#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think it could get even higher for us by mid-summer which could hurt our "recovering" economy even more. In a way, I feel like I'm living in the 70's all over again. Last edited by gldstwmn; 05-12-2004 at 12:13 AM.. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Finally, we attacked Iraq because for 11 years the world agreed he had WMD and SH never met his burden of proving he did not. Then, when called on to act on its 1.8 billion resolutions, the France, Russia, and Kofi A., take a bribe and refuse to act. You may not like those facts, but they are facts. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The UN did not for 11 years believe that SH had WMD? SH did not sell oil via the oil for food program at discounted prices to France, Russia, and the head of the UN (via his relatives)? These are facts. If you know otherwise, please prove it. I submit you cannot. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Here is the evidence of the bribes by SH
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe...russia.saddam/ http://www.nationalreview.com/jos/jos200405051300.asp http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/20...19-2004/un.htm http://www.suntimes.com/output/osull...dt-osul05.html Please explain to me how the evidence of bribes is incorrect |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Moreover, why are you not so quick to place the blame of SH. He NEVER EVER met his burden of proving to the UN that he had destroyed the WMD we all knew he had Now - if you want to talk about how W screwed up the fight in Iraq or that W was too quick to act on the intelligence, we will more likely than not agree all day. But to say W lied about the existence of WMD via the intelligence is just wrong - period. Look, I am not saying Bush is an angel. In fact, he is FAR from it. But to say the US had absolutly no reasons to oust SH suggests you have not been informed of the facts. AND - I agree, I think W ought to be impeached for the way he went about it in that he lied about the nuclear stuff. But, Bush I, Clinton, W, pretty much all members of Congress, and the entire world believed SH had WMD. But if that is not good enought for you, i am unsure what else to point to Just admit you are wrong on this point because you are Moreover, then you would have to agree that Clinton should have been impeached because he repeatedly stated SH had WMD during and after office In fact, he still says it as does Kerry. So, how do they differ from W on this issue. They do not. Last edited by strandinthewind; 05-11-2004 at 05:49 PM.. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Again, I am not saying I believe in the way W went about getting rid of SH. I am just saying the world, W, Clinton, Kerry, the UN, etc. ALL thought for 11 years SH had to go because of the mounting threat of WMD. So, to say W was alone in that boat is just flat out wrong. Interetingly, even David Kay said it was a good thing SH was ousted because the mechanisms to produce the WMD were there (or something like that). So, W was right to think they had WMD. Again, its his lack of a clear plan for after the war and his baiting Americans with information he knew was false are the reasons I think he should be impeached. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|
Blues: The British Connection by Bob Brunning
$12.99
Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae
$56.99
1960s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD
$6.50
1970s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD
$6.66
PETER GREEN 2 CD WITH FLEETWOOD MAC ALONE WITH THE BLUES ANTHOLOGY BOB BRUNNING
$14.00