View Full Version : May and June are just the FIRST leg of the summer!
Livia
02-24-2004, 05:09 PM
From Businesswire.com:
February 24, 2004 09:01 AM US Eastern Timezone
Fleetwood Mac U.S. Tour Dates Announced; VH-1 and VH-1 Classic Are the Exclusive Media Presenters
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 24, 2004--Fleetwood Mac will bring their legendary live show again to major arenas across the country this spring and summer with an eagerly-awaited new tour featuring material spanning their epochal career.
The group, featuring original members Stevie Nicks, Lindsey Buckingham, Mick Fleetwood and John McVie, return to the concert stage after their triumphant tour of 2003, which saw the band performing to SRO crowds that included a whole new generation of ardent fans.
This year, Fleetwood Mac will again spotlight such perennial favorites as "Go Your Own Way," "Landslide," "Rhiannon," "Big Love" and "Don't Stop," as well as selections from their latest Warner Bros. Records release, Say You Will. Reviews for the 2003 Say You Will Tour included unanimous raves across the country; "A performance that bordered on the divine" stated The Buffalo News (May 16, 2003), and "reinvigorated, ravishing and with renewed reason to exist" said The Orange County Register (July 14, 2003).
The 2004 tour marks a new chapter in the storied saga of the group, which began last year when Lindsey Buckingham reunited with the band, on stage and in the studio, for the first time in sixteen years. The Fleetwood Mac concert schedule presented by VH1 and VH1 Classic, will run through the summer with more dates being announced as available.
The first leg of Fleetwood Mac's 2004 U.S. tour is as follows:
5/8 Madison, WI Kohi Center Arena
5/9 Champaign, IL Assembly Hall
5/12 Green Bay, WI Reseh Center
5/14 Nashville, TN AmSouth Amphitheater
5/15 Atlanta, GA Chastain Park Amphitheater
5/18 West Palm Beach, FL Sound Advice Amphitheater
5/20 Charlotte, NC Verizon Wireless Amphitheater
5/22 Raleigh ,NC ALLTEL Pavilion
5/23 Jacksonville, Fl Jacksonville Vets Memorial Arena
5/26 Bristow, VA Nissan Pavillion
5/28 Mansfield, MA Tweeter Center
5/29 Holmdel, NJ PNC Bank Arts Center
6/1 Scranton, PA Montage Mountain
6/3 Camden, NJ Tweeter Center
6/5 Hershey, PA Hershey Park Stadium
6/6 Wantaugh, NY Tommy Hilfiger at Jones Beach Theatre
6/8 Hartford, CT CTNOW.COM Meadows Music Center
6/10 Pittsburg, PA Post Gazette Pavilion
6/12 Tinley Park, IL Tweeter Center
6/13 Cleveland, OH Blossom Music Center
6/16 Dallas, TX Smirnoff Music Center
6/17 Spring, TX The Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion
6/20 Irvine, CA Verizon Wireless Amphitheater
6/22 Chula Vista, CA Coors Amphitheater
6/24 Fresno, CA Savemart Center
6/26 Concord, CA Chronicle Pavilion
6/27 Merrysville, CA Sleep Train Amphitheater
estranged4life
02-24-2004, 05:19 PM
that's good, There may still be a chance for another OKC show afterall...
Rather see the Mac here in Oklahoma than at the Dallas "Parking Garage" at the Texas State Fairgrounds ;)
Brian j.
dissention
02-24-2004, 05:27 PM
Good lord, by the time they finally stop touring, they won't even be able to croak. :laugh:
Thanks, Livia! :wavey:
WelshWitchPMD
02-24-2004, 05:29 PM
I heard some second hand news last June that the tour was going to last about 18 months. If that is true then we could see them tour through November.
dissention
02-24-2004, 05:49 PM
Originally posted by WelshWitchPMD
I heard some second hand news last June that the tour was going to last about 18 months. If that is true then we could see them tour through November.
Don't forget that last January, Mick updated his ****ty site and said that he was prepping for two years of touring. I guess he wasn't lying this time around! :laugh:
Patti
02-24-2004, 05:55 PM
Cool! There's hope yet! Thanks for the news, Livia.
Patti
estranged4life
02-24-2004, 05:56 PM
Originally posted by dissention
Good lord, by the time they finally stop touring, they won't even be able to croak. :laugh:
of the video for the Grateful Dead's "Touch Of Grey", With the skeletal puppets on strings suddenly come to mind??? ;)
Brian j.
at this rate, the 3rd Buckingham will be getting acne before this tour finishes.
Not that I'm complaining. But my wallet is! :laugh:
Livia
02-24-2004, 06:21 PM
Another article w/ more of the same kinda info:
Live Daily (http://www.livedaily.com/news/6155.html)
mylittledemon
02-24-2004, 06:22 PM
What I'm most worried about is that this is "it" for the band. I was told by a friend of one of the band members that they've commited to doing this for another 3-5 years. I don't see how that's possible if they continue to tour like this. I'd rather them put out a new album instead of touring their asses off.
Originally posted by mylittledemon
I'd rather them put out a new album instead of touring their asses off.
I have to agree with you there.
Mystical88
02-24-2004, 06:38 PM
I am just grateful that they are doing this Tour! It has been wonderful!
THE MAC IS BACK:nod: :nod:
strandinthewind
02-24-2004, 06:43 PM
I wonder if Stevie has been working from the road on a new solo record. She certainly has operated this way in the past. Is she obligated to do another one for WB/Reprise or I wonder is l another FM will record suffice?
ryan8472
02-24-2004, 06:53 PM
Originally posted by estranged4life
of the video for the Grateful Dead's "Touch Of Grey", With the skeletal puppets on strings suddenly come to mind??? ;)
Brian j.
:laugh: LOL
I think it's great that they are still going to tour, even though it'll be the same setlist . However, as some of you said, a new album in the works would be even better....
Mike B
02-24-2004, 07:11 PM
Originally posted by mylittledemon
I was told by a friend of one of the band members that they've commited to doing this for another 3-5 years.
Good lord! 3-5 years of touring? Wha? :eek:
Well, if that's true then we <i>have</i> to get a new setlist eventually...don't we? :laugh:
Seriously, if they plan something like that, they need to slap together those discarded tracks from SYW, record a few more tunes and put out another CD of new stuff. They ain't getting <i>any</i> younger and we need as much music out of them as we can get.
Cammie
02-24-2004, 07:11 PM
:wavey: Merf, we Gotta' Agree with you on
this one!:eek:Shouldn't The Mac Stop while
they are ahead in the Music Game?:] Hope
it's not just for $$$ as said! What game are
they playing? Last Man Standing?;)haha!Sky;)
mylittledemon
02-24-2004, 07:39 PM
No, a certain guitar tech told me 3-5 years of staying together as a band. Not touring...he meants staying together period, whether that involved making more records and touring remains to be seen.
SteveMacD
02-24-2004, 10:39 PM
Originally posted by mylittledemon
No, a certain guitar tech told me 3-5 years of staying together as a band. Not touring...he meants staying together period, whether that involved making more records and touring remains to be seen.
I wouldn't read anything into it, especially with these four people. Lindsey all but ruled out working with the Mac again as late as 1995, and Stevie has been saying "five years" for about twenty (or more) now. This is one of those bands where they can't stay away from one another.
HomerMcvie
02-25-2004, 03:27 AM
I wouldn't read anything into it, especially with these four people. Lindsey all but ruled out working with the Mac again as late as 1995, and Stevie has been saying "five years" for about twenty (or more) now. This is one of those bands where they can't stay away from one another.
Well, the glitter has pretty much faded on ALL solo careers, so, whatcha gonna do? (Here come the chiffonheads......run!)
Does anyone actually THINK that if Stevie was BIGGER than FM, that she'd be doing FM now? Go with your strong suit. Fill dat piggy bank.:nod:
rianbay1
02-27-2004, 06:00 AM
Originally posted by HomerMcvie
Well, the glitter has pretty much faded on ALL solo careers, so, whatcha gonna do? (Here come the chiffonheads......run!)
Does anyone actually THINK that if Stevie was BIGGER than FM, that she'd be doing FM now? Go with your strong suit. Fill dat piggy bank.:nod:
Yeah, I think she would. Say You Will (Last I heard 900,000 copeis sold) and Trouble in Shangri-la (about 700,000 copies sold)...Not a HUGE difference there. Touring, F MAC makes substantially more, but always has. Plus, I think it would be a lot easier to do an EXTENDED tour as part of a group (more dates, more $).
She was there back in the day when Bella Donna outsold Mirage. tour and all.
rianbay1
02-27-2004, 06:00 AM
Originally posted by HomerMcvie
Well, the glitter has pretty much faded on ALL solo careers, so, whatcha gonna do? (Here come the chiffonheads......run!)
Does anyone actually THINK that if Stevie was BIGGER than FM, that she'd be doing FM now? Go with your strong suit. Fill dat piggy bank.:nod:
Yeah, I think she would. Say You Will (Last I heard 900,000 copeis sold) and Trouble in Shangri-la (about 700,000 copies sold)...Not a HUGE difference there. Touring, F MAC makes substantially more, but always has. Plus, I think it would be a lot easier to do an EXTENDED tour as part of a group (more dates, more $).
She was there back in the day when Bella Donna outsold Mirage. tour and all.
strandinthewind
02-27-2004, 10:30 AM
I think FM is together because they want to be. So, I think FM is what it is and its best just to enjoy it and not worry about it.
I think there will always be the underlying issue of solo careers. After all LB is the one that left first, inter alia, to concentrate on his solo career, which he has stated he felt the more mainstream FM was retarding. TITN was originally his solo record that, like the current SYW morphed into a FM record for whatever reason. As for Stevie, I think she knows she does not "need" FM to sell a record even though she does not sell millions of records anymore. Moreover, her solo tours are perhaps more succesful for her in that she is the only one getting paid a star's salary, etc. I also think that after the millions (at least $5 rumored before the DC went on the road) she made off of the Dixie Chicks' cover of Landslide, she never has to work again or, at the least, she could sell another old song or write songs and let other people sing then a la Dianne Warren. As for Mick and John, they are FM in the sense that as Stevie said, they could fire LB and SN and start over with new people.
So, I conclude that FM wants to be together or they clearly would not be together. I do think, however, SN and perhaps LB, will put out at least one more more solo record. Hopefully, they will do another FM record. Of course, that makes LB and SN touring at least into their early 60's. What was that about swinging a walker at LB :laugh:
:cool:
John Run
02-27-2004, 11:07 AM
FM is touring because they want to be together. They do not need the money, with maybe the exception of Mick. Over the last 8-9 years he has finally begun to recover from 30 years of excessive spending and bad business decisions.
Stevie and Lindsey when all is said in done with this tour and all of its associated revenue streams they will have grossed upwards of 15 mil each 2003 and 2004 combined. That far exceeds what Stevie made from TISL's revenue streams. It also far exceeds Lindsey's earnings from any single music project from any other time in his career.
John and Mick will probably realize 10 mil in that time. Again the height of their take from music.
So yes lots of money involved. They have made more money than most of us over an 15 month period (May 2003-August 2004) than most of will see in a lifetime. To put this in perpesctive a person could earn an average 100,000 a year from their job (the averge income in the US is 43K) for 45 years and earn 4.5 mil in their lifetime from work.
They don't need to do it. They are doing it because they get paid well and they can demand to get paid well, however in the end if there was no desire to do it, they would not be there. Enjoy the music. It is a good time to be a Fleetwood Mac fan!!
One post script. Stevie did not earn 5 mil from the Dixie Chicks Landslide. There was probably a 250k flat fee paid to record it and then another 2 million in royalities both from album sale and airplay royalties. The average number 1 song earns about 1.25 mil in songwriting airplay royalities. What may have helped landslide earn a little more was its crossover success. Heavy airplay on country formats, AC, HAC, AAA. That is a lot of airplay. Also her versions of Landslide still earn royalty money.
The songs to date that are believed to have earned the most royalty money are Yesterday and believe it or not I will Always Love You which has earned its song writer Dolly Parton upwards of 8mil.
strandinthewind
02-27-2004, 11:11 AM
Thanks for the info. on Landslide. I got my info. from someone in the business who would have cause to know. But, I never saw any supporting documentation (damnit!! :laugh: ).
Also, I loved it when Dolly Parton was asked if she liked Whitney (there allegedly was a feud between them) - Dolly in classic manner responded - "Of couse I like her - she made my $X million dollars and it costs alot to look this cheap!!" :laugh:
Livia
02-27-2004, 12:01 PM
Also, keep in mind that John and Mick don't get royalty money. They're not songwriters. So, album sales and touring IS their bread and butter.
:wavey:
gldstwmn
02-27-2004, 12:16 PM
For some reason, I do think that Mick and John get some of the publishing. Otherwise, why would Stevie have to go to Mick to ask permission to use Silver Springs on Timespace?
strandinthewind
02-27-2004, 12:29 PM
Originally posted by gldstwmn
For some reason, I do think that Mick and John get some of the publishing. Otherwise, why would Stevie have to go to Mick to ask permission to use Silver Springs on Timespace?
I have often thought that as well. I do not think they are treated like session players - "here's your wage for the time put in and that's it." I think that as a part of FM they must get something more than that. Maybe when CM, LB, or CM submit a song and FM works on it, after a point FM has the rights to release it. Interestingly, I wonder if Stevie had to buy or get permission to use POTU and Candlebright? I think FM wokred on POTU and LB worked on Candlebright. :shrug:
sodascouts
02-27-2004, 01:43 PM
Originally posted by rianbay1
She was there back in the day when Bella Donna outsold Mirage. tour and all.
Bella Donna outsold Mirage? Ouch!
Livia
02-27-2004, 02:13 PM
For some reason, I do think that Mick and John get some of the publishing. Otherwise, why would Stevie have to go to Mick to ask permission to use Silver Springs on Timespace?
Because Silver Springs had already been recorded by the members of Fleetwood Mac. Mick, or Ken Caillat, or whoever, had the master tapes. Stevie had to ask whoever to hand them over so she could put it on Timespace. I don't think it had anything to do with publishing, as it had more to do with Mick not wanting a Fleetwood Mac "recording" on a Stevie Nicks solo album. Stevie and her mother share the publishing rights on Silver Springs.
As far as Planets, Candlebright, etc., Fleetwood Mac may have played on the demos, but the publishing rights belong to Stevie. If she wants to hire completely different musicians to make the recording that ends up on her solo album, no one in Fleetwood Mac can, or should, stop her.
:wavey:
gldstwmn
02-27-2004, 03:30 PM
Originally posted by Livia
Because Silver Springs had already been recorded by the members of Fleetwood Mac. Mick, or Ken Caillat, or whoever, had the master tapes. Stevie had to ask whoever to hand them over so she could put it on Timespace. I don't think it had anything to do with publishing, as it had more to do with Mick not wanting a Fleetwood Mac "recording" on a Stevie Nicks solo album. Stevie and her mother share the publishing rights on Silver Springs.
:wavey:
I thought about that as well. While I know Silver Springs belongs to Stevie's mom, I can't see Stevie not having the master to Silver Springs. Also, SS was written at a time when Seedy Management (Mick and John) was still managing FM. Wasn't it common for managers to get a percentage of their artists publishing?
Livia
02-27-2004, 03:48 PM
Wasn't it common for managers to get a percentage of their artists publishing?
Gosh, I hope not! LOL In any case, I still think it had everything to do w/ Mick not wanting a Fleetwood Mac song on a Stevie solo album. She may own the intellectual property, but the master recording was part of the Rumours sessions.
:wavey:
strandinthewind
02-27-2004, 03:53 PM
Originally posted by Livia
Gosh, I hope not! LOL In any case, I still think it had everything to do w/ Mick not wanting a Fleetwood Mac song on a Stevie solo album. She may own the intellectual property, but the master recording was part of the Rumours sessions.
:wavey:
Maybe she did not want to re-record it because she did not want to pay the musicians, etc. Or, bless her heart, I do not think at that point in her life she thought she could repeat the vocal at that time. As demonstrated in The Dance, she was wrong. But, maybe it took LB standing across the stage as something to direct the venom at to make her get to that vocal :cool:
SteveMacD
02-28-2004, 01:36 PM
Originally posted by Livia
In any case, I still think it had everything to do w/ Mick not wanting a Fleetwood Mac song on a Stevie solo album.
Mick couldn't let Stevie use the Fleetwood Mac version. There was already a contract with WB to have the song be THE big highlight on the Mac's box set. Mick's hands were tied.
sodascouts
02-28-2004, 03:13 PM
Originally posted by SteveMacD
Mick couldn't let Stevie use the Fleetwood Mac version. There was already a contract with WB to have the song be THE big highlight on the Mac's box set. Mick's hands were tied.
If that were the case, why does Stevie blame Mick for it? Maybe she just needed an excuse to get out of Fleetwood Mac, since after Lindsey left, there was no joy in it for her.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.