|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
I could be wrong, but I believe I recently read that the California law making oral contracts enforceable took effect in the nineties. That would explain why Lindsey might now have a case against the band based on oral promises, but the reverse would not be true in 1987.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Also Consider The Damages
FM filled big venues even without Lindsey, so what did the damages really amount to?
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Oral contracts can be binding. Interesting question to ask. He really screwed them over back then from what I can remember.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, Tango in the Night sold 6 or 7 million (or something like that) worldwide. There would have been no album had it not been for his handiwork. That's a lot of money.
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
|
|
Lindsey Buckingham/Christine McVie Self-TitledVinyl LP (2017 Warner) NM
$15.00
Christine McVie - Self Titled - Factory SEALED 1984 US 1st Press HYPE Sticker
$26.99
Lot Of 3 Christine McVie Records The Legendary Perfect Album
$30.00
Christine McVie Shirt, Thank You For The Memories (S - 5XL) Unisex Tee
$30.00
Christine McVie legendary perfect Sire SASD 7522 orig 1976 blues rock EX
$8.00