Chemical weapons designed to make the enemy homosexual

[½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ®]

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true

Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.

THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behavior among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.
Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.
The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organization that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.
Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.
:shocked: :shocked: :shocked:

[77Rumours77]

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true

Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.

THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behavior among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.
Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.
The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organization that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.
Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.
:shocked: :shocked: :shocked:


for once I have no comment :eek: :shocked: :confused: :rolleyes:

[GateandGarden]

What is with that avatar?

Though not as shocking as the article, I guess.

[ontheEdgeof17]

Where is that weapon?!?!!? I'm shooting down the White House with Homo Pox. :laugh:

[Violet]

What is with that avatar?



They really do look like they're eating each other, don't they?

[ryan8472]

OMG :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

[ontheEdgeof17]

What is with that avatar?



It's better than the dancing Santa penis. :nod: :lol:

[estranged4life]

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true

Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons
15 January 2005
From New Scientist Print Edition.

THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.

Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behavior among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says.

Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. There was also the idea of making troops' skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight.

The proposals, from the US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, date from 1994. The lab sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals". The plans have been posted online by the Sunshine Project, an organization that exposes research into chemical and biological weapons.

Spokesman Edward Hammond says it was not known if the proposed $7.5 million, six-year research plan was ever pursued.
:shocked: :shocked: :shocked:


that's kinda strange to read. I remember reading an article years ago (At least back in the late eighties) about how the US military had "possibly" created a bio/chemical weapon and tested it successfully on a part of the population that the government considered "Expendible to society", And how this bio/chem could shorten one's lifespan and also how it could "eradicate their being"...

Once this "weapon" was tested it spread out of control and not only were those who were considered "Expendible to society" affected but those who were considered "intergral parts of society" were also unknowingly infected...

The bio/chemical weapon in question has long been rumoured to have been AIDS/HIV! For some reason the article posted above sounded ironically smiliar to that article I read...Hell, I never forgot that article because it still sounds somewhat plausible.

[77Rumours77]

What is with that avatar?

Thought not as shocking as the article, I guess.
That would be Madonna and <puke> Britney Spears </puke>
Unless you already figured it out... :wavey:

[GateandGarden]

That would be Madonna and <puke> Britney Spears </puke>
Unless you already figured it out... :wavey:Yeah, I saw it replayed on TV eighty times. I considered it quite offensive to the GLBT community.

[ontheEdgeof17]

Yeah, I saw it replayed on TV eighty times. I considered it quite offensive to the GLBT community.



How so? It was just for shock value. I don't see how it is offensive....just as 'offensive' as what goes on during Will and Grace.

[Lala]

I read about this in the paper last night on my break @ work. I thought it was pretty disgusting.

In Mr. Buckingham's words..."What's the world coming to?"

[77Rumours77]

Yeah, I saw it replayed on TV eighty times. I considered it quite offensive to the GLBT community.

It was cool the fist 20 times now its just annoying!

Madonna! You could of done better than that! God only know the STD's she has now.. Poor poor Madonna! She now has Herpes, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, ect, ect, ect.. :laugh:

[GypsySorcerer]

How so? It was just for shock value. I don't see how it is offensive....just as 'offensive' as what goes on during Will and Grace.

I know I can't speak for the GLBT community. I don't know if it was offensive, but I think that portrayls of lesbianism as "two girls showing off and trying to turn men on" is negative. :shrug: I don't know, that was just my take.

[GateandGarden]

How so? It was just for shock value. I don't see how it is offensive....just as 'offensive' as what goes on during Will and Grace.The characters on "Will and Grace" are supposed to actually be gay or bisexual. Britney and Madonna (and Christina) just wanted to take advantage of the fact that insincere homosexual acts seem to be trendy in our times. Homosexuality is not a game, a joke, or a publicity stunt. Like heterosexuality, homosexuality should not be a trend. I don't want people to be saying "Oh yeah, the decade of 2000-2009, when it was cool to watch reality TV, sport tacky furry boots, wear 80s retro fashion, and be gay for 2 minutes." Homosexuality should not be in that category. What made all of it worse was when Britney came out and said she would never kiss a woman again unless it was Madonna. What an idiot. I just really hated that and talked to quite a few other gays who felt the same way. Perhaps we're uptight. :shrug:

[GateandGarden]

I know I can't speak for the GLBT community. I don't now if it was offensive, but I think that portrayls of lesbianism as "two girls showing off and trying to turn men on" is negative. :shrug: I don't know, that was just my take.And what she said. :nod: :wavey:

[ontheEdgeof17]

The characters on "Will and Grace" are supposed to actually be gay or bisexual. Britney and Madonna (and Christina) just wanted to take advantage of the fact that insincere homosexual acts seem to be trendy in our times. Homosexuality is not a game, a joke, or a publicity stunt. Like heterosexuality, homosexuality should not be a trend. I don't want people to be saying "Oh yeah, the decade of 2000-2009, when it was cool to watch reality TV, sport tacky furry boots, wear 80s retro fashion, and be gay for 2 minutes." Homosexuality should not be in that category. What made all of it worse was when Britney came out and said she would never kiss a woman again unless it was Madonna. What an idiot. I just really hated that and talked to quite a few other gays who felt the same way. Perhaps we're uptight. :shrug:


Whether you like it or not, homosexuality is/was a trend. If it wasn't a trend, we wouldn't have the gay shows and gay themes on the media. As you can see, since it is becoming more taboo again, the gay shows are more calmer. You don't see kissing on Will and Grace....it's very calm compared to what it was in like 2000.

For me, it was a good thing to have everything out in the open so people can see how 'normal' it was. However, it was overkill and now the backlash has begun. Eventually, there will be little to no gay references on the media, IMO.

[GateandGarden]

Whether you like it or not, homosexuality is/was a trend. If it wasn't a trend, we wouldn't have the gay shows and gay themes on the media. As you can see, since it is becoming more taboo again, the gay shows are more calmer. You don't see kissing on Will and Grace....it's very calm compared to what it was in like 2000.

For me, it was a good thing to have everything out in the open so people can see how 'normal' it was. However, it was overkill and now the backlash has begun. Eventually, there will be little to no gay references on the media, IMO.I think you're right that a lot of it is necessary just to get it out to the public so everyone can be aware that homosexuality is here. (I'll restrain myself from the "We're here, we're..." yeah, you know :laugh: ) Anyway, I think there's a fine line. I think Britney, Madonna, and Christina crossed it. When it becomes something that is not at all about tolerance and acceptance but merely about making money and arousing straight guys, I do not approve. I'm not sure but I think the backlash you're talking about that is a response to two guys kissing on "Will and Grace" is different from one that would come from two straight women kissing for publicity. I expect people to accept two gay men kissing but I expect people to be offended by Britney and Madonna obviously exploiting homosexuality. Of course, I always expect too much of people. :rolleyes: Are people not able to differentiate? I think "Will and Grace" should be very open because we haven't reached lots of people yet. There is still so much to be done. I don't think Britney and Madonna made anyone more open-minded about homosexuality or bisexuality. I hope this makes sense. I felt like I just rambled. :o

[Serrart]

It was cool the fist 20 times now its just annoying!

Madonna! You could of done better than that! God only know the STD's she has now.. Poor poor Madonna! She now has Herpes, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, ect, ect, ect.. :laugh:

I think it was very pathetic, Madonna shamelessly and consciously used the not so bright Britney Spears in a trashy way only to rise media attention. :nod:

Romy

[ontheEdgeof17]

I think you're right that a lot of it is necessary just to get it out to the public so everyone can be aware that homosexuality is here. (I'll restrain myself from the "We're here, we're..." yeah, you know :laugh: ) Anyway, I think there's a fine line. I think Britney, Madonna, and Christina crossed it. When it becomes something that is not at all about tolerance and acceptance but merely about making money and arousing straight guys, I do not approve. I'm not sure but I think the backlash you're talking about that is a response to two guys kissing on "Will and Grace" is different from one that would come from two straight women kissing for publicity. I expect people to accept two gay men kissing but I expect people to be offended by Britney and Madonna obviously exploiting homosexuality. Of course, I always expect too much of people. :rolleyes: Are people not able to differentiate? I think "Will and Grace" should be very open because we haven't reached lots of people yet. There is still so much to be done. I don't think Britney and Madonna made anyone more open-minded about homosexuality or bisexuality. I hope this makes sense. I felt like I just rambled. :o


I just don't see the difference. Madonna hasn't had sexual boundaries long before being gay was 'in'. There was no surprise from me because she's been kissing girls for years.

I just don't understand why you think it is okay for actors playing gay to kiss, but not for two women who are straight? Will and Grace plays on the sterotypes of homosexuals.....guys that can't have a monogamous relationship....having "fag hags"......being flighty and fruity. I think that is worse for the GLBT community than Madonna...who embraced the gay community long before anyone else did.

[GateandGarden]

I just don't see the difference. Madonna hasn't had sexual boundaries long before being gay was 'in'. There was no surprise from me because she's been kissing girls for years.

I just don't understand why you think it is okay for actors playing gay to kiss, but not for two women who are straight? Will and Grace plays on the sterotypes of homosexuals.....guys that can't have a monogamous relationship....having "fag hags"......being flighty and fruity. I think that is worse for the GLBT community than Madonna...who embraced the gay community long before anyone else did.Well, I guess I haven't considered the negative things that "Will and Grace" has presented. I suppose if I had done that I would have a problem. But then if they tried to be unrealistic and make gay people out to be perfect people then would definitely be a problem as well. I would prefer some sort of happy medium. But, you're right about Madonna--she has always done that, but what about Britney? You know she wasn't about promoting tolerance when she said there's no way she'd ever do that again unless it was with Madonna. I almost took that comment as homophobic, but then I just thought it was too stupid and senseless to be homophobic. :laugh: I know they're both acting, but I didn't think the cast of "Will and Grace" really thought of homosexuality as a joke. I thought there was something more genuine there. :shrug:

[77Rumours77]

I just don't see the difference. Madonna hasn't had sexual boundaries long before being gay was 'in'. There was no surprise from me because she's been kissing girls for years.

I just don't understand why you think it is okay for actors playing gay to kiss, but not for two women who are straight? Will and Grace plays on the sterotypes of homosexuals.....guys that can't have a monogamous relationship....having "fag hags"......being flighty and fruity. I think that is worse for the GLBT community than Madonna...who embraced the gay community long before anyone else did.

Someone clue me in.... I though Madonna was an Icon in the GLBT community?? :shrug:

[GateandGarden]

Someone clue me in.... I though Madonna was an Icon in the GLBT community?? :shrug:She is. But all I can say is that I talked to some gays and bisexuals on the internet who said it offended them. And I talked to some straight people who said it offended them because they are straight allies. Perhaps it was more so Britney's involvement and her comments that followed that offended many. :shrug:

[estranged4life]

It was cool the fist 20 times now its just annoying!

Madonna! You could of done better than that! God only know the STD's she has now.. Poor poor Madonna! She now has Herpes, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, ect, ect, ect.. :laugh:

lip sync-itis, One hit-wonderdom and worse of all multiple-marriages-for-publicity-syndrome!!!

[Serrart]

I just don't see the difference. Madonna hasn't had sexual boundaries long before being gay was 'in'. There was no surprise from me because she's been kissing girls for years.

Yes, but this time she's done it in TV without a logic reason, except: "Buy my album, even if it's awful because I'm cool", or "Come on guys this is for the voyeurs in you", or "see MTV audience what I do with your little hot sensation who's been using the "I'm a virgin" card for years?". :rolleyes:

Romy

[77Rumours77]

lip sync-itis, One hit-wonderdom and worse of all multiple-marriages-for-publicity-syndrome!!!

:lol: :laugh: :lol: :laugh:
I like madonna, But a lot of her stuff she has dont in the past decade has really just made me dislike her. But Sadly I would still pay to see her!

[estranged4life]

:lol: :laugh: :lol: :laugh:
I like madonna, But a lot of her stuff she has dont in the past decade has really just made me dislike her. But Sadly I would still pay to see her!

havent payed attention to Madonna since the mid-80's...She had her day in the sun, She should be content with it.

As for Brit-Kneed "Overblown 'entertainer' #1" Speared, I will be glad when she falls off this planet..."The sooner, the better as long as she is a whole lot deader."

Hey Brit-kneed, Either do a Hustler spread (Trust me, If her 'fame' start to wane she will be posing for a smut mag) or go drink some liquid Clorox okay?

[ontheEdgeof17]

She is. But all I can say is that I talked to some gays and bisexuals on the internet who said it offended them. And I talked to some straight people who said it offended them because they are straight allies. Perhaps it was more so Britney's involvement and her comments that followed that offended many. :shrug:


So if Madonna kissed KD Lang, it would have been okay or if Ellen smooched on Defranco?

I'm just one to see performing as performing. Will and Grace doesn't offend me, but I can definately see them playing on sterotypes. Madonna and Britney kissing does not offend me. John Mayer has kissed guys on stage and no one makes an uproar about that. Madonna knew what she was doing....she knew the public would eat it up.....just like SnL, IMO. They know their stage antics would be ate up by us.

[Johnny Stew]

I guess the problem people had with the Madonna/Britney kiss (oh, and let's not forget that Christina kissed Mo, too. She HATES when people forget she did it too! :laugh: ) is that it didn't seem as if it was done for entertainment's sake or enlightenment's sake, but rather for the sake of being sensationalistic.

But, look at it this way... even though most TV and radio discussions of the kiss, leaned towards the lascivious angle, it still got people TALKING about a subject that people don't like to talk about.

Personally, I didn't have any problems with it. In fact, I was not the least bit shocked. :shrug:
Of all the things Madonna and her dancers have done on stage over the years in relation to homosexuality (the male dancers writhing on each other during "The Beast Within," or Mo, Donna and Niki simulating a bisexual orgy with the dancers during "Deeper & Deeper," etc.), her kissing Britney and Christina seemed tame.

I cannot wait for the day when the sight of same-gender kissing becomes passé to everyone. I'll be thrilled when it becomes so commonplace and so non-sensationalistic, that people couldn't care less who does it, or where and when.

That's the way it should be.

[dissention]

I guess the problem people had with the Madonna/Britney kiss (oh, and let's not forget that Christina kissed Mo, too. She HATES when people forget she did it too! :laugh: ) is that it didn't seem as if it was done for entertainment's sake or enlightenment's sake, but rather for the sake of being sensationalistic.

My problem with it was that it was such an obvious publicity stunt. I don't give a rats ass about it being "shocking" or anything like that because I wasn't shocked or offended. I just laughed at it because it was one of the worst PR stunts I've ever seen. And this was right around the time that Madonna was promoting her childrens book. I mean, c'mon. :lol:

[amber]

I cannot wait for the day when the sight of same-gender kissing becomes passé to everyone. I'll be thrilled when it becomes so commonplace and so non-sensationalistic, that people couldn't care less who does it, or where and when.

That's the way it should be.
Heck, i already feel that way. It should be a matter of, oh, only 50 to 100 years before all the rest of the country catches up... :rolleyes: :laugh:

[amber]

My problem with it was that it was such an obvious publicity stunt. I don't give a rats ass about it being "shocking" or anything like that because I wasn't shocked or offended. I just laughed at it because it was one of the worst PR stunts I've ever seen. And this was right around the time that Madonna was promoting her childrens book. I mean, c'mon. :lol:
My problem with it is that i don't think any of them are hot!! :lol: :lol: JK.

[Johnny Stew]

My problem with it was that it was such an obvious publicity stunt. I don't give a rats ass about it being "shocking" or anything like that because I wasn't shocked or offended. I just laughed at it because it was one of the worst PR stunts I've ever seen. And this was right around the time that Madonna was promoting her childrens book. I mean, c'mon. :lol:

Well, you're right. It did smack of "look at this KISS! Isn't it HOT?! Now buy our albums, PLEASE!"

In the past, as shocking as stuff that Madonna has done, was... it always seemed like there was a deeper meaning. She was trying to rouse people out of complacency, and open their eyes and minds to other cultures and ways of living.

The Mo/Britney/Christina kiss seemed somehow desperate and sad. But I wasn't the least bit offended or put off by it, no matter what their reasons for doing it.

[estranged4life]

Well, you're right. It did smack of "look at this KISS! Isn't it HOT?! Now buy our albums, PLEASE!"


of this country proves if you want to make more $$$$ just jump on the proverbial tried-and-true "let's do an offensive publicity stunt for cash" bandwagon...Big f**ckin' Yawn for both Mu-dunna and Brit-Kneed Speared

[Johnny Stew]

I'm tellin' ya, Brian... when I release my first album, I'm going to go on TV and kiss every cute guy I see.

Oh, who am I kidding... I'm willing to do that even without an album to promote! ;) :laugh:

[ontheEdgeof17]

I'm tellin' ya, Brian... when I release my first album, I'm going to go on TV and kiss every cute guy I see.

Oh, who am I kidding... I'm willing to do that even without an album to promote! ;) :laugh:


If an artist you loved kissed someone on stage, there wouldn't be a problem with it. People just complain when they don't like the artist.

[Johnny Stew]

If an artist you loved kissed someone on stage, there wouldn't be a problem with it. People just complain when they don't like the artist.

Personally, I want to see Chris Isaak and Michael Bublé make-out. :o :blob1:

[sunmaiden]

If an artist you loved kissed someone on stage, there wouldn't be a problem with it. People just complain when they don't like the artist.


Yeah, sorry but I DO NOT like Britnet Spears, and thought that kiss was weird. I like Madonna, kudos to her, but not Britney. And that avatar is grossing me out! It was funny the first time I saw it, then very annoying the second...third...etc.

[ontheEdgeof17]

Personally, I want to see Chris Isaak and Michael Bublé make-out. :o :blob1:


John Mayer and Adam Levine was HOTT!

[dissention]

John Mayer and Adam Levine was HOTT!

John Mayer's eyes freak me out. I always end up looking for track marks. :laugh:

[sunmaiden]

John Mayer and Adam Levine was HOTT!

Does anyone know the explitive John Mayer used at the tsunami benefit? I was just wondering... :shrug:

[ontheEdgeof17]

John Mayer's eyes freak me out. I always end up looking for track marks. :laugh:


It's his lips that freak me out. Holy moly they are huge.

I was just happy to see Adam kiss a guy. :)

[amber]

John Mayer's eyes freak me out. I always end up looking for track marks. :laugh:
good call. true, i've heard.

[estranged4life]

I'm tellin' ya, Brian... when I release my first album, I'm going to go on TV and kiss every cute guy I see.

Oh, who am I kidding... I'm willing to do that even without an album to promote! ;) :laugh:

if I were to release an album I will personally execute all these celebrities (Using .45 caliber full metal jacketed hollow points execution style) who make my stomach churn (ie-Oprah, William Shatner, Ass-lee Simpletard, etc) on stage then kicking no talent singing hacks (ie-Brit-kneed, ANYONE appearring on American 'Idiotic' Idol, The 2 Simple-Tards sisters, etc.) into the moshpit while I promote worshiping Satan, encouraging Catholic Nuns to strip and do a lap dance for me and finally french kissing a blood soaked crucified Christ while ripping a bible apart, Then just sit back and watch the $$$$ roll in (Thanks controversy...You're my new best-friend!!!) :nod: :lol: :laugh:

Hey, It 'supposedly' worked for Brian Warner (A few of the above rumors reportedly happened at Brian Warner's, aka Marilyn Manson, shows a few years back...It helped to sell-out his shows in Oklahoma, So if it worked for him then it should work for me!).

[estranged4life]

Personally, I want to see Chris Isaak and Michael Bublé make-out. :o :blob1:

reason why Stevie Nicks likes Chris Isaak...Let's say, according to a gossip website I recently saw will surfing for stupid BS, that size does matter :rolleyes:

[golddustwoman77]

There just doesn't seem to be a good response to this. It just seems crazy! :shrug: It just makes me think that Big Brother really is watching us, and that if we knew half of what the government has their hands in, we would all be shaking in our shoes. What's next! :rolleyes:

[Johnny Stew]

John Mayer and Adam Levine was HOTT!

Right you are, Ken! :nod: :D

Don't click if you're offended by the sight of two men kissing....

[Johnny Stew]

I know the real reason why Stevie Nicks likes Chris Isaak...Let's say, according to a gossip website I recently saw will surfing for stupid BS, that size does matter :rolleyes:

:laugh: :lol: :laugh: :lol: :laugh:

I've heard the same rumour about Mr. Isaak. ;) :angel:

[Johnny Stew]

John Mayer always looks like he has the flu or something. He looks like death warmed up, yo.

He always looks stoned. :laugh:

Which could explain him kissing Adam Levine on stage. After all, the old claim is that every straight guy is just one joint and a six-pack of beer away from a homosexual experience. :laugh: :laugh:

[amber]

He always looks stoned. :laugh:

Which could explain him kissing Adam Levine on stage. After all, the old claim is that every straight guy is just one joint and a six-pack of beer away from a homosexual experience. :laugh: :laugh:
that kiss was hot, thanks.
Mr. Mayer does Heroin, i think, is why he looks like that. :)

[dissention]

John Mayer always looks like he has the flu or something. He looks like death warmed up, yo.

+10, Greg. :wavey:

[dissention]

that kiss was hot, thanks.
Mr. Mayer does Heroin, i think, is why he looks like that. :)

He looks like a junkie whore from my old street. Track marks that would put the MA Turnpike to shame.

[ryan8472]

that kiss was hot, thanks.
Mr. Mayer does Heroin, i think, is why he looks like that. :)
How about a man with the flu, who is on heroin? :laugh:

So how'd that date go, Diss?

[ontheEdgeof17]

So how'd that date go, Diss?


Read the scoop in the Eternally Cool Bands thread.

[amber]

He looks like a junkie whore from my old street. Track marks that would put the MA Turnpike to shame.
:laugh: yep. I have that on fair authority, too.

How about a man with the flu, who is on heroin?

:laugh: Even worse! I imagine the heroin use would excacerbate the flu... :D

[ontheEdgeof17]

Mr. Mayer does Heroin, i think, is why he looks like that. :)


I love the heroin crazed fashion years. :nod: Way to bring it back, John.

[amber]

I love the heroin crazed fashion years. :nod: Way to bring it back, John.
You do? from the early nineties? gross. :D

[ontheEdgeof17]

You do? from the early nineties? gross. :D


Gawd yes! Black circles around the eyes......slanky arms.....dirty clothing. I love that look.

[Johnny Stew]

Always reminds me of the time I was watching a Fiona Apple video on MTV, and my dad, totally confusing the term "heroin chic," asked me, "is she supposed to be one of those 'Heroin Chicks'?" :laugh:

[dissention]

How about a man with the flu, who is on heroin? :laugh:

So how'd that date go, Diss?

Horrible. Read all about it in the Eternally Cool Bands thread, dear. Anyone who tries to stiff a waitress and dislikes Debbie and Franz isn't a winner, IMO. :laugh:

[amber]

Gawd yes! Black circles around the eyes......slanky arms.....dirty clothing. I love that look.
Dude! geesh. *bleah*

[dissention]

:laugh: Never heard that one before. Big shock. Don't you all remember, "the heart...my second favorite organ." Oh and, Robert DeNiro has a thing for African-American prostitutes, he visits them frequently in San Francisco. :shrug: Hehe, gossip thread here we come! :rolleyes:

DON'T make me bust out with my gossip on Clint Black, man. :lol:

[ontheEdgeof17]

Dude! geesh. *bleah*


Whhhhhhatttttttt? :shrug:

[GypsySorcerer]

DON'T make me bust out with my gossip on Clint Black, man. :lol:

The country singer?

[Johnny Stew]

DON'T make me bust out with my gossip on Clint Black, man. :lol:

Clint Black gossip? I wanna hear it! :D

I've always enjoyed the Antonio Sabato, Jr. gossip I've heard. :nod:

[amber]

Whhhhhhatttttttt? :shrug:
I just always thought the look was really gross. "look! I'm unhealthy!"
and as far as Clint Black, isn't he gay?

[dissention]

The country singer?

He's got a thing for uncut men, if you catch my drift. ;)

[GypsySorcerer]

He's got a thing for uncut men, if you catch my drift. ;)

:blob2: Go Clint...

[ontheEdgeof17]

He's got a thing for uncut men, if you catch my drift. ;)


:eek:

...then I hope his wife has something we don't know about.

[dissention]

I've always enjoyed the Antonio Sabato, Jr. gossip I've heard. :nod:

He's a walking STD from what I've heard. That man has crabs like normal people have freckles.

[Johnny Stew]

He's got a thing for uncut men, if you catch my drift. ;)

:laugh:

I resolutely refuse to comment on Mr. Black's alleged predilection, 'lest I incriminate myself in the process. :o :laugh: :shocked:

[dissention]

Aw. He'd get along with Colin Farrell, then, from what I hear.

THERE LUV IZ SEW PUR!!@!@!#$!@!!! :D

Ugh, I can smell Colin Farrell by just seeing him on TV. What a stinky wanker. He looks like Jimmy Iovine's lovechild. o_O

[Johnny Stew]

He's a walking STD from what I've heard. That man has crabs like normal people have freckles.

The gossip I've heard about Mr. Sabato Jr., is that he likes male company while engaging in an otherwise solo activity. ;)

[dissention]

:laugh:

I resolutely refuse to comment on Mr. Black's alleged predilection, 'lest I incriminate myself in the process. :o :laugh: :shocked:

:eek: TMI, Le Stew. :laugh:

Did you get Michael?

[Johnny Stew]

:eek: TMI, Le Stew. :laugh:

:sorry: :laugh:

Did you get Michael?

Yeah, I did... and I love it. Didn't you get my email?

[ryan8472]

Ugh, I can smell Colin Farrell by just seeing him on TV. What a stinky wanker. He looks like Jimmy Iovine's lovechild. o_O
Ack! I just threw up the food I was chewing, dear. :xoxo: :laugh:

[dissention]

The gossip I've heard about Mr. Sabato Jr., is that he likes male company while engaging in an otherwise solo activity. ;)

I knew he was a whore, but he never struck me as someone who likes jerk-off parties. Thanks! :laugh: :wavey:

[Serrart]

If an artist you loved kissed someone on stage, there wouldn't be a problem with it. People just complain when they don't like the artist.

Well, no. If David Bowie had kissed Britney Spears (luckily his tastes are far better and the White Duke has class) during a show like that only to promote his album I would have thought it was vulgar and ridiculous in the same way.

Romy

[ryan8472]

Oh I see where this thread is going.... :laugh: :lol:

[dissention]

:sorry: :laugh:



Yeah, I did... and I love it. Didn't you get my email?

Oy, no, I rarely check my email. :laugh: I will now, though.

[GateandGarden]

So if Madonna kissed KD Lang, it would have been okay or if Ellen smooched on Defranco?It all depends on the motive, IMO. It offends me if it's nothing more than shameless self-promotion. :shrug: Basically, what everyone else has been saying. Many seem to have said better than I did.

[GateandGarden]

and as far as Clint Black, isn't he gay?Huh? Maybe that's something Lisa Hartman Black ought to know about. :shocked: :laugh:

Or were you joking? :shrug:

[dissention]

Huh? Maybe that's something Lisa Hartman Black ought to know about. :shocked: :laugh:

Or were you joking? :shrug:


She looks like a Kewpie doll come to life. :nod:

[ryan8472]

She looks like a Kewpie doll come to life. :nod:
My mom has the original Kewpie doll. Those things are SCARY looking. :shocked:

[GateandGarden]

:eek:

...then I hope his wife has something we don't know about.Oh! I missed this post at first! :laugh:

[dissention]

My mom has the original Kewpie doll. Those things are SCARY looking. :shocked:

THEY ARE! I used to be insanely scared of them when I was a kid. They're ten times scarier than Chucky, man.

[ryan8472]

My mum has a hairless, clothesless Kewpie doll on her dresser. :eek:
:eek: :eek:

Don't let Diss see that! :eek: :lol:

[GateandGarden]

My mum has a hairless, clothesless Kewpie doll on her dresser. :eek:That does sound unpleasant! :laugh:

[DrummerDeanna]

I used to have a Kewpie doll!!!

I used to take it into the bath with me - then it molded :(

[½ ¡Ñ§ÅñË ®]

7 pages? Gadzooks. :eek: I'll read it tomorrow.

[irishgrl]

I cried about HOW MUCH FREAKIN MONEY OUR DAMN GOVERNMENT SPENDS ON #$%^& NOTHING!!!!!! We should all be OUTRAGED! ARRGH! and there are people who go to bed hungry at night.....or cold or homeless....Good Grief :distress: