The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2016, 04:33 PM
Jondalar's Avatar
Jondalar Jondalar is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,699
Default Corporate Rock

I was feeling nostalgic and I started downloading 1980s songs and I came across Send Her My Love by Journey. I forgot how much I loved that song. It is my favorite Journey song. Just love the hook. Anywho, one thing led to another and I watched Journey's Behind the Music. In the Behind the Music Journey talked about the curse of being labeled Corporate Rock. I did some more research on them and found out that critics didn't like them at all because they were Corporate Rock." I also found out that they have outsold Fleetwood Mac. Their Greatest Hits alone has sold 15 million copies. Escape sold 9 million. Frontiers sold 6 millions. They had a few other albums sell 3 million a piece.

Anyway, I never ever heard Fleetwood Mac labeled as Corporate Rock. i have heard of Heart, Starship, Boston, Foreigner and even the Eagles being labeled as Corporate Rock, but not Fleetwood Mac. I wonder if that is because of the oddness of Stevie and Lindsey. Does their quirkiness throw the band off in people mind? Did Tusk derail any thoughts of Corporate Rock? Tango in the Night could of been a Corporate Rock album, but it's not really referenced as one. It does have own sound that makes it a little unique.

I just find the whole thing a bit odd, especially because of the success of Rumors. Unlike, Heart or Journey, they haven't been ripped to shreds by the critics. Critics pretty much like them even though their music sales like corporate rock. There is a quality that just sets them apart.
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 03-31-2016, 06:24 PM
bombaysaffires bombaysaffires is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 6,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jondalar View Post
I was feeling nostalgic and I started downloading 1980s songs and I came across Send Her My Love by Journey. I forgot how much I loved that song. It is my favorite Journey song. Just love the hook. Anywho, one thing led to another and I watched Journey's Behind the Music. In the Behind the Music Journey talked about the curse of being labeled Corporate Rock. I did some more research on them and found out that critics didn't like them at all because they were Corporate Rock." I also found out that they have outsold Fleetwood Mac. Their Greatest Hits alone has sold 15 million copies. Escape sold 9 million. Frontiers sold 6 millions. They had a few other albums sell 3 million a piece.

Anyway, I never ever heard Fleetwood Mac labeled as Corporate Rock. i have heard of Heart, Starship, Boston, Foreigner and even the Eagles being labeled as Corporate Rock, but not Fleetwood Mac. I wonder if that is because of the oddness of Stevie and Lindsey. Does their quirkiness throw the band off in people mind? Did Tusk derail any thoughts of Corporate Rock? Tango in the Night could of been a Corporate Rock album, but it's not really referenced as one. It does have own sound that makes it a little unique.

I just find the whole thing a bit odd, especially because of the success of Rumors. Unlike, Heart or Journey, they haven't been ripped to shreds by the critics. Critics pretty much like them even though their music sales like corporate rock. There is a quality that just sets them apart.
because FM retained control over what they recorded and why. The others got dictated to over time by the record companies. Heart talk about how they were just told these are the songs you are going to do and they were the most bland, sound-like-everything-else-on-the-radio songs. Honestly, I think Stevie started down that road particularly as her addictions, especially the Klonopin, got worse. Tom Petty recalls sniping at her that she was becoming a "pop star" and told her she should 'stop surrounding herself with all these losers who keep pushing her for hit singles'. He said she needed to be "reminded of what she's capable of" and not get pushed into more "synthesizer rock" as he called it.

I think Lindsey gets a lion's share of credit for the band not being pigeon-holed that way. He saw it coming after Rumours and fought tooth and nail for Tusk.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2016, 07:17 PM
Macfan4life's Avatar
Macfan4life Macfan4life is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Somewhere near Key Biscayne, nothing there so I came back
Posts: 6,212
Default

This is apple and oranges. Journey was given the "corporate rock" slanderous adjective because of their sound. Their productions very slick for radio hits. Ballads like Open Arms, etc.
Fleetwood Mac has never been accused of being corporate rock. Yes Rumours was one time the biggest selling album but they did not alter their sound to do it. You cant compare the phrase "corporate rock" with album sales. Some of the biggest sellers are very very much anti-establishment and anything but corporate rock.

The only negative slander that was thrown Fleetwood Mac's way was "commercial." Mirage and Tango are definitely commercial pop albums.

Any hoo, I never agreed with the Journey categorization but I understand it.
__________________
My heart will rise up with the morning sun and the hurt I feel will simply melt away
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2016, 08:04 AM
SisterNightroad's Avatar
SisterNightroad SisterNightroad is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Italy
Posts: 5,242
Default

Actually now I finally remembered that I read Tom Petty talking about Fleetwood Mac as a "corporate rock band":

And we were a little wary of Stevie. We didn’t quite know whether to like Stevie or not, because we kind of saw this big corporate rock band, Fleetwood Mac, which was wrong, they were actually artistic people. But in those days, nobody trusted that sort of thing and we just kept thinking, ‘What does she want from us?


Then I read some other magazines that prefer a "harder" sound, and among them Fleetwood Mac could be considered a corporate rock band.
So ultimately I think it depends on which public you are talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2016, 10:30 PM
redbird's Avatar
redbird redbird is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 473
Default

To me "corporate rock" pretty much means "arena rock" and Fleetwood Mac's sound never quite got there, though you can see the trajectory of their sound nearing it. Stevie got closer, I'd agree.

Maybe it's because Fleetwood Mac made their mark before the term did. They have been so many things over time, so why focus on the period in which they sound the most like Journey or Foreigner? It wasn't their hallmark sound IMO. The Rumours line-up made its mark as a post-60's band, which is not what is meant by "corporate rock" as I see it. The band may have shared the lifestyle because of the money but they evolved from a blues background meeting a folk rock background. They were soft rock, which did get commercial, but to me "corporate rock" and "arena rock" had a hard rock ancestry, influence from metal and glam.It's hard to imagine them doing a song like "Hot Blooded", and you can admit that "Over My Head" and "Little Lies" and so on are designed to be radio hits, but they would still never be Styx songs.

I have to ask though, did critics really love them? Always? I feel like there surely was a lot of critical dismay over what was once Peter Green's band churning out slick little top ten ditties. They look okay in retrospect because they could have been so much worse, and the songwriting and more grounded musical influences were still there, there was enough cream to rise to the top, but I can't believe that they were never dismissed as lightweight.

Last edited by redbird; 04-17-2016 at 10:43 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


I Got News for You - Audio CD By Bekka Bramlett - VERY GOOD picture

I Got News for You - Audio CD By Bekka Bramlett - VERY GOOD

$249.52



The Zoo Shakin' the Cage CD Mick Fleetwood Bekka Bramlett Billy Thorpe picture

The Zoo Shakin' the Cage CD Mick Fleetwood Bekka Bramlett Billy Thorpe

$11.99



RITA COOLIDGE CD THINKIN' ABOUT YOU BEKKA BRAMLETT LETTING YOU GO WITH LOVE 1998 picture

RITA COOLIDGE CD THINKIN' ABOUT YOU BEKKA BRAMLETT LETTING YOU GO WITH LOVE 1998

$12.00



It Won't Be Christmas Without You by Brooks & Dunn (CD, Oct-2002, Arista) picture

It Won't Be Christmas Without You by Brooks & Dunn (CD, Oct-2002, Arista)

$5.21



Bekka (Bramlett) & Billy (Burnette) - Bekka & Billy - 1997 Almo Sounds - Used CD picture

Bekka (Bramlett) & Billy (Burnette) - Bekka & Billy - 1997 Almo Sounds - Used CD

$9.00




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved