matter to me. It didn't hurt my feelings. It was perfectly all right that she apologized. She didn't have to apologize. I know how tough it is. And actually I know those trick questions."

______________________________________________________________

I had forgotten that Mrs. Bush had worked as a school teacher and librarian, and there couldn't be a more important job than teaching our children," Heinz Kerry said.

"As someone who has been both a full-time mom and full-time in workforce, I know we all have valuable experiences that shape who we are.

"I appreciate and honor Mrs. Bush's service to the country as first lady, and am sincerely sorry I had not remembered her important work in the past."





http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/20/theresa.apologizes.laura/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/21/laura.teresa/

As for Diss' comments - you expect anything else :laugh: :wavey: ;) :p :laugh:

sodascouts
01-20-2005, 08:29 PM
Eh, I don't think so. I've met people who didn't vote for him based on Teresa, which is absolutely ridiculous.


Seriously? That's pretty strange. Are you sure they weren't just saying that to annoy you?

sodascouts
01-20-2005, 08:31 PM
Jason - I was talking about TK - the implication that being a stay-at-home mom wasn't a "real job" is there, and I thought it was tacky. But hardly a monumental moment of the campaign. As for her comment to the reporter - understandable. I actually think a lot of people got a kick out of it.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 08:32 PM
Seriously? That's pretty strange. Are you sure they weren't just saying that to annoy you?

Lord knows I have never been guilty of saying anything to make him foam at the mouth :laugh: (levity here) :cool:

Seriously, I know many a person who hated her - but they probably were not voting D anyway :shrug:

amber
01-20-2005, 08:32 PM
Seriously? That's pretty strange. Are you sure they weren't just saying that to annoy you?
:laugh:
I've heard of people like that, too. I thought it was a "dumbass" myth, but there really are people who vote for those reasons.

dissention
01-20-2005, 08:35 PM
Seriously? That's pretty strange. Are you sure they weren't just saying that to annoy you?

:laugh: No, they weren't. They were a bit gray around the temples, so I just took it as them not really being used to such outspoken characters.

catinthedark
01-20-2005, 08:35 PM
Maybe because in this day and age, people don't vote based on their perceptions of the first lady's facial expressions.

Too bad. Instead, the US and the rest of the world is stuck with four more years.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 08:36 PM
Jason - I was talking about TK - the implication that being a stay-at-home mom wasn't a "real job" is there, and I thought it was tacky. But hardly a monumental moment of the campaign . . . .

Well, I think the text " . . . So her experience and her validation comes from important things, but different things" does not support that she was belittling that. I mean she directly calls it "important" - how is that a slam :shrug: I think her point was that people get different experience in the workplace than they do staying at home as a mother. Those are different experiences and both are important, which is what she said.

Then, I think when she realized it could be construed in another way (though how it could be I really do not see) - she took the higher ground and immediately apologized :shrug: Thus, I see no tackiness there by either party.

Plus, LB said it was a trick question :shrug:

sodascouts
01-20-2005, 08:46 PM
Well, I think the text " . . . So her experience and her validation comes from important things, but different things" does not support that she was belittling that. I mean she directly calls it "important" - how is that a slam :shrug: I think her point was that people get different experience in the workplace than they do staying at home as a mother. Those are different experiences and both are important, which is what she said.

Maybe if I heard her saying it I would get a different impression, but from reading the text, it seems condescending to me. It was nice of her to apologize, though. As I said it wasn't a huge deal to me.


Plus, LB said it was a trick question :shrug:

How did Lindsey get into this discussion? Oh, wait, the OTHER LB. ;)

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 09:56 PM
Maybe because in this day and age, people don't vote based on their perceptions of the first lady's facial expressions.

No, they vote on the false issue of the possibility that the opposing party might allow gays to marry instead. :rolleyes:

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 09:59 PM
Of course it did not help that she told people EXACTLY what she thought of them. Again, politics is ALL about perception and, right or wrong, most of America still views a strong woman in power as an outcast or an undesireable. There are rare exceptions like little old Southern ladies with a fiesty attitude, but those are few and far between.

You mean like this group from today's inauguration parade:

<img src="http://fireworksland.com/misc/peeps.jpg"

estranged4life
01-20-2005, 10:23 PM
You mean like this group from today's inauguration parade:

<img src="http://fireworksland.com/misc/peeps.jpg"

was the above image from a Delta Burke convention or did I miss something??? :shrug: :thumbsup:

dissention
01-20-2005, 10:48 PM
was the above image from a Delta Burke convention or did I miss something??? :shrug: :thumbsup:

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 10:53 PM
You mean like this group from today's inauguration parade:

<img src="http://fireworksland.com/misc/peeps.jpg"

OH MY MF'ING MOON AND STARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek:

Bless their hearts :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
I am so laughing at the top of my lungs :lol:
I am so getting you that outfit the next time you come here :p

THANKS for posting that - it made my night!!!!!!!!!1 :woohoo:

SuzeQuze
01-20-2005, 10:54 PM
Okay, was that image a parody, like were they joking? That is the strangest thing!!! There's gonna be some pretty plain Easter baskets this year since all the ribbon is gone.

strandinthewind
01-20-2005, 10:57 PM
Okay, was that image a parody, like were they joking? That is the strangest thing!!! There's gonna be some pretty plain Easter baskets this year since all the ribbon is gone.

I am still laughing over that.

PLEASE notice the African American woman of the left and the other woman in pink on the far right with her mouth agape :laugh: :laugh: They are my fav's :laugh:

Also, if I did not know better, I could swear this was a Gay Pride parade :eek:

In fact, I think the Abe Lincoln Girls (Log Cabin Republicans :laugh: ) should have worn these outfits :laugh:

I am STILL laughing at this :laugh:

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 11:10 PM
Okay, was that image a parody, like were they joking? That is the strangest thing!!! There's gonna be some pretty plain Easter baskets this year since all the ribbon is gone.

No, that's a real picture from today's parade. :) They're from Alabama. :thumbsup:

gldstwmn
01-20-2005, 11:12 PM
OH MY MF'ING MOON AND STARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek:

Bless their hearts :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
I am so laughing at the top of my lungs :lol:
I am so getting you that outfit the next time you come here :p

THANKS for posting that - it made my night!!!!!!!!!1 :woohoo:

Gotta love 'em. That was probably the highlight of the parade.

estranged4life
01-20-2005, 11:14 PM
Gotta love 'em. That was probably the highlight of the parade.

sure as hell wasn't Shrubby Chimp-co & wife, Oily Dick-tator Cheney & family...Or the University of Texas Longhorn marching band for that matter :rolleyes: