Impression X4 Lighting for 2013 Tour

[michelej1]

[The interviews Curry used to give about his set up were a little bit more detailed and personal]

http://www.plsn.com/index.php?view=a...=default&page=

GLP impression X4s Go Their Own Way on Fleetwood Mac

LOS ANGELES - Designing shows for artists ranging from Sheryl Crow to Fleetwood Mac over a long period, experienced LD Paul ‘Arlo’ Guthrie has been increasingly finding GLP’s impression X4s an essential component in his touring inventory. Earlier this summer, PRG supplied production for the evergreen Fleetwood Mac’s Live 2013 48-city U.S. arena tour — and this time Guthrie requisitioned 36 of the new generation LED moving heads.


More details from GLP (www.glp.de):

The impression X4 itself features 19 of the new Osram Quad Optic 15W RGBW LEDs in a slimline body with no base unit weighing just 17.5 lbs. The fixture offers a 7° to 50° zoom range for variable beam spread and matrix effects, and full color mixing including CTC and customizable pixel patterns across its front face.

The association between Paul Guthrie (of Toss Film & Design) and Fleetwood Mac dates back to 1999 when he worked with lead singer Stevie Nicks, before co-designing the band’s 2003 tour with their veteran LD Curry Grant and Bruce Rodgers (of Tribe Design). He then took over the reins entirely for their 2009 and 2013 tours.

Sensitive to the persona of the band, and their desire to carry the show themselves rather than being driven solely by the stage dynamics, the LD concedes that each member first needs to be individually catered for, before everything combines into a single production. “We try not to revisit things each time, but each member has his or her own likes and dislikes, plus there are a number of basic principles we need to adhere to on each production — such as how we light them for camera and the fact we can’t use any haze.”

Guthrie had become an early adopter of GLP’s pioneering LED technology, using the original impression 90s soon after they were released and moving onto the impression 120 RZ zooms in 2010, when Sheryl Crow went on tour. But when it came to spec’ing the latest Fleetwood Mac tour a number of attributes attracted him to the new generation impression X4 — notably the obvious economies to be had from the size, weight and power draw as well as the quality of colors and dimmer curve, he says. “The pixel effect of the X4s is the most unique attribute used.”

This versatility has enabled them to perform different functions, as the LD explains. “I had some X4s rigged high in the mother grid — for overhead effects, 16 on an upstage truss to provide upstage wash and also tone a white drape that is used for the middle section of the show and then some on the floor under the band risers. They integrate perfectly with the conventional 1200W and 1500W [discharge] fixtures.”

Getting them to and from a gig is also a breeze, he notes. “The packaging is great — having six heads fitted in each small road case that would normally hold two lights is a great advantage.” He confirmed that every fixture worked from first show to last without issue.

Board operator Rich Locklin also adds his endorsement that the lights are both easy to program and fast to respond.

The two and a half hour show, which resumes in Europe in the fall, is built around greatest hits as well as its current EP Extended Play — their first new recordings in more than a decade.

Guthrie has been “extremely happy” with the performance of the impression X4s on the road. “Now that the marketplace is flooded with choices for LED lighting it is difficult to criticize a light that is well designed and well built with feature sets catering to users that want good color rendering and smooth transitions,” he says.

And for lower budget tours such as Sheryl Crow — which combine promoter supplied lighting rigs with a touring floor package — they can be even more valuable. “I am using 10 X4s with Sheryl and these additional impressions provide me with a super versatile effect light as well as a great wash light — taking up minimal truck space and requiring minimal current draw.”

[vivfox]

I've always loved these technical related articles.

[Macfanforever]

Originally Posted by vivfox

I've always loved these technical related articles.

I agree .I'm a tech geek as they call it.I love chatting with the crew at the show and talk watts and bandwidth and THD.

I would love to do that kind of work.

[Macfanforever]

One thing I did notice this year was the change with the projection setup Stevie had on her tour last year to a big bright jumbo screen at the FM tour.It look awesome at any angle.I hope she will continue to use it later on her tours.

[vivfox]

Originally Posted by Macfanforever

One thing I did notice this year was the change with the projection setup Stevie had on her tour last year to a big bright jumbo screen at the FM tour.It look awesome at any angle.I hope she will continue to use it later on her tours.

I don't think it is suited for the smaller venues she generally performs in.

[michelej1]

In this Lighting & Sound International article Dave Cobb says,

http://edition.pagesuite-professiona...fa1857&pnum=44

Analogue live you can tweak in fluidly, rather than thinking 'What screen am I on?' Fleetwood Mac is a classic example where you have to ask, what's the point of having pre-sets when they go off-score so often?

Does that mean that the group is so spontaneous that it's hard to pre-set the lighting for them? If so, that's a surprise to me.

Stevie is also mentioned on the same page:

Dave Natale started it off for me, while I was finishing Stevie Nicks.